Quality of Life Outcomes for Parotid Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: This study describes patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and associated factors in patients who underwent surgery for malignant parotid tumors (MPT). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all surgically treated MPT patients in a multidisciplinary head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship clinic (2017-2023). PROMs included University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL), Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Insomnia Severity Index. Multivariable regression analysis was used to investigate clinical predictors associated with PROMs. RESULTS: In 62 MPT patients, the prevalence of clinically relevant dysphagia symptoms (EAT-10), elevated symptoms of depression (PHQ-8), moderate/severe symptoms of anxiety (GAD-7), moderate/severe neck pain with activities of daily living (NDI), and moderate/severe symptoms of insomnia at last follow-up was 32.3%, 15.5%, 7.1%, 17.7%, and 7.2%, respectively. Nonparametric one-sided test revealed that patients treated with adjuvant CRT had significantly worse physical QOL, social-emotional QOL, and swallowing scores than patients treated with surgery alone (p = 0.01, p = 0.02, p = 0.03, respectively); that patients treated with surgery and adjuvant RT had significantly worse physical QOL and social-emotional QOL than patients treated with surgery alone (p < 0.01, p = 0.01, respectively) and that patients treated with surgery and adjuvant CRT had significantly worse swallowing and neck pain than patients treated with surgery and adjuvant RT (p = 0.03, p = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with surgically treated MPT, adjuvant CRT and RT were associated with worse PROMs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Patient, family caregiver, and economic outcomes of an integrated screening and novel stepped collaborative care intervention in the oncology setting in the USA (CARES): a randomised, parallel, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care of screening and referring patients for treatment for symptoms, such as depression, pain, and fatigue, is not effective. This trial aimed to test the efficacy of an integrated screening and novel stepped collaborative care intervention versus standard of care for patients with cancer and at least one of the following symptoms: depression, pain, or fatigue. METHODS: This randomised, parallel, phase 3 trial was conducted in 29 oncology outpatient clinics associated with the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center in the USA. Patients (aged ≥21 years) with any cancer type and clinical levels of depression, pain, or fatigue (or all of these) were eligible. Eligible family caregivers were aged 21 years or older and providing care to a patient diagnosed with cancer who consented for this study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to stepped collaborative care or standard of care using a central, permuted block design (sizes of 2, 4, and 6) stratified by sex and prognostic status. The biostatistician, oncologists, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment. Stepped collaborative care was once-weekly cognitive behavioural therapy for 50-60 min from a care coordinator via telemedicine (eg, telephone or videoconferencing). Pharmacotherapy for symptoms might be initiated or changed if recommended by the treatment team or preferred by the patient. Standard of care was screening and referral to a health-care provider for treatment of symptoms. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life in patients at 6 months. Maintenance of the treatment benefits was assessed at 12 months. Participants included in the primary analysis were per intention to treat, which included patients missing one or both follow-up assessments. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02939755). FINDINGS: Between Dec 5, 2016, and April 8, 2021, 459 patients and 190 family caregivers were enrolled. 222 patients were assigned to standard of care and 237 to stepped collaborative care. Of 459 patients, 201 (44%) were male and 258 (56%) were female. Patients in the stepped collaborative care group had a greater 0-6-month improvement in health-related quality of life than patients in the standard-of-care group (p=0·013, effect size 0·09). Health-related quality of life was maintained for the stepped collaborative care group (p=0·74, effect size 0·01). Patients in the stepped collaborative care group had greater 0-6-month improvements than the standard-of-care group in emotional (p=0·012), functional (p=0·042), and physical (p=0·033) wellbeing. No adverse events were reported by patients in either group and deaths were considered unrelated to the study. INTERPRETATION: An integrated screening and novel stepped collaborative care intervention, compared with the current standard of care, is recommended to improve health-related quality of life. The findings of this study will advance the implementation of guideline concordant care (screening and treatment) and has the potential to shift the practice of screening and treatment paradigm nationwide, improving outcomes for patients diagnosed with cancer. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute.

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes Associated With Neck Lymphedema in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine the predictors of neck lymphedema and to explore its association with symptoms and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients who underwent non-operative treatment. METHODS: This study involved a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent radiation therapy (±chemotherapy). Patients with visits <6 weeks or >2 years following completion of radiation and those with recurrent or metastatic cancer were excluded. Presence of post-treatment lymphedema, demographics, clinical characteristics, health-related behaviors, and symptoms were collected. PROs were obtained using validated questionnaires that assessed depression, anxiety, swallowing dysfunction, and quality of life (QOL). Multivariable regression models were used to examine the relationship between lymphedema with predictors and symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 203 patients included, 88 (43.4%) developed post-treatment lymphedema. In multivariable analysis, pre-treatment Body Mass Index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.01, 1.14] p = 0.016) and N stage (OR = 1.96, 95% CI [1.06, 3.66], p = 0.032) were found to be independently associated with lymphedema. Regarding PROs, lymphedema was associated with greater swallowing dysfunction (3.48, 95% CI [0.20, 6.75], p = 0.038), decreased mouth opening (-3.70, 95% CI [-7.31, -0.10], p = 0.044), and increased fatigue (1.88, 95% CI [1.05, 3.38], p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Higher pre-treatment BMI and greater N stage are identified as independent predictors for lymphedema development in non-operative HNC patients. Additionally, patients experiencing lymphedema reported worsening swallowing dysfunction and increased symptoms related to trismus and fatigue. Recognizing patients at elevated risk for lymphedema allows for early intervention, alleviation of symptom burden, and optimization of health care resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Neighborhood Deprivation and Symptoms, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors.

Importance: Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with increased risk of poor health and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. However, there are few data on how neighborhood deprivation affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in HNC survivors. Objective: To investigate whether neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation is associated with symptom burden, psychological distress, and QOL among HNC survivors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used prospectively collected data from patients seen in a university-affiliated multidisciplinary HNC survivorship clinic between September 2018 and September 2021 who received radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx or hypopharynx. Exposure: Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, measured using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Main Outcomes and Measures: The PROMs pertaining to symptom burden and severity of psychological distress were measured using the Neck Disability Index, Insomnia Severity Index, the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, and the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Physical and social-emotional QOL were obtained using the University of Washington QOL questionnaire. Multivariable linear regression analysis adjusting for individual-level sociodemographic, comorbidity, and treatment characteristics investigated the association between ADI and PROMs. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare the lowest (most affluent areas: ADI, 0%-20%) and highest (most deprived areas: ADI, 80%-100%) ADI quintiles. Results: A total of 277 patients were included in the final analysis (mean [SD] age, 64.18 [9.60] years; 215 [77.6%] male). Cancer sites were the oral cavity (52 [18.8%]), oropharyngeal area (171 [61.7%]), and larynx or hypopharynx (54 [19.5%]). Multivariable analysis showed that for every 1-point increase in ADI, social-emotional QOL changed by -0.14 points (95% CI, -0.24 to -0.05 points), anxiety increased by 0.03 points (95% CI, 0.01-0.06 points), and neck disability worsened by 0.05 points (95% CI, 0.01-0.10 points). Compared with patients in the most affluent areas, those in the most deprived areas had significantly lower physical (-15.89 points; 95% CI, -25.96 to -2.31 points; Cohen d = -0.83) and social-emotional (-13.57 points; 95% CI, -22.79 to -3.49 points; Cohen d = -0.69) QOL and higher depression (2.60 points; 95% CI, 0.21-4.40 points; Cohen d = 0.52), anxiety (3.12 points; 95% CI, 1.56-4.66 points; Cohen d = 0.61), insomnia (3.55 points; 95% CI, 0.33-6.41 points; Cohen d = 0.54), and neck disability (5.65 points; 95% CI, 1.66-9.55 points; Cohen d = 0.66) scores. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, a higher ADI score was associated with higher risk of increased psychological distress, higher symptom burden, and decreased QOL after treatment among HNC survivors. These findings suggest that proactive, patient-centered interventions are needed to address these disparities.

Electromyography findings in radiation-induced unilateral tongue immobility.

BACKGROUND: We used electromyography to characterize hypoglossal nerve function among radiation-treated head and neck cancer survivors with later onset unilateral tongue immobility. METHODS: Patients with unilateral tongue immobility without evidence of recurrent cancer were seen at a tertiary academic institution between February and September 2021. All patients were at least 2 years post-treatment with radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Participants were under annual surveillance and displayed no evidence of operative injury to the hypoglossal nerve. RESULTS: The median symptom-free interval for the 10 patients included in this study was 13.2 years (range 2-25 years). Myokymia alone was present in 3 of 10 patients, fibrillation potentials alone were present in 3 of 10 patients, and 1 subject displayed both fibrillation and myokymia. Three out of 10 patients had normal hypoglossal nerve function. DISCUSSION: These findings highlight how disparate mechanisms may underlie similar clinical presentations of radiation-induced neuromuscular dysfunction.

CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Growing Vestibular Schwannoma: Longitudinal Tumor Control, Hearing Outcomes, and Predicting Post-Treatment Hearing Status.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine tumor control rates for treating growing vestibular schwannoma (VS) with CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (CK SRS); (2) to determine hearing outcomes after CK SRS; (3) to propose a set of variables that could be used to predict hearing outcomes for patients receiving CK SRS for VS. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series review. METHODS: 127 patients who received CK SRS for radiographically documented growing VS were reviewed. Tumors were monitored for post-procedure growth radiographically with linear measurements and three-dimensional segmental volumetric analysis (3D-SVA). Hearing outcomes were reviewed for 109 patients. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to identify variables correlated with hearing outcomes. RESULTS: Tumor control rate was 94.5% for treating VS with CK SRS. Hearing outcomes were categorized using the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) classification system. As of their last available audiogram, 33.3% of patients with pre-treatment class A and 26.9% of patients with class B retained their hearing in that class. 15.3% of patients starting with class A or B with extended follow-up (>60 months), maintained hearing within this same grouping. Our final model proposed to predict hearing outcomes included age, fundal cap distance (FCD), tumor volume, and maximum radiation dose to the cochlea; however, FCD was the only statistically significant variable. CONCLUSION: CK SRS is an effective treatment for control of VS. Hearing preservation by class was achieved in a third of patients. Finally, FCD was found to be protective against hearing loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:S1-S12, 2024.

The female self-advocacy in Cancer Survivorship scale is a psychometrically sound measure of self-advocacy in male cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and psychometrically evaluate an adapted version of the Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship (FSACS) Scale in men with a history of cancer. METHODS: This psychometric instrument development and validation study used a two-phase approach to first adapt the FSACS Scale items to reflect the experience of men with a history of cancer and then evaluate the psychometric properties of the adapted scale compared to the original FSACS Scale. The study was conducted from December 2018 through April 2022 through cancer clinics, patient registries, and national advocacy organizations. We evaluated scale reliability and validity using reliability coefficients, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and item analyses to determine a final set of scale items. RESULTS: Item responses from N = 171 men with a history of cancer were evaluated to determine scale validity. After removing poor-performing items based on item-level analyses, factor analyses confirmed that a 3-factor structure of both the adapted and original FSACS Scale best fit the scale. The 10 new items did not outperform the original 20-item scale and were therefore excluded from the final scale. The final 20-item scale explained 87.94% of item variance and subscale's Cronbach α varied from 0.65 to 0.86. CONCLUSION: The SACS Scale can be used in research and clinical contexts to assess the propensity of men and women to get their needs, values, and priorities met in the face of a challenge.

Stakeholder perspectives on six identified interpersonal communication components of patient navigation in breast cancer care.

PURPOSE: Although identified as a key competency domain and a needed area of professional development, interpersonal communication in breast cancer care patient navigation is understudied. Moreover, the patient-navigator relationship may be influenced by the interpersonal communication skills and behaviors of the patient navigator. This paper reports on the interpretation step of a concept mapping study, where key stakeholders shared their perspectives on six identified interpersonal communication components of breast cancer care patient navigation. METHODS: This study utilized concept mapping, a community-engaged mixed method approach. After conducting brainstorming, sorting, and concept mapping analysis, a six-cluster concept map of interpersonal communication in breast cancer care patient navigation was identified. Interpretation sessions with each participant group (patients, patient navigators, administrators) allowed both naming and more in-depth exploration of the six clusters. The sessions were led by a facilitator, the PI, and were audio recorded and transcribed. RESULTS: Six 2-h interpretation sessions were conducted with 21 participants, including patients with breast cancer, breast cancer patient navigators (lay or medically trained), and patient navigation administrators from Western Pennsylvania. Through a group consensus process, the six clusters were named. Participants identified that all six identified components were essential to patient navigation, but the ability to build patient-centered trust and relationships and maintain professional communication were the most impactful components of the patient-navigator relationship. CONCLUSION: These findings validate the importance of interpersonal skills and behaviors of patient navigators in breast cancer care. These findings can inform the patient navigation role description, competencies, and the development of curriculum for training and metrics for evaluation.

Pretreatment pain predicts perineural invasion in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Perineural invasion (PNI) in head and neck cancer (HNC) is a distinct pathological feature used to indicate aggressive tumor behavior and drive treatment strategies. Our study examined the prevalence and predictors of PNI in HNC patients stratified by tumor site. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients who underwent surgical resection at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 2015 and 2018 was performed. Pretreatment pain was assessed at least 1 week before surgery using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N). Demographics, clinical characteristics, and concomitant medications were obtained from medical records. Patients with cancers at the oropharynx and non-oropharynx (i.e., cancer at oral cavity, mandible, larynx) sites were separately analyzed. Tumor blocks were obtained from 10 patients for histological evaluation of intertumoral nerve presence. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients (202 males, median age = 60.94 ± 11.06) were assessed. Pain and PNI were significantly associated with higher T stage (p < 0.001) and tumor site (p < 0.001); patients with non-oropharynx tumors reported more pain and had a higher incidence of PNI compared to oropharynx tumors. However, multivariable analysis identified pain as a significant variable uniquely associated with PNI for both tumor sites. Evaluation of nerve presence in tumor tissue showed 5-fold higher nerve density in T2 oral cavity tumors compared to oropharyngeal tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study finds that PNI is associated with pretreatment pain and tumor stage. These data support the need for additional research into the impact of tumor location when investigating targeted therapies of tumor regression.

Longitudinal Analysis of Caregiver Burden in Head and Neck Cancer.

Importance: Despite the critical role of caregivers in head and neck cancer (HNC), there is limited literature on caregiver burden (CGB) and its evolution over treatment. Research is needed to address evidence gaps that exist in understanding the causal pathways between caregiving and treatment outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of and identify risk factors for CGB in HNC survivorship. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal prospective cohort study took place at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Dyads of treatment-naive patients with HNC and their caregivers were recruited between October 2019 and December 2020. Eligible patient-caregiver dyads were 18 years or older and fluent in English. Patients undergoing definitive treatment identified a caregiver as the primary, nonprofessional, nonpaid person who provided the most assistance to them. Among 100 eligible dyadic participants, 2 caregivers declined participation, resulting in 96 enrolled participants. Data were analyzed from September 2021 through October 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants were surveyed at diagnosis, 3 months postdiagnosis, and 6 months postdiagnosis. Caregiver burden was evaluated with the 19-item Social Support Survey (scored 0-100, with higher scores indicating more support), Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA; scored 0-5, with higher scores on 4 subscales [disrupted schedule, financial problems, lack of family support, and health problems] indicating negative reactions, and higher scores on the fifth subscale [self-esteem] indicating favorable influence); and 3-item Loneliness Scale (scored 3-9, with higher scores indicating greater loneliness). Patient health-related quality of life was assessed using the University of Washington Quality of Life scale (UW-QOL; scored 0-100, with higher scores indicating better QOL). Results: Of the 96 enrolled participants, half were women (48 [50%]), and a majority were White (92 [96%]), married or living with a partner (81 [84%]), and working (51 [53%]). Of these participants, 60 (63%) completed surveys at diagnosis and at least 1 follow-up. Of the 30 caregivers, most were women (24 [80%]), White (29 [97%]), married or living with a partner (28 [93%]), and working (22 [73%]). Caregivers of nonworking patients reported higher scores on the CRA subscale for health problems than caregivers of working patients (mean difference, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18-0.64). Caregivers of patients with UW-QOL social/emotional (S/E) subscale scores of 62 or lower at diagnosis reported increased scores on the CRA subscale for health problems (UW-QOL-S/E score of 22: CRA score mean difference, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.48-1.77; UW-QOL-S/E score of 42: CRA score mean difference, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.34-1.15; and UW-QOL-S/E score of 62: CRA score mean difference, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.59). Woman caregivers had statistically significant worsening scores on the Social Support Survey (mean difference, -9.18; 95% CI, -17.14 to -1.22). The proportion of lonely caregivers increased over treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study highlights patient- and caregiver-specific factors that are associated with increased CGB. Results further demonstrate the potential implications for negative health outcomes for caregivers of patients who are not working and have lower health-related quality of life.

