Standardized single-stage laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy regardless of testis position: Modification of technique eliminates the need for intra-operative decision-making.

Background / Purpose: It is generally perceived that a primary laparoscopic orchiopexy has superior outcomes due to preservation of the testicular artery, and thus should be the choice when achievable. The two-stage laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy (LFSO) is considered superior regarding success rate compared to the one-stage procedure when the artery must be transected. Outcomes can be jeopardized when a primary orchiopexy is ultimately realized to be the incorrect procedure due to insufficient testicular artery length. It is preferable to decide the approach before initiating dissection, however, in reality, this does not always occur. A single uniform approach to all intraabdominal testes (IAT) that takes into consideration the main challenges encountered when performing laparoscopic orchiopexy can simplify the approach and potentially achieve good outcomes. We present our experience with a standardized approach for IAT regardless of testicular position and describe the surgical modification needed to achieve good results with the one-stage LFSO. Materials and Methods: Key surgical maneuvers implicated in the modified one-stage LFSO (M-LFSO) include preservation of a wide peritoneal flap between the vessels and the vas deferens, dissecting the vessels as proximal as possible and avoiding manipulation of the epididymis and vessels between the vas and epididymis when transferring the testis to the scrotum. Results: Our cohort included 55 boys (59 testes). Median age and weight at surgery were 13.3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 9.2-32.4) and 10.4 kg (IQR 9.2-12.6). The mean operative time was 70 min (IQR 60-85). The median follow-up was 11 months (IQR 7-12). There was one case of testicular atrophy (2%) and two cases of suboptimal testicular position in the scrotum at 6 months. Conclusions: M-LFSO is a standardized approach for all cases of IAT regardless of testicular position. Preservation of a wide peritoneal flap and proximal dissection of the vessels may contribute to the adequate testicular blood supply. The proposed approach eliminates the need for intra-operative decision-making and for ancillary procedures.

Outpatient Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology: Assessment of Feasibility and Short-Term Safety.

PURPOSE: Robotic reconstructive and extirpative procedures have been widely utilized for surgical management of various conditions in pediatric urology. Outpatient laparoscopic surgery has become the standard in cases of orchidopexy, inguinal hernia repair and varicocelectomy. There is a growing body of evidence that robotic surgery for more complex conditions can also be performed in an outpatient setting. The aim of the study was to assess the short-term safety and feasibility of robotic reconstructive and extirpative procedures for various pediatric urological conditions as scheduled outpatient procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographic information and perioperative data were prospectively collected in an institutional database for all pediatric patients undergoing outpatient robotic surgery from June 2012 to December 2019. Primary outcomes included rates of 30-day complications, emergency room visits and readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 135 pediatric patients underwent robotic procedures in an outpatient setting. The majority underwent pyeloplasty (62) or extravesical ureteral reimplantation (55). Ten patients underwent ureteroureterostomy and 8 patients underwent extirpative procedures (nephrectomy, hemi-nephrectomy). Median age at surgery was 62 months (IQR, 27-99), median weight was 20 kg (IQR, 12-30) and median body mass index was 17 (IQR, 15-18). During the 30-day followup period there were 9 complications (6.7%), of which only 1 (0.7%) was high grade (Clavien-Dindo 3). There were 9 emergency room visits (6.7%) including 5 cases of readmission (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic reconstructive and extirpative procedures in pediatric urology can be safely performed as scheduled outpatient procedures in the majority of patients, obviating the need for routine inpatient care.

Juxtaglomerular Cell Tumor: A Rare Presentation of a Surgically Curable Cause of Secondary Hypertension in the Pediatric Population.

Hypertension is often the primary presenting symptom of multiple renal pathologies. Overactivity of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone-System (RAAS) is a common cause and usually results from an induced physiologic response. However, conditions do exist that involve autonomous renin production. Juxtaglomerular cell tumors (JGCT), or reninomas, are renal lesions that cause refractory hypertension via this mechanism. Symptoms and lab abnormalities usually subside with surgical resection of these tumors. Here, we present a case of a 13-year old female with uncontrolled hypertension secondary to reninoma treated with partial nephrectomy, with focus on initial presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and surgical management of this uncommon tumor.

