Results from the "Me & My Heart" (eMocial) Study: a Randomized Evaluation of a New Smartphone-Based Support Tool to Increase Therapy Adherence of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated whether patient support, administered via an electronic device-based app, increased adherence to treatment and lifestyle changes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with ticagrelor in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with diagnosed ACS treated with ticagrelor co-administered with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid were randomized into an active group (with support tool app for medication intake reminders and motivational messages) and a control group (without support tool app), and observed for 48 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02615704). Patients were asked to complete the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Lifestyle Changes Questionnaire (LSQ), and were assessed for blood pressure and body mass index (BMI) at baseline (visit 1) and at the end of the study (visit 2). Medication adherence was measured using the Brilique Adherence Questionnaire (BAQ). RESULTS: Patients (N = 676) were randomized to an active (n = 342) or a control (n = 334) group. BAQ data were available for 174 patients in the active group and 174 patients in the control group. Over the 48-week period, mean (standard deviation) adherence for the active and control groups was 96.4% (13.2%) and 91.5% (23.1%), respectively (effect of app intervention, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood pressure and BMI between visits. General improvements in SF-36 and LSQ scores were observed for both groups. CONCLUSION: The patient support tool app was associated with significant improvements in patient-reported treatment adherence compared with a data collection app alone in patients prescribed ticagrelor for ACS.

Living with heart failure: patient experiences and implications for physical activity and daily living.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) substantially limits the ability of patients to engage in physical activities. A detailed understanding of how patients experience these limitations is required to develop valid and sensitive measures for use in clinical research. This qualitative study was designed to provide a thorough description of how HF patients experience physical activity limitations in their daily lives. METHODS AND RESULTS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 HF patients. Interview transcripts were coded with the aim of identifying key aspects of physical activity. Patients were divided between HF with preserved ejection fraction (n = 21, 52.5%) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (n = 19, 47.5%); the majority of patients were New York Heart Association Class II (n = 22, 52.5%) or Class III (n = 16, 40.0%). Relevant physical activity themes, including mobility and broader daily function areas, were identified. The most frequently reported mobility limitations involved difficulty walking (up a steep incline, up steps, and long distances), limited walking speed, difficulty standing for long periods of time, and difficulty carrying and lifting objects. These limitations were principally related to three HF symptoms: dyspnoea, tiredness/fatigue, and peripheral oedema. Patients adapted to their symptoms and related mobility limitations in several ways, including taking rests during an activity, doing an activity more slowly, and avoiding/refraining from an activity altogether. The broader daily function areas most commonly impacted by the mobility limitations were housework, exercising or playing sports, and going shopping. CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients report numerous physical activity limitations. These specific mobility and daily function areas can be measured using clinical outcome assessments (e.g. patient-reported outcomes and performance outcomes) in clinical trials and observational research. Accelerometry can be used to contribute to a holistic picture of patient functioning by passively collecting this type of data.

Characteristics, Symptom Severity, and Experiences of Patients Reporting Chronic Kidney Disease in the PatientsLikeMe Online Health Community: Retrospective and Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global health burden, and is associated with increased adverse outcomes, poor quality of life, and substantial health care costs. While there is an increasing need to build patient-centered pathways for improving CKD management in clinical care, data in this field are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to understand patient-reported experiences, symptoms, outcomes, and treatment journeys among patients with CKD through a retrospective and qualitative approach based on data available through PatientsLikeMe (PLM), an online community where patients can connect and share experiences. METHODS: Adult members (aged ≥18 years) with self-reported CKD within 30 days of enrollment, who were not on dialysis, and registered between 2011 and 2018 in the PLM community were eligible for the retrospective study. Patient demographics and disease characteristics/symptoms were collected from this retrospective data set. Qualitative data were collected prospectively through semistructured phone interviews in a subset of patients, and questions were oriented to better understand patients' experiences with CKD and its management. RESULTS: The retrospective data set included 1848 eligible patients with CKD, and median age was 56 years. The majority of patients were female (1217/1841, 66.11%) and most were US residents (1450/1661, 87.30%). Of the patients who reported comorbidities (n=1374), the most common were type 2 diabetes (783/1374, 56.99%), hypertension (664/1374, 48.33%), hypercholesterolemia (439/1374, 31.95%), and diabetic neuropathy (376/1374, 27.37%). The most commonly reported severe or moderate symptoms in patients reporting these symptoms were fatigue (347/484, 71.7%) and pain (278/476, 58.4%). In the qualitative study, 18 eligible patients (13 females) with a median age of 60 years and who were mainly US residents were interviewed. Three key concepts were identified by patients to be important to optimal care and management: listening to patient needs, coordinating health care across providers, and managing clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a unique source of real-world information on the patient experience of CKD and its management by utilizing the PLM network. The results reveal the challenges these patients face living with an array of symptoms, and report key concepts identified by patients that can be used to further improve clinical care and management and inform future CKD studies.

