Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 52
Filtrar
1.
Target Oncol ; 18(5): 717-726, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37682504

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular comorbidities are not contraindications of bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities before bevacizumab treatment on overall survival and cardiovascular safety in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: A 2009-2015 cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer aged ≥ 65 years administered first-line bevacizumab was extracted from the French healthcare reimbursement claims database. Baseline heart failure, hypertension, and venous/arterial thromboembolic events were identified. The 36-month overall survival rate was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on the 36-month overall survival using a time-dependent, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards model. The 36-month cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events, and the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on the likelihood of cardiovascular events were evaluated using the Fine and Gray model, with death as a competing risk. RESULTS: We included 9222 patients (56.4% male; median age 73 years). Two-thirds (66.7%) had baseline cardiovascular comorbidities. The median 36-month overall survival was 20.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.9-21.0] and 21.8 [95% CI 21.1-22.6] months in patients with and without cardiovascular comorbidities, respectively. Age ≥ 75 years, dependency in activities of daily living, radiotherapy, and another targeted therapy were identified as death risk factors, but not cardiovascular comorbidities. At 36 months, cardiovascular events had occurred in 60.2% [95% CI 58.9-61.4] and 44.1% [95% CI 42.3-45.9] of patients with and without cardiovascular comorbidities. Baseline venous thrombosis, female, three or more cardiovascular medications, another targeted therapy, and more than six bevacizumab injections were identified as risk factors for cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, cardiovascular comorbidities before administering bevacizumab to older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer impacted the cardiovascular safety, but not overall survival. Unless they limit functional independency, older patients with cardiovascular comorbidities should be treated with bevacizumab under close monitoring.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Hipertensão , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Bevacizumab/farmacologia , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Atividades Cotidianas , Comorbidade
2.
Therapie ; 78(5): 559-563, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36841650

RESUMO

Although it can be difficult to define who should be considered an elderly person, the population aged 65 and over is experiencing the fastest demographic expansion and will represent almost one billion inhabitants of the 2030 World. Drug use increases dramatically with age and the elderly population is, by far, the highest consumer of medicines, up to 10 times more than younger adults. This consumption is in many aspects inappropriate, unjustified or sub-optimal and associated with a huge number of adverse reactions, admissions in emergency units and attributable deaths. A good part of which could be prevented if basic rules of good prescription and ad-hoc guidelines were systematically used. Even if older adults are more likely to present an adverse drug reaction, available data tend to support that the main risk factor of iatrogenesis in the elderly is the number of drugs used. Moreover, it is often irrelevant to transpose to this population the conclusions concerning the benefit-risk balance of drugs assessed in younger adults; similarly, approaches and programs classically used in pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology should be tailored to this specific population.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Humanos , Idoso , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Fatores de Risco , Farmacoepidemiologia , Prescrições
3.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(4): 1338-1348, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36285576

RESUMO

AIMS: Pharmacovigilance signals of heart failure (HF) following exposure to protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) have been detected in recent years. Our aim was to identify the PKIs most frequently associated with the development of HF. METHODS: Using the French National Healthcare Database, all patients newly exposed to a PKI between January 2011 and June 2014 were followed up for 18 months. Specific hospitalization diagnosis and long-term HF-related disease codes were used to identify HF patients. HF incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were measured and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using a Cox model. Sensitivity analyses were performed to limit the potential indication and competitive risk bias. RESULTS: Thirteen PKIs were studied. Among the 49 714 new PKI users registered during the study period, the mean IRR of HF was 3.38 per 100 person-years, with a median time to onset of 155 days. We found a significant increase in the incidence of HF for six medicinal products: pazopanib (aHR = 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-3.52), dasatinib (aHR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.42-3.44), ruxolitinib (aHR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.69-2.64), crizotinib (aHR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.07-2.72), everolimus (aHR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.26-1.67) and vemurafenib (aHR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.86). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with our primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides knowledge on HF following exposure to a PKI. Additional studies could confirm these results for dasatinib, everolimus, pazopanib and ruxolitinib, and particularly for the two medicinal products with results slightly above the significance threshold, namely, crizotinib and vemurafenib, in our sensitivity analyses.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases , Humanos , Incidência , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Dasatinibe , Crizotinibe , Everolimo , Vemurafenib , Insuficiência Cardíaca/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia
4.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 37(10): 1049-1059, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36129659

