Comparison of Older Related versus Younger Unrelated Donors for Older Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Large Single-Center Analysis.

For patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), HLA-matched related donors (MRDs) have traditionally been the preferred donor source. However, as the age of recipients increases, their sibling donors are aging as well. In this study, we investigated whether younger matched unrelated donors (MUDs) might be a better donor source than similarly aged sibling donors for patients age >60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A total of 499 patients age 60 to 70 years with AML or MDS who underwent alloHCT from an older MRD (donor age ≥50 years) or a younger MUD (donor age ≤35 years) between 2010 and 2022 were evaluated. Of these, 360 patients (72%) received an MUD graft and 139 (28%) received an MRD graft. The median recipient age was 64 years in the MRD group and 66 years in the MUD group. With a median follow-up among survivors of 53 months (range, 9 to 147 months ), the 4-year progression-free survival was 40% in the MRD group and 41% in the MUD group (P = .79) and the 4-year overall survival was 50% and 44%, respectively (P = .15), with no between-group differences in nonrelapse mortality, relapse, and acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. In the MUD group, we also compared the effect of donor age 18 to 24 years and donor age 25 to 35 years and found no differences in outcomes between the groups. We conclude that outcomes are comparable between the use of older MRDs and use of younger MUDs for elderly patients with AML or MDS, that there is no donor age effect among younger MUDs, and that the use of either donor type is reasonable.

ACT To Sustain: Adoptive Cell Therapy To Sustain access to non-commercialized genetically modified cell therapies.

Genetically modified cell therapies (GMCT), particularly immune effector cells (IEC) such as chimeric receptor antigen (CAR) T cells, have shown promise in curing cancer and rare diseases after a single treatment course. Following close behind CAR T approvals are GMCT based on hematopoietic stem cells, such as products developed for hemoglobinopathies and other disorders. Academically sponsored GMCT products, often developed in academic centers without industry involvement, face challenges in sustaining access after completion of early phase studies when there is no commercial partner invested in completing registration trials for marketing applications. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) formed a task force named ACT To Sustain (Adoptive Cell Therapy to Sustain) to address the "valley of death" of academic GMCT products. This paper presents the task force's findings and considerations regarding financial sustainability of academically sponsored GMCT products in the absence of commercial development. We outline case scenarios illustrating barriers to maintaining access to promising GMCT developed by academic centers. The paper also delves into the current state of GMCT development, commercialization, and reimbursement, citing examples of abandoned products, cost estimates associated with GMCT manufacturing and real-world use of cost recovery. We propose potential solutions to address the financial, regulatory, and logistical challenges associated with sustaining access to academically sponsored GMCT products and to ensure that products with promising results do not languish in a "valley of death" due to financial or implementational barriers. The suggestions include aligning US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) designations with benefit coverage, allowing for cost recovery of certain products as a covered benefit, and engaging with regulators and policy makers to discuss alternative pathways for academic centers to provide access. We stress the importance of sustainable access to GMCT and call for collaborative efforts to develop regulatory pathways that support access to academically sponsored GMCT products.

Active infection at the time of CD34+ selected stem cell boost is associated with treatment failure and poor survival.

BACKGROUND: The use of CD34+ selected stem cell boost (SCB) post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) has been increasing. Predictors of treatment failure following SCB, both in the context of poor graft function (PGF) or other settings, are not well-characterized. We report among the largest single center retrospective experiences of the use of SCB and evaluate potential predictors of response and outcomes. METHODS: 58 patients who underwent HCT between 2015 and 2022 and who received SCB were identified. The indication for SCB was predominantly PGF, defined as the presence of 2 or more cytopenias for at least two consecutive weeks beyond day +14 after alloHCT in the presence of ≤ 30% bone marrow cellularity and ≥ 90% donor myeloid chimerism in the absence of morphological disease. RESULTS: The median dose of infused CD34+ selected SCB products was 3.88 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range: 0.99-9.92). The median 2-year OS and NRM following SCB was 47% and 38%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of 6-month grade III-IV acute and 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD following SCB were 3.4% and 12%, respectively. Overall response (CR + PR) was attained in 36/58 (62%) patients, and in 69% with PGF. On multivariable analysis, an active infection at the time of SCB was the greatest predictor of poor response and survival (p=0.013) following SCB. CONCLUSION: SCB can restore hematopoiesis in the majority of patients, particularly for those with poor graft function in whom there is no active infection at infusion.

