Renal Medullary Carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is an aggressive and rare renal malignancy that predominantly affects Black patients but is also found in individuals of other ethnicities. To date, only a few hundred cases have been reported in the urologic literature. Due to this extreme rarity, the exact pathophysiology and optimal treatment have yet to be well described. This study aims to determine the predictors of mortality and overall survival outcomes in patients with RMC. METHODS: We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database 18 registries to retrieve demographic and clinical information on patients with RMC between 1996 and 2018. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictors of mortality in the study population. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were then created to display the differences in overall survival of Black versus non-Black patients diagnosed with renal medullary carcinoma during the study period. RESULTS: We identified 100 patients diagnosed with renal medullary carcinoma using the SEER Database in the study period. The mean age was 28.0 ± 12.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.7-30.4). Among the patients, 76% were male and 24% were female. Most RMC patients were Black (83%) with only 17% identifying as White. The mean survival in months was 13.8 ± 3.0 (95% CI 7.9-19.7). The majority (70%) of patients in this study presented with distant, metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Black patients with RMC were less likely to receive surgery and five times more likely to die in comparison to their White counterparts OR = 5.4 (95% CI 1.09-26.9, P = 0.04). Not only did Black patients have a lower survival rate at 12 mo compared to White patients, but they also continued to experience a sharp decline in survival to 10.2% at 24 mo (P < 0.05) and 7.6% at 48 mo (P < 0.05) following diagnosis of renal medullary carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that RMC is a rare disease that disproportionately affects Black patients. The prognosis appears to be substantially worse for Black subjects diagnosed with this cancer than non-Black patients. The worse outcomes seen in Black subjects are of an unclear etiology and are yet to be investigated.

Color or money?: The impact of socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity on breast cancer mortality.

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of breast cancer is highest in White women, Black women die at a higher rate. Our aim was to compare the relative association between race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on breast cancer mortality. METHODS: We identified female breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2007 - 2011 and followed through 2016 in the SEER database. Patients were grouped into socioeconomic quartiles by a prosperity index. The primary outcome of interest was 5-year cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: A total of 286,520 patients were included. Five-year survival was worst for Black women compared to other races/ethnicities in each socioeconomic quartile. When compared to White women in the lowest quartile, Black women in the lowest quartile, 2nd quartile, and 3rd quartile experienced the lowest 5-year survival rates (Hazard ratio 1.33, 1.23, 1.20; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Regarding cancer mortality, only in the most prosperous quartile do Black women achieve a similar outcome to the poorest quartile White women.

Persistence of Disparity in Thyroid Cancer Survival After Adjustments for Socioeconomic Status and Access.

INTRODUCTION: Thyroid cancer incidence has increased substantially in the past 4 decades, estimated at 3.5% annually. Incidence is highest in white patients, yet black patients have the worst survival. Racial/ethnic differences in presentation and outcomes are hypothesized to be a result of differences in access to care. Analyses delineating the relative contribution of access to racial/ethnic survival disparities are scarce. We aimed to explore the association of delay in access to care and early/increased detection with racial/ethnic disparities in thyroid cancer survival. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried from 2007 to 2011 for patients with a first primary thyroid cancer diagnosis and up to 5 years of follow-up. Composite scores were generated from county-level variables to capture socioeconomic status and screening habits. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized for survival analysis. RESULTS: We identified 46,970 patients (67% white, 7% black, 15% Hispanic, 10% Asian or Pacific Islander, and 1% unknown/other). Compared to white patients, black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander patients were more likely to present with distant disease (3% vs 5%, 5%, and 6%, respectively; P < .001). After adjusting for sex, age, stage, subtype, tumor size, surgery, radiation, socioeconomics, and screening habits, black patients were the only race/ethnicity found to have increased odds of 5-year mortality compared to white patients (24%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Thyroid cancer survival is worst for black patients regardless of socioeconomic status or screening habits. Racial/ethnic disparities in survival are not attributable to early detection alone.