RESUMO

Since pandemic start, patients may have faced difficulties in accessing to care and treatment. This study aimed at assessing the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and its control measures on the use of drugs indicated in cardiovascular prevention and diabetes mellitus in France. From 09/17/2018 to 09/20/2020, a repeated cohort analysis was performed using the French nationwide health insurance databases. The pandemic impact was assessed using time-series analyses and unobserved components model for the weekly number of patients with (i) drug dispensing, (ii) ongoing treatment, (iii) treatment initiation, (iv) treatment disruption. Overall, 14,822,132 patients with cardiovascular drug dispensings and 3,231,618 with antidiabetic ones were identified. After a sharp spike in the amount of dispensings in the week the first national lockdown was announced, the period was marked by decreased levels and trends. Altogether, the estimated impact of the pandemic on dispensings appeared limited over the lockdown period (1-3% lack in dispensings). During lockdown, the weekly numbers of treatment disruptions remained stable whereas a significant decrease in treatment initiations was observed for almost all drug classes (e.g. ß-blockers initiations: - 8.9%). Conversely, the post-lockdown period showed increases in treatment disruptions especially for antihypertensive and lipid lowering drugs (e.g. statins disruptions: + 4.9%). The pandemic and associated measures had a significant impact on cardiovascular and antidiabetic drugs use in France, mostly consisting in decreases of treatment initiations over lockdown and increases in treatment disruptions afterwards. Both could result in increased morbimortality that remains to be assessed.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , França/epidemiologia
5.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(3)2022 Feb 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35159036

RESUMO

Systematic molecular profiling and targeted therapy (TKI) have changed the face of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) treatment. However, there are no specific recommendations to address the prescription of TKI for older patients. A multidisciplinary task force from the French Society of Geriatric Oncology (SoFOG) and the French Society of Pulmonology/Oncology Group (SPLF/GOLF) conducted a systematic review from May 2010 to May 2021. Protocol registered in Prospero under number CRD42021224103. Three key questions were selected for older patients with NSCLC: (1) to whom TKI can be proposed, (2) for whom monotherapy should be favored, and (3) to whom a combination of TKI can be proposed. Among the 534 references isolated, 52 were included for the guidelines. The expert panel analysis concluded: (1) osimertinib 80 mg/day is recommended as a first-line treatment for older patients with the EGFR mutation; (2) full-dose first generation TKI, such as erlotinib or gefitinib, is feasible; (3) ALK and ROS1 rearrangement studies including older patients were too scarce to conclude on any definitive recommendations; and (4) given the actual data, TKI should be prescribed as monotherapy. Malnutrition, functional decline, and the number of comorbidities should be assessed primarily before TKI initiation.