Tabelecleucel for EBV+ PTLD following allogeneic HCT or SOT in a multicenter expanded access protocol.

Patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (EBV+ PTLD) in whom initial treatment fails have few options and historically low median overall survival (OS) of 0.7 months following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and 4.1 months following solid organ transplant (SOT). Tabelecleucel is an off-the-shelf, allogeneic EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte immunotherapy for EBV+ PTLD. Previous single-center experience showed responses in patients with EBV+ PTLD following HCT or SOT. We now report outcomes from a multicenter expanded access protocol (NCT02822495) in HCT (n = 14) and SOT (n = 12) recipients treated with tabelecleucel for EBV+ PTLD that was relapsed/refractory to rituximab ± chemotherapy. The investigator-assessed objective response rate was 65.4% overall (including 38.5% with a complete and 26.9% with a partial response), 50.0% in HCT, and 83.3% in SOT. The estimated 1- and 2-year OS rates (95% CI) were both 70.0% (46.5, 84.7) overall, both 61.5% (30.8, 81.8) in HCT, and both 81.5% (43.5, 95.1) in SOT (median follow-up: 8.2, 2.8, and 22.5 months, respectively). Patients responding to tabelecleucel had higher 1- and 2-year OS rates (94.1%) than non-responders (0%). Treatment was well tolerated with no reports of tumor flare, cytokine release syndrome, or rejection of marrow and SOT. Results demonstrate clinically meaningful outcomes across a broad population treated with tabelecleucel, indicating a potentially transformative and accessible treatment advance for relapsed/refractory EBV+ PTLD following HCT or SOT.

Intraventricular CARv3-TEAM-E T Cells in Recurrent Glioblastoma.

In this first-in-human, investigator-initiated, open-label study, three participants with recurrent glioblastoma were treated with CARv3-TEAM-E T cells, which are chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells engineered to target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variant III tumor-specific antigen, as well as the wild-type EGFR protein, through secretion of a T-cell-engaging antibody molecule (TEAM). Treatment with CARv3-TEAM-E T cells did not result in adverse events greater than grade 3 or dose-limiting toxic effects. Radiographic tumor regression was dramatic and rapid, occurring within days after receipt of a single intraventricular infusion, but the responses were transient in two of the three participants. (Funded by Gateway for Cancer Research and others; INCIPIENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05660369.).

Adoptive Immune Effector Cell Therapies in Cancer and Solid Organ Transplantation: A Review.

Cancer is one of the most devastating complications of kidney transplantation and constitutes one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. Immunosuppression, although effective in preventing allograft rejection, inherently inhibits immune surveillance against oncogenic viral infections and malignancy. Adoptive cell therapy, particularly immune effector cell therapy, has long been a modality of interest in both cancer and transplantation, though has only recently stepped into the spotlight with the development of virus-specific T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Although these modalities are best described in hematopoietic cell transplantation and hematologic malignancies, their potential application in the SOT setting may hold tremendous promise for those with limited therapeutic options. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the development of adoptive cell therapies with a focus on virus-specific T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. We also describe the current experience of these therapies in the SOT setting as well as the challenges in their application and future directions in their development.

Expert consensus guidelines on management and best practices for tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy.

