Spinal lesions caused by abusive trauma in young children.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal lesions are increasingly recognized as an integral part of the child abuse spectrum; however, the description of lesions, their biomechanics, true incidence, clinical impact, and medicolegal implications are poorly understood. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We report from the literature and our personal experience on abusive spinal lesions (ASL) in children under 3 years, compared with cases of abusive head injuries (AHI) without spinal lesions on the one hand and with accidental spinal lesions on the other. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2021, we collected 12 observations of ASL, 4 male and 8 female. These were compared with 338 cases of infants having AHI without ASL and 18 cases of accidental spinal trauma in the same age group. Fractures were found in 10 cases of ASL: wedge fracture in 9, and complete disruption with paraplegia in one, which required emergency reduction and stabilization with a good motor recovery. Two patients had intraspinal hemorrhagic lesions without fracture, associated in one case with tetraplegia which contributed to the fatal outcome. ASL affected girls more often and had a more severe clinical presentation; more than half of ASL involved the lumbar levels, which were unaffected in accidental traumas. CONCLUSIONS: ASL are not exceptional, and their presence corroborates cranial lesions indicating child abuse. Two etiologies emerge from this study: wedge fractures and cervical spinal cord lesions caused by shaking and the rare thoraco-lumbar dislocation indicating a particularly violent assault. Systematic MRI study of the spine is warranted in cases of child abuse.

Answer to Lynøe: Interesting data about confessions and abusive head trauma, but suboptimal analysis.

The authors of the cited paper respond to the critics formulated by a Swedish leading expert regarding methodology shortcomings of our study "Confessed versus denied inflicted head injuries in infants: similarities and differences." They admit some methodological limitations but maintain their conclusions that the diagnosis was correct in the confession and denial groups and that the denial was more difficult in the more severe cases.

Confessed versus denied inflicted head injuries in infants: similarities and differences.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abusive head injuries (AHI), and in particular shaken baby syndrome (SBS), are common causes of mortality and morbidity in infants. Although SBS is a well-established entity, based on clinical experience and experimental data, and confirmed by the perpetrators' confessions, a growing number of publications challenge the diagnostic criteria, and even the validity of the perpetrators' confession. We decided to study AHI in infants and compare cases with and without confession. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected prospectively all cases of infantile traumatic head injuries hospitalized in our institution between 2001 and 2021. From this database, we selected victims of AHI, comparing cases for which the perpetrator confessed during police inquiry ("confession" group) versus cases without confession ("denial" group). RESULTS: We studied 350 cases of AHI in infants; 137 of these (39.1%) were confessed. We found no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the child's previous history, as well as the personality and previous history of the caretakers. However, the "confession" group showed significantly more severe clinical presentation, cerebral lesions, retinal hemorrhages, and a more pejorative outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the diagnosis of AHI was confirmed by the confession in a large number of cases, indicating that the diagnostic criteria of AHI are robust. We also found that denial, although possibly sincere, was likely ill-founded, and that the perpetrators' decision to confess or deny was markedly influenced by the severity of the inflicted lesions.

The legal challenges to the diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome or how to counter 12 common fake news.

BACKGROUND: The shaken baby syndrome (SBS) is a common cause of severe traumatic lesions in infants. Although well established for almost five decades, SBS and its diagnosis are becoming more and more aggressively challenged in courts. These challenges feed on the scientific debate and controversies regarding the pathophysiology and the differential diagnoses, scientific uncertainty being readily exploited by specialized barristers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present review, we analyze the most common challenges to the concept of SBS and its diagnosis, as well as the scientific evidence available to counter these challenges, the differential diagnoses, and how SBS can be diagnosed with confidence. RESULTS: We found that the pathophysiology of SBS is well documented, with stereotyped descriptions by perpetrators, in good correlation with experimental studies and computer models. SBS is a well-defined clinico-pathological entity with a characteristic constellation of lesions; with a rigorous evaluation protocol, its diagnosis can be made rapidly and with excellent accuracy beyond a reasonable doubt. CONCLUSION: It is important that medical experts master an extensive knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of the lesions of SBS, in particular infantile subdural hematomas, as well as other CSF-related conditions. This emphasizes the role that pediatric neurosurgeons should play in the clinical and medicolegal management of these patients.

