Feasibility and Utility of Different Approaches to Violence Risk Assessment for Young Adults Receiving Treatment for Early Psychosis.

This pilot study examined violence risk assessment among a sample of young adults receiving treatment for early psychosis. In this study, thirty participants were assessed for violence risk at baseline. Participants completed follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months to ascertain prevalence of violent behavior. Individuals were on average 24.1 years old (SD = 3.3 years) and predominantly male (n = 24, 80%). In this sample, six people (20%) reported engaging in violence during the study period. Individuals who engaged in violence had higher levels of negative urgency (t(28) = 2.21, p = 0.035) This study sought to establish the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical utility of violence risk assessment for clients in treatment for early psychosis. Overall, this study found that most individuals with early psychosis in this study (who are in treatment) were not at risk of violence. Findings suggest that violent behavior among young adults with early psychosis is associated with increased negative urgency.

Adapting coordinated specialty care in the post-COVID-19 era: study protocol for an integrative mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs provide evidence-based services for young people with a recent onset of a psychotic disorder. OnTrackNY is a nationally recognized model of CSC treatment in New York state. In 2019, OnTrackNY was awarded a hub within the Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET) to advance its learning health care system (LHS). The OnTrackNY network is comprised of 23 CSC teams across New York state. OnTrack Central, an intermediary organization, provides training and implementation support to OnTrackNY teams. OnTrack Central coordinates a centralized data collection protocol for quality improvement and evaluation of program fidelity and a mechanism to support practice based-research. OnTrackNY sites' breadth coupled with OnTrack Central oversight provides an opportunity to examine the impacts of the COVID-19 crisis in New York State, and supplementary funding was awarded to the OnTrackNY EPINET hub in 2021 for that purpose. METHODS: This project will examine the implications of modifications to service delivery within the OnTrackNY LHS during and after the COVID-19 crisis. We will use the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modification-Enhanced (FRAME) to classify systematically, code, and analyze modifications to CSC services and ascertain their impact. We will utilize integrative mixed methods. Qualitative interviews with multi-level stakeholders (program participants, families, providers, team leaders, agency leaders, trainers (OnTrack Central), and decision-makers at the state and local levels) will be used to understand the process of making decisions, information about modifications to CSC services, and their impact. Analysis of OnTrackNY program data will facilitate examining trends in team staffing and functioning, and participant service utilization and outcomes. Study findings will be summarized in a CSC Model Adaptation Guide, which will identify modifications as fidelity consistent or not, and their impact on service utilization and care outcomes. DISCUSSION: A CSC Model Adaptation Guide will inform CSC programs, and the state and local mental health authorities to which they are accountable, regarding modifications to CSC services and the impact of these changes on care process, and participant service utilization and outcomes. The guide will also inform the development of tailored technical assistance that CSC programs may need within OnTrackNY, the EPINET network, and CSC programs nationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04021719 , July 16th, 2019.

Adapting Coordinated Specialty Care in the Post-COVID-19 Era: Study Protocol for an Integrative Mixed-methods Study.

Background : Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs provide evidence-based services for young people with a recent onset of a psychotic disorder. OnTrackNY is a nationally recognized model of CSC treatment in New York state. In 2019, OnTrackNY was awarded a hub within the Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET) to advance its learning health care system (LHS). The OnTrackNY network is comprised of 23 CSC teams across New York state. OnTrack Central, an intermediary organization, provides training and implementation support to OnTrackNY teams. OnTrack Central coordinates a centralized data collection protocol for quality improvement and evaluation of program fidelity and a mechanism to support practice based-research. OnTrackNY sites’ breadth coupled with OnTrack Central oversight provides an opportunity to examine the impacts of the COVID-19 crisis in New York State. Methods : This project will examine the implications of modifications to service delivery within the OnTrackNY LHS during and after the COVID-19 crisis. We will use the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME) to classify systematically, code, and analyze modifications to CSC services and ascertain their impact. We will utilize integrative mixed methods. Qualitative interviews with multi-level stakeholders (program participants, families, providers, team leaders, agency leaders, trainers (OnTrack Central), and decision-makers at the state and local levels) will be used to understand the process making decisions, information about modifications to CSC services, and their impact. Analysis of OnTrackNY program data will facilitate examining trends in team staffing and functioning, and participant service utilization and outcomes. Study findings will be summarized in a CSC Model Adaptation Guide , which will identify modifications as fidelity consistent or not, and their impact on service utilization and care outcomes. Discussion : A CSC Model Adaptation Guide will inform CSC programs, and the state and local mental health authorities to which they are accountable, regarding modifications to CSC services and the impact of these changes on care process, and participant service utilization and outcomes. The guide will also inform the development of tailored technical assistance that CSC programs may need within OnTrackNY, the EPINET network, and CSC programs nationally. Trial Registration : NCT04021719, July 16 th , 2019.