6.
Therapie ; 77(2): 229-240, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34973825

RESUMO

Since the early 2000s, the arrival of the so-called targeted therapies and immunotherapies have prolonged survival rates in many cancers. In parallel, post-marketing surveillance of anticancer drugs through pharmacoepidemiology has gradually developed. This paper provides (i) a detailed argumentation of the foundations for pharmacoepidemiology of anticancer drugs, (ii) an overview of pharmacoepidemiological studies currently available in this field, and (iii) some perspectives to improve pharmacoepidemiology for oncology practice. First of all, according to the existing literature, the development of pharmacoepidemiological studies for the clinical evaluation of anticancer drugs appears particularly justified based on common limitations of clinical trials in oncology regarding essential methodological principles such as adequate control groups, randomisation or double blinding. Many descriptive field cohort studies have investigated together treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety to compare results from clinical trials with those of everyday practice. The utilisation of anticancer drugs has also been extensively described through cross-sectional or cohort studies by often using medico-administrative or medical databases. Such studies are useful to quantify and characterise use over time in the population, including clinically unvalidated use, and to evaluate adherence and persistence to increasingly available oral anticancer drugs. Despite their importance to increase knowledge, comparative effectiveness or safety studies remain uncommon. In a context of rapidly emerging therapies and personalised treatments, this may be due to methodological challenges especially related to the choice of a comparator or the consideration of confounding by indication. In the future, efforts must be pursued to provide real-time access to high-quality, large-scale clinical, biological and treatment data, and to improve record-linkage between hospital and outpatient databases. More research is also needed to better evaluate all medications, not only anticancer, as part of an overall cancer care pathway and to bring the evaluation of anticancer drugs closer to patients and society (social pharmacology).


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Farmacoepidemiologia/métodos
7.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol ; 36(2): 421-426, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34699080

RESUMO

Owing to a broad spectrum and low cost antimicrobial, cotrimoxazole is largely prescribed. However, its use is associated with various adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that warrant to ensure rational prescribing. This study aimed to describe spontaneous reports of cotrimoxazole ADRs and to evaluate the quality of prescription in patients who had ADRs. Suspected cotrimoxazole-induced ADRs cases reported to the Bordeaux regional pharmacovigilance center (France) during a 5-year period were described. Seriousness was assessed according to international criteria. Quality of prescription was assessed by compliance with the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and relevance of cotrimoxazole indication. Then, an ADR was considered as preventable if the cotrimoxazole indication was not relevant, or potentially preventable if indication was relevant but the prescription was not compliant with the SPC. A total of 96 cases were analyzed: median age was 60.5 years (range: 4-94); 59.4% of patients were male. ADRs were mostly cutaneous disorders (n = 46) and hematological disorders (n = 25). A total of 60 serious ADRs occurred in 55 patients. Prescribers complied with all SPC recommendations in 21.9% of cases. Indication of cotrimoxazole was relevant or highly relevant in 41 cases. In 58% of cases, the occurrence of a cotrimoxazole-induced ADR would have been preventable or potentially preventable. In a context of increasing interest for this antibiotic to treat infections due to resistant bacteria, physicians should be more aware of the potential consequences of inappropriate prescribing cotrimoxazole and reserve its use when there is no alternative and under suitable monitoring.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Farmacovigilância , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/efeitos adversos
8.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 22(4): 627-636, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34525899

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) in the older population remain a growing public health concern due to the many associated adverse events increasing healthcare service use and health costs. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and direct costs of PIPs in older adults aged ≥65 years in France. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017 using a representative sample of the French national healthcare reimbursement system database. PIPs were defined using the French REMEDI[e]S tool. Overall reimbursed direct costs and by PIP category were extrapolated to the French older population. RESULTS: The overall PIP prevalence was estimated at 56.7% (95% CI: 56.4-57.0). Medications with an unfavorable benefit/risk ratio had the highest prevalence (34.0%, 95% CI: 33.7-34.3). Direct costs associated with PIPs represented 6.3% of the total reimbursed medication costs in 2017 (€507 million). Drug duplications were the main contributors to these costs (39.2% of the total reimbursed PIP costs, €199 million) and among all PIPs, proton pump inhibitors (>8 weeks) were the most expensive PIPs (€152 million). CONCLUSIONS: PIP prevalence is still high among French older adults, with substantial direct costs. Large-scale interventions targeting the most prevalent and/or costly PIPs are needed to reduce their clinical and economic impacts.


