ImmunoPET imaging of TIGIT in the glioma microenvironment.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor. Currently, there are few effective treatment options for GBM beyond surgery and chemo-radiation, and even with these interventions, median patient survival remains poor. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy against non-central nervous system cancers, ICI trials for GBM have typically had poor outcomes. TIGIT is an immune checkpoint receptor that is expressed on activated T-cells and has a role in the suppression of T-cell and Natural Killer (NK) cell function. As TIGIT expression is reported as both prognostic and a biomarker for anti-TIGIT therapy, we constructed a molecular imaging agent, [89Zr]Zr-DFO-anti-TIGIT (89Zr-αTIGIT), to visualize TIGIT in preclinical GBM by immunoPET imaging. PET imaging and biodistribution analysis of 89Zr-αTIGIT demonstrated uptake in the tumor microenvironment of GBM-bearing mice. Blocking antibody and irrelevant antibody tracer studies demonstrated specificity of 89Zr-αTIGIT with significance at a late time point post-tracer injection. However, the magnitude of 89Zr-αTIGIT uptake in tumor, relative to the IgG tracer was minimal. These findings highlight the features and limitations of using 89Zr-αTIGIT to visualize TIGIT in the GBM microenvironment.

Electrolyte Imbalance in Anti-LGI1 Encephalitis: It Is Not All in Your Head.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Antileucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (anti-LGI1) autoimmune encephalitis was first described in 2010 and is today the most common type of limbic encephalitis. During the course of the disease, 60%-88% of the patients develop hyponatremia. The etiology of the sodium disorder is unclear, often presumed to be the result of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). Other electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported in association with anti-LGI1 antibody encephalitis. Due to the presence of hypomagnesemia and hypophosphatemia in our patients, we set out to try to find the expression of LGI1 protein in the kidney as an explanation for these abnormalities. METHODS: We reviewed the medical files of all patients diagnosed with anti-LGI1 antibody encephalitis, at the Department of Neurology in the Tel Aviv Medical Center between January 2011 and December 2020, exploring for electrolyte abnormalities. Using tissue staining, Western blot, mass spectrometry, and RNA expression techniques, we tried to demonstrate the expression of LGI1 protein in the human kidney. RESULTS: We identified 15 patients diagnosed with anti-LGI1 antibody encephalitis. Their average age was 65 years (44-80), and 9 were male individuals. Thirteen of the 15 patients (87%) developed varying degrees of hyponatremia. Laboratory studies demonstrated low serum osmolality, low serum blood urea nitrogen, and low uric acid, with a high urinary sodium and inappropriately high urine osmolality, supporting the presumable diagnosis of SIADH. One patient with hyponatremia that was tested, had high levels of copeptin, supporting the diagnosis of SIADH. In addition to hyponatremia, 7 patients (47%) exhibited other electrolyte abnormalities; 5 patients (33%) had overt hypophosphatemia, 4 patients (27%) had overt hypomagnesemia, and 2 other patients (13%) had borderline low magnesium levels. Western blot analysis of human kidney lysate, mass spectrometry, and qRT-PCR failed to demonstrate the expression of LGI1 protein in the kidney. DISCUSSION: Hyponatremia in patients with anti-LGI1 antibody encephalitis is due to SIADH as previously assumed. Other electrolyte abnormalities such as hypomagnesemia and hypophosphatemia occur in at least 40% of patients and may be another clue for the diagnosis of anti-LGI1 antibody encephalitis. Because we failed to demonstrate LGI1 expression in the kidney, the results of our study suggest that renal losses lead to these disturbances, most probably due to SIADH.

Immuno-PET Imaging of CD69 Visualizes T-Cell Activation and Predicts Survival Following Immunotherapy in Murine Glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Immunotherapy may be promising for the treatment of some patients with GBM; however, there is a need for noninvasive neuroimaging techniques to predict immunotherapeutic responses. The effectiveness of most immunotherapeutic strategies requires T-cell activation. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate an early marker of T-cell activation, CD69, for its use as an imaging biomarker of response to immunotherapy for GBM. Herein, we performed CD69 immunostaining on human and mouse T cells following in vitro activation and post immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in an orthotopic syngeneic mouse glioma model. CD69 expression on tumor-infiltrating leukocytes was assessed using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from patients with recurrent GBM receiving ICI. Radiolabeled CD69 Ab PET/CT imaging (CD69 immuno-PET) was performed on GBM-bearing mice longitudinally to quantify CD69 and its association with survival following immunotherapy. We show CD69 expression is upregulated upon T-cell activation and on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in response to immunotherapy. Similarly, scRNA-seq data demonstrated elevated CD69 on TILs from patients with ICI-treated recurrent GBM as compared with TILs from control cohorts. CD69 immuno-PET studies showed a significantly higher tracer uptake in the tumors of ICI-treated mice compared with controls. Importantly, we observed a positive correlation between survival and CD69 immuno-PET signals in immunotherapy-treated animals and established a trajectory of T-cell activation by virtue of CD69-immuno-PET measurements. Our study supports the potential use of CD69 immuno-PET as an immunotherapy response assessment imaging tool for patients with GBM. Significance: Immunotherapy may hold promise for the treatment of some patients with GBM. There is a need to assess therapy responsiveness to allow the continuation of effective treatment in responders and to avoid ineffective treatment with potential adverse effects in the nonresponders. We demonstrate that noninvasive PET/CT imaging of CD69 may allow early detection of immunotherapy responsiveness in patients with GBM.

New Insights on DR and DQ Human Leukocyte Antigens in Anti-LGI1 Encephalitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the clinical characteristics and HLA associations of patients with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 encephalitis (LGI1E) from a large single center in Israel. Anti-LGI1E is the most commonly diagnosed antibody-associated encephalitic syndrome in adults. Recent studies of various populations reveal significant associations with specific HLA genes. We examined the clinical characteristics and HLA associations of a cohort of Israeli patients. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients with anti-LGI1E diagnosed at Tel Aviv Medical Center between the years 2011 and 2018 were included. HLA typing was performed using next-generation sequencing at the tissue typing laboratory of Sheba Medical Center and compared with data from the Ezer Mizion Bone Marrow Donor Registry, containing over 1,000,000 samples. RESULTS: Our cohort displayed a male predominance and median age at onset in the 7th decade, as previously reported. The most common presenting symptom was seizures. Notably, paroxysmal dizziness spells were significantly more common than previously reported (35%), whereas faciobrachial dystonic seizures were found only in 23%. HLA analysis revealed overrepresentation of DRB1*07:01 (OR: 3.18, CI: 20.9 p < 1.e-5) and DRB1*04:02 (OR: 3.8, CI: 20.1 p < 1.e-5), as well as of the DQ allele DQB1*02:02 (OR: 2.8, CI: 14.2 p < 0.0001) as previously reported. A novel overrepresentation observed among our patients was of the DQB1*03:02 allele (OR: 2.3, CI: 6.9 p < 0.008). In addition, we found DR-DQ associations, among patients with anti-LGI1E, that showed complete or near-complete linkage disequilibrium (LD). By applying LD analysis to an unprecedentedly large control cohort, we were able to show that although in the general population, DQB*03:02 is not fully associated with DRB1*04:02, in the patient population, both alleles are always coupled, suggesting the DRB1*04:02 association to be primary to disease predisposition. In silico predictions performed for the overrepresented DQ alleles reveal them to be strong binders of LGI1-derived peptides, similarly to overrepresented DR alleles. These predictions suggest a possible correlation between peptide binding sites of paired DR-DQ alleles. DISCUSSION: Our cohort presents distinct immune characteristics with substantially higher overrepresentation of DRB1*04:02 and slightly lower overrepresentation of DQB1*07:01 compared with previous reports implying differences between different populations. DQ-DR interactions found in our cohort may shed additional light on the complex role of immunogenetics in the pathogenesis of anti-LGI1E, implying a possible relevance of certain DQ alleles and DR-DQ interactions.