Learning Alone or Learning Together: Is It Time to Reevaluate Teacher and Learner Responsibilities?

Medical schools across the United States and Canada constantly consider how to improve their curricula and their pedagogical strategies. The authors found it informative to compare how students in 2 professional schools, medicine and business, are taught. The authors believe that creating the best future physicians requires students and faculty to be physically together to learn essential skills. Increasing student interactions with peers and faculty enhances learning, and the classroom is a natural place for these interactions to take place. Requiring medical students to attend teaching sessions in the preclinical curriculum should help foster their development of core competencies, including critical decision making, clinical reasoning, and patient-centered care.

Utilizing a novel unified healthcare model to compare practice patterns between telemedicine and in-person visits.

OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine practice has been shown to vary from clinical guidelines. Variations in practice patterns may be caused by disruptions in the continuity of care between traditional and telemedicine providers. This study compares virtual and in-person visits in Stanford's ClickWell Care (CWC) - where patients see the same provider for both visit modalities. METHODS: Clinical data for two years of patient encounters at CWC from January 2015-2017 (5772 visits) were obtained through Stanford STRIDE. For the 20 most common visit categories, including 17 specific diagnoses, we compared the frequency of prescriptions, labs, procedures, and images ordered, as well as rates of repeat visits. RESULTS: For the 17 specific diagnoses, there are no differences in labs ordered. Two diagnoses show differences in images ordered, and four differences in prescriptions. Overall, there are more labs (0.16 virtual, 0.33 in-person p < 0.0001) and images ordered (0.07 virtual, 0.16 in-person, p < 0.0001) for in-person visits - due mainly to general medical exam visits. Repeat visits were more likely after in-person visits (19% virtual, 38% in-person, p < 0.0001), 10 out of 17 specific diagnoses showed differences in visit frequency between visit modalities. Visits for both anxiety (5.3x, p < 0.0001) and depression (5.1x, p < 0.0001) were much more frequent in the virtual setting. CONCLUSIONS: Prescriptions, labs, and images ordered were similar between in-person and virtual visits for most diagnoses. Overall however, for in-person visits we find increased orders for labs and images, primarily from general medical exams. Finally, for anxiety and depression patients show clear preferences for virtual visits.

Healthcare Service Utilization under a New Virtual Primary Care Delivery Model.

Background:Telemedicine holds great promise for changing healthcare delivery. While telemedicine has been used significantly in the direct-to-consumer setting, the use of telemedicine in a preventive primary care setting is not well studied.Introduction:ClickWell Care (CWC) is the first known implementation of a technology-enabled primary care model. We wanted to quantify healthcare utilization of primary care by patient characteristics and modality of care delivery.Materials and Methods:Our study population included those who completed a visit to a CWC clinic between January 1, 2015 and September 30, 2015. We compared patients based on utilization of CWCs in-person and virtual visits across the following domains: patient demographics, distance from clinic, responses to a Health Risk Assessment, and top 10 conditions treated.Results:Thousand two hundred seven patients completed a visit with a CWC physician in 2015. Nearly three-quarters of our patients were ≤40 years and sex was significantly different (p = 0.015) between visit cohorts. The greatest representation of men (47%) was seen in the virtual-only cohort. Patients' proximity to the clinic was also significantly different across visit cohorts (p = 0.018) with 44% of in-person-only and 34% of virtual-only patients living within 5 miles of Stanford Hospital.Discussion:We found men were more likely to engage in virtual-only care. Young patients are willing to accept virtual care although many prefer to complete an in-person visit first.Conclusions:Our findings suggest that a "bricks-and-clicks" care model where telemedicine is supported by a brick-and-mortar location may be an effective way to leverage telemedicine to deliver primary care.

Digital biomarkers of spine and musculoskeletal disease from accelerometers: Defining phenotypes of free-living physical activity in knee osteoarthritis and lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are 2 of the leading causes of disability worldwide. In order to provide disease-specific prescriptions for physical activity, there is a clear need to better understand physical activity in daily life (performance) in these populations. PURPOSE: To discover performance phenotypes for LSS and OA by applying novel analytical methods to accelerometry data. Specific objectives include the following: (1) to identify characteristic features (phenotypes) of free-living physical activity unique to individuals with LSS and OA, and (2) to determine which features can best differentiate between these conditions. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Leveraging data from 3 existing cross-sectional cohorts, accelerometry signal feature characterization and selection were performed in a computational laboratory. PATIENT SAMPLE: Data from a total of 4,028 individuals were analyzed from the following 3 datasets: LSS Accelerometry Database (n=75); OA Initiative (n=1950); and the 2003 to 2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (pain-free controls, n=2003). METHODS: In order to characterize the accelerometry signals, data were examined using (1) standard intervals for counts/minute from Freedson et al. and (2) the physical performance intervals for mobility-limited pain populations. From this, 42 novel accelerometry features were defined and evaluated for significance in discriminating between the groups (LSS, OA, and controls) in order to then determine which sparse set of features best differentiates between the groups. These sparse sets of features defined the performance phenotypes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Accelerometry features and their ability to differentiate between individuals with LSS, OA, and controls. RESULTS: Given age and gender, classification rates were at least 80% accurate (pairwise) between diseased and pain-free populations (LSS vs. controls and OA vs. controls). The most important features to distinguish between disease groups corresponded to measures in the light and sedentary activity intervals. The more subtle classification between diseased populations (LSS vs. OA) was 72% accurate, with light and moderate activity providing the prominent distinguishing features. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the discovery of performance phenotypes of LSS and OA from accelerometry data, revealed through a novel set of features that characterize daily patterns of movement in people with LSS and OA. These performance phenotypes provide a new method for analyzing free-living physical activity (performance) in LSS and OA, and provide the groundwork for more personalized approaches to measuring and improving function.