Assuntos
Prescrição Inadequada , Prescrições , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , França , Humanos , Prevalência
9.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 139: 297-306, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34166754

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop an algorithm for the identification of basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL)-dependency in health insurance databases. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We used the AMI (Aging Multidisciplinary Investigation) population-based cohort including both individual face-to-face assessment of ADL-dependency and merged health insurance data. The health insurance factors associated with ADL-dependency were identified using a LASSO logistic regression model in 1000 bootstrap samples. An external validation on a 1/97 representative sample of the French Health Insurance general population of Affiliates has been performed. RESULTS: Among 995 participants of the AMI cohort aged ≥ 65y, 114 (11.5%) were ADL-dependent according to neuropsychologists individual assessments. The final algorithm developed included: age, sex, four drug classes (dopaminergic antiparkinson drugs, antidepressants, antidiabetic agents, lipid modifying agents), three type of medical devices (medical bed, patient lifter, incontinence equipment), four medical acts (GP's consultations at home, daily and non-daily nursing at home, transport by ambulance) and four long-term diseases (stroke, heart failure, coronary heart disease, Alzheimer and other dementia). Applying this algorithm, the estimated prevalence of ADL-dependency was 12.3% in AMI and 9.5% in the validation sample. CONCLUSION: This study proposes a useful algorithm to identify ADL-dependency in the health insurance data.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Coleta de Dados/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Avaliação Geriátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , França , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino
10.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 77(11): 1713-1724, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34115158

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To establish a consensus on both explicit and implicit criteria in order to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in French older people aged 75 years and over or 65 years and over with multimorbidity. METHODS: Fifteen experts in geriatrics, general practice, pharmacy, and clinical pharmacology were involved in a two-round Delphi survey to assess preliminary explicit and implicit criteria based on an extensive literature review and up-to-date evidence data. Experts were asked to rate their level of agreement using a 5-level Likert scale for inclusion of criteria and also for rationale and therapeutic alternatives. A consensus was considered as reached if at least 75% of the experts rated criteria as "strongly agreed" or "agreed." RESULTS: The new tool included a seven-step algorithm (implicit criteria) encompassing the three main domains that define PIP (i.e. overprescribing, underprescribing, and misprescribing) and 104 explicit criteria. Explicit criteria were divided into 6 tables related to inappropriate drug duplications (n = 7 criteria), omissions of medications and/or medication associations (n = 16), medications with an unfavourable benefit/risk ratio and/or a questionable efficacy (n = 39), medications with an unsuitable dose (n = 4) or duration (n = 6), drug-disease (n = 13), and drug-drug interactions (n = 19). CONCLUSION: The REMEDI[e]S tool (REview of potentially inappropriate MEDIcation pr[e]scribing in Seniors) is an original mixed tool, adapted to French medical practices, aimed at preventing PIP both at the individual level in clinical practice and the population level in large-scale studies. Therefore, its use could contribute to an improvement in healthcare professionals' prescribing practices and safer care in older adults.


Assuntos
Técnica Delphi , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Feminino , França , Geriatria , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Multimorbidade
11.
Therapie ; 76(6): 587-595, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34045080

RESUMO

AIM: To describe the ambulatory changes in drug prescriptions 3 months after hospital discharge among elderly patients aged 75 and over, and to identify the reasons for these changes. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on subjects, discharged between 09/2016 and 01/2017 from the Bordeaux University Hospital. Prescription forms were collected from patients' pharmacists. The main outcome was the occurrence of at least one significant change (SC) defined as an initiation, a discontinuation, a switch or change in drug daily dosage as regards the drugs prescribed upon hospital discharge and those prescribed 3 months after. Whenever drug SC occurred, general practitioners were requested to elicit reasons for such changes. RESULTS: Among the 126 patients included in our study, 73 underwent a 3-month follow-up period, without death or being re-hospitalised. 87.7% of them had at least one SC 3 months after discharge, with an average of 3.1±2.5 SC per patient. Main changes involved: discontinuation or dose decrease of anxiolytics, hypnotics, antalgics, betablockers and calcium channel blockers; start or dose increase of diuretics, ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. In patients with a 3-month follow-up period, 27.4% underwent at least one ADR-induced SC. CONCLUSION: Most elderly patients experience drug prescription changes after discharge. Some, according to drug iatrogenic, could be avoided through better cooperation between hospital and ambulatory prescribers.


