Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 8 Suppl 1: s170-3, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15655612

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preoperative staging of rectal cancer is essential for the selection of the optimal treatment. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) in local staging of rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 4-year period, 33 patients with biopsy-proven rectal cancer underwent evaluation of the invasion of the rectal wall, the mesorectal lymph nodes status and the pelvic organs using EUS. We compared the EUS findings (uTN) to the histopathology examination of the resected specimens (pTN) according to TNM classification. RESULTS: Most patients had T3 tumours. Overall accuracy in assessing the depth of rectal wall invasion (T) and the lymph node status was 79% and 59% respectively. Two patients previously treated by preoperative chemoradiation were correctly staged only for N stage. CONCLUSIONS: EUS is a valuable diagnostic tool in local staging of rectal cancer. Progressively increasing experience will overcome the obstacles in accurate interpretation of ultrasound images.


Assuntos
Endossonografia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia por Agulha , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Amostragem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Eur J Surg ; 167(2): 106-9, 2001 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11266248

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience of mesenteric injuries after blunt abdominal trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital, Greece. SUBJECTS: 31 patients with mesenteric injuries out of 333 who required operations for blunt abdominal trauma between March 1978 and March 1998. 21 were diagnosed within 6 hours (median 160 min, early group) and in 10 the diagnosis was delayed (median 21 hours, range 15 hours-7 days, delayed group). INTERVENTIONS: Emergency laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, morbidity, and hospital stay. RESULTS: There were no deaths. The diagnosis was confirmed by diagnostic peritoneal lavage in 17/21 patients in the early group whereas 7/10 in the delayed group were diagnosed by clinical examination alone. Most of the injuries (n = 23) were caused by road traffic accidents. 30 patients had injured the small bowel mesentery and 4 the large bowel mesentery. 25 of the 31 patients had associated injuries. There were no complications in the early group, compared with 6 wound infections and 1 case of small bowel obstruction in the delayed group (p < 0.0001). Median hospital stay in the early group was 11 days (range 3-24) compared with 23 days (range 10-61) in the delayed group (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Because delay in diagnosis is significantly associated with morbidity and duration of hospital stay we recommend that all patients admitted with blunt abdominal trauma should have a diagnostic peritoneal lavage as soon as possible


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Mesentério/lesões , Doenças Peritoneais/diagnóstico , Doenças Peritoneais/epidemiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominais/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Grécia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Laparotomia/métodos , Masculino , Mesentério/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Peritoneais/cirurgia , Probabilidade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia
3.
Res Exp Med (Berl) ; 200(2): 125-35, 2001 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11271513

RESUMO

The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the effect of diclofenac sodium and ketoprofen, two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with different excretion pathways, and the role of other enteric factors during simultaneous administration of these drugs on the development of mucosal lesions of the small intestine in canines. Twenty-five animals were divided into three groups. Group I included 10 canines, 5 with diclofenac sodium (group Ia) and 5 with ketoprofen administration (group Ib). Group II included 5 animals in which a segment of ileum was surgically isolated from the rest of the small intestine. Group III included 10 animals in two subgroups of 5; a segment of ileum was surgically isolated in both subgroups; groups IIIa received diclofenac and group IIIb ketoprofen. Histological examination of the specimens taken revealed macroscopic and microscopic mucosal lesions in 5/5 animals in group Ia, whereas none of the 5 animals in group Ib had any lesions. Group II did not reveal any mucosal lesions. Three out of 5 animals (60%) administered diclofenac in group IIIa had intestinal mucosal lesions, but none of the 5 revealed lesions in the isolated loop of ileum. No lesions were observed in the isolated loop or in the rest of the intestinal mucosa in the animals in group IIIb. Our results suggest that NSAIDs produce intestinal mucosal lesions not only when administered per mouth but also after intramuscular administration. Diclofenac, unlike ketoprofen, was responsible for the development of lesions in the intestinal mucosa. The role of drugs and/or their metabolites in the intestine and certain other factors must still be determined.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/toxicidade , Diclofenaco/toxicidade , Intestino Delgado/efeitos dos fármacos , Intestino Delgado/patologia , Cetoprofeno/toxicidade , Animais , Cães , Mucosa Intestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Mucosa Intestinal/patologia
4.
Angiology ; 51(4): 325-9, 2000 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10779003

RESUMO

Just a few years ago, resistance to activated protein C (APCR) was reported to be of high significance representing a strong predisposing factor in the development of venous thrombosis (VT). A little while later, APCR was established to be the result of a point mutation of the factor V gene (factor V Leiden: a G-to-A transition at position 1691). Up to today, it is not certain whether factor V Leiden is in itself able to lead to VT, or whether it acts in synergy with other factors. Nevertheless, heterozygous subjects have a tenfold increase in the risk of VT when compared to general population, whereas the risk is 80 times greater in homozygous individuals. In 1996, a prothrombin gene mutation (prothrombin G20210A allele), which is a single-nucleotide G-to-A transition at position 20210 in the sequence of the 3'-untranslated region (3'UTR) on chromosome 11, was discovered. The presence of this mutant gene results in elevated plasma prothrombin concentrations, increasing the possibility for the development of VT. However, the coexistence of these two abnormalities, as well as the clinical consequence, have not yet been studied. So far, only a few reports are found in the literature describing the coexistence of both mutations. The authors present a 25-year-old patient with a simultaneous double mutation of the FV and F II gene. The patient was homozygous for the factor V Leiden and heterozygous for the prothrombin G20210A allele. It is unclear whether the coexistence of the two predisposes more to the development of VT than the summation of the two as independent factors.


Assuntos
Fator V/genética , Mutação Puntual , Síndrome Pós-Flebítica/genética , Protrombina/genética , Trombose Venosa/genética , Adulto , Heterozigoto , Homozigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva
5.
Int Angiol ; 19(4): 314-8, 2000 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11305729

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many predisposing factors have been associated with the development of venous thromboembolism. Recently, Factor V Leiden has been described as a common genetic risk factor. The geographic distribution of this genetic abnormality in the general population greatly varies. The prevalence of the Factor V Leiden mutation in Europe is high, particularly in Greece, where according to some authors it is especially high. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the Factor V Leiden mutation in patients presenting with at least one episode of venous thromboembolism and to compare it with that of the general population. METHODS: Blood samples were drawn from 388 subjects. 240 healthy blood donors (controls) and 148 unselected patients with a history of one or more episodes of venous thrombosis. DNA analysis was performed using the polymerase chain reaction to amplify the factor V gene exon 10, and to detect the Factor V Leiden point mutation. RESULTS: DNA analysis revealed Factor V Leiden mutations in eight (3.3%) control subjects (seven heterozygous and one homozygous) and in twenty-four (16.2%) patients, (twenty-two heterozygous and two homozygous). The difference between the two groups is statistically significant (p<0.0001; chi2 test). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of the Factor V Leiden mutation in the general population of North-Western Greece is 3.3%, which is within the same range as that reported for other European countries. The Factor V Leiden mutation is one of the most important predisposing genetic factors in the development of venous thrombosis and was present in 16.2% of our patients.


Assuntos
Fator V/análise , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Fator V/genética , Grécia/epidemiologia , Heterozigoto , Homozigoto , Humanos , Mutação Puntual , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Tromboembolia/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...