Objective measurement of function following lumbar spinal stenosis decompression reveals improved functional capacity with stagnant real-life physical activity.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a prevalent and costly condition associated with significant dysfunction. Alleviation of pain and improvement of function are the primary goals of surgical intervention. Although prior studies have measured subjective improvements in function after surgery, few have examined objective markers of functional improvement. PURPOSE: We aimed to objectively measure and quantify changes in physical capacity and physical performance following surgical decompression of LSS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Thirty-eight patients with LSS determined by the treating surgeon's clinical and imaging evaluation, and who were scheduled for surgical treatment, were consecutively recruited at two academic medical facilities, with 28 providing valid data for analysis at baseline and 6 months after surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Before surgery and at 6 months after surgery, participants provided 7 days of real-life physical activity (performance) using ActiGraph accelerometers; completed two objective functional capacity measures, the Short Physical Performance Battery and Self-Paced Walking Test; and completed three subjective functional outcome questionnaires, Oswestry Disability Index, Spinal Stenosis Symptom Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36. METHODS: Physical activity, as measured by continuous activity monitoring, was analyzed as previously described according to the 2008 American Physical Activity Guidelines. Paired t tests were performed to assess for postsurgical changes in all questionnaire outcomes and all objective functional capacity measures. Chi-square analysis was used to categorically assess whether patients were more likely to meet these physical activity recommendations after surgery. RESULTS: Participants were 70.1 years old (±8.9) with 17 females (60.7%) and an average body mass index of 28.4 (±6.2). All subjective measures (Oswestry Disability Index, Spinal Stenosis Symptom Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36) improved significantly at 6 months after surgery, as did objective functional measures of capacity including balance, gait speed, and ambulation distance (Short Physical Performance Battery, Self-Paced Walking Test). However, objectively measured performance (real-life physical activity) did not change following surgery. Although fewer participants qualified as inactive (54% vs. 71%), and more (11% vs. 4%) met the physical activity guideline recommendations at the 6-month follow-up, these differences were not statistically significant (p=.22) CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study, of which we are aware, to objectively evaluate changes in postsurgical performance (real-life physical activity) in people with LSS. We found that at 6 months after surgery for LSS, participants demonstrated significant improvements in self-reported function and objectively measured physical capacity, but not physical performance as measured by continuous activity monitoring. This lack of improvement in performance, despite improvements in self-reported function and objective capacity, suggests a role for postoperative rehabilitation focused specifically on increasing performance after surgery in the LSS population.

New Delivery Model for Rising-Risk Patients: The Forgotten Lot?

BACKGROUND: Shared-risk models encourage providers to engage young patients early. Telemedicine may be well suited for younger, healthier patients although it is unclear how best to incorporate telemedicine into routine clinical care. INTRODUCTION: We test the assumptions surrounding the use of telemedicine, younger and rising-risk patients, and primary care in ClickWell Care (CWC), a care model developed at our institution for our own accountable care organization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CWC's team of physicians and wellness coaches work together to provide comprehensive primary care through in-person, phone, and video visits. This study examines usage of the clinic over its initial year in operation. RESULTS: 1,464 unique patients conducted a total of 3,907 visits. 2,294 (58.7%) visits were completed virtually (1,382 [35.4%] by phone and 912 [23.3%] by video). Patients were more inclined to see the physician in-person for a new visit (1,065 visits [70.5%] vs. 362 [24%] phone and 83 [6%] video) and more likely to see the physician virtually for a return visit (606 [43.2%] phone and 249 [17.7%] video vs. 548 [39.1%] in-person), a statistically significant difference (X2 = 306.7, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This new care model successfully engaged a younger population of patients. However, our data suggest young patients may not be inclined to establish care with a primary care physician virtually and, in fact, choose an initial in-person touch point, although many are willing to conduct return visits virtually. This new model of care could have a large impact on how care is delivered to low- and rising-risk patients.