Assuntos
Alta do Paciente , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos
13.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(3): 1120-1128, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32656857

RESUMO

AIMS: Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild-type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first-line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five years for vital status). Molecular genetics platforms have provided additional RAS and BRAF mutation testing results. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to tumour mutation (mt) status: RASmt/BRAFany, RASwt/BRAFmt and RASwt/BRAFwt. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate association between mutation status and death or progression. RESULTS: A total of 389 patients were included in 65 centres and with a known tumour mutation status: 64 RASmt/BRAFany (21%), 33 RASwt/BRAFmt (13%) and 213 RASwt/BRAFwt (87%). Respective baseline characteristics were: median age 65, 64 and 63 years, male gender 63%, 64% and 69%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 75%, 76% and 79%, and liver-only metastases 39%, 33% and 40%. Median progression-free survival was 8.0 months [5.9-9.3] for patients with RASmt/BRAFany, 6.0 months [2.3-7.2] for patients with RASwt/BRAFmt, and 10.4 months [9.5-11.0] for patients with RASwt/BRAFwt. Respectively, median overall survival was 18.4 months [10.9-23.3], 9.7 months [6.9-16.6] and 29.3 months [26.3-36.1]. In multivariate analyses, progression (HR = 2.71 [1.79-4.10]) and death (HR = 2.79 [1.81-4.30]) were more likely for RASwt/BRAFmt vs RASwt/BRAFwt patients. CONCLUSIONS: BRAF mutations were associated with markedly poorer outcomes in initially unresectable RASwt mCRC patients treated by cetuximab in first-line treatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Cetuximab/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Mutação , Metástase Neoplásica , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)
14.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol ; 35(1): 76-85, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740979

RESUMO

Considering their novelty and cost, post-marketing evaluation is highly relevant for new anticancer drugs. Identify and characterize available and potentially useful databases for post-marketing evaluation of these specific drugs is necessary. A review was conducted to identify available and accessible databases to study the post-marketing evaluation of drugs in real-life care setting. Databases identified have been classified into medico-administrative databases, medical record databases, and databases resulting from ad hoc collections. Taking as examples databases available in France, each type was described as well as its strengths and limits for a potential use in the oncology field. Record linkage of medico-administrative databases could cover almost the whole population and is now used to evaluate anticancer drugs (e.g., Système National des Données de Santé). Large medical record databases are still lacking, but efforts are currently made to give access to hospital data warehouses for research purposes. Finally, databases resulting from ad hoc collections are also available for some cancer localizations and allow to obtain highly valuable clinical and biological data. A range of important and valuable databases exist but, individually, none is enough to answer to all questions from health authorities, healthcare professionals, and patients. In order to obtain a complete overview on utilization, associated health outcomes and costs of these drugs, it seems necessary to better interlink available databases.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Bases de Dados Factuais , França , Humanos , Prontuários Médicos , Farmacovigilância , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Sistema de Registros
15.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(3): 1303-1309, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32737898

RESUMO

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of trauma associated with the use of antidopaminergic antiemetics in a real-world setting. METHODS: A self-controlled case series analysis was performed using the EGB database, the representative sample of the French national healthcare insurance system database. All subjects aged 18 years and over who presented with at least 1 trauma-related hospitalization and 1 supply for domperidone, metoclopramide or metopimazine between 2009 and 2014 were included in the study. Associations were evaluated by incidence rate ratios. RESULTS: Included exposed cases were 7610 for domperidone cohort, 2189 for metoclopramide and 3911 for metopimazine. Incidence rate ratio for trauma-related hospitalization during the first 7 days of exposure period compared to unexposed period was 1.53 (95% confidence interval 1.29-1.80) for domperidone, 2.00 (1.37-2.91) for metoclopramide and 2.30 (1.71-3.09) for metopimazine. CONCLUSION: We found an increased risk of hospitalizations for traumatic injuries for the main marketed antidopaminergic antiemetics during the first days of use. The highest risk was observed for metopimazine, which could relate to its pharmacological profile and central effects.