Adoptive cell therapy with autologous, ex vivo-expanded, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is being investigated for treatment of solid tumors and has shown robust responses in clinical trials. Based on the encouraging efficacy, tolerable safety profile, and advancements in a central manufacturing process, lifileucel is now the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved TIL cell therapy product. To this end, treatment management and delivery practice guidance is needed to ensure successful integration of this modality into clinical care. This review includes clinical and toxicity management guidelines pertaining to the TIL cell therapy regimen prepared by the TIL Working Group, composed of internationally recognized hematologists and oncologists with expertize in TIL cell therapy, and relates to patient care and operational aspects. Expert consensus recommendations for patient management, including patient eligibility, screening tests, and clinical and toxicity management with TIL cell therapy, including tumor tissue procurement surgery, non-myeloablative lymphodepletion, TIL infusion, and IL-2 administration, are discussed in the context of potential standard of care TIL use. These recommendations provide practical guidelines for optimal clinical management during administration of the TIL cell therapy regimen, and recognition of subsequent management of toxicities. These guidelines are focused on multidisciplinary teams of physicians, nurses, and stakeholders involved in the care of these patients.

A phase 1/2 clinical trial of invariant natural killer T cell therapy in moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells, a unique T cell population, lend themselves for use as adoptive therapy due to diverse roles in orchestrating immune responses. Originally developed for use in cancer, agenT-797 is a donor-unrestricted allogeneic ex vivo expanded iNKT cell therapy. We conducted an open-label study in virally induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-2 virus (trial registration NCT04582201). Here we show that agenT-797 rescues exhausted T cells and rapidly activates both innate and adaptive immunity. In 21 ventilated patients including 5 individuals receiving veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), there are no dose-limiting toxicities. We observe an anti-inflammatory systemic cytokine response and infused iNKT cells are persistent during follow-up, inducing only transient donor-specific antibodies. Clinical signals of associated survival and prevention of secondary infections are evident. Cellular therapy using off-the-shelf iNKT cells is safe, can be rapidly scaled and is associated with an anti-inflammatory response. The safety and therapeutic potential of iNKT cells across diseases including infections and cancer, warrants randomized-controlled trials.

Tabelecleucel for allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell or solid organ transplant recipients with Epstein-Barr virus-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease after failure of rituximab or rituximab and chemotherapy (ALLELE): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Survival in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease following haematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) or solid organ transplant (SOT) is poor after failure of initial therapy, indicating an urgent need for therapies for this ultra-rare disease. With recent EU marketing authorisation, tabelecleucel is the first off-the-shelf, allogeneic, EBV-specific T-cell immunotherapy to receive approval for treatment of relapsed or refractory EBV-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. We aimed to determine the clinical benefit of tabelecleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory EBV-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease following HSCT or SOT. METHODS: In this global, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial, eligible patients (of any age) had biopsy-proven EBV-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, disease that was relapsed or refractory to rituximab after HSCT and rituximab with or without chemotherapy after SOT, and partially HLA-matched and appropriately HLA-restricted tabelecleucel available. Patients received tabelecleucel administered intravenously at 2 × 106 cells per kg on days 1, 8, and 15 in 35-day cycles and are assessed for up to 5 years for survival post-treatment initiation. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. All patients who received at least one dose of tabelecleucel were included in safety and efficacy analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03394365, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: From June 27, 2018, to Nov 5, 2021, 63 patients were enrolled, of whom 43 (24 [56%] male and 19 [44%] female) were included, 14 had prior HSCT, 29 had SOT. Seven (50%, 95% CI 23-77) of 14 participants in the HSCT group and 15 (52%, 33-71) of 29 participants in the SOT group had an objective response, with a median follow-up of 14·1 months (IQR 5·7-23·9) and 6·0 months (1·8-18·4), respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were disease progression (in four [29%] of 14 in HSCT and eight [28%] of 29 in SOT) and decreased neutrophil count (in four [29%] of 14 in HSCT and four [14%] of 29 in SOT). Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were reported in 23 (53%) of 43 patients and fatal treatment-emergent adverse events in five (12%); no fatal treatment-emergent adverse event was treatment-related. There were no reports of tumour flare reaction, cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, transmission of infectious diseases, marrow rejection, or infusion reactions. No events of graft-versus-host disease or SOT rejection were reported as related to tabelecleucel. INTERPRETATION: Tabelecleucel provides clinical benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory EBV-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, for whom there are no other approved therapies, without evidence of safety concerns seen with other adoptive T-cell therapies. These data represent a potentially transformative and accessible treatment advance for patients with relapsed or refractory disease with few treatment options. FUNDING: Atara Biotherapeutics.