Robotic versus laparoscopic ipsilateral uretero-ureterostomy for upper urinary tract duplications in the pediatric population: A multi-institutional review of outcomes and complications.

OBJECTIVE: To review and compare robotic ipsilateral uretero-ureterostomy (RIUU) and laparoscopic ipsilateral uretero-ureterostomy (LIUU) in terms of safety, efficacy, and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review, including all pediatric patients who underwent RIUU and LIUU at 5 different medical centers, between 2015 and 2019, was performed. Patient's demographics, perioperative data, surgical techniques, complications, and results were compared. RESULTS: The study included 66 pediatric patients, 22 RIUU and 44 LIUU. Median age at surgery was 12 month (IQR 7-52) and median weight was 12 kg (IQR 9-16). Upper to lower IUU was performed in 55 cases and lower to upper IUU in 11 cases. Median operative times for RIUU and LIUU were 90 min (IQR 75-97.5) and 112.5 min (IQR 81.5-121.25), respectively (p = 0.034). Clavien-Dindo grade 3 postoperative complications occurred in two LIUU patients. One patient underwent an ancillary procedure with laparoscopic distal ureteral stump removal. All patients had resolution of symptoms and improvement in hydronephrosis or a non-obstructed curve on MAG3 diuretic renal scan. CONCLUSION: RIUU and LIUU are both safe and effective minimally invasive approaches for duplex upper urinary tract anomalies in the pediatric population. RIUU demonstrated shorter operating times .

Minimally Invasive Dismembered Extravesical Cross-Trigonal Ureteral Reimplantation for Obstructed Megaureter: A Multi-Institutional Study Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Approaches.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 minimally invasive surgical options for the treatment of obstructed megaureter: robot assisted dismembered extravesical cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation (RADECUR) and laparoscopic dismembered extravesical cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation (LDECUR). METHODS: A 2 arm retrospective comparative study, including all pediatric patients who underwent ureteral reimplantation of unilateral obstructed megaureter, either by RADECUR or LDECUR. Patient demographics, perioperative surgical data, complications, and results are described. The surgical technique in both arms was similar: dismembering of the ureter, performing an extravesical cross-trigonal detrusorotomy, and intracorporeal tailoring of the ureter when indicated, were the pivotal maneuvers utilized. RESULTS: The study included 95 patients (48 and 47 in the RADECUR and LDECUR arms, respectively) operated between the years 2016 and 2019. Overall, median age at surgery was 24 months (IQR 12-48) and median weight was 14 kg (IQR 11-21). Median operative time was 93 minutes (IQR 90-120) for RADECUR and 130 minutes (IQR 105-160) for LDECUR (P< 0.001). Intracorporeal excisional tapering was performed in 11 of the RADECUR patients and 19 LDECUR patients. Grade 1-2 Clavien-Dindo complications occurred in 7 patients, and grade 3 complication in 1 patient in the RADECUR arm. In the LDECUR arm, grade 1-2 complications occurred in 2 patients, and 2 had a grade 3 complications. Surgical success was achieved in 97% and 94% in the RADECUR and LDECUR groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Unilateral robotic extravesical cross-trigonal ureteral re-implantation for treatment of obstructed megaureter in the pediatric population is safe and effective both for RADECUR and LDECUR. Operative time is significantly shorter for RADECUR.

Pediatric Robotic Transplant Ureteral Reimplantation for Vesicoureteral Reflux.

Background: The first published report of a pediatric robotic extravesical transplant ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in a renal allograft is described. Case Presentation: The patient is an 11-year-old Caucasian girl who had acute allograft pyelonephritis and was subsequently found to have dilating VUR. Conclusion: Robotic surgery facilitated an effective nondismembered extravesical reimplant with minimal morbidity.