Assuntos
Antieméticos , Adolescente , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Domperidona , Hospitalização , Humanos , Metoclopramida
16.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(7): 2988-2995, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33294983

RESUMO

We describe the safety profiles of all drug classes used for the treatment of advanced melanoma from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System over 2008-2018. Adverse reactions reported in 25 900 pharmacovigilance cases are described for chemotherapies, immunomodulators, targeted therapies and immunotherapies. There was a sharp increase in the number of cases over time, with peaks associated with the launch of new treatments. The adverse reactions diversified over time; notably, skin (alopecias, dermatitis) and retinal disorders were frequently associated with targeted therapies and endocrine disorders (hypothalamus, thyroid and adrenal dysfunctions) with immunotherapies. Less well-known reactions were also detected, such as neuropsychiatric disorders with targeted therapies and gastrointestinal ulcers, pneumothorax and pleural effusions with immunotherapies. The findings highlight the need for various health professionals (including medical specialists or trained nurses) to enhance management of complications.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Melanoma , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacovigilância , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug Administration
17.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(4): 1695-1704, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33295072

RESUMO

AIMS: Although medicine misuse is a public health issue, it has multiple meanings in the medical literature. This study aimed to characterize, classify and identify the most appropriate definitions of medicine misuse. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in Medline, ISI Web of Science, SocINDEX, PsycInfo, PsycArticles and Psychological and Behavioral Sciences Collection, using keywords related to "misuse", "appropriateness" and "medicine" between 1 November 2008 and 25 August 2020. Additional searches were conducted in websites of regulatory agencies and public health institutions. Two authors independently selected studies providing both definitions and examples of misuse, while a third resolved disagreements. Definitions were used to propose a hierarchical classification based on initiator, intent, purpose and context of medicine misuse. The study is registered on PROSPERO: CRD42018115789. RESULTS: Of 3404 identified records, 51 were included. A total of 71 definitions and 74 examples of misuse were retrieved. When the prescriber is initiator and according to intent, potential medicine misuse referred to "intentional or unintentional prescribing not in line with clinical evidence". Based on context, they could prescribe medicines not clinically justified, i.e. overprescribing, or prescribe indicated medicines incorrectly, i.e. misprescribing. Among other groups of definitions, those overlapping with drug abuse or medication use errors were considered out-of-scope. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the terms and definitions used to characterize medicine misuse and could serve as a basis for a terminology that makes clear distinctions between misuse, abuse and errors.


Assuntos
Erros de Medicação , Humanos
18.
J Clin Med ; 9(11)2020 Nov 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33233595

RESUMO

We aimed to describe the burden represented by potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in chronic polypharmacy in France. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study using data from the French National Insurance databases. The study period was from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016. Chronic drug use was defined as uninterrupted daily use lasting ≥6 months. Chronic polypharmacy was defined as the chronic use of ≥5 medications, and chronic hyperpolypharmacy as the chronic use of ≥10 medications. For individuals aged ≥65 (older adults), PIMs were defined according to the Beers and Laroche lists, and for individuals aged 45-64 years (middle-aged) PIMs were defined according to the PROMPT (Prescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People's Treatments) list. Among individuals with chronic polypharmacy, 4009 (46.2%) middle-aged and 18,036 (64.8%) older adults had at least one chronic PIM. Among individuals with chronic hyperpolypharmacy, these figures were, respectively, 570 (75.0%) and 2544 (88.7%). The most frequent chronic PIM were proton pump inhibitors (43.4% of older adults with chronic polypharmacy), short-acting benzodiazepines (older adults: 13.7%; middle-aged: 16.1%), hypnotics (6.1%; 7.4%), and long-acting sulfonylureas (3.9%; 12.3%). The burden of chronic PIM appeared to be very high in our study, concerning almost half of middle-aged adults and two-thirds of older adults with chronic polypharmacy. Deprescribing interventions in polypharmacy should primarily target proton pump inhibitors and hypnotics.