Prophylactic maintenance with venetoclax/azacitidine after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplant for high-risk MDS and AML.

ABSTRACT: We conducted a phase 1 trial assessing safety and efficacy of prophylactic maintenance therapy with venetoclax and azacitidine (Ven/Aza) for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) after Ven and fludarabine/busulfan conditioning (Ven/FluBu2 allo-SCT) with tacrolimus and methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Among 27 patients who underwent Ven/FluBu2 allo-SCT (55.6% with prior Ven exposure, and 96% with positive molecular measurable residual disease), 22 received maintenance therapy with Aza 36 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 5, and Ven 400 mg by mouth on days 1 to 14 per assigned dose schedule/level (42-day cycles × 8, or 28-day cycles × 12). During maintenance, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, which were transient and manageable. Infections were uncommon (n = 4, all grade 1-2). The 1-year and 2-year moderate/severe chronic GVHD rates were 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3%-18%) and 22% (95% CI, 9%-40%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 25 months among survivors, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Among the 22 patients who received Ven/Aza maintenance, the 2-year OS, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, and cumulative incidence of relapse rates were 67% (95% CI, 43%-83%), 59% (95% CI, 36%-76%), 0%, and 41% (95% CI, 20%-61%), respectively. Immune monitoring demonstrated no significant impact on T-cell expansion but identified reduced B-cell expansion compared with controls. This study demonstrates prophylactic Ven/Aza maintenance can be safely administered for patients with high-risk MDS/AML, but a randomized study is required to properly assess any potential benefit. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03613532.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in the Outpatient Setting: An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.

The first series of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy products were approved in 2017 to 2019 and have shown remarkable efficacy in both clinical trials and the real-world setting, but at the cost of prolonged patient hospitalization. As the toxicity management protocols were refined, the concept of cellular therapy administered in the outpatient setting gained steam, and single institutions began to perform certain aspects of CAR-T monitoring in the outpatient setting for select patients. However, there are many considerations for a successful outpatient program. In anticipation of increasing use of CAR-T-cell therapy in the outpatient setting as a mechanism to overcome frequent hospital bed shortages and high cost of inpatient care, the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy convened a group of experts in hematology, oncology, and cellular therapy to provide a comprehensive review of the existing publications on outpatient CAR-T cell therapy, discuss selected ongoing clinical trials of outpatient CAR-T, and describe strategies to optimize safety without compromising efficacy for patients treated and monitored in the outpatient setting.

A robust quality infrastructure is key to safe and effective delivery of immune effector cells: how FACT-finding can help.

ABSTRACT: Immune effector cells (IECs) include a broad range of immune cells capable of modulating several disease states, including malignant and nonmalignant conditions. The growth in the use of IECs as both investigational and commercially available products requires medical institutions to develop workflows/processes to safely implement and deliver transformative therapy. Adding to the complexity of this therapy are the variety of targets, diseases, sources, and unique toxicities that a patient experiences following IEC therapy. For over 25 years, the Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT) has established a standard for the use of cellular therapy, initially with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and more recently, with the development of standards to encompass IEC products such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. To date, IEC therapy has challenged the bandwidth and infrastructure of the institutions offering this therapy. To address these challenges, FACT has established a programmatic framework to improve the delivery of IEC therapy. In this study, we outline the current state of IEC program development, accreditation, and solutions to the challenges that programs face as they expand their application to novel IEC therapy.

