Addressing Housing Issues Among People With Kidney Disease: Importance, Challenges, and Recommendations.

Kidney disease disproportionately impacts people with low socioeconomic status, and low socioeconomic status is associated with worse outcomes for people with kidney disease. Unstable housing, which includes housing insecurity and homelessness, is increasing due to rising housing costs. There is mounting evidence that unstable housing and other health-related social needs are partially driving worse outcomes for people with low socioeconomic status. In this perspective, we consider the challenges to addressing housing for people with kidney disease, such as difficulty with identification of those with unstable housing, strict eligibility criteria for housing support, inadequate supply of affordable housing, and flaws in communities' prioritization of affordable housing. We discuss ways to tailor management for people experiencing unstable housing with kidney disease, and the importance of addressing safety, trauma, and emotional concerns as a part of care. We identify opportunities for the nephrology community to surmount challenges through increased screening, investment in workforce dedicated to community resource navigation, advocacy for investment in affordable housing, restructuring of communities' prioritization of affordable housing, and conducting needed research. Identifying and addressing housing needs among people with kidney disease is critical to eliminating kidney health disparities.

Social and Behavioral Barriers to Effective Care During the Transition to End-Stage Kidney Care.

Individuals living with CKD are disproportionately burdened by a multitude of adverse clinical and person-centered outcomes. When patients transition from advanced kidney disease to kidney failure, the psychosocial effects as well as social determinants of health challenges are magnified, making this a particularly difficult time for patients beginning kidney replacement therapy. The key social determinants of health challenges often include food and housing insecurity, poverty, unreliable transportation, low level education and/or health literacy, lack of language interpreters and culturally concordant educational materials, lack of health care insurance coverage, and mistrust of the health care system. Psychosocial and physical stressors, such as depression, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, sleep difficulty, fatigue, and pain, are often part of the illness burden among individuals living with CKD and can interact synergistically with the social challenges making the transition to kidney replacement therapy particularly challenging. To better support patients during this time, it is critical that social and structural determinants of health as well as mental health be assessed and if needs are identified, that services be provided.

Patients' Perspectives on Health-Related Social Needs and Recommendations for Interventions: A Qualitative Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: People with low socioeconomic status are disproportionately affected by kidney failure, and their adverse outcomes may stem from unmet health-related social needs. This study explored hemodialysis patient perspectives on health-related social needs and recommendations for intervention. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two people with low socioeconomic status receiving hemodialysis at 3 hemodialysis facilities in Austin, Texas. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Interviews were analyzed for themes and subthemes using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Seven themes and 21 subthemes (in parentheses) were identified: (1) kidney failure was unexpected (never thought it would happen to me; do not understand dialysis); (2) providers fail patients (doctors did not act; doctors do not care); (3) dialysis is detrimental (life is not the same; dialysis is all you do; dialysis causes emotional distress; dialysis makes you feel sick); (4) powerlessness (dependent on others; cannot do anything about my situation); (5) financial resource strain (dialysis makes you poor and keeps you poor; disability checks are not enough; food programs exist but are inconsistent; eat whatever food is available; not enough affordable housing; unstable housing affects health and well-being); (6) motivation to keep going (faith, support system, will to live); and (7) interventions should promote self-efficacy (navigation of community resources, support groups). LIMITATIONS: Limited quantitative data such as on dialysis vintage, and limited geographic representation. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis exacerbates financial resource strain, and health-related social needs exacerbate dialysis-related stress. The participants made recommendations to address social needs with an emphasis on increasing support and community resources for this population. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: People receiving dialysis often experience health-related social needs, such as food and housing needs, but little is known about how these impact patients' health and well-being or how to best address them. We interviewed people receiving dialysis about how health-related social needs affect them and what they think dialysis facilities can do to help them address those needs. The participants reported that they often lose their independence after starting dialysis and health-related social needs are common, exacerbate their stress and emotional distress, and reduce their sense of well-being. Dialysis facilities may be able to enhance the experience of these patients by facilitating connections with local resources and providing opportunities for patients to support one another.