Clinical urologic and urodynamic outcomes in patients with anorectal malformation and absent vagina after vaginal replacement.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Anorectal malformations (ARMs) represent a complex spectrum of anorectal and genitourinary anomalies and a paucity of evidence is available on long-term urologic outcomes in all ARM subtypes. It was our subjective bias from being a referral center for ARM patients that the subtype of rectovestibular fistula and absent vagina had higher risk of renal and bladder abnormalities than typical rectovestibular fistula patients. Therefore, to confirm or refute our clinical suspicions, the purpose of this study was to review this specific cohort of ARM patients and describe both the clinical urological and urodynamic outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed for 120 patients who were treated for ARM and vaginal replacement at our institution between 1991 and 2017. Fifteen patients with rectovestibular fistula and absent vagina were included in our review. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from their medical records, including urodynamic findings, need for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), urinary continence, and renal function. RESULTS: Vaginal replacement surgery was undertaken concomitantly with ARM repair in 10 of the 15 patients (67%). One patient was lost to follow up, and mean follow up postoperatively was 39 months. In all but one patient, rectum or colon was used as the substrate for vaginal replacement. Of the 15 patients, 13 had continence data available. A total of 10 patients (77%) were able to achieve social continence. Overall six patients used CIC to manage their bladder and 40% of continent patients used CIC. Urinary continence outcomes in patients who had partial vaginal replacement compared to those with total vaginal replacement did not reveal a clinically significant difference. Continence was achieved in 3/4 patients (75%) with a history of tethered cord compared to 7/9 patients (78%) without a history of tethered cord release. Urodynamics were performed postoperatively in 7 of the 157 patients (47%). Uninhibited detrusor contractions (UDCs) were present in 3 out of 7 patients, and a cystometric capacity greater than expected was noted in 4 patients. Additionally, 2 patients had end filling detrusor pressure greater than 40 cm H2O. GFR data were available for 13 of the 15 patients and (85%) were classified as chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage I or not having any significant loss of renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of rectovestibular fistula and absent vagina, 77% reported achieving urinary continence. However CIC was employed in 40% of the patients which is higher than prior published noncloaca female ARM patient population. Urodynamic abnormalities were noted when performed and led to change in bladder management. Renal function measured with GFR was normal in 85%. Patients with rectovestibular fistula and absent vagina benefit from urologic screening given higher rates of lower urinary tract dysfunction that can require CIC to protect the upper urinary tract and achieve urinary continence. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Endoscopic-assisted robotic pyelolithotomy: a viable treatment option for complex pediatric nephrolithiasis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Endourological and percutaneous approaches are the standard of care for treatment of pediatric urolithiasis. However, in certain situations, an endoscopic-assisted robotic pyelolithotomy (EARP) can be an acceptable alternative. Limited data exist on pediatric EARP; thus, the authors describe their experience. METHODS: Patient selection: The authors retrospectively analyzed the records of all robotic procedures performed at five institutions from 7/09-10/17 to identify patients who underwent EARP. The authors collected demographics data, indications, operative time, and postoperative complications. Stone composition was reported as the majority composition (≥50%), unless any uric acid or struvite was noted, and those stones were classified as such. TECHNIQUE: Through a traditional or hidden incision endoscopic surgery (HIdES) robot pyeloplasty approach, the authors are able to easily pass a flexible endoscope through a robotic trocar and into the renal collecting system to perform pyeloscopy or ureteroscopy. Stones were primarily retrieved via the pyelolotomy and, if indicated, treated with laser lithotripsy. RESULTS: The authors identified 26 patients who underwent EARP in 27 renal units. Median patient age was 12.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 6.1-14.5 years), and body mass index was 17.5 kg/m2 (IQR 16.5-25.4 kg/m2). The median pre-operative dimension of the largest stone was 9.0 mm (IQR 5.8 mm-15.0 mm). Reasons for EARP: 21 (77.8%) concomitant pyeloplasty, four (14.8%) altered anatomy precluding other techniques, and two (7.4%) multiple large stones. Multiple stones were present in 20 renal units (74.1%). Stones were located in the renal pelvis in nine (33.3%), lower pole in 10 (37.0%), ureter in one (3.7%), and multiple locations in seven (25.9%). Hidden incision endoscopic surgery approach was used in 14 (51.9%), and the median operative time was 237.5 min (IQR 189.8-357.8 min) with a median length of stay 1.0 day (IQR 1.0-2.0 days). Stone composition included calcium oxalate in 14 (51.9%), calcium phosphate in five (18.5%), cysteine in two (7.4%), struvite in two (7.4%), and unknown in four (14.8%). Overall stone free status was 19 (70.4%); of the eight (29.6%) renal units with residual stones, four underwent ureteroscopy, two extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), one spontaneously passed, and one underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). After secondary treatment, final stone free rate was 96.3%. Complications included stent migration and admission for urosepsis. At a median follow-up of 12 months (IQR 6.2-19.2 months), five (18.5%) had stone recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic-assisted robotic pyelolithotomy is a reasonable treatment option for select pediatric patients with concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction and nephrolithiasis or pediatric patients with stones inaccessible by standard methods.

Need for botulinum toxin injection and bladder augmentation after isolated bladder outlet procedure in pediatric patients with myelomeningocele.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with neurogenic bladder outlet incompetence, a bladder outlet procedure (BOP) may be required to achieve urinary continence. However, when performed in isolation, a BOP can be associated with bladder deterioration and upper-tract injury. In the event of bladder deterioration, additional procedures such as bladder augmentation (BA) or botulinum toxin injection (BTI) may be pursued. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcomes after isolated BOP in a pediatric myelomeningocele (MMC) population, including the need for additional surgical intervention in the form of BTI or BA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients with MMC who underwent an isolated BOP between 2004 and 2017. Primary outcomes included the need for postoperative BTI or BA. Secondary outcomes included the association between preoperative urodynamic parameters and need for BTI or BA. RESULTS: BTI or BA was performed in 18 of 36 (50%) patients at a median of 17.8 months (IQR 11.2-29.3) after an isolated BOP. A median of 1 (IQR 1-3) BTI was performed in 11 (30.6%) patients. BA was performed in 9 (25%) patients, including 2 patients who previously underwent BTI. Patients who did not undergo BTI or BA after BOP had a slightly increased percentage estimated bladder capacity at the end of follow-up (107% versus 95%, p=0.42). By contrast, patients who underwent BTI or BA had a post-BOP percentage estimated bladder capacity that decreased from 112 to 70% (p < 0.001), increased maximum detrusor leak point pressure from 43 to 67 cm H2O (p = 0.01), and higher rate of de novo upper-tract changes. Unfortunately, no preoperative clinical, radiographic, or urodynamic factors predicted the need for BTI or BA. DISCUSSION: On time-to-event analysis, the risk of BTI or BA was 53% at 5 years in our cohort. Risk of these procedures was highest in the first two years after BOP. 9 of 11 (82%) patients who underwent BTI had improvement in bladder dynamics and BA was not pursued. These findings suggest that BTI provides a less-morbid alternative to BA in patients with MMC and de novo adverse bladder storage changes after an isolated BOP. CONCLUSION: The need for BTI or BA after an isolated BOP is significant in patients with MMC. BTI offers a less-invasive alternative to BA in this population.

A Novel Surgical Technique for Obstructed Megaureter: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Dismembered Extravesical Cross-Trigonal Ureteral Reimplantation-Short-Term Assessment.