Effects of Dapagliflozin on Symptoms, Function, and Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Results From the DAPA-HF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Goals of management in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction include reducing death and hospitalizations, and improving health status (symptoms, physical function, and quality of life). In the DAPA-HF trial (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse-Outcomes in Heart Failure), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin, reduced death and hospitalizations, and improved symptoms in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. In this analysis, we examine the effects of dapagliflozin on a broad range of health status outcomes, using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). METHODS: KCCQ was evaluated at randomization, 4 and 8 months. Patients were divided by baseline KCCQ total symptom score (TSS); Cox proportional hazards models examined the effects of dapagliflozin on clinical events across these subgroups. We also evaluated the effects of dapagliflozin on KCCQ-TSS, clinical summary score, and overall summary score. Responder analyses were performed to compare proportions of dapagliflozin versus placebo-treated patients with clinically meaningful changes in KCCQ at 8 months. RESULTS: A total of 4443 patients had available KCCQ at baseline (median KCCQ-TSS, 77.1 [interquartile range, 58.3-91.7]). The effects of dapagliflozin vs placebo on reducing cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure were consistent across the range of KCCQ-TSS (lowest to highest tertile: hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57-0.86]; hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61-0.98]; hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.46-0.83]; P for heterogeneity=0.52). Patients treated with dapagliflozin had greater improvement in mean KCCQ-TSS, clinical summary score, and overall summary score at 8 months (2.8, 2.5 and 2.3 points higher versus placebo; P<0.0001 for all). Fewer patients treated with dapagliflozin had a deterioration in KCCQ-TSS (odds ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78-0.90]; P<0.0001); and more patients had at least small, moderate, and large improvements (odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.08-1.23]; odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.08-1.22]; odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.07-1.22]; number needed to treat=14, 15, and 18, respectively; P<0.0001 for all; results consistent for KCCQ clinical summary score and overall summary score). CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin reduced cardiovascular death and worsening heart failure across the range of baseline KCCQ, and improved symptoms, physical function, and quality of life in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Furthermore, dapagliflozin increased the proportion of patients experiencing at least small, moderate, and large improvements in health status; these effects were clinically important. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03036124.

Design and rationale for the "Me & My Heart" (eMocial) study: A randomized evaluation of a new smartphone-based support tool to increase therapy adherence of patients with acute coronary syndrome.

A novel smartphone-based patient support tool was developed to increase the adherence to antiplatelet therapy and lifestyle changes in patients after coronary angioplasty for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The eMocial study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02615704) investigates whether an electronic support tool will improve adherence to comedication and lifestyle changes in ACS patients. The primary hypothesis of this trial is that an electronic support tool can increase adherence to comedication (primary endpoint) thereby supporting positive lifestyle changes (secondary endpoints). Patients hospitalized with ACS (ST elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], non-ST elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI], or unstable angina pectoris) and treated with ticagrelor coadministered with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid will be randomized 1:1 to an active group receiving the patient support tool via a smartphone-based application or to a control group without the patient support tool. Patient questionnaires to evaluate lifestyle changes and quality of life will be used at baseline and at the end of the 48-week observation phase. Patients are asked to fill out questionnaires to determine their adherence, treatment attitudes, health-care utilization and risk factors on a monthly basis. The study was started in February 2016 and the completion date is scheduled for October 2019. For final analysis 664 patients are expected be available. Preliminary baseline demographics were unstable angina pectoris (13.7%), NSTEMI (49.9%), STEMI (36.4%), male gender (86.3%), and diabetes mellitus (17.6%). Our study could significantly help to understand how inadequate adherence to antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients could be improved with a smartphone-based application.

