Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 24(1): 151-156, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28511553

RESUMO

When patients on antiplatelet therapy (APT) require minor invasive surgery, APT is usually continued to limit the risk of thrombosis. However, the possibility of hemostatic difficulties necessitates the monitoring of platelet aggregation to prevent unexpected bleeding. We examined whether whole blood aggregometry as a point-of-care testing (POCT) could be useful as a tool for predicting hemostatic difficulties. Sixty-five patients receiving APT and 15 patients who were not receiving APT were enrolled in the present study; all patients were scheduled to undergo a tooth extraction. Whole blood samples were obtained and were examined using multiple electrode aggregometry. The aggregometry was performed using arachidonic acid (AA), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and thrombin receptor activating peptide. Hemostatic difficulty was defined as a need for more than 10 minutes of compression to achieve hemostasis. The AA test results were significantly lower in patients treated with aspirin (control: 97.7 [29.0] U, aspirin: 14.5 [7.2] U, P < .001). The ADP test results were also significantly lower in patients treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor (control: 77.7 [21.7] U, P2Y12 inhibitor: 37.3 [20.4] U, P < .01). Six of the examined cases exhibited hemostatic difficulties. The cutoff values for the prediction of hemostatic difficulty were 16.5 U for the AA test (sensitivity, 0.833; specificity, 0.508) and 21 U for the ADP test (sensitivity, 0.847; specificity, 0.500). Our study showed that whole blood aggregometry was useful as a POCT for the prediction of hemostatic difficulties after tooth extraction in patients receiving APT.


Assuntos
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Hemostasia/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos dos fármacos , Extração Dentária , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes de Função Plaquetária
2.
PLoS One ; 12(2): e0171627, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28182732

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidences of morbidity and mortality caused by pharmacosedation for dental treatment have not yet reached zero. Adverse events are related to inappropriate respiratory management, mostly originating from an overdose of sedatives. Since sedation is utilized for the satisfaction of both the dentist and the patient, the optimal dose should be minimized to prevent adverse events. We attempted to define the optimal doses of midazolam and propofol required to achieve high levels of patient and dentist satisfaction. METHODS: One thousand dental patients, including those undergoing third molar extractions, were enrolled in this study. A dose of 1 mg of midazolam was administered at 1-minute intervals until adequate sedation was achieved. Propofol was then infused continuously to maintain the sedation level. Both the patients and the dentists were subsequently interviewed and asked to complete a questionnaire. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine the factors that contributed to patient and dentist satisfaction. RESULTS: The peak midazolam dose resulting in the highest percentage of patient satisfaction was 3 mg. Both a lower dose and a higher dose reduced patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction increased with an increasing dosage of propofol up until 4 mg/kg/hr, reaching a peak of 78.6%. The peak midazolam dose resulting in the highest percentage of dentist satisfaction (78.8%) was 2 mg. Incremental propofol doses reduced dentist satisfaction, in contrast to their effect on patient satisfaction. The strongest independent predictors of patient satisfaction and dentist satisfaction were no intraoperative memory (OR, 5.073; 95% CI, 3.532-7.287; P<0.001) and unintentional movements by the patient (OR, 0.035; 95% CI, 0.012-0.104; P<0.001), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: We found that 3 mg of midazolam and 3 mg/kg/hr of propofol may be the optimal doses for maximizing both patient and dentist satisfaction. Although this level of sedation is relatively light, memory loss and an absence of unintentional patient movements can be expected without adverse events.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária/métodos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Midazolam/efeitos adversos , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Dentária/psicologia , Anestesia Dentária/normas , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Midazolam/administração & dosagem , Midazolam/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Propofol/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA