RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is an extensive surgery that is indicated in cases of recurrent advanced gynecological cancer with curative and sometimes palliative intent. The procedure is associated with both high morbidity and mortality and as such is considered a highly specialist procedure. The aim of the study was to analyze surgical outcomes in women who underwent PE for advanced gynecological malignancy in a tertiary cancer referral center over 11 years. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective single-center study. There were 17 patients included who underwent PE in Hull Royal Infirmary Hospital (Hull, UK) between 2010 and 2021. The main outcome measures were the perioperative complications, overall survival (OS), and recurrence free survival (RFS). Cumulative survival rates were reported at 1, 3 and 5 years. Univariate Cox regression analysis was undertaken to analyze factors that are prognostic for OS and RFS. Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed from the results of the Cox regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to visually display estimates of OS and RFS over the follow-up period. RESULTS: The median age at the time of surgery was 63.0 (IQR: 48.0-71.0). All patients received surgery with curative intent and complete tumor resection (R0) was achieved in 94.1% of cases. An overall 5-year survival was achieved in 63.7% of patients. Mean overall survival (OS) was 8.4 years (95% CI: 7.78-9.02). The RFS was 5.0 years (95% CI: 4.13-5.87). Both OS and RFS were significantly negatively affected by the hospital stay (P=0.020 and P=0.035, respectively), but not by the type of surgery (P=0.263 and P=0.826, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrated stable and comparable outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer in the UK. The standard of care is a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. The aim of the treatment is the resection of all macroscopic disease. In selected cases of advanced ovarian cancer this is achieved with ultra-radical surgery. However, NICE encourages further research due to low quality evidence on the safety and efficacy of this extensive surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the morbidity and survival rates of ultra-radical surgery for advanced ovarian cancer performed in our unit and compare our findings with the current literature. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 39 patients diagnosed with stage IIIA-IV ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer who underwent surgery in our unit between 2012 and 2020. The main outcome measures were the perioperative complications, the disease-free survival, the overall survival rate and the recurrence rate. RESULTS: The study enrolled 39 patients with stages IIIA-IV who were treated in our unit between 2012 and 2020. 21 patients were at stage III (53.8%) whereas 18 (46.1%) at stage IV. 14 patients underwent primary and 25 secondary debulking surgery. Major and minor complications occurred 17.9% and 56.4% of the patients, respectively. Complete cytoreduction following surgery was achieved in 24 cases (61.5%). The mean and the median survival time were 4.8 years and 5 years, respectively. The mean disease-free survival time was 2.9 years while median disease-free survival time was 2 years. Age (P=0.028) and complete cytoreduction (p=0.048) were found to be significantly associated with survival. Primary debulking surgery was significantly associated with lower probability of recurrence (P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of patients is relatively small, our study indicates that ultra-radical surgery in centers with high expertise may result in excellent survival rates with an acceptable rate of major complications. All patients in our cohort were operated by an accredited gynecological oncologist and a hepatobiliary general surgeon with a special interest in ovarian cancer. A few cases required input from a colorectal and a thoracic surgeon. We believe that the careful selection of the patients that can benefit from ultra-radical surgery and our model of joint surgery can explain our excellent results. Further research is essential to establish that ultra- radical surgery has an acceptable rate of morbidity for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