Purpose: To describe our experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered extravesical cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation (RADECUR)-a novel minimally invasive surgical technique for treatment of obstructed megaureter. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of our prospectively collected data, of all pediatric patients who underwent unilateral RADECUR for the treatment of primary or secondary obstructed megaureter at two medical centers during a 3-year period. Patient demographics, perioperative data, surgical technique, complications, and results are described. Results: Thirty-five pediatric patients underwent RADECUR between January 2016 and May 2019. Median age and weight at surgery were 28 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 20-58) and 20 kg (IQR: 13-27), respectively. There were no conversions to an open procedure. Median console time was 100 minutes (IQR: 90-125). Ten patients underwent intracorporeal excisional tapering of the obstructed ureter. Mean pre- and postoperative ureteral diameters were 14.5 mm (IQR: 12-18) and 7 mm (IQR: 0-10), respectively (p < 0.0001). All but one patient demonstrated a reduction in hydronephrosis and ureteral diameter on follow-up ultrasonography. Grade 1-2 Clavien-Dindo complications occurred in five patients (14%) and another patient developed a grade 3 complication. Three patients developed postoperative febrile urinary tract infection, one of them was found to have high-grade reflux and subsequently underwent open ureteral reimplantation. Conclusions: Unilateral robotic extravesical cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation for treatment of obstructed megaureter in the pediatric population is safe and effective. Further larger scale comparative studies with other surgical techniques are needed to determine the role of RADECUR in the armamentarium of treatment for distal ureteral obstruction.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Partial Nephrectomy for Nonfunctioning Moieties of Renal Duplication and Fusion Anomalies in Infants and Children.

Objectives: To report on long-term follow-up and outcomes of infants and small children who have undergone laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) partial nephrectomy to manage upper urinary tract duplication and fusion anomalies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed evaluating outcomes of pediatric patients who underwent LESS partial nephrectomy for upper urinary tract duplication and fusion anomalies from January 2012 to July 2015, by a single surgeon at a tertiary pediatric referral center. Demographic and perioperative data were reviewed as well as follow-up imaging. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Results: A total of 18 patients were identified. Additional access was used for two patients to complete the procedure. Median follow-up was 39 months. No short-term complications were encountered. Three patients were noted to have abnormal postoperative ultrasounds: two perinephric fluid collections and one atrophy of the remaining ipsilateral moiety. One fluid collection resolved completely, and the other decreased in size. Complete atrophy of the ipsilateral moiety occurred. No secondary procedures were required. Conclusions: LESS partial nephrectomy is safe for renal duplication and fusion anomalies with good long-term outcomes. Although it can be safely performed, it is a technically demanding procedure and has been discontinued in favor of robotic partial nephrectomy.

Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Cross-trigonal Ureteral Reimplantation With Tailoring for Primary Obstructive Megaureter.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel, minimally invasive surgical technique, robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered extravesical cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation for primary obstructive megaureter and to report a case series of 13 patients. METHODS: Thirteen patients between the ages of 10 and 96 months who were diagnosed with primary obstructive megaureter underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered extravesical cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation between April 2017 and May 2019. The principle of this technique is performing an extravesical cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation with intracorporeal tailoring of the ureter. This provides the advantage of achieving a long tunnel mimicking the Cohen cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation, without performing the open surgical technique and offers the potential benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Surgical technique is described, demographic data and intra- and/or postoperative parameters are reported. RESULTS: Median age was 26 months (IQR 16-60). Median weight was 15 kg (IQR 10.1-31). Median console time was 113 minutes (IQR 90.5-140). Median postoperative stay was 2.5 days (IQR 1.3-3). Median ureteral diameter decreased from 17 mm (IQR 12.5-18.5) to 3 mm (IQR 0-6.5, P = .001). Median renal pelvis diameter decreased from 28 mm (IQR 20.5-37.8) to 4 mm (IQR 1.5-5, P = .005). Median renal function before surgery was 46% (IQR 24.5-48.5) and following surgery was 42% (IQR 36-42, P = .700). Median T1/2 decreased from 28 minutes (IQR 19.3-30) to 4.5 minutes (IQR 3-5, P = .009). Postoperative complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification were apparent in 3 patients (21%). One had grade I complication (fever, resolved spontaneously) and 2 had a Grade II complication (urinary tract infection). CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation with intracorporeal tailoring is safe, feasible, and reproducible in short-term follow-up.

Pediatric Partial Nephrectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Duplication Anomalies: A Comparison Between Different Surgical Approaches and Techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To review and compare 4 different surgical approaches for partial nephrectomy of a nonfunctioning moiety in children with upper urinary tract duplication anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all pediatric patients who underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN), or laparoendoscopic single site partial nephrectomy (LESS-PN) for the treatment of a nonfunctioning moiety in a duplicated collecting system at 2 medical centers between 2007 and 2017. Patient demographics, perioperative data, surgical techniques, complications, and results were compared. RESULTS: A total of 59 pediatric patients underwent partial nephrectomy for an upper urinary tract duplication anomaly during a 10-year period: 24 OPN, 7 LPN, 18 RPN, and 10 LESS-PN. Median age was 16 months (interquartile range 9-49.7). Median weight was 10.7 Kg (interquartile range 8.8-16.4). Median estimated blood loss was comparable between all minimally invasive approaches, but significantly increased in the open approach. OPN required more narcotics (0.554 mg Morphine equivalent/Kg/day, range 0.03-6.13) and Acetaminophen (72.12 mg/Kg/day, range 0-209.06) than all other groups in the study. Median operating time in OPN (154.5 minutes, range 108-413) and LESS-PN (140 minutes, range 65-245) were found to be significantly shorter in comparison to LPN (190 minutes, range 159-355), and RPN (256 minutes, range 163-458); (P = .03, .005, .02, and .005). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive approaches (LPN, RPN, and LESS-PN) for partial nephrectomy in upper urinary tract duplication anomalies may be associated with decreased postoperative analgesia requirements, shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and less use of drains in comparison to the open approach, while demonstrating efficacy and safety.

Outpatient Robotic Unilateral Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation in the Pediatric Population: Short-Term Assessment of Safety.

PURPOSE: Robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been established as a viable option for surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux. Typically this procedure is associated with a hospital stay for routine postoperative care. We assessed the short-term safety of robotic unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation as a scheduled outpatient procedure in a pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied a cohort of patients who underwent robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation between June 2012 and January 2018. No regional blocks were performed. Patients were discharged from the postanesthesia care unit as part of a scheduled outpatient procedure without an extended stay. Postoperative outcomes included 30-day emergency room visits, readmissions to the hospital and Clavien-Dindo grade I to V complications. RESULTS: Four male and 23 female patients were identified. Median age was 85 months (range 27 to 210) and median weight was 26 kg (13 to 97). Median robotic console time was 140 minutes (range 84 to 257). No patient required a hospital stay for management of pain. Two patients (9%) required unplanned antibiotic therapy postoperatively for bacterial cystitis and pneumonia (Clavien-Dindo grade II complications). The patient with pneumonia was diagnosed during a subsequent emergency room visit. One patient was rehospitalized on postoperative day 4 because of constipation. No Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication was observed in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation is safe as an outpatient procedure in the pediatric population. Further evaluation is warranted to assess its short and long-term outcomes on a larger scale.

Prospective multicenter study on robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (RALUR-EV): Outcomes and complications.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (RALUR-EV) is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. We have previously reported retrospective outcomes from our study group, and herein provide an updated prospective analysis with a focus on success rate, surgical technique, and complications among surgeons who have overcome the initial learning curve. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of RALUR-EV in children, among experienced surgeons. DESIGN AND METHODS: We reviewed our prospective database of children undergoing RALUR-EV by pediatric urologists at eight academic centers from 2015 to 2017. Radiographic success was defined as absence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien scale. Univariate regression analysis was performed to assess for association among various patient and technical factors and radiographic failure. RESULTS: In total, 143 patients were treated with RALUR-EV for primary VUR (87 unilateral, 56 bilateral; 199 ureters). The majority of ureters (73.4%) had grade III or higher VUR preoperatively. Radiographic resolution was present in 93.8% of ureters, as shown in the summary table. Ureteral complications occurred in five ureters (2.5%) with mean follow-up of 7.4 months (SD 4.0). Transient urinary retention occurred in four patients following bilateral procedure (7.1%) and in no patients after unilateral. On univariate analysis, there were no patient or technical factors associated with increased odds of radiographic failure. DISCUSSION: We report a radiographic success rate of 93.8% overall, and 94.1% among children with grades III-V VUR. In contemporary series, alternate management options such as endoscopic injection and open UR have reported radiographic success rates of 90% and 93.5% respectively. We were unable to identify specific patient or technical factors that influenced outcomes, although immeasurable factors such as tissue handling and intraoperative decision-making could not be assessed. Ureteral complications requiring operative intervention were rare and occurred with the same incidence reported in a large open series. Limitations include lack of long-term follow-up and absence of radiographic follow-up on a subset of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic resolution of VUR following RALUR is on par with contemporary open series, and the incidence of ureteral complications is low. RALUR should be considered as one of several viable options for management of VUR in children.