Unstable Housing and Mortality Among US Veterans Receiving Dialysis.

Importance: Housing status is an important health determinant, yet little is known about unstable housing among individuals receiving dialysis. Objective: To determine factors associated with unstable housing among US veterans receiving dialysis and to estimate the association of unstable housing with risk of death. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and the US Renal Data System for patients who initiated dialysis between October 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018. Veterans were included if they used VHA outpatient services and completed 1 or more unstable housing screenings within a 3-year period before starting dialysis. Data analysis was conducted from January 24 to June 16, 2023. Exposures: Unstable housing was defined as self-report of not having stable housing within the past 2 months or having concerns about stable housing in the next 2 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was all-cause mortality. Characteristics associated with unstable housing at the time of dialysis initiation were examined. The multivariate Fine and Gray cumulative incidence model was used, treating transplant as a competing risk and age as an effect modifier, to examine the risk of death associated with unstable housing. Results: This study included 25 689 veterans, with a median age of 68 (IQR, 62-74) years. Most participants were men (98%), and more than half (52%) were White. There were 771 veterans (3%) with a positive screen for unstable housing within a 3-year period before starting dialysis. Compared with veterans with stable housing, those with unstable housing were younger (mean [SD] age, 61 [8] vs 68 [10] years), were more likely to be Black (45% vs 32%) or Hispanic (9% vs 7%), and were more likely to start dialysis with a central venous catheter (77% vs 66%), receive in-center hemodialysis (96% vs 91%), and have non-Medicare insurance (53% vs 28%). Factors associated with unstable housing included Hispanic ethnicity, non-arteriovenous fistula vascular access, lack of predialysis nephrology care, and non-Medicare insurance. Veterans with unstable housing had higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.20 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.37] for a median age of 68 years), and risks increased with age (P = .01 for interaction). In age-stratified analyses, unstable housing was associated with higher mortality among veterans aged 75 to 85 years (AHR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.18 to 2.28]), but associations were not observed for other age groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of veterans receiving dialysis, unstable housing experienced before starting dialysis was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, and risks increased with age. Further efforts are needed to understand the experiences of older adults with unstable housing and to estimate the scope of unstable housing among all individuals receiving dialysis.

Proceedings of a Workshop to Promote Community Health Worker Interventions in Nephrology.

ABSTRACT: Latinx populations face a higher burden of kidney failure and associated negative outcomes compared with non-Latinx White populations, despite sharing a similar prevalence of CKD. Community health worker (CHW) interventions have been shown to improve outcomes for Latinx individuals, but they are largely underutilized in kidney disease. We convened a workshop of four ongoing kidney disease CHW programs to identify successes, challenges, potential solutions, and needed research to promote CHW programs for Latinx individuals with kidney disease. Key points from the workshop and recommendations for intervention and research are highlighted. Facilitators of program success included prioritizing trust-building with participants, enabling participants to determine what aspects of the intervention were needed, providing participants with tools to help themselves and others after the intervention, and taking a trauma-informed approach to relationships. Challenges included persistent systemic barriers despite successful care navigation and low recruitment and retention. Research is needed to capture the effect of CHW interventions on outcomes and to determine how to implement CHW interventions for people with kidney disease nationwide.

Facilitating Medical Care for Latinx Individuals at Risk for CKD: A Pilot Intervention.