Talking About Breast Cancer: Which Symptoms and Treatment Side Effects are Important to Patients with Advanced Disease?

BACKGROUND: Patients' experience of symptoms and associated treatment is an increasingly important consideration in both regulatory and health technology assessments, and can inform treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to gain insight directly from patients with advanced breast cancer about which symptoms and treatment side effects are important to them. METHODS: Women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were interviewed individually by trained interviewers, using a semi-structured interview guide. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed qualitatively, including whether symptoms were mentioned spontaneously (indicating their importance to patients) or only when questioned directly. RESULTS: Sixteen women (aged 38-74 years) participated. The most commonly reported symptom aspects were: pain (16/16 [all reported spontaneously]); feeling tired/fatigued (15/16 [12 spontaneously]); changes in weight (15/16 [2 spontaneously]); hair loss (15/16 [5 spontaneously]); changes in appetite (11/16 [8 spontaneously]); nausea (9/16 [all spontaneously]). Pain was attributed mostly to the disease or to its treatment. Tiredness, changes in weight/appetite, and hair loss were attributed mostly to the treatment. All women (14 spontaneously) reported that the cancer affected their emotional well-being and their ability to perform daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: Further qualitative research is needed to understand how patients distinguish cancer-related symptoms from treatment-related side effects, to gain insight into which patient experiences should be measured and how best to measure them.

Symptom profile in partial responders to a proton pump inhibitor compared with treatment-naïve patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a post hoc analysis of two study populations.

BACKGROUND: Partial response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy poses a healthcare challenge. This study aimed to compare symptom profiles in partial PPI responders and treatment-naïve patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: A post hoc analysis of data from two studies was performed. Partial PPI responders with GERD (n = 580; NCT00703534) had frequent (≥ 3 days/week) heartburn and/or regurgitation despite PPI therapy; patients with no improvement were excluded. Treatment-naïve patients with GERD (diagnosed by endoscopy and pH-metry; n = 203; NCT00291746) had frequent (≥ 3 days/week) upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) was completed by all patients at study entry and by treatment-naïve patients after PPI therapy. RESULTS: The highest (mean [95% confidence interval]) discomfort scores were reported in the Reflux (heartburn, regurgitation), Indigestion, and Abdominal pain domains of the GSRS, both in partial PPI responders (4.3 [4.2-4.4], 3.7 [3.6-3.8], and 3.4 [3.3-3.5], respectively) and in treatment-naïve patients (3.5 [3.3-3.7], 3.6 [3.4-3.7], and 3.1 [3.0-3.3], respectively). Partial PPI responders reported more discomfort than treatment-naïve patients in the Reflux, Abdominal pain, and Constipation domains (4.3 [4.2-4.4] vs. 3.5 [3.3-3.7], 3.4 [3.3-3.5] vs. 3.1 [3.0-3.3], and 2.5 [2.4-2.6] vs. 2.1 [1.9-2.2], respectively). All GSRS domain scores improved in treatment-naïve patients following PPI therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom patterns in partial PPI responders were similar to those in treatment-naïve patients with GERD, but partial PPI responders experienced more severe reflux, abdominal pain, and constipation than did treatment-naïve patients.