Hidden incision endoscopic surgery (HIdES) trocar placement for pediatric robotic pyeloplasty: comparison to traditional port placement.

Robotic assisted laparoscopy pyeloplasty (RALP) has been associated with shorter recovery, less pain and improved cosmesis. To minimize visible scars, the hidden incision endoscopic surgery (HIdES) trocar placement has been previously developed. Our aim was to compare outcomes between the HIdES and traditional port placement (TPP) for pediatric RALP. A retrospective study was performed on patients under 15 years of age who underwent RALP at a single institution between August 2011 and November 2013. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, narcotic administration, and complications were reviewed. A total of 49 patients were identified (29 in HIdES, 20 in TPP). There was no difference in median age (p = 0.77) or median height (p = 0.88) between the two groups. Median operative time was 180 min for HIdES and 194 min for TPP (p = 0.27). Eleven patients (11/29, 37.9%) in the HIdES group and fourteen patients (14/20, 70%) in the TPP group received postoperative narcotics (p < 0.05). Median follow-up was 42 months for HIdES and 41 months for TPP (p = 0.96). There were two complications (2/29, 6.9%) with HIdES, and one complication (1/20, 5.0%) with TPP (p = 1.00). The success rates were 96.6% (28/29) for HIdES and 100% (20/20) for TPP (p = 1.00). HIdES trocar placement for pediatric robotic pyeloplasty is a safe and viable alternative to TPP. HIdES is comparable to TPP regarding operative time, narcotic administration, hospital stay, and complication rate, without compromising success.

Tubeless outpatient robotic upper urinary tract reconstruction in the pediatric population: short-term assessment of safety.

Robotic upper urinary tract reconstruction (UUTR) has been widely utilized for surgical management of congenital obstruction. To further reduce morbidity and simplify postoperative care, outpatient robotic pyeloplasty (RP) and robotic ureteroureterostomy (RUU) were performed without ureteral stents, drains, or urethral catheters. The aim of the study was to assess the safety of performing tubeless robotic UUTR as an outpatient procedure. A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent outpatient tubeless RP and RUU between July 2015 and January 2017. All procedures were primary interventions. No ureteral stents, drains, or urethral catheters were utilized. No regional blocks were utilized. Patients were discharged from the post anesthesia care unit as a scheduled outpatient procedure without an extended stay. Primary outcomes included 30-day complications, emergency room (ER) visits, and readmissions. A total of 19 patients (14 male, 5 female) were identified (RP = 17, RUU = 3), including one patient who underwent staged bilateral RP. Median age was 21.5 months (range 3-220). Median weight was 11.5 kg (range 6-89). Median operative time was 167 min (range 108-249), defined as skin incision to closure. No 30-day complications, ER visits, or readmissions were observed for any patient. The study concludes that pediatric tubeless outpatient robotic UUTR is safe. Further evaluation is needed to assess this approach on a larger scale, as well as assessing the long-term outcomes of tubeless reconstruction.