Opportunistic Infections in Patients Receiving Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide: Impact of Haploidentical versus Unrelated Donor Allograft.

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an effective strategy for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and is the standard of care for haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). It is increasingly used for matched and mismatched unrelated donor (MUD/MMUD) HCT, but infections remain a concern. The objective of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and risk factors for infections in haploidentical and unrelated donor HCT recipients treated with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis. This single-center retrospective study examined 354 consecutive adults undergoing HCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis (161 MUD/MMUD; 193 haploidentical) between 2015 and 2022. Opportunistic infections (OIs), including cytomegalovirus (CMV), adenovirus (AdV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and invasive fungal disease (IFD), were assessed from day 0 through day +365. The 1-year cumulative incidence functions of OIs and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were calculated using dates of relapse and repeat HCT as competing risks. Secondary analysis evaluated risk factors for OIs and NRM using univariate and multivariable Cox regression models. Haploidentical HCT recipients had an increased risk of OIs compared to unrelated donor allograft recipients (39% for haploidentical versus 25% for MUD/MMUD; hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 2.49; P = .006). On multivariable analysis, haploidentical donor (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.23; P = .046), prior HCT (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.09; P = .002), and diagnosis of aGVHD (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.14; P = .041) were associated with increased risk of OIs. NRM within the first year was not significantly different between the 2 cohorts (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, .64 to 1.93; P = .70). Overall, haploidentical donor was a significant risk factor for OIs in patients receiving PTCy, although 1-year NRM was not different between haploidentical HCT and MUD/MMUD HCT recipients. CMV and AdV infections were significantly increased among haploidentical HCT recipients, whereas the incidences of EBV infection and IFD were similar in the 2 cohorts. Our findings may have implications for infection monitoring and prophylaxis in the setting of PTCy, particularly in haploidentical HCT recipients.

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis: lower incidence of relapse and chronic GVHD.

The ability of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) to facilitate haploidentical transplantation has spurred interest in whether PTCY can improve clinical outcomes in patients with HLA-matched unrelated donors undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). We investigated our institutional experience using PTCY-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis compared with conventional tacrolimus-based regimens. We compared overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and acute and chronic GVHD in 107 adult patients receiving a PTCY-based regimen vs 463 patients receiving tacrolimus-based regimens for GVHD prophylaxis. The 2 cohorts were well balanced for baseline characteristics except that more patients in the PTCY cohort having received 7-of-8-matched PBSCT. There was no difference in acute GVHD. All-grade chronic GVHD and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were substantially reduced in patients receiving PTCY compared with in those receiving tacrolimus-based regimens (2-year moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD: 12% vs 36%; P < .0001). Recipients of PTCY-based regimens also had a lower incidence of relapse compared with recipients of tacrolimus-based regimens (25% vs 34% at 2-years; P = .027), primarily in patients who received reduced intensity conditioning. This led to improved PFS in the PTCY cohort (64% vs 54% at 2 years; P = .02). In multivariable analysis, the hazard ratio was 0.59 (P = .015) for PFS and the subdistribution hazard ratio was 0.27 (P < .0001) for moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD and 0.59 (P = .015) for relapse. Our results suggest that PTCY prophylaxis is associated with lower rates of relapse and chronic GVHD in patients who receive HLA-matched unrelated donor PBSCT.