The RAISE Connection Program: Psychopharmacological Treatment of People With a First Episode of Schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the adherence of psychiatrists to the Schedule of Recommended First and Second Line Antipsychotic Medications ("Antipsychotic Schedule"), which was implemented in two Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) Connection Program Implementation and Evaluation Study clinics. METHODS: Sixty-five individuals with a first episode of psychosis were enrolled in the RAISE Connection Program clinics. Two psychiatrists received training and ongoing consultation on use of a shared decision-making approach to prescribing antipsychotic medications according to the Antipsychotic Schedule. Information about participants, prescribed antipsychotic medications, and completion of side-effect assessments were obtained from standardized research assessments and chart extractions. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the extent to which patterns of antipsychotic prescribing and side-effect monitoring were consistent with the Antipsychotic Schedule. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of participants were prescribed an antipsychotic medication and received the medication on 76%±35% of the days they were in treatment. Seventy-seven percent of participants were prescribed at least one Antipsychotic Schedule first-line antipsychotic, 20% were prescribed olanzapine, and 10% received a trial of clozapine. Regarding monitoring for metabolic side effects, 92% of participants had at least one weight recorded, 72% had at least one blood glucose measure recorded, and 62% had at least one lipid profile recorded. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of a study in which training and ongoing clinical supervision by experts was provided to psychiatrists and shared decision making was encouraged, antipsychotic prescribing patterns closely adhered to recommendations established by the RAISE Connection Program.

Use of Peer Staff in a Critical Time Intervention for Frequent Users of a Psychiatric Emergency Room.

Project Connect, a clinical demonstration program developed in consultation with the New York State Office of Mental Health, adapted critical time intervention for frequent users of a large urban psychiatric emergency room (ER). Peer staff provided frequent users with time-limited care coordination. Participants increased their use of outpatient services over 12 months, compared with a similar group not enrolled in the program. For persons with significant general medical, psychiatric, and social needs, provision of this intervention alone is unlikely to reduce reliance on ERs, especially among homeless individuals.

Client Views of Engagement in the RAISE Connection Program for Early Psychosis Recovery.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed factors that facilitated or impeded clients' engagement in services offered by the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) Connection Program for youths and young adults experiencing early psychosis. It was part of the larger RAISE Implementation and Engagement Study. METHODS: Thematic qualitative analyses of data from in-person, semistructured interviews with 32 clients were used to examine experiences of program services, staff practices, clients' engagement behaviors, and related factors, such as expectations, family involvement, illness, and setting. Eighteen clients were well engaged with services, and 14 were not. Thirteen were interviewed early in their program involvement (two to nine months after enrollment) and 18 others later (12 to 24 months after enrollment). RESULTS: Four domains of factors influenced engagement: individualized care, program attributes, family member engagement, and personal attributes. A central factor was the program's focus on clients' life goals. For many interviewees, engagement hinged substantially on receiving what could be considered nonclinical services, such as supported education and employment. Other key factors were individualized services and staff interactions that were respectful, warm, and flexible; engagement of family members; and a focus on shared decision making. CONCLUSIONS: The findings help explain the Connection Program's effectiveness regarding client engagement and deepen understanding of treatment engagement for youths and young adults experiencing early psychosis. The individualized, flexible, recovery-focused, and assertive model of services and client-staff interaction, incorporating shared decision making and a focus on client life goals, should be implemented and sustained in services for this population.