Breast Cancer in Black Women: Racial/Ethnic Disparities Affecting Survival.

Breast cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy affecting women in the United States, with >245,000 cases diagnosed annually. Breast cancer mortality rates have continued to trend down in the past three decades, yet racial/ethnic disparities persist, with the worst mortality rates seen in Black women. Of note, when compared by race, this downward trend is also trailing in Black women. Survival after breast cancer is mainly driven by factors related to early detection and effective therapy. These factors can be grouped into "biological" such as age, genetic mutations, tumor characteristics; and "social" such as education, income, access to care. There have been studies attributing racial disparities solely to biological factors, and there are those attributing the disparities to social factors alone. Although the exact mechanism is unclear, a relationship between both factors as relates to racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes has been demonstrated. In this report, we review factors contributing to the increased morbidity and mortality for breast cancer in Black women and explore sociological relationships. Facing the worst poverty rates compared with other races, Black women are inevitably more likely to be uninsured, have limited access to quality education, and have fewer financial resources. The goal of this review was to elucidate the complex interplay between biological and social factors contributing to racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes. We conclude by emphasizing the need for interventions made at both local and national levels.

Metastatic Acral lentiginous melanoma: A case report and review.

Of the four subtypes of cutaneous melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is atypical in its presentation. ALM is a rare melanoma subtype that presents on the volar surfaces of the hand and foot. The difficulty of making an early diagnosis of ALM is highlighted by the case seen in our institution. The dire prognosis associated with ALM is postulated to be not only related to its destructive nature, but also due to a lack of patient awareness and vigilance, inadequate physician awareness, and disparity in healthcare access. We present this as a unique account of an ALM lesion in a 76 year old African-American male presenting originally in the left foot that went misdiagnosed for several years. The original lesion was considered to be an ulcerating left great toe lesion with signs typical of osteomyelitis. These clinical findings were corroborated by radiological x-ray evidence. Upon amputation and biopsy for suspected worsening osteomyelitis five years later, the pathological diagnosis of melanoma was finally made.

Emergency Department Presentation of Retinal Artery Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To determine how frequently patients who present to an emergency department (ED) with a retinal artery occlusion (RAO) undergo brain imaging and cardiovascular testing and are hospitalized. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who presented to an ED with an RAO in the National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), a nationally representative United States database. METHODS: The NEDS was queried to identify patients who presented to an ED with the primary diagnosis of RAO between 2006 and 2014. Patient and hospital characteristics were evaluated, and a multivariable regression was performed to determine predictors of hospitalization. Testing was categorized into 3 groups: (1) brain imaging performed using computed tomography or magnetic resonance; (2) carotid imaging performed using ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance; and (3) cardiac testing performed using electrocardiogram or echocardiogram. The number of tests performed for each category was recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of patients undergoing brain imaging, carotid imaging, or cardiac testing. Rate and predictors of hospitalization. RESULTS: Among 259 343 582 ED visits, 2802 had a primary diagnosis of RAO. Patients were mostly aged ≥65 years (59%) and male (54%). Hypertension (59%), dyslipidemia (36%), and diabetes (20%) were the most common preexisting cardiovascular diseases. Brain imaging, carotid imaging, and cardiac testing were performed in 20.3%, 7.1%, and 23.8% of the patients, respectively; at least 1 test from each of these 3 categories was performed in 4.1% of the patients. Half of the patients were hospitalized. Factors that increased the chances of hospitalization included the following (P < 0.05): age of <45 years; female sex; a history of smoking; presenting to a metropolitan hospital and having giant cell arteritis, carotid artery disease, atrial fibrillation, cardiac valve disease, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, and chronic ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who presented to an ED with an RAO did not receive emergency brain imaging, carotid imaging, or basic cardiac testing. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to raise awareness that RAOs should be treated as a precursor of stroke or a stroke equivalent.