Atypical presentations of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease typically manifests as heartburn and regurgitation, but it may also present with atypical or extraesophageal symptoms, including asthma, chronic cough, laryngitis, hoarseness, chronic sore throat, dental erosions, and noncardiac chest pain. Diagnosing atypical manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease is often a challenge because heartburn and regurgitation may be absent, making it difficult to prove a cause-and-effect relationship. Upper endoscopy and 24-hour pH monitoring are insensitive and not useful for many patients as initial diagnostic modalities for evaluation of atypical symptoms. In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who have atypical or extraesophageal symptoms, aggressive acid suppression using proton pump inhibitors twice daily before meals for three to four months is the standard treatment, although some studies have failed to show a significant benefit in symptomatic improvement. If these symptoms improve or resolve, patients may step down to a minimal dose of antisecretory therapy over the following three to six months. Surgical intervention via Nissen fundoplication is an option for patients who are unresponsive to aggressive antisecretory therapy. However, long-term studies have shown that some patients still require antisecretory therapy and are more likely to develop dysphagia, rectal flatulence, and the inability to belch or vomit.

Esophageal Dilation / Dilators.

Esophageal dilation is the treatment of choice for most patients with esophageal dysphagia (functional and mechanical). Multiple forms of esophageal dilators are available. Mechanical dilators (guidewire/nonguidewire assisted) are the major forms of dilators used. Balloon dilator use has increased but they offer only a marginal advantage over traditional mechanical dilators at a greatly increased cost (2 degrees to single use). Comparative trials are biased in favor of balloon dilators, but balloon dilators are not indicated for empiric dilation for dysphagia. Empiric dilation for solid food dysphagia is still controversial. Dilation is rarely associated with complications and is rarely contraindicated unless previous dilation attempts have been unsuccessful. Special circumstances such as caustic strictures, radiation stricture, and dysphagia associated with eosinophilic esophagitis should engender cautious dilation. Attention to detail about placement of guidewires and stricture type are still critical for safety. Predilation barium studies are not needed in all patients but should be employed if the endoscope is not able to pass the stricture and stricture length and angulation are unknown. Intralesional steroids and proton pump inhibitor therapy are important adjuvant treatments for resistant strictures and reflux associated strictures. Balloon dilation for achalasia is still a viable alternative, but it is likely to decrease in usage with the advent of more widespread laparoscopic myotomy.

Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

The primary treatment goals in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease are relief of symptoms, prevention of symptom relapse, healing of erosive esophagitis, and prevention of complications of esophagitis. In patients with reflux esophagitis, treatment is directed at acid suppression through the use of lifestyle modifications (e.g., elevating the head of the bed, modifying the size and composition of meals) and pharmacologic agents (a histamine H2-receptor antagonist [H2RA] taken on demand or a proton pump inhibitor IPPI] taken 30 to 60 minutes before the first meal of the day). The preferred empiric approach is step-up therapy (treat initially with an H2RA for eight weeks; if symptoms do not improve, change to a PPI) or step-down therapy (treat initially with a PPI; then titrate to the lowest effective medication type and dosage). In patients with erosive esophagitis identified on endoscopy, a PPI is the initial treatment of choice. Diagnostic testing should be reserved for patients who exhibit warning signs (i.e., weight loss, dysphagia, gastrointestinal bleeding) and patients who are at risk for complications of esophagitis (i.e., esophageal stricture formation, Barrett's esophagus, adenocarcinoma). Antireflux surgery, including open and laparoscopic versions of Nissen fundoplication, is an alternative treatment in patients who have chronic reflux with recalcitrant symptoms. Newer endoscopic modalities, including the Stretta and endocinch procedures, are less invasive and have fewer complications than antireflux surgery, but response rates are lower.

Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin versus pneumatic balloon dilation for treatment of primary achalasia.

GOALS: Despite a high success rate, pneumatic dilatation for achalasia is accompanied by a significant risk of esophageal perforation. Injection of botulinum toxin (botox) into the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) can lead to improvement in symptoms with reduced risk of complications. Direct comparisons of the two techniques are needed to define their role in clinical management. STUDY: We compared pneumatic dilatation to botox for patients with achalasia using a double blind, randomized study design. Patients underwent clinical, manometric, radiographic and endoscopic evaluation to confirm primary achalasia. They were randomized to receive either 80 units of botox into the LES or Witzel balloon dilatation. Patients also received sham dilatation or injection, respectively. The patients and investigators assessing symptom response were blinded to therapy. Symptoms and esophageal function were assessed at 3 weeks, 3 months and 1 year after therapy. Treatment failure was defined as the lack of decrease in symptom grade more than 1 or recurrence of symptoms. Patients with treatment failure crossed over to the alternative treatment. RESULTS: Thirty four patients were studied, and 31 completed the trial. Of the 18 patients randomized to Witzel dilatation, 16 (89%) of 18 remained in clinical remission. Of the two patients with treatment failure, one responded to botox injection. Of the 16 patients randomized to botox, (38%) 6 of 16 remained in clinical remission. Four patients had initial failure, and 6 relapsed at a mean of 4 months after therapy. Of the nine patients who crossed over to dilatation, seven responded well, but two required surgical management of perforation. Although both treatments had excellent initial clinical improvement, patients randomized to Witzel dilatation had superior long-term success ( < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Initial therapy with Witzel dilatation is associated with better long-term outcome than a single injection of botox. Because of the risk of endoscopic perforation, botox remains a viable alternative to dilatation.

Endoscopic Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common illness that requires continuous and potentially long-term therapy. Current therapies include long-term acid-reducing medications (most commonly proton pump inhibitors), laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery, and most recently, endoscopic therapies. For the majority of patients with symptomatic GERD, long-term acid-reduction medications are standard therapy. However, endoscopic therapies offer an exciting new avenue for both research and clinical application in persons with gastroesophageal reflux disease. The role of endoscopic therapy in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux is still unclear at this time. Its major advantage will be for patients who do not desire long-term medical therapy, particularly those who are on fixed incomes and do not have prescription coverage. The mechanisms by which endoscopic antireflux treatment is effective at this time are uncertain at this time but likely involve a decrease in transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations that result in decreased acid reflux and potentially in reduced acid sensory stimulation. The anticipated benefits from endoscopic therapy are discontinuance of medications in 30% to 50% of patients at 2 years posttreatment, a reduction in medication use in another 10% to 15% of patients, and avoidance of disruption of the antireflux barrier. The long-term durability of endoscopic treatment is still unknown, although 2-year data appear promising. The role of endoscopic therapy in the treatment of patients with modest hiatal hernias, delayed gastric emptying, atypical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, and failed Nissen fundoplication with documented postprocedure reflux remains unclear and requires further study.

The Stretta procedure for the treatment of GERD: 6 and 12 month follow-up of the U.S. open label trial.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter prospective study investigated the longer-term (12 month) safety and efficacy of radiofrequency energy delivery for the treatment of GERD. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of 118 patients with chronic heartburn and/or regurgitation who required antisecretory medication daily and had demonstrated pathologic esophageal acid exposure, a sliding hiatal hernia (