Night-time symptoms and their impact on sleep in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who have a partial response to proton pump inhibitors: a qualitative patient interview study.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists about night-time symptoms that are generated directly from patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who have a partial response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. This information is needed to select an appropriate instrument in studies in this patient population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this qualitative interview study was to gain understanding of the night-time symptoms of patients with GERD who had a partial response to PPIs. The specific aims were (i) to evaluate whether GERD symptoms experienced during the night differ from those occurring during the day; and (ii) to understand the impact of night-time symptoms on sleep and next-day functioning. METHODS: Four US sites participated in this study of patients with GERD who, despite PPI therapy for at least 4 weeks, still experienced both daytime and night-time heartburn and/or regurgitation. Non-responders to PPIs were excluded. Patient statements were coded and grouped by concept. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled. The predominant and most troublesome symptoms during both the day and night were heartburn and regurgitation. At night-time only, expressions describing regurgitation were more frequent than those describing heartburn (62 vs. 26 %). During the daytime only, expressions describing regurgitation and heartburn occurred with similar frequency (21 vs. 27 %). Patients experienced greater severity of heartburn and regurgitation at night than during the day, and the difference was more pronounced for regurgitation. Patients focused on symptom frequency during the day but on symptom severity at night. Of expressions about the impact of night-time GERD symptoms, 46 % described impact on sleep and 41 % described compensatory behaviors when woken up by symptoms. Next-day impacts of night-time symptoms predominantly included changes in diet (53 %). CONCLUSIONS: Partial responders to PPI therapy experience similar GERD symptoms at night and during the day. However, regurgitation is more predominant at night than during the day, and at night patients focus more on symptom severity than symptom frequency.

Dyspeptic symptom development after discontinuation of a proton pump inhibitor: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Conflicting data exist on whether discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is associated with rebound secretion of gastric acid. METHODS: A total of 48 healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative volunteers (24 females) were randomized in a double-blinded manner to treatment with either pantoprazole 40 mg or placebo once daily for 28 days. Dyspeptic symptoms were registered daily using the Glasgow dyspepsia score (GDS) 2 weeks before, during, and 6 weeks after treatment. Plasma levels of gastrin and serum levels of chromogranin-A levels were measured before, during, and after treatment. RESULTS: During the 2 weeks before treatment, the placebo group had a mean GDS of 0.20 + or - 0.7 compared with the pantoprazole group score of 0.54 + or - 1.3 (NS). No significant differences between the symptom severity scores of the two groups were shown during the treatment period. During the first week after discontinuation of treatment, the pantoprazole group had a mean symptom score of 5.7 + or - 11.7 vs. 0.74 + or - 2.6 in the placebo group (P<0.01). A total of 11 out of 25 (44%) subjects in the pantoprazole group developed dyspepsia compared with 2 out of 23 (9%) in the placebo group (P<0.01). During the second week of follow-up, the pantoprazole group had a mean symptom score of 1.6 + or - 3.4 compared with 0 + or - 0 in the placebo group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the mean symptom score for the pantoprazole group (1.1 + or - 0.6) compared with the placebo group (0.4 + or - 0.3) during the third week of follow-up. Symptom scores during the first week after treatment correlated with basal (P<0.01) and meal-stimulated (P<0.01) gastrin levels at the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-week course of pantoprazole seems to induce dyspeptic symptoms in previously asymptomatic healthy H. pylori-negative subjects. The correlation between symptom score and gastrin levels suggests that these symptoms are due to acid rebound hypersecretion and seem to be related to the degree of acid inhibition.

Oral medications with significant hepatic metabolism at higher risk for hepatic adverse events.