Complications, Readmissions, and Revisions for Spine Procedures Performed by Orthopedic Surgeons Versus Neurosurgeons: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of training pathway, either neurosurgical or orthopedic, on complications, readmissions, and revisions in spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Training pathway has been shown to have an impact on outcomes in various surgical subspecialties. Although training pathway has not been shown to have a significant impact on spine surgery outcomes in the perioperative period, long-term results are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 197,682 patients receiving 1 of 3 common spine surgeries [lumbar laminectomy, lumbar fusion, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)] between 2006 and 2010 was conducted. Patient data were obtained from a large claims database. Postoperative adverse effects, all-cause readmission, revision surgery rates, and intermediary payments in these cohorts of patients were compared between spine surgeons with either neurosurgical or orthopedic backgrounds. RESULTS: Patient demographics, hospital-stay characteristics, and medical comorbidities were similar between neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. The risks of surgical complications, all-cause readmission, and revision surgery were also similar between neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons across all procedure types assessed, with several minor exceptions: neurosurgeons had marginally higher odds of any complication for lumbar fusions [odds ratio (OR) 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.20] and ACDFs (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.15). Neurosurgeons also had slightly higher rates of revision surgery for concurrent lumbar laminectomy with fusion (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.22), and ACDFs (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14-1.28). No associations between surgeon type and any particular complication were consistently observed for all procedure groups. There were also no associations between surgeon type and 30-day all-cause readmission. Median total intermediary payments were somewhat higher for neurosurgery patients for all procedure groups assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Few significant associations between surgeon type and patient outcomes exist in the context of spine surgery. Those which do are small and unlikely to be clinically meaningful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Objective measurement of free-living physical activity (performance) in lumbar spinal stenosis: are physical activity guidelines being met?

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) would benefit from increased physical activity. Yet, to date, we do not have disease-specific activity guidelines for LSS, and the nature of free-living physical activity (performance) in LSS remains unknown. LSS care providers could endorse the 2008 United States Physical Activity Guidelines; however, we do not know if this is realistic. The goal of the present study was to determine the proportion of individuals with LSS meeting the 2008 Guidelines. A secondary goal was to better understand the nature of physical performance in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: People from the Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Accelerometry Database, all of whom have both radiographic and clinical LSS and are seeking various treatments for their symptoms. OUTCOME MEASURES: Seven-day accelerometry (functional outcome) and demographics (self-reported). METHODS: For the present study, we analyzed only baseline data that were obtained before any new treatments. Patients with at least 4 valid days of baseline accelerometry data were included. We determined the proportion of individuals with LSS meeting the 2008 US Physical Activity Guidelines of at least 150 minutes of moderate-vigorous (MV) physical activity per week in bouts of 10 minutes or more. We also used the novel Physical Performance analysis designed by our group to determine time spent in varying intensities of activity. There are no conflicts of interest to disclose. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 75 individuals with a mean age of 68 (SD 9), 37% of whom were male. Three people (4%) were considered Meeting Guidelines (at least 150 MV minutes/week), and 56 (75%) were considered Inactive with not even 1 MV minute/week. With the 10-minute bout requirement removed, 10 of 75 (13%) achieved the 150-minute threshold. The average time spent in sedentary activity was 82%, and of time spent in nonsedentary activity, 99.6% was in the light activity range. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the present study confirms that people with symptomatic LSS, neurogenic claudication, walking limitations, and LSS-related disability are extremely sedentary and are not meeting guidelines for physical activity. There is an urgent need for interventions aimed at reducing sedentary behavior and increasing the overall level of physical activity in LSS, not only to improve function but also to prevent diseases of inactivity. The present study suggests that reducing sedentary time, increasing time spent in light intensity activity, and increasing time spent in higher intensities of light activity may be appropriate as initial goals for exercise interventions in people with symptomatic LSS and neurogenic claudication, transitioning to moderate activity when appropriate. Results of the present study also demonstrate the importance of employing disease-specific measures for assessment of performance in LSS, and highlight the potential value of these methods for developing targeted and realistic goals for physical activity. Physical activity goals could be personalized using objective assessment of performance with accelerometry. The present study is one step toward a personalized medicine approach for people with LSS, focusing on increasing physical function.

Brain volume and shape in infants with deformational plagiocephaly.

PURPOSE: Infants with deformational plagiocephaly (DP) have been shown to exhibit developmental delays relative to unaffected infants. Although the mechanisms accounting for these delays are unknown, one hypothesis focuses on underlying differences in brain development. In this study, we used MRI to examine brain volume and shape in infants with and without DP. METHODS: Participants included 20 infants with DP (mean age = 7.9 months, SD = 1.2; n = 12 male) and 21 controls (mean age = 7.9 months, SD = 1.3; n = 11 male). Measures included volumes of the total brain and cerebellum; midsagittal areas of the corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis; and linear distance measures used to quantify the shape of selected brain structures. We also evaluated the association between shape measures and developmental scores on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III (BSID-III). RESULTS: Brain volume did not distinguish cases and controls (p = .214-.976). However, cases exhibited greater asymmetry and flattening of the posterior brain (p < .001-.002) and cerebellar vermis (p = .035), shortening of the corpus callosum (p = .012), and differences in the orientation of the corpus callosum (p = .005). Asymmetry and flattening of brain structures were associated with worse developmental outcomes on the BSID-III. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with DP show differences in brain shape, consistent with the skull deformity characteristic of this condition, and shape measures were associated with infant development. Longitudinal studies, beginning in the neonatal period, are needed to clarify whether developmental effects precede or follow brain deformation.