Label-free 3D-CLEM Using Endogenous Tissue Landmarks.

Emerging 3D correlative light and electron microscopy approaches enable studying neuronal structure-function relations at unprecedented depth and precision. However, established protocols for the correlation of light and electron micrographs rely on the introduction of artificial fiducial markers, such as polymer beads or near-infrared brandings, which might obscure or even damage the structure under investigation. Here, we report a general applicable "flat embedding" preparation, enabling high-precision overlay of light and scanning electron micrographs, using exclusively endogenous landmarks in the brain: blood vessels, nuclei, and myelinated axons. Furthermore, we demonstrate feasibility of the workflow by combining in vivo 2-photon microscopy and focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy to dissect the role of astrocytic coverage in the persistence of dendritic spines.

Innovations in studying in vivo cell behavior and pharmacology in complex tissues--microvascular endothelial cells in the spotlight.

Many studies on the molecular control underlying normal cell behavior and cellular responses to disease stimuli and pharmacological intervention are conducted in single-cell culture systems, while the read-out of cellular engagement in disease and responsiveness to drugs in vivo is often based on overall tissue responses. As the majority of drugs under development aim to specifically interact with molecular targets in subsets of cells in complex tissues, this approach poses a major experimental discrepancy that prevents successful development of new therapeutics. In this review, we address the shortcomings of the use of artificial (single) cell systems and of whole tissue analyses in creating a better understanding of cell engagement in disease and of the true effects of drugs. We focus on microvascular endothelial cells that actively engage in a wide range of physiological and pathological processes. We propose a new strategy in which in vivo molecular control of cells is studied directly in the diseased endothelium instead of at a (far) distance from the site where drugs have to act, thereby accounting for tissue-controlled cell responses. The strategy uses laser microdissection-based enrichment of microvascular endothelium which, when combined with transcriptome and (phospho)proteome analyses, provides a factual view on their status in their complex microenvironment. Combining this with miniaturized sample handling using microfluidic devices enables handling the minute sample input that results from this strategy. The multidisciplinary approach proposed will enable compartmentalized analysis of cell behavior and drug effects in complex tissue to become widely implemented in daily biomedical research and drug development practice.

Noncontact laser microdissection and catapulting for pure sample capture.

The understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cellular function, growth, and proliferation is based on the accurate identification, isolation, and finally characterization of a specific single cell or a population of cells and its subsets of biomolecules. For the simultaneous analysis of thousands of molecular parameters within one single experiment as realized by DNA, RNA, and protein microarray technologies, a defined number of homogeneous cells derived from a distinct morphological origin are required. Sample preparation is therefore a very crucial step preceding the functional characterization of specific cell populations. Laser microdissection and laser pressure catapulting (LMPC) enables pure and homogeneous sample preparation resulting in an increased specificity of molecular analyses. With LMPC, the force of focused laser light is utilized to excise selected cells or large tissue areas from object slides down to individual single cells and subcellular components like organelles or chromosomes. After microdissection, the sample is directly catapulted into an appropriate collection vial. As this process works entirely without mechanical contact, it enables pure sample retrieval from morphologically defined origin without cross-contamination. LMPC has been successfully applied to isolate and catapult cells from, for example, histological tissue sections, from forensic evidence material, and also from tough plant matter, supporting biomedical research, forensic science, and plant physiology studies. Even delicate living cells like stem cells have been captured for recultivation without affecting their viability or stem cell character, an important feature influencing stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and drug development. The combination of LMPC with microinjection to inject drugs or genetic material into individual cells and to capture them for molecular analyses bears great potential for efficient patient-tailored medication.

Noncontact laser microdissection and pressure catapulting: sample preparation for genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analysis.

The understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cellular metabolism and proliferation necessitates accurate identification, isolation, and finally characterization of a specific cell or a population of cells and subsequently their subsets of biomolecules. For the simultaneous analysis of thousands of molecular parameters within a single experiment, as realized by DNA, RNA, and protein microarray technologies, a defined number of homogeneous cells derived from a distinct morphological origin is required. Sample preparation is therefore a very crucial step for high-resolution downstream applications. Laser microdissection and laser pressure catapulting (LMPC) enables such pure and homogeneous sample preparation, resulting in an eminent increase in the specificity of molecular analyses. For microdissection, the force of focused laser light is used to excise selected cells or large tissue areas from object slides or from living cell culture down to a resolution of individual single cells and subcellular components like organelles or chromosomes, respectively. After microdissection this sample is directly catapulted into an appropriate collection device. As the entire process works without any mechanical contact, it enables pure sample retrieval from morphologically defined origin without cross contamination. Wherever homogenous samples are required for subsequent analysis of, e.g., cell areas, single cells, or chromosomes, the PALM MicroBeam system is an indispensable tool. The integration of image analysis platforms fully automates screening, identification, and finally subsequent high-throughput sample handling. These samples can be directly linked into versatile downstream applications, such as single-cell mRNA-extraction, different PCR methods, microarray techniques, and many others. Acceleration in sample generation vastly increases the throughput in molecular laboratories and leads to an increasing knowledge about differentially regulated mRNAs and expressed proteins, providing new insights into cellular mechanisms and therefore enabling the development of systems for tumor biomarker identification, early detection of disease-causing alterations, therapeutic targeting and/or patient-tailored therapy.

Transcriptional stimulation by the DNA binding protein Hap46/BAG-1M involves hsp70/hsc70 molecular chaperones.

The hsp70/hsc70-associating protein Hap46 of human origin, also called BAG-1M (Bcl-2-associated athanogene 1), has been characterized previously as a DNA binding protein, which is able to stimulate transcription. By use of in vitro assays we now show that Hap46-mediated transcriptional activation can occur from linearized as well as from supercoiled circular DNA and does not require the presence of a transcription promoter. Accordingly, we observed no preferential binding of Hap46 to overlapping DNA fragments covering the sequence of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) early promoter, thus suggesting non-specific binding. The C-terminal deletion variant Hap46DeltaC47, which is unable to associate with hsp70/hsc70 molecular chaperones, produced greatly diminished effects on transcription, indicating a significant involvement of hsp70/hsc70 chaperones but not an absolute requirement. In contrast, deletion of the acidic hexarepeat region, as in variant Hap46Delta12-62, did not disturb transcriptional stimulation. While full-length Hap46 readily formed complexes with a series of structurally unrelated transcription factors, variant Hap46DeltaC47 proved incapable of doing so. Together these data suggest that transcriptional stimulation is a major biological activity of Hap46 and point to involvement of hsp70/hsc70 molecular chaperones in transcription in concert with Hap46, thus providing a link between hsp70/hsc70 molecular chaperones and components of the transcription machinery.