Cytokine release syndrome in haploidentical stem cell transplant may impact T-cell recovery and relapse.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) following haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) resembles CRS after chimeric antigen receptor-T therapy. We conducted this single-center retrospective study to evaluate the association of posthaploidentical HCT CRS with clinical outcomes and immune reconstitution. One hundred sixty-nine patients who underwent haploidentical HCT between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Of these, 98 patients (58%) developed CRS after HCT. CRS was diagnosed based on the presence of fever within the first 5 days after HCT without evidence of infection or infusion reaction and was graded according to established criteria. The development of posthaploidentical HCT CRS was associated with a lower incidence of disease relapse (P = .024) but with an increased risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease GVHD (P = .01). The association of CRS with a lower incidence of relapse was not confounded by graft source or disease diagnosis. Neither CD34 nor total nucleated cell dose was associated with CRS independently of graft type. In patients developing CRS, CD4+ Treg (P < .0005), CD4+ Tcon (P < .005), and CD8+ T cells (P < .005) increased 1 month after HCT compared with those who did not develop CRS, but not at later time points. The increase in CD4+ regulatory T cells 1 month after HCT was most notable among patients with CRS who received a bone marrow graft (P < .005). The development of posthaploidentical HCT CRS is associated with a reduced incidence of disease relapse and a transient effect on post-HCT immune reconstitution of T cells and their subsets. Therefore, the validation of these observations in a multicenter cohort is required.

Clinical Features of Acute Kidney Injury in the Early Post-Transplantation Period Following Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies but is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). To date, few studies have examined risk factors for AKI at engraftment, or the relationship between AKI and clinical outcomes. This study examined the incidence and risk factors for periengraftment AKI, as well as the association between AKI and overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic HCT at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2012 and 2019. Periengraftment (day 0 to day 30) AKI incidence and severity were defined using modified KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria. Factors associated with periengraftment AKI risk were examined using Cox regression analysis. The impact of periengraftment AKI on OS and NRM (defined as death without recurrent disease after HCT), was evaluated using Cox regression and the Fine and Gray competing risks model, respectively. Kidney recovery, defined as a return of serum creatinine (SCr) to within 25% of baseline or liberation from kidney replacement therapy (KRT), was examined at day 90 post-HCT. Periengraftment AKI occurred in 330 of 987 patients (33.4%) at a median of 13 days (interquartile range, 4 to 30 days) post-transplantation. Factors associated with a higher multivariable-adjusted risk of AKI were supratherapeutic rapamycin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20 to 2.03; P < .001), fludarabine/melphalan conditioning (HR, 1.35, 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.81; P = .05, compared to fludarabine/busulfan and fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation), HCT Comorbidity Index ≥4 (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.79; P = .002), albumin <3.4 g/dL (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.33 to 3.12; P = .001), hemoglobin ≤12 (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.78; P < .001), supratherapeutic tacrolimus (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.95; P = .02), and baseline SCr >1.1 mg/dL (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.48 to 2.35; P < .001). Periengraftment AKI was associated with worse OS (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.71; P < .001) and NRM (subdistribution HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.89; P < .001). Kidney recovery occurred in 18%, 15%, and 30% of patients with stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 AKI without KRT, respectively, and 4 of 16 patients (25%) were liberated from KRT. Periengraftment AKI is common among RIC allogeneic HCT recipients. We identified several important risk factors for periengraftment AKI. Its association with worse OS and NRM underscores the importance of timely recognition and management.

Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating abatacept in patients with steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after allogeneic transplant remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Abatacept is a selective costimulation modulator, used for the treatment of rheumatologic diseases, and was recently the first drug to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease. We conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of abatacept in steroid-refractory cGVHD. The overall response rate was 58%, seen in 21 out of 36 patients, with all responders achieving a partial response. Abatacept was well tolerated with few serious infectious complications. Immune correlative studies showed a decrease in interleukin -1α (IL-1α), IL-21, and tumor necrosis factor α as well as decreased programmed cell death protein 1 expression by CD4+ T cells in all patients after treatment with abatacept, demonstrating the effect of this drug on the immune microenvironment. The results demonstrate that abatacept is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cGVHD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01954979.

Immune Effector Cell-Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis-Like Syndrome.