Subdural hematoma in infants: can it occur spontaneously? Data from a prospective series and critical review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Subdural hematomas (SDH) in infants often result from nonaccidental head injury (NAHI), which is diagnosed based on the absence of history of trauma and the presence of associated lesions. When these are lacking, the possibility of spontaneous SDH in infant (SSDHI) is raised, but this entity is hotly debated; in particular, the lack of positive diagnostic criteria has hampered its recognition. The role of arachnoidomegaly, idiopathic macrocephaly, and dehydration in the pathogenesis of SSDHI is also much discussed. PURPOSE: We decided to analyze apparent cases of SSDHI from our prospective databank. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected cases of SDH in infants without systemic disease, history of trauma, and suspicion of NAHI. All cases had fundoscopy and were evaluated for possible NAHI. Head growth curves were reconstructed in order to differentiate idiopathic from symptomatic macrocrania. RESULTS: Sixteen patients, 14 males and two females, were diagnosed with SSDHI. Twelve patients had idiopathic macrocrania, seven of these being previously diagnosed with arachnoidomegaly on imaging. Five had risk factors for dehydration, including two with severe enteritis. Two patients had mild or moderate retinal hemorrhage, considered not indicative of NAHI. Thirteen patients underwent cerebrospinal fluid drainage. The outcome was favorable in almost all cases; one child has sequels, which were attributable to obstetrical difficulties. CONCLUSION: SSDHI exists but is rare and cannot be diagnosed unless NAHI has been questioned thoroughly. The absence of traumatic features is not sufficient, and positive elements like macrocrania, arachnoidomegaly, or severe dehydration are necessary for the diagnosis of SSDHI.

[Accidental or non-accidental brain injury in infants. Prospective study of 88 cases]. / Traumatismes crâniens accidentels ou non du nourrisson. Etude prospective de 88 cas.

OBJECTIVE: To study the epidemiology of head injury (HI) in infants, the factors favouring the occurrence of a subdural haematoma (SDH), the prevalence of retinal haemorrhages (RH) and the prognostic factors, by comparing the non-accidental (NAHI) and accidental (AHI) head injuries. RH, in particular, are of fundamental value in the diagnosis of NAHI but, in the absence of systematic studies, their sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of the NAHI have rarely been assessed. METHOD: We prospectively collected the clinical, ophthalmologic and radiological data of HI occurring in children under 24 months old, notably by distinguishing essential macrocrania and symptomatic macrocrania of an SDH, by classifying the HI according to its severity. RESULTS: We observed 88 cases over a period of 22 months. It 28 cases it was NAHI and in the 60 others, AHI. The SDH was often correlated with the presence of retinal haemorrhages and the absence of signs of cranial impact, but not with child abuse or with essential macrocrania. The RH were of great importance in the diagnosis of NAHI; however, non-severe RH was noted in 4 cases of AHI. The neurological prognosis was essentially correlated with the initial clinical severity. CONCLUSION: Although only representing 33% of cases, child abuse was responsible for 2/3 of the deaths and for the totality of the severe morbidity in our series. The infants exhibiting perinatal problems represented an important group at risk of abuse, which justified their regular medical-social follow-up.

Imaging of head injuries in infants: temporal correlates and forensic implications for the diagnosis of child abuse.

OBJECT: The dating of inflicted head injuries in infants is a recurrent and difficult problem in the forensic evaluation of child abuse. The dating of hemorrhagic lesions when using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is delicate because many confusing factors interact. In particular, infants frequently develop subdural hematomas (SDHs), which are generally composed of a supernatant, similar to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and a sediment, similar to blood clots. In the absence of a validated theoretical model predicting the evolution of blood signal in head-injured infants, clinical data are much needed; however, reliably dated information regarding head injuries in infants is scarce. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied infants who presented with dated and corroborated head injury to investigate the temporal modifications of computerized tomography (CT) and MR imaging in relation to the delay since trauma. In cases of SDH, the authors distinguished between sediment and supernatant based on their CT scanning appearance. They then studied the MR imaging signal of these two components in T1- and T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and gradient-echo sequences. Whereas the signal of the supernatant showed little difference from that of the CSF and did not yield information about the date of trauma, the signal in the sediment, especially on the T1-weighted and FLAIR sequences, showed time-related modifications that could be used to date the trauma. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose a method by which to develop a time scale for the dating of head injuries in infants based on the modifications of signal and location of blood on CT and MR images.