Practical Monitoring of Treatment Fidelity: Examples From a Team-Based Intervention for People With Early Psychosis.

Mental health programs can address many components of fidelity with routinely available data. Information from client interviews can be used to corroborate these administrative data. This column describes a practical approach to measuring fidelity that used both data sources. The approach was used in the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) Connection Program, a team-based intervention designed to implement evidence-based practices for people experiencing early psychosis suggestive of schizophrenia. Data indicated that the intervention was implemented as intended, including program elements related to shared decision making and a range of evidence-based clinical interventions.

Patterns of emergency department use for medical conditions among persons with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined predictors of medical emergency department use among veterans with serious mental illness. METHODS: Participants were 118 psychiatrically hospitalized veterans with a serious mental illness who were identified as at risk for treatment dropout. Participants completed an interview and had their charts reviewed as part of a larger study. RESULTS: Nearly half of participants had at least one medical emergency visit, and 20% had two or more visits in the six months after hospital discharge. Outpatient service utilization of both general medical treatment and mental health-substance abuse treatment, as well as psychiatric symptoms, anxiety, and lower levels of satisfaction with current living situation, were associated with increased medical emergency department use. CONCLUSIONS: Medical emergency department use was relatively common in this population of veterans with serious mental illness. Mental health and general medical health needs should be addressed in an integrated fashion to reduce the use of the emergency department.

Making room for mental health in the medical home.

Discussions of health care reform emphasize the need for coordinated care, and evidence supports the effectiveness of medical home and integrated delivery system models. However, mental health often is left out of the discussion. Early intervention approaches for children and adolescents in primary care are important given the increased rates of detection of mental illness in youth. Most adults also receive treatment for mental illness from nonspecialists, underscoring the role for mental health in medical home models. Flexible models for coordinated care are needed for people with serious mental illness, who have high rates of comorbid medical problems. Programs implemented in the New York State public mental health system are examples of efforts to better coordinate medical and mental health services.

Best practices: Best practices for improving engagement of clients in clinic care.

Mental health clinicians and program administrators must implement effective strategies for engaging and retaining clients in care. At a recent series of forums open to providers from clinics in New York City that was sponsored by the city and state public mental health authorities, high-performing providers described their client engagement strategies. In this column the effective strategies reported are summarized in four areas: the first session, staff training and expertise, productivity measures, and engaging families and support persons. The approaches should be of use to administrators to improve programs' ability to engage and retain clients in community-based clinic care.

Disengagement from mental health treatment among individuals with schizophrenia and strategies for facilitating connections to care: a review of the literature.

Disengagement from mental health services can lead to devastating consequences for individuals with schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses who require ongoing treatment. We review the extent and correlates of dropping out of mental health treatment for individuals with schizophrenia and suggest strategies for facilitating treatment engagement. Although rates vary across studies, reviews of the literature suggest that up to one-third of individuals with serious mental illnesses who have had some contact with the mental health service system disengage from care. Younger age, male gender, ethnic minority background, and low social functioning have been consistently associated with disengagement from mental health treatment. Individuals with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders, as well as those with early-onset psychosis, are at particularly high risk of treatment dropout. Engagement strategies should specifically target these high-risk groups, as well as high-risk periods, including following an emergency room or hospital admission and the initial period of treatment. Interventions to enhance engagement in mental health treatment range from low-intensity interventions, such as appointment reminders, to high-intensity interventions, such as assertive community treatment. Disengagement from treatment may reflect the consumer's perspective that treatment is not necessary, is not meeting their needs, or is not being provided in a collaborative manner. An emerging literature on patient-centered care and shared decision making in psychiatry provides suggestive evidence that efforts to enhance client-centered communication and promote individuals' active involvement in mental health treatment decisions can also improve engagement in treatment.