Spatial accuracy of the stereotactic Leksell®Vantage™ head frame in comparison with the standard stereotactic Leksell®G Frame for Gamma-Knife.

Purpose. Since January 2021, the Leksell®Vantage head frame (V-frame) is used for Gamma Knife®treatments in addition to the historical Leksell®G-Frame known as the reference. The aim of this study was to compare the spatial accuracy of treatments with these two frames.Methods. Firstly, the constancy of the geometric accuracy of the system according to the Elekta quality assurance process was carried out during sixteen months with V and G-frames' adaptors. Then, End-to-end test was carried out with both V and G-frame using an anthropomorphic phantom and Gafchromic®films. The overall precision of the radiation center was calculated as the displacement vector for a 4 mm collimator shot. Additionally, the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) positioning system was used to assess the precision of the Leksell coordinates system defined by V-frames on 64 patients in comparison to G-frames for 46 patients. To ensure that patient's head movement was not possible during treatment with the V-frame, the High Definition Motion Management (HDMM) system was used and a final CBCT was performed at the end of the irradiation.Results. The QA constructor's tests done with the G-frame and V-frame adaptor gave similar results over sixteen months. End-to-end tests demonstrated that the mean positioning accuracy was 0.54 mm (SD of 0.14 mm) and 0.70 mm (SD of 0.14 mm) with V-frame and G-frame respectively. The displacement vector given by CBCT ranged from 0.02 to 1.05 mm with a mean value of 0.38 mm (SD of 0.18 mm) for the 64 V-framed patients and from 0 to 0.92 mm with a mean value of 0.31 mm (SD of 0.18 mm) for the 46 G-framed patients. The mean translation movement between the beginning and the end of the 64 treatments with V-frame was 0.08 mm (SD of 0.04 mm, maximum value of 0.19 mm).Conclusion. We estimated that V-frames are as precise as G-frames with a targeting accuracy of less than 1 mm.

Mask-Based versus Frame-Based Gamma Knife ICON Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Radiosurgery is performed with a diversity of instruments relying usually either on a stereotactic frame or a mask for patient head fixation. Comfort and safety efficacy of the 2 systems have never been rigorously evaluated and compared. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between February 2016 and January 2017, 58 patients presenting with nonsmall cell lung cancer brain metastases have been treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) with random use of a frame or a mask for fixation were included patients older than 18, with <5 brain metastases (at the exclusion of brainstem and optic pathway's locations) and no earlier history of radiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was the pain scale assessment (PSA) at the beginning of the GKS procedure. RESULTS: The PSA at the beginning of the GKS procedure was not different between the 2 groups. The PSA at the day before GKS, before magnetic resonance imaging, just after frame application, and the day after radiosurgery (departure) has shown no difference between the 2 groups. At the end of the radiosurgery itself (just after frame or mask removal) and 1 h after, the mean pain scale was higher in patients treated with the frame (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) but 2 patients were not able to tolerate the mask discomfort and had to be treated with frame. Tumor control and morbidity probability were demonstrated to be no difference between the 2 groups in this population of patients with BM not in highly functional area. The median of the extra dose to the body due to the cone-beam computed tomography was 7.5 mGy with a maximum of 35 mGy in patients treated with a mask fixation (null in the others treated with frame). Mask fixation was associated to longer treatment time although the beam on time was not different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, with brain oligo-metastases out of critical location, single-dose mask-based GKS can be done with a comfort and a safety efficacy comparable to frame-based GKS. There seems to be no clear patient data that confirm the value of the mask system with regards to comfort.

Toward a comparison and an optimization of CT protocols using new metrics of dose and image quality part I: prediction of human observers using a model observer for detection and discrimination tasks in low-dose CT images in various scanning conditions.

In the context of reducing the patient dose coming from CT scanner examinations without penalizing the diagnosis, the assessment of both patient dose and image quality (IQ) with relevant metrics is crucial. The present study represents the first stage in a larger work, aiming to compare and optimize CT protocols using dose and IQ new metrics. We proposed here to evaluate the capacity of the Non-PreWhitening matched filter with an eye (NPWE) model observer to be a robust and accurate estimation of IQ. We focused our work on two types of clinical tasks: a low contrast detection task and a discrimination task. We designed a torso-shaped phantom, including Plastic Water®slabs with cylindrical inserts of different diameters, sections and compositions. We led a human observer study with 13 human observers on images acquired in multiple irradiation and reconstruction scanning conditions (voltage, pitch, slice thickness, noise level of the reconstruction algorithm, energy level in dual-energy mode and dose), to evaluate the behavior of the model observer compared to the human responses faced to changing conditions. The model observer presented the same trends as the human observers with generally better results. We rescaled the NPWE model on the human responses by scanning conditions (kVp, pitch, slice thickness) to obtain the best agreement between both observer types, estimated using the Bland-Altman method. The impact of some scanning parameters was estimated using the correct answer rate given by the rescaled NPWE model, for both tasks and each insert size. In particular, the comparison between the dual-energy mode at 74 keV and the single-energy mode at 120 kVp showed that, if the 120 kVp voltage provided better results for the smallest insert at the lower doses for both tasks, their responses were equivalent in many cases.