Health Literacy and Adherence to Clinical Recommendations in Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND: After definitive cancer treatment, survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) are commonly recommended to participate in therapies aimed at reducing the burden of treatment-related side effects. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated whether adherence to referral to physical therapy (PT) and speech-language pathology therapy (SLPT) is related to patient health literacy (HL). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients attending a multidisciplinary HNC survivorship clinic between 2017 and 2019. HL was measured using the Brief Health Literacy Screen, with scores below 10 indicating inadequate HL. Chi-square and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between HL and adherence to PT or SLPT referral. KEY RESULTS: From the overall cohort (N = 454), 80 patients (18%) had inadequate HL. Compared to those with adequate HL, patients with inadequate HL were significantly less likely to complete initial PT evaluation (74% vs. 58%, p = .034) but were not significantly less likely to complete initial SLPT evaluation (70% vs. 61%, p = .37). After adjusting for age, primary tumor site, and treatment stage, we found that patients with inadequate HL were half as likely to follow up for initial PT evaluation (odds ratio 0.45, p = .032). CONCLUSION: Overall, inadequate HL is associated with reduced adherence to PT but is not associated with adherence to SLPT among HNC survivors. These results highlight the clinical importance of HL and underscore the need for interventions to facilitate adherence to treatment for patients with inadequate HL. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2023;7(1):e52-e60.].

The effect of opioids on the efficacy of immunotherapy in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

OBJECTIVES: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) causes severe pain and opioids, the mainstay of pain management, may have immunomodulatory effects. We evaluated the effect of opioids on immunotherapy efficacy in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study of 66 R/M HNSCC patients from 2015 to 2020, opioid dosage, calculated as mean morphine milligram equivalent per day, was assessed on the day of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment and most recent prior visit. Intratumoral T cells were evaluated by single cell RNAseq and immunohistochemistry prior to treatment. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between opioid usage, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate. RESULTS: Patients were 79% male, 35% oropharynx, 35% oral cavity, 40% locoregional recurrence, and 56% platinum failure. Higher opioid dosage by continuous variable was significantly associated with lower PFS (p = 0.016) and OS (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, including platinum failure status and PD-L1, higher opioids were associated with lower OS. Opioid usage by categorical variable was associated with significantly lower intratumoral CD8+ T cells. Opioid receptor, OPRM1, expression was identified in intratumoral and circulating T cells. CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort of anti-PD-1 mAb treatment in R/M HNSCC patients, higher opioids were associated with significantly lower PFS and OS and lower CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis in R/M HNSCC patients and further research into the clinical and biologic effect of opioids is warranted.

Quality of Life in Patients With Recurrent and Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In the setting of similar outcomes, quality of life (QOL) measures can be utilized to compare treatment modalities in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We evaluate QOL and symptoms in patients treated for primary, second primary, and recurrent HNSCC. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Head and neck cancer survivorship clinic. METHODS: We identified patients seen between 2016 and 2019. QOL and symptoms were assessed with the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire, 10-item Eating Assessment Tool, 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire, 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Neck Disability Index. Regression analysis was utilized to explore associations and compare QOL outcomes. RESULTS: Our cohort comprised 662 patients: 546 with primary HNSCC, 34 with second primary HNSCC, and 82 with recurrent HNSCC. Multimodality therapy was associated with lower UW-QOL Physical Subscale (UW-QOL-PS) vs single modality: chemoradiation therapy (-12.17 [95% CI, -16.57 to -7.78]) and surgery + postadjuvant treatment (-12.11 [-16.06 to -8.16]). Multimodality therapy was also associated with lower UW-QOL Social-Emotional Subscale (UW-QOL-SS): chemoradiation therapy (-6.70 [-11.41 to -1.99]) and surgery + postadjuvant treatment (-7.41 [-11.63 to -3.19]). Recurrence (-14.42 [-18.80 to -10.04]) and second primary (-11.15 [-17.71 to -4.59]) demonstrated lower UW-QOL-PS vs primary. Radiation for recurrence or second primary had worse UW-QOL-PS (-10.43 [-19.27 to -1.59]) and UW-QOL-SS (-10.58 [-18.76 to -1.54]) and higher Eating Assessment Tool (6.08 [1.39-10.77]) than surgery alone. Surgery + postadjuvant treatment showed worse UW-QOL-PS (-12.65 [-23.76 to -1.54]) and UW-QOL-SS (-12.20 [-22.38 to -2.03]). CONCLUSION: Multimodality therapy, particularly with recurrent and second primary HNSCC, is more likely to contribute to diminished QOL and symptoms. This important consideration should play a role in framing informed discussions with patients regarding treatment.

Hearing screening and amplifier uptake results in a multidisciplinary head and neck cancer survivorship clinic.

PURPOSE: Hearing loss and tinnitus are prevalent among survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC), but auditory issues are under-addressed in the survivorship literature. The purpose of this study was to describe the hearing loss and management experience of a group of survivors provided with a hearing screening and amplifier assistance if needed during their visit. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 1176 individuals seen in the HNC Survivorship Clinic between December 2016 and October 2020 who interacted with audiology was performed. RESULTS: Of these survivors, 72% failed the 30-dB HL hearing screening at one or more frequencies. Thirty-three percent of the sample reported tinnitus. Consistent with the general population, this group has a low prevalence of hearing aid use. In this clinic, individuals who fail the hearing screening at all frequencies are offered a simple, non-custom amplifier for use during their visit. Thirty-one percent of individuals offered the amplifier used it during their Survivorship Clinic visit to enhance communication and reduce listening effort. Only 54% of individuals who failed the hearing screening self-reported hearing loss. The poor sensitivity and specificity associated with the self-perception of hearing loss data support the need for hearing screening that consists of responding to tones. Of individuals who received a recommendation for a comprehensive hearing test, 21% received a hearing test with 68% of these individuals receiving the hearing test the same day of their Survivorship Clinic visit. CONCLUSIONS: The data from 1176 survivors of HNC seen by audiology over the past few years as part of the UPMC HNC Survivorship Clinic support the need for hearing management in this population to improve communication during and after the Survivorship Clinic visit. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors of HNC have a high prevalence of greater than mild hearing loss and tinnitus (both issues known to negatively impact health-related communication and quality of life). This manuscript describes a hearing screening program within a Survivorship Clinic that identifies individuals in need of non-custom amplification during their appointment to support effective communication. Survivors should be referred to audiologists for evaluation and management of treatment-related issues of hearing.

Using Concept Mapping to Explore Interpersonal Communication Components of Patient Navigation in Breast Cancer Care.

BACKGROUND: Research exploring the relational dimensions of patient navigation identifies interpersonal communication as fundamental to the patient navigator's (PN's) ability to reduce barriers to care and improve cancer care outcomes. Although interpersonal communication is a core competency for PNs, its key components are commonly understudied and overlooked. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the key interpersonal communication components of patient navigation in breast cancer care that patients, PNs, and PN administrators perceived to impact the patient-navigator relationship. METHODS: This study used concept mapping, a community-engaged research method. Participants completed 3 concept mapping activities: brainstorming, sorting and rating, and interpretation. RESULTS: A total of 31 persons participated in the study: 13 patients, 14 PNs, and 4 PN administrators. The concept mapping analysis produced a 6-cluster concept map, and each concept was named through a group consensus process. Among the 6 concepts, both patients and PNs emphasized the importance of "Empathetic, Comprehensive, and Compassionate Support," "Bridge to Clinical Education and Supportive Resources," and "Ongoing Individualized Coordination of Care" as the most important components for facilitating the patient-navigator relationship. CONCLUSION: Patients, PNs, and PN administrators all emphasized the essential role of interpersonal communication in the PN-patient relationship and how it is woven into every aspect of the PN role. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As a core competency, we need to work toward the development and testing of evidence-based training to support their professional development and ultimately promote positive cancer care outcomes.

Evaluation of Neck Disability Using Computed-Tomography in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors.

