What Was, Is No More: Community Pharmacy Economics.

DISCLOSURES: No funding supported the writing of this article. The author is an employee of AmerisourceBergen and leads its Good Neighbor Pharmacy program, which supports independent community pharmacy customers.

Blood pressure control and pharmacotherapy patterns in the United States before and after the release of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: Despite recommendations from the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7), only 36.8% of patients were at target blood pressure (BP) in 2003 and 2004. The objective of this study was to assess improvements in BP control and treatment patterns before and after the publication of JNC 7. METHODS: This was a retrospective, time series analysis of 27 provider groups and managed care organizations from 1998 through 2006. Patients with hypertension were identified from more than 4000 physicians. Medical charts were collected and clinical data were evaluated using prevailing JNC criteria during the time period before and after JNC 7. RESULTS: A total of 19,258 patients were identified with hypertension: 15,258 included in the before-JNC 7 cohort and 4,000 in the after-JNC 7 cohort. BP control in the before-JNC 7 cohort was 40.8% compared with 49.3% in the after-JNC 7 cohort (P < .0001). After controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, patients in the before-JNC 7 cohort were 45% less likely to achieve BP control compared with the after-JNC 7 cohort (odds ratio, 0.551; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Although findings indicate BP control is improving, a significant need for further improvement remains.

High-risk patients with hypertension: Are we doing enough?

Despite the increasing risk of cardiovascular disease, especially in patients with multiple risk factors, blood pressure (BP) control remains suboptimal. This study investigated real-world BP goal attainment and prescribing patterns for high-risk patients. A retrospective chart review study was conducted in patients treated by eight large primary care physician group practices between December 2003 and May 2006. A total of 1,917 hypertensive patients were identified with >/=1 risk factors: African-American ethnicity (634); diabetes (851); advanced age (1,123); body mass index (BMI) 25 kg/m(2) (1,614). BP control rate was 46% overall, and similar in the advanced age and overweight/obese subpopulations, but substantially lower (28%) in the diabetic subpopulation. Systolic blood pressure >/=20 mm Hg above the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment Report recommendation was found in 13% of the overall, advanced age and overweight/obese subpopulations, and in 20% of diabetics and 18% of African-Americans. Overall, 62% of patients received >/=2 antihypertensive while 36% of diabetics, 31% of African-Americans, 28% of advanced age, and 26% of overweight/obese patients received >/=3 antihypertensive classes. Despite availability of multiple antihypertensive classes, BP control rates were still suboptimal in this study's high-risk patients. There is a need for awareness and more aggressive treatment in high-risk patients given their increased risk of poor outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness of second-generation antihistamines and montelukast in relieving allergic rhinitis nasal symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Allergic rhinitis imposes a significant health and economic burden both on individuals and the healthcare system. Second-generation prescription antihistamines, levocetirizine, fexofenadine, and desloratadine, and the leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, differ in their ability to relieve common rhinitis symptoms. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of prescription agents based on their effectiveness in relieving nasal symptoms. METHODS: Effectiveness was measured as the composite of nasal symptoms, including congestion, rhinorrhea, and sneezing, from clinical studies that compared each of the 4 comparators to placebo. Direct costs included prescription therapy and rhinitis-related physician office visits. Physician office visit costs were collected from an analysis of the PharMetrics insurance claims database. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using a Monte Carlo simulation to assess the robustness of the average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: The cost per clinically significant improvement of nasal symptoms for levocetirizine was less than for the other model comparator agents. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for levocetirizine dominated montelukast and desloratadine and was lower than either branded or generic fexofenadine. CONCLUSION: Levocetirizine is a cost-effective therapy for the relief of nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

Practice efficiency and economics: the case for rapid recovery sedation agents for colonoscopy in a screening population.

GOAL: To determine rapidly acting agents' impact on practice efficiency and cost for outpatient colonoscopy in a screening population. BACKGROUND: Propofol-mediated endoscopic sedation is popular due to rapid sedation onset and superior recovery profile compared with sedation with an opioid and benzodiazepine. There are few data on the impact of this type of sedation on the economics and efficiency of an endoscopy unit. STUDY: A provider-perspective economic model assessed the ability of propofol and fospropofol disodium (Aquavan, GPI 15715, MGI Pharma) to increase practice efficiency and determined break-even costs based on current colonoscopy reimbursement levels. Reimbursement inputs by practice setting, costs, and recovery profiles-taken from published literature examining time to discharge-were used to populate the model. To measure robustness of model results to changes in base case inputs, sensitivity analyses were performed. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, inputs were varied simultaneously and randomly for 1000 iterations to determine 95% confidence intervals (CI) for break-even costs. RESULTS: In the time to complete 1 colonoscopy with midazolam/meperidine, 1.76 colonoscopies can be completed with propofol and 1.91 colonoscopies can be completed with fospropofol disodium. This efficiency benefit produced a break-even cost for rapid recovery agents of $71.53 (95% CI: $38.39, $105.67) in a hospital outpatient clinic and $61.48 (95% CI: $41.33, $108.99) in an ambulatory surgical center. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated the break-even cost of these agents was most sensitive to operating costs and time to discharge ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid recovery agents for colonoscopy can improve practice efficiency and offer economic advantages over traditional sedation.

