Kidney transplantation: is there any place for refugees?

There are more than 8 million refugees worldwide with the Middle East bearing the brunt. Socioeconomic factors are the major obstacles that refugees encounter when seeking health care in the host country. It, therefore, comes as no surprise that refugees are denied equal opportunities for one of the most sophisticated and expensive medical procedures in the world, kidney transplantation. With respect to transplantation, refugees are caught between a rock and a hard place: as recipients they have to single-handedly clear many hurdles on the arduous road to renal transplantation and as donors they are left unprotected against human organ trafficking. It should be the moral responsibility of the host country to provide this population with a support network. The ways and means of establishing this network should be defined locally; nevertheless, enabling refugees to receive a transplant is the most basic step, which should be followed by the provision of financial support and follow-up facilities in a concerted effort to ensure the continued function of the invaluable graft. It is also necessary that refugees be protected from being an organ reservoir on the black market. There are no precise regional or international data available on kidney transplantation in refugees; among the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation countries, only Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey have thus far provided data on their respective kidney transplantation regulations and models. Other countries in the region should follow suit and design models tailored to the local needs and conditions. What could, indubitably, be of enormous benefit in the long term is the establishment of an international committee on transplantation in refugees.

Renal transplantation in Iran over the past two decades: a trend analysis.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we have reported updated statistics of the Iranian Transplantation Registry, the status of the recipients and grafts, and a detailed time trend with respect to patient characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the Iranian Renal Transplantation Registry and information from the Dialysis and Transplant Patients Public Association, to obtain data on all kidney transplantations performed in Iran between 1986 and 2005. Data were gathered regarding the total number of transplantations, graft loss, recipient death, and donor and recipient characteristics, including demographic data, cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and source of kidney. We assessed changes in variables on a biannual basis. RESULTS: A total of 19521 transplantations were registered over the study period, of which, 761 recipients (3.9%) had died and 2333 allografts (11.9%) had been lost. The source of the kidney in 2556 (13%) subjects was a living related donor (LRD), in 16234 (83%) a living unrelated donor (LURD), and in 831 (4%) cadaveric. During the study decades we noted an increase in the number of kidney transplantations (from 22 to 3690), age of recipients (from 30 to 40), male-to-female ratio of recipients (from 0.58 to 0.67), male-to-female ratio of donors (from 0.48 to 0.52), diabetes mellitus (from 0% to 27%), and hypertension (from 4% to 15%), as causes of ESRD, as well as the use of cadaveric kidneys (0% to 11%). CONCLUSION: Analyzing renal transplantation data not only helps to evaluate the effectiveness of transplantation activities in a country, but also provides information to estimate future costs in the health care system.

The outcome of diverticulosis in kidney recipients with polycystic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: Diverticulosis is a common finding in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). To avoid the serious complications of diverticulosis after kidney transplantation, some policies have recommended aggressive actions, such as elective colectomy. These policies are not widely agreed upon. This controversy led us to investigate the serious complications and the outcome of diverticulosis in ADPKD kidney recipients to see whether such therapies are justified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2002 to 2006, we followed 18 ADPKD kidney recipient patients with barium enema-documented diverticulosis. All subjects were asymptomatic for diverticulosis at the time of transplantation. The mean value +/- SD of follow-up duration was 25.4 +/- 28.5 months. We documented demographic data, familial history of ADPKD, barium enema findings, and complications as well as graft and patient survivals. RESULTS: Hepatic flexure was the most prevalent site for diverticula. The mean (SD) of diverticular count was 6 +/- 5.1. Patients with a familial history of ADPKD showed a higher number of diverticular (P=.01). Diverticulitis occurred in three patients, all of whom died. CONCLUSION: Diverticulitis is a fatal and not rare complication in ADPKD patients. The rate of complications in our study was similar to previous findings, but we observed serious complications even among patients asymptomatic at the time of transplantation. The decision to take aggressive action such as elective colectomy is still a matter of debate that needs further evaluation.

Severity of chronic pain affects health care utilization after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: While the association between chronic pain and high health care utilization is a known issue in the general population, this relation has not been well studied among kidney transplantation patients. METHODS: The subjects were first-time kidney transplant recipients engrafted between 2003 and 2006 and 6 months to 5 years postoperatively. Using SF-36 Bodily Pain Scale, patients were categorized in three groups: group I, those with scores over 66.6; group II, between 66.6 and 33.3; and group III, over 33.3. The subjects' health care utilization was prospectively assessed by recording the number of hospital admission days and the frequency of home nurse visits, outpatient physician visits, and emergency department visits for any medical reason in a 6-month period. RESULTS: A stepwise increase in the frequency of patients admitted to the hospital (P=.017), and those referred to emergency departments (P=.007) was correlated with greater severity of pain in the three groups. However, the frequency of patients having outpatient physician visits (P=.30) or home nurse visits (P=.387) did not vary significantly. Similarly, with increased pain severity, an increase was observed in the number of emergency department visits (P=.005) and duration of hospital stays (P=.049), but not in the number of home nurse (P=.890) or physician visits (P=.112). CONCLUSION: The severity of pain seems to increase the amount of health care use among kidney transplant patients. To minimize associated costs, appropriate pain rehabilitation programs are suggested.

Study of surgical complications between primary and secondary renal transplants.

INTRODUCTION: In a retrospective study we reviewed the surgical complications of primary and secondary renal transplants in 1108 consecutive renal transplants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 2001, 1108 consecutive renal transplants were performed using living related and unrelated donors. Sixty-five second grafts (group 1) were performed in patients of mean age 34.5 (range 18 to 55) and 1043 primary renal transplants (group 2) in patients of mean age 38.2 (range 10 to 63). One case in group 1 and 94 cases in group 2 were diabetic patients. Factors analyzed were vascular, wound, ureteral, and lymphocele complications. RESULTS: The follow-up period ranged from 10 to 120 months (average 27.3). The mean creatinine level in patients with active grafts was 1.45 mg/dL. The last creatinine levels in the two groups were not significantly different. The rates of surgical complications were 4.6% in group 1 and 3.8% in group 2, including vascular complications (one case in group 1 and 16 in group 2), wound problems (nobody in group 1 and seven cases in group 2), lymphocele (two cases in group 1 and eight cases in group 2), and ureteral complications (nobody in group 1 and nine cases in group 2). The incidence of complications between the two groups did not show a significant difference (P = .72). CONCLUSION: With some changes in the standard operation, surgical complications in second renal transplants are not more frequent than among the primary transplants. Therefore, we strongly recommend a second renal transplant when the primary graft has failed.