Objective: We have previously reported that 55% of head and neck cancer survivors have neck disability. However, it is unclear what factors contribute to their neck disability. Our study aim is to determine if survivors with neck disability have evidence of cervical spine degenerative disease assessed by computed tomography (CT). Materials/Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of patient-reported neck disability, prospectively collected on survivors of squamous cell carcinomas without recurrence or metastasis over one-year post-treatment. Neck disability and its impact on daily life was measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and compared with cervical CT scans within 6 months. Scans were evaluated for degeneration of the disc and facet of the cervical vertebrae rated on a 5-point scale where 5 indicates more severe disease. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze the association between NDI and radiographic findings. Results: 116 survivors of oropharyngeal carcinomas were identified, predominantly male (81.9%) with an average age of 62.8 ± 8.2 (range 43.8-81.4). Most survivors had advanced stage III-IVa cancer (94.0%) with treatment modalities including surgery (n=26, 52.0%), chemotherapy (n = 45, 90.0%), and radiation therapy (n = 49, 98.0%). Absence of neck disability was observed in 44.0% of survivors, 39.7% had mild disability, and 16.4% moderate disability. The time from treatment to clinic visit was an average of 3.1 ± 2.7 years (range 1.1-13.4). Multivariable analysis of NDI controlling for age, time since treatment, and treatment modality identified an inverse association between NDI and spinal degenerative disease examining cervical discs (-1.46 95% confidence interval (CI) [-2.86, -0.06], p = 0.041) and age (-0.24 95% CI[-0.40, -0.08], p = 0.004). Conclusions: Our study shows that neck impairment and pain in head and neck cancer survivors is not sufficiently explained by cervical degeneration related to age or trauma, supporting the theory that post-treatment neck disability occurs as a side effect of treatment. These results support the further assessment of structure and function of cervical musculature and degeneration following HNC treatment.

Definitive local therapy to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with distant metastasis.

Objectives: Data on the efficacy of including definitive local therapy to the primary site for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients with synchronous distant metastasis are lacking. In multiple different solid tumor types, there has been benefit when using systemic therapy followed by local consolidative therapy (stereotactic ablative radiotherapy or surgery) directed at metastases. We proposed to retrospectively evaluate patients at our institution that received definitive treatment to the primary. Methods: Single institution retrospective study evaluating 40 patients with metastatic HNSCC treated with definitive surgery (55%) or chemoradiation (45%) to the primary site from 2000 to 2020. The major endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the total population and multiple sub-groups. Some variables were evaluated with multiple covariates Cox model. Results: The median PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 6.4-11.6), and OS was 14.2 months (95% CI, 10.9-27.5). In 28% of patients that received induction therapy, there was a twofold increase in median overall survival to 27.5 months. In the 33% of patients that received anti-PD-1 mAb as part of their treatment course, the median OS was significantly increased to 41.7 months (95% CI, 8.7-NR) versus 12.1 months (95% CI, 8.4-14.4) with a 5-year OS of 39%. Multivariate analysis for OS showed significance for age at diagnosis, use of IO, and number of metastatic sites. Conclusion: We observed impressive survival outcomes in metastatic HNSCC patients treated with definitive local therapy to the primary site in addition to induction and/or immunotherapy. Further study is warranted.Level of Evidence: 3.

Flourishing in head and neck cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing cohort of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients affected by late- and long-term posttreatment side effects. Our study evaluates the relationship between the demographics, clinical characteristics, and posttreatment symptom burden with the subjective sense of flourishing among HNC survivors. METHODS: A cross-sectional, single-center study of adult survivors of squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx/hypopharynx who completed the Secure Flourishing Index (SFI) and patient-reported outcomes related to depression, anxiety, swallowing dysfunction, neck disability, and insomnia between November 2020 and April 2021. RESULTS: A total of 100, predominantly male (86%), survivors with an average age of 63.0 ± 9.6 were included in the study. Univariable analysis showed a significant association between higher flourishing scores and advanced age (95% CI: [0.011, 0.84], p = 0.0441), normal diet (95% CI: [5.79, 31.18], p = 0.0149), employment (95% CI: [1.24, 17.20], p = 0.0239), higher income (95% CI: [7.30, 27.72], p = 0.0248), and decreased reported difficulty paying for needs (95% CI: [-33.46, -18.88], p < 0.001). Flourishing was inversely associated with higher symptoms of depression (95% CI: [-2.23, -1.15], p < 0.001), anxiety (95% CI: [-1.92,-0.86], p < 0.001), swallowing dysfunction (95% CI: [-0.77, -0.26], p < 0.001), neck disability (95% CI: [-1.05, -0.35], p < 0.001), and insomnia (95% CI: [-1.12, -0.22], p = 0.004) in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Common late- and long-term side effects of HNC treatment and financial hardship are associated with lower levels of flourishing or a more negative perception of life after treatment. Results highlight the importance of symptom burden for survivors' overall evaluation of their quality of life.