UNLABELLED: Reactive metabolites generated by hepatic metabolism are thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), but supporting data are limited. If this is true, then compounds with significant hepatic metabolism should cause more DILI than those without it. We conducted a study to examine the relationship between hepatic metabolism and DILI of prescription medications. We systematically extracted the metabolism characteristics of 207 of the most widely prescribed oral medications in the United States. Compounds with >50% hepatic metabolism were characterized as those with significant hepatic metabolism (n = 149). Hepatic adverse events of interest were alanine aminotransferase >3 times the upper limit of normal, jaundice, liver failure, liver transplantation, or fatal DILI. Compared with compounds with lesser hepatic metabolism, compounds belonging to the significant hepatic metabolism group had significantly higher frequency of alanine aminotransferase >3 times the upper limit of normal (35% versus 11%, P = 0.001), liver failure (28% versus 9%, P = 0.004), and fatal DILI (23% versus 4%, P = 0.001), but not jaundice (46% versus 35%, P = 0.2) or liver transplantation (9% versus 2%, P = 0.11). Twelve compounds with no hepatic metabolism had no reports of liver failure, liver transplantation, or fatal DILI. When the relationship between hepatic adverse events and combination of hepatic metabolism and daily dose was examined, compounds with both significant hepatic metabolism and daily dose >50 mg (n = 50) were significantly more hepatotoxic than compounds belonging to other groups. Compared with medications without biliary excretion, compounds with biliary excretion (n = 50) had significantly higher frequency of jaundice (74% versus 40%, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our study finds an important relationship between a compound's metabolism profile and reports of hepatic adverse events.

Relationship between daily dose of oral medications and idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: search for signals.

UNLABELLED: Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is traditionally thought not to be dose-related. However, it has been pointed out that most medicines that were withdrawn from marketing or received a black-box warning because of hepatotoxicity were prescribed at daily doses greater than 50 mg/day. To examine the relationship between daily dose of medications and idiosyncratic DILI, we conducted a study with two aims. First, using two pharmaceutical databases, we examined the relationship between daily dose of commonly prescribed medicines in the United States and reported frequency of their selected hepatic adverse events. Second, we examined serious DILI cases reported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (1970-2004) for any signals supporting the relationship between daily dose and idiosyncratic DILI. Medications were categorized into < or =10 mg/day, 11-49 mg/day, and > or =50 mg/day groups. Among US prescription medicines, a statistically significant relationship was observed between daily dose of oral medicines and reports of liver failure (P = 0.009), liver transplantation (P < 0.001), and death caused by DILI (P = 0.004) but not alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3 x upper limit of normal (P = 0.10) or jaundice (P = 0.16). Of 598 eligible Swedish DILI cases, 9% belonged to the < or =10 mg/day group, 14.2% to the 11-49 mg/day group, and 77% of cases were caused by medications given at dose > or =50 mg/day. A statistically significant relationship was noted between daily dose and poor outcome (death or liver transplantation) of Swedish DILI cases (2%, 9.4%, and 13.2% in < or =10, 11-49, and > or =50 mg/day groups, respectively, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These data suggest a relationship between daily doses of oral prescription medications and idiosyncratic DILI. More studies are needed to validate these observations and to explore their implications.

Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have previously been shown to be of importance in patients with asthma. Limited data, however, exist on the prevalence of GERD in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and information about the occurrence of the total burden of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in these patients is lacking. METHODS: A total of 113 patients with COPD completed four self-administered questionnaires: the Gastrointestinal Symptom-Rating Scale (GSRS), ROME II modular questionnaires (criteria for irritable bowel syndrome), the Psychological General Well-Being index (PGWB), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. Eighty-two patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) and 2000 healthy individuals from the general Swedish population served as controls. RESULTS: The total GSRS score in patients with COPD was 2.12 (1.92-2.28) which was significantly higher than the score from the general population of 1.96 (1.81-2.12). No significant difference between COPD and CRF patients was, however, observed, in any of the GSRS dimensions. Patients in the COPD group had lower total PGWB scores compared both with CRF patients 90 (78-104) vs. 98 (83-113) (P<0.05) and with the general population 103 (102-104) (P<0.001). A negative correlation between the GSRS and PGWB scores (r=-0.49; P<0.001) was observed in patients with COPD. Sixteen (14%) of the patients with COPD fulfilled the Rome II criteria for irritable bowel syndrome. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of GI symptoms is higher in patients with COPD than in healthy individuals, but not higher than in CRF patients. The GI symptoms are associated with impairments in psychological well-being, and they require diagnostic workups to explore different treatment options in these patients.