Comparison of Robotic Pyeloplasty and Standard Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants: A Bi-Institutional Study.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes between robotic pyeloplasty (RP) and standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) in the infant population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all children under 1 year of age who underwent RP or LP at two different medical centers between October 2009 and February 2016. Patient demographics, perioperative data, complications, and results were reviewed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent standard LP, and 21 patients underwent RP during the study period. Median age and median weight at time of operation for the whole cohort were 6.1 months and 7.9 kg. Surgery success rates were similar with 95% and 92% in RP and LP, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in operating time between the 2 groups, with a median time of 156 minutes in RP (range 125-249) and 192 minutes (range 98-229) in standard LP (P = .35). Median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the robotic group with a median stay of 1 day (range 1-3) and 7 days (range 7-12) in the standard LP group.(P < .0001) Drains or nephrostomy tubes were used more often in the laparoscopic group (100%, 13/13) as opposed to RP (9.5%, 2/21, P < .0001) There was a comparable complication rate between the 2 groups, 30.8% for LP and 23.8% for RP (P = .65). CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive dismembered pyeloplasty is safe and effective in the infant population and produces high success rates. The results, complication rates, and operative time were comparable between the two surgical methods while the standard LP demonstrated longer hospital stay. Both the robotic approach and the LP can be successfully utilized for the benefit of infants with UPJ obstruction.

Results of a prospective randomized control trial comparing hydrophilic to uncoated catheters in children with neurogenic bladder.

INTRODUCTION: Children with neurogenic bladder (NGB) often require a lifetime of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), typically using uncoated catheters (UCs). Hydrophilic catheters (HCs) have lower friction than UCs with reported less damage to the urethra. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between these catheters. METHODS: An investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare HCs versus UCs. Children aged 2-17 years with NGB on CIC were enrolled for 1 year. Block randomization was used. Dexterity scores were obtained in those who perform self-catheterization. Outcomes were UTI, difficulty passing the catheter, urethral injury, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Demographic data is presented in the Table. Seventy-eight patients were enrolled. Age and gender were similar between the groups. Fifteen patients in each group performed CIC via an abdominal wall stoma. Eight and 15 patients withdrew from the UC and HC groups, respectively. The HC group overall had more problems with the catheter, mainly difficulty with handling. There were no differences for passing the catheter, pain, hematuria, or urethral injuries. There were two urinary tract infections (UTIs) in two HC patients and 17 UTIs in seven UC patients (p = 0.003). Patients with UTIs in the HC group went from 16% in the previous year to 5% during the study. Three children in the HC group had three or more UTIs in the year before enrollment and none during the study. The patients that completed the study with HC were overall satisfied and many requested to continue with the HC. CONCLUSIONS: HCs may decrease the risk of UTI in children with NGB. Urethral complications were low in both groups. Most HC patients were pleased but some found the slippery coating difficult to handle.

Minimally Invasive Approach for Treatment of Seminal Vesicle Cyst Associated with Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis.

OBJECTIVES: We reviewed the clinical presentation and approach for the treatment of symptomatic seminal vesicle cyst associated with ipsilateral renal agenesis while presenting our experience with a series of 5 patients treated with minimally invasive surgery for Zinner syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between the years 2008 and 2016, we operated on 5 patients who presented with symptomatic seminal vesicle cyst and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Patients' charts and medical records were reviewed and compared with past published minimally invasive series. RESULTS: Four patients were treated in a laparoscopic approach and one was treated with robotic-assisted seminal vesicle cyst excision. In all cases, the cystic complex was drained and excised with marsupialization of the remaining cyst walls to prevent cystic recurrence. The mean operating time was 3:47 h and mean hospitalization time was 7 days (4-14). The mean follow-up period was 3.2 years (range 1.7-4.8 years). All patients reported a resolution of symptoms during postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Seminal vesicle cyst with ipsilateral renal agenesis should be suspected in young male patients presenting with pelvic cystic masses. Treatment is reserved for symptomatic patients and the preferred approach is minimally invasive surgery. This approach is feasible and effective while providing advantages both for the patient and the surgeon.