Effect of twice daily inhaled albuterol on cardiopulmonary exercise outcomes, dynamic hyperinflation, and symptoms in secondhand tobacco-exposed persons with preserved spirometry and air trapping: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In tobacco-exposed persons with preserved spirometry (active smoking or secondhand smoke [SHS] exposure), air trapping can identify a subset with worse symptoms and exercise capacity. The physiologic nature of air trapping in the absence of spirometric airflow obstruction remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the underlying pathophysiology of air trapping in the context of preserved spirometry and to determine the utility of bronchodilators in SHS tobacco-exposed persons with preserved spirometry and air trapping. METHODS: We performed a double-blinded placebo-controlled crossover randomized clinical trial in nonsmoking individuals at risk for COPD due to exposure to occupational SHS who had preserved spirometry and air trapping defined as either a residual volume-to-total lung capacity ratio (RV/TLC) > 0.35 or presence of expiratory flow limitation (EFL, overlap of tidal breathing on maximum expiratory flow-volume loop) on spirometry at rest or during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Those with asthma or obesity were excluded. Participants underwent CPET at baseline and after 4-week trials of twice daily inhalation of 180 mcg of albuterol or placebo separated by a 2-week washout period. The primary outcome was peak oxygen consumption (VO2) on CPET. Data was analyzed by both intention-to-treat and per-protocol based on adherence to treatment prescribed. RESULTS: Overall, 42 participants completed the entire study (66 ± 8 years old, 91% female; forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] = 103 ± 16% predicted; FEV1 to forced vital capacity [FVC] ratio = 0.75 ± 0.05; RV/TLC = 0.39 ± 0.07; 85.7% with EFL). Adherence was high with 87% and 93% of prescribed doses taken in the treatment and placebo arms of the study, respectively (P = 0.349 for comparison between the two arms). There was no significant improvement in the primary or secondary outcomes by intention-to-treat or per-protocol analysis. In per-protocol subgroup analysis of those with RV/TLC > 0.35 and ≥ 90% adherence (n = 27), albuterol caused an improvement in peak VO2 (parameter estimate [95% confidence interval] = 0.108 [0.014, 0.202]; P = 0.037), tidal volume, minute ventilation, dynamic hyperinflation, and oxygen-pulse (all P < 0.05), but no change in symptoms or physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Albuterol may improve exercise capacity in the subgroup of SHS tobacco-exposed persons with preserved spirometry and substantial air trapping. These findings suggest that air trapping in pre-COPD may be related to small airway disease that is not considered significant by spirometric indices of airflow obstruction.

Actigraphy informs distinct patient-centered outcomes in Pre-COPD.

BACKGROUND: Actigraphy can provide useful patient-centered outcomes for quantification of physical activity in the "real-world" setting. METHODS: To characterize the relationship of actigraphy outputs with "in-laboratory" measures of cardiopulmonary function and respiratory symptoms in pre-COPD, we obtained actigraphy data for 8 h/day for 5 consecutive days a week before in-laboratory administration of respiratory questionnaires, PFT, and CPET to a subgroup of subjects participating in the larger study of the health effects of exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke who had air trapping but no spirometric obstruction (pre-COPD). Using machine learning approaches, we identified the most relevant actigraphy predictors and examined their associations with symptoms, lung function, and exercise outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-one subjects (age = 66±7 years; BMI = 24±3 kg/m2; FEV1/FVC = 0.75 ± 0.05; FEV1 = 103 ± 17 %predicted) completed the nested study. In the hierarchical cluster analysis, the activity, distance, and energy domains of actigraphy, including moderate to vigorous physical activity, were closely correlated with each other, but were only loosely associated with spirometric and peak exercise measures of oxygen consumption, ventilation, oxygen-pulse, and anaerobic threshold (VO2AT), and were divergent from symptom measures. Conversely, the sedentary domain clustered with respiratory symptoms, air trapping, airflow indices, and ventilatory efficiency. In Regression modeling, sedentary domain was inversely associated with baseline lung volumes and tidal breathing at peak exercise, while the activity domains were associated with VO2AT. Respiratory symptoms and PFT data were not associated with actigraphy outcomes. DISCUSSION: Outpatient actigraphy can provide information for "real-world" patient-centered outcomes that are not captured by standardized respiratory questionnaires, lung function, or exercise testing. Actigraphy activity and sedentary domains inform of distinct outcomes.