Relationship of blood pressure control to adherence with antihypertensive monotherapy in 13 managed care organizations.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between medication compliance and blood pressure (BP) control among members of 13 managed care organizations with essential hypertension (HTN) who received antihypertensive monotherapy for at least 3 pharmacy claims prior to the blood pressure measurement. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of medical and pharmacy claims over a 4-year period (1999-2002) from 13 U.S. health plans. Data were collected by trained health professionals from randomly selected patient medical records per Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) technical specifications. Patients were selected if they (1) had received monotherapy or fixed-dose combination therapy (administered in one tablet or capsule) during the time BP was measured (thus those with no BP drug therapy were excluded); (2) had received 3 or more antihypertensive pharmacy claims for the antihypertensive drug therapy prior to BP measurement; and (3) had one or more antihypertensive pharmacy claims after BP was measured. Control of BP was defined according to guidelines of the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC 6) on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (<140/90 mm Hg, or <130/85 mm Hg for patients with diabetes). Medication adherence was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR), and MPR was used to classify patients into 3 adherence levels: high (80%-100%), medium (50%-79%), and low (<50%). The relationship between medication adherence and BP control was assessed using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: There were 1,017,181 patients with a diagnosis of HTN in medical claims data from which 10,734 (10.6%) were randomly selected for chart review. There were 1,032 patients (9.6%) in the sample who had a diagnosis of HTN but who were excluded because they had no HTN drug therapy. Of the total 9,894 patients (92.2%) who were excluded from the sample, 3,029 patients (28.2%) met all other inclusion criteria but were receiving more than one HTN drug. Of the 840 patients on HTN monotherapy, the mean age was 59 12.2 years; 422 (50%) were women, 16% had diabetes, and 43% had dyslipidemia. The monotherapy HTN drug was an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (27% of patients), calcium channel blocker (22%), beta-blocker (20%), or diuretic (11%). Of the 840 patients, 629 (74.8%) were determined to have high medication adherence, 165 (19.6%) had medium adherence, and 46 (5.5%) had low adherence. Approximately 270 (43%) of high adherence patients achieved BP control compared with 56 (34%) and 15 (33%) patients with medium and low adherence, respectively. High-adherence patients were 45% more likely to achieve BP control than those with medium or low compliance after controlling for age, gender, and comorbidities (odds ratio=1.45; P =0.026). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that 75% of these health plan members with a diagnosis of essential HTN who were selected for receipt of at least 4 pharmacy claims for HTN monotherapy exhibited high medication adherence. However, only 43% of high-adherence patients attained their target (JNC 6) blood pressure goal compared with 33% to 34% of patients with medium or low adherence to antihypertensive monotherapy.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of sequential treatment pathways in the treatment of onychomycosis.

This study examines the budgetary effect of using ciclopirox, itraconazole (pulse treatment), terbinafine, or itraconazole (continuous treatment) as first-, second-, or third-line therapy in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis by determining which therapeutic sequence is most cost effective. Using a disease treatment pathway model, alternative agents were compared based on cost per clinical response. The results from this sequential treatment analysis demonstrated that ciclopirox followed by itraconazole pulse and then terbinafine provides the lowest-cost approach to the treatment of onychomycosis (dollar 757.89 per clinical response), followed by the sequence of ciclopirox, terbinafine, and itraconazole pulse (dollar 796.13 per clinical response). This study provides a framework for formulary decision makers to evaluate a sequential treatment pathway that resembles actual practice.

The economic burden of non-influenza-related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory tract infection (VRTI) is the most common illness in humans. Despite the high incidence, the economic impact of non-influenza-related VRTI has not been rigorously explored. Our objectives were to obtain an updated incidence of non-influenza-related VRTI in the United States and to quantify the health care resource use (direct costs) and productivity losses (indirect costs) associated with these infections. METHODS: A nationwide telephone survey of US households (N = 4051) was conducted between November 3, 2000, and February 12, 2001 to obtain a representative estimate of the self-reported incidence of non-influenza-related VRTI and related treatment patterns. Direct treatment costs measured included outpatient clinician encounters, use of over-the-counter and prescription drugs, and associated infectious complications of non-influenza-related VRTI. Absenteeism estimates for infected individuals and parents of infected children were extrapolated from National Health Interview Survey data. RESULTS: Of survey respondents, 72% reported a non-influenza-related VRTI within the past year. Respondents who experienced a self-reported non-influenza-related VRTI averaged 2.5 episodes annually. When these rates are extrapolated to the entire US population, approximately 500 million non-influenza-related VRTI episodes occur per year. Similarly, if the treatment patterns reported by the respondents are extended to the population, the total economic impact of non-influenza-related VRTI approaches $40 billion annually (direct costs, $17 billion per year; and indirect costs, $22.5 billion per year). CONCLUSIONS: Largely because of the high attack rate, non-influenza-related VRTI imposes a greater economic burden than many other clinical conditions. The pending availability of effective antiviral therapies warrants increased attention be paid to this common and expensive illness.