19.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 272, 2019 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31039784

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The appropriateness of psychotropic prescriptions in the elderly is a major quality-of-care challenge at hospital. Quality indicators have been developed to prevent inappropriate psychotropic prescriptions. We aimed to select and automatically calculate such indicators, from the Bordeaux University Hospital information system, and to analyze the appropriateness of psychotropic prescription practices, in an observational study. METHODS: Experts selected indicators of the appropriateness of psychotropic prescriptions in hospitalized elderly patients, according to guidelines from the French High Authority for Health. The indicators were reformulated to focus on psychotropic administrations. The automated calculation of indicators was analyzed by comparing their measure to data collected from a clinical audit. In elderly patients hospitalized between 2014 and 2015, we then analyzed the evolution of the appropriateness of psychotropic prescription practices during hospital stay, using methods of visualization, and described practices by considering patients' characteristics. RESULTS: Two indicators were automated to detect overuse and misuse of psychotropic drugs. Indicators identified frequent inappropriate drug administrations, but practices tended to become more appropriate after quality-of-care improvement actions. In the majority of patients (85%), there was no inappropriate administration of psychotropic drugs during hospital stay; for the remaining 15% with at least one inappropriate administration, physicians tended to limit overuse or misuse during hospital stay. Inappropriate administrations were more frequent in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders, dependence and associated complications or morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The automated indicators are structuring tools for the development of a drug prescription monitoring system. Inappropriate psychotropic administrations were limited by physicians during hospital stay; some inappropriate prescriptions might be explained by clinical characteristics of patients.


Assuntos
Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Auditoria Clínica , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Therapie ; 74(2): 279-288, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30824175

RESUMO

Some concerns have emerged about the evidence of benefits on survival outcomes or quality of life of new anticancer drugs. In parallel, the decreased cancer mortality leads to an increased number of patients exposed to cancer treatment-related consequences. In this context, pharmacoepidemiology is crucial to assess anticancer drug use, effectiveness and safety in real life conditions. We aimed to describe strengths, limitations and considerations associated with the use of the French national health insurance database (système national des données de santé [SNDS]) to conduct pharmacoepidemiological studies in oncology. The SNDS represents a powerful tool in pharmacoepidemiology owing to its extensive coverage, accurate description and quantification of drug exposure and individual data on patients. The main limitations of this database ensue from the administrative nature resulting in technical difficulties in its management and gaps in availability of data. Another limitation is the lack of accurate identification of diseases, comorbidities or outcomes and potential confounding with notably the lack of data regarding cancer stage, prognosis or risk factors. Finally, the accurate identification of the nature of chemotherapy received by patients is sometimes complex. To minimize these limitations, several approaches and statistical methods could be used as highlighted by national or international initiatives. First, the SNDS may be linked with cancer registry or clinical data. Then, several data sources could be combined using meta-analytical methods. The development of methodological tools and the use of standardized methods are crucial to enhance the quality of studies that can impact clinical practice and guide public decision. Pharmacoepidemiological approaches and pharmacovigilance represent an important cornerstone in oncology for signal detection or long-term follow up of cancer patients. In this context, validated methods to identify cancer patients and to describe chemotherapy regimens within these data should be promoted and remain too scarce despite international guidelines. Moreover, limits and strength of each data sources should be systematically discussed according to the research question. Optimized and framed use of claims database represents a future challenge in onco-pharmacoepidemiology.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacoepidemiologia/métodos , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacovigilância , Qualidade de Vida , Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...