Rationale and Objective: Latinx individuals are at a higher risk for kidney failure than non-Latinx White individuals; however, they are less likely to receive pre-kidney failure medical care. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a community health worker (CHW) intervention that facilitated access to medical care for Latinx individuals. Study Design: Single-arm prospective study. Setting and Participants: Latinx adults were found to have albuminuria or risk factors for kidney disease at community screening events in Austin, Texas. Intervention: A 6-month CHW intervention that facilitated the following: (1) obtaining medical insurance; (2) medical care coordination with primary and nephrology care; (3) kidney disease education; and (4) connection with local resources to address health-related social needs. Outcomes: Recruitment, retention, medical care linkage, and participant and CHW-reported satisfaction with the intervention. Results: Of the 173 individuals who attended the 2 community screening events, 49 agreed to participate in the study, of whom, 51% were men with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 45 ± 14 years, and all self-identified as Mexican or Chicano. The mean ± SD estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 110 ± 21 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 41% of the participants reported a urine albumin-creatinine ratio of ≥30 mg/g. Among those enrolled, 28 of the 49 (57%) completed at least 1 CHW visit, and 20 of 49 (41%) completed the intervention. 7 individuals who needed assistance with insurance obtained insurance, and 15 of 20 (75%) scheduled an appointment with a primary care physician within 180 days. Participants reported that the US health care previously seemed inaccessible but gained insurance, the ability to navigate the system, and the ability to help others in their community to access medical care because of the program. Limitations: Small sample size and a single community may limit generalizability. Conclusions: We reported the acceptability of a CHW intervention. We encountered challenges with feasibility and identified strategies to overcome them. Studies are needed to test the effect of CHW interventions on outcomes and kidney health disparities. Funding: National Kidney Foundation young investigator research grant to Dr Novick. Plain Language Summary: Latinx individuals are at a higher risk for kidney failure than non-Latinx White individuals; however, they are less likely to receive pre-kidney failure medical care. We piloted a community health worker intervention that connected people with risk factors or showed evidence of kidney dysfunction at community screening events with medical care. Our findings indicate the acceptability of the intervention. We encountered challenges with feasibility and identified strategies to overcome them.

Unstable Housing and Kidney Disease: A Primer.

Stable housing is essential for health. Over 580,000 Americans experienced homelessness during one night in 2020, and over 37 million households spend over 30% of their income on housing. Unstable housing has been associated with mortality, acute care utilization, communicable and non-communicable diseases, a higher risk of kidney disease, and kidney disease progression. In this review, we define various forms of unstable housing, provide an overview of the interaction between unstable housing and health, and discuss existing evidence associating housing and kidney disease. We provide historical context for unstable housing in the United States, and detail policy, community, and individual-level factors that contribute to the risk of unstable housing. Unstable housing likely affects kidney health via a complex interplay of individual and structural factors. Various screening tools are available for use by providers. Special considerations should be made when working with individuals experiencing unstable housing to meet their unique needs, facilitate health care engagement, and optimize outcomes. Housing interventions have been shown to improve outcomes and should be examined for their role in kidney disease.

Perspectives on Kidney Disease Education and Recommendations for Improvement Among Latinx Patients Receiving Emergency-Only Hemodialysis.

Importance: In most states, undocumented Latinx immigrants with kidney failure receive dialysis in acute care settings on an emergency-only basis. How much kidney disease education Latinx immigrants receive and how to improve kidney disease education and outreach among Latinx populations are unknown. Objective: To understand the kidney disease educational gaps of Latinx individuals who need but lack access to scheduled outpatient dialysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews in a Texas hospital system from March 2020 to January 2021 with 15 individuals who received emergency-only dialysis when they were first diagnosed with kidney failure. Demographic information was collected, and a thematic analysis was performed using the constant comparative method on interviews after they were audio-recorded, translated, and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was performed from April 2020 to February 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Subthemes and themes from semistructured interviews. Results: All 15 persons interviewed (9 male individuals [60%]; mean [SD] age, 51 [17] years) identified as Hispanic, 11 (73%) were born in Mexico, and none reported knowing about their kidney disease more than 6 months before starting dialysis. The themes identified were (1) lack of kidney disease awareness, (2) education provided was incomplete and poor quality, (3) lack of culturally concordant communication and care, (4) elements that Latinx patients receiving emergency-only dialysis want in their education, (5) facilitators of patient activation and coping, and (6) Latinx patient recommendations to improve community outreach. Conclusions and Relevance: Latinx adults receiving emergency-only dialysis are usually unaware of their kidney disease until shortly before or after they start dialysis, and the education they receive is poor quality and often not culturally tailored. Participants made feasible recommendations on how to improve education and outreach among Latinx communities.