T cell-mediated hyperinflammatory responses, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), are now well-established toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. As the field of CAR T cells advances, however, there is increasing recognition that hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-like toxicities following CAR T cell infusion are occurring broadly across patient populations and CAR T cell constructs. Importantly, these HLH-like toxicities are often not as directly associated with CRS and/or its severity as initially described. This emergent toxicity, however ill-defined, is associated with life-threatening complications, creating an urgent need for improved identification and optimal management. With the goal of improving patient outcomes and formulating a framework to characterize and study this HLH-like syndrome, we established an American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy panel composed of experts in primary and secondary HLH, pediatric and adult HLH, infectious disease, rheumatology and hematology, oncology, and cellular therapy. Through this effort, we provide an overview of the underlying biology of classical primary and secondary HLH, explore its relationship with similar manifestations following CAR T cell infusions, and propose the term "immune effector cell-associated HLH-like syndrome (IEC-HS)" to describe this emergent toxicity. We also delineate a framework for identifying IEC-HS and put forward a grading schema that can be used to assess severity and facilitate cross-trial comparisons. Additionally, given the critical need to optimize outcomes for patients experiencing IEC-HS, we provide insight into potential treatment approaches and strategies to optimize supportive care and delineate alternate etiologies that should be considered in a patient presenting with IEC-HS. By collectively defining IEC-HS as a hyperinflammatory toxicity, we can now embark on further study of the pathophysiology underlying this toxicity profile and make strides toward a more comprehensive assessment and treatment approach.

Paving the Road for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells: American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy 80/20 Task Force Consensus on Challenges and Solutions to Improving Efficiency of Clinical Center Certification and Maintenance of Operations for Commercially Approved Immune Effector Cell Therapies.

As the number and type of regulatory authority-approved cellular therapies grow, clinical treatment centers face a heavy burden of duplicative documentation around initial qualification, ongoing auditing, and reporting, with overlapping requirements from each manufacturer to ensure safe use of their specific product, which in the United States are stipulated under individual Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Biologic License Applications. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) convened the 80/20 Task Force to consider challenges and potential solutions to these issues. The Task Force proposed that 80% of manufacturers' requirements for onboarding and ongoing operations of commercially available products could be standardized and streamlined. Task Force members interviewed dozens of stakeholders, including clinicians at large academic medical centers already using commercial and investigational immune effector cell (IEC) products, regulators, members of accrediting bodies and professional cellular therapy societies, and manufacturers of IEC therapies for oncologic indications. In November 2021, the Task Force organized and led virtual discussions in a public forum and at a private ASTCT 80/20 Workshop at the online AcCELLerate Forum, a cellular-therapy stakeholders' meeting organized by the ASTCT, National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). At the workshop, approximately 60 stakeholders worked to identify and prioritize common challenges in onboarding and maintenance of operations at clinical sites for commercial FDA-approved and future IEC therapies and ways to streamline the process. It was agreed that standardization would improve efficiency of onboarding, allowing more cost-effective, sustainable growth of approved IEC therapies at treatment centers, and facilitate wider access while maintaining safety and clinical success. This early but extensive survey of stakeholders resulted in 5 overarching suggestions for both established and emerging treatment centers: (1) eliminate duplication in accreditation and auditing of clinical sites; (2) define expectations for the education about and management of CAR-T therapy toxicities to potentially replace product-specific REMS programs; (3) streamline current REMS education, testing, and data reporting; (4) standardize information technology (IT) platforms supporting enrollment, clinical site-manufacturer communication, and logistics of maintaining chain of identity/chain of custody across multiple transportation steps; and (5) encourage the use of universal nomenclature by cell therapy manufacturers. Future discussions need to engage a broader range of stakeholders, including administrators, pharmacists, nurses, data coordinators, surgeons, pathologists, and those developing promising cellular therapies for solid tumors, as well as teams from smaller academic or community cancer center settings. Continued collaboration with stakeholders outside of clinical sites will include accrediting bodies/auditors, established and emerging cell therapy companies, software developers, professional societies, and the patients who receive these therapies. Active dialog with government regulators remains essential. Such joint efforts are critical as the number of IEC therapies for myriad oncologic and nononcologic indications grows.