Gender Disparities in Authorship of Invited Manuscripts During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction: Women have historically been under-represented in medical literature, particularly prominent in authorship of invited commentaries. With the instantaneous change in work environment forcing Americans to adapt to working at home, many theorize that women will be more adversely affected due to traditional concepts of women being more responsible for the home in addition to work responsibilities. Objective: Understand how women contributed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) literature early in the pandemic. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of manuscripts published in three high-impact U.S. medical journals from February to May 2020 was performed. We used log-binomial regression to examine for an association between COVID-19 status and likelihood of having at least one female first author, and evaluated for effect modification according to whether the manuscript was invited. Results: Among 980 manuscripts, 313 (31.9%) listed at least one female first author, 203 were written on COVID-19 (20.7%), and 144 (14.7%) were invited. There was no association between COVID-19 status and having at least one female first author overall (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.19). The relationship between COVID-19 status and first-author sex was 0.23 (95% CI 0.06-0.92) for invited manuscripts and 1.04 (95% CI 0.81-1.35) for noninvited manuscripts (p for interaction 0.02). Discussion: We demonstrate that women were not less likely to be first authors on COVID-19 manuscripts but were less likely to be first authors on invited COVID-19 manuscripts. Early career female researchers are the most vulnerable for inability to meet metrics for promotion, accounting for the continued under-representation of women in senior academic roles. COVID-19 has the potential to exacerbate this disparity.

Disparities in Mental Health and Well-Being Among Black and Latinx Patients With Kidney Disease.

Black and Latinx individuals in the United States are afflicted disproportionately with kidney disease. Because of structural racism, social risk factors drive disparities in disease prevalence and result in worse outcomes among these patient groups. The impact of social and economic oppression is pervasive in physical and emotional aspects of health. In this review, we describe the history of race and ethnicity among black and Latinx individuals in the United States and discuss how these politicosocial constructs impact disparities in well-being and mental health. Lastly, we outline future research, clinical considerations, and policy considerations to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in well-being among black and Latinx individuals with kidney disease.

COVID-19 and Kidney Disease Disparities in the United States.

Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, age, and sex-related health disparities in kidney disease are prominent in the United States. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately affected marginalized populations. Older adults, people experiencing unstable housing, racial and ethnic minorities, and immigrants are potentially at increased risk for infection and severe complications from COVID-19. The direct and societal effects of the pandemic may increase risk of incident kidney disease and lead to worse outcomes for those with kidney disease. The rapid transition to telemedicine potentially limits access to care for older adults, immigrants, and people experiencing unstable housing. The economic impact of the pandemic has had a disproportionate effect on women, minorities, and immigrants, which may limit their ability to manage kidney disease and lead to complications or kidney disease progression. We describe the impact of COVID-19 on marginalized populations and highlight how the pandemic may exacerbate existing disparities in kidney disease.

The impact of donor urine chemical toxicology analysis on outcomes of kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acceptance of organs from acute chemical intoxicated donors remains controversial and outcomes are insufficiently explored. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of 484 patients undergoing deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). We assessed the association of positive urine drug screen before transplantation with cohort statistics, delayed graft function (DGF), and graft outcomes at 2 years. Multiple logistical regression (MLR) analysis was used to assess the odds ratio for DGF. RESULTS: Of 484 random DDKTs performed at our institution between January 2010 and October 2015, 280 deceased kidney donors were current drug users. Mean age was 35.4 (15) years, 39% male, 61% were African Americans, and 38.2% had more than one test positive. The main chemical toxins detectable in donor urine were alcohol, heroin, opioid/methadone, cocaine, marijuana, benzodiazepines, methamphetamine, ecstasy, and LSD. Single and multiple urine chemical toxicology of kidney donors did not have a significant effect on KT outcomes of DGF and graft failure during a median follow-up (P for odds ratios > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of deceased donor kidney grafts from donors with positive urine chemical toxicology may be a worthwhile method of increasing the availability of scarce donor kidney organs as such exposure to illicit drug(s) is not associated with major adverse transplant outcomes.