The Lateral Femoral Condyle Index Is Not a Risk Factor for Primary Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

BACKGROUND: The lateral femoral condyle index (LFCI)-a recently developed measure of the sphericity of the lateral femoral condyle-was reported to be a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, issues have been raised regarding how the index was measured and regarding the patient group and the knee in which it was measured. PURPOSE: To investigate the association between the LFCI and the risk of sustaining a primary, noncontact ACL injury, and to examine whether this association was moderated by the posterior-inferior-directed slope of the lateral tibial plateau. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted of deidentified magnetic resonance images of the uninjured knees of 86 athletes with ACL injury and the corresponding knees of 86 control athletes, matched for sports team, sex, and age. From those images, we measured the LFCI and the posterior-inferior-directed slope of the middle region articular cartilage surface of the tibial plateau's lateral compartment. Conditional logistic regressions were performed to determine whether the LFCI was significantly associated with ACL injury risk and whether the lateral tibial compartment middle cartilage slope moderated this association. Data were analyzed for female and male participants separately as well as for both groups combined. RESULTS: The LFCI was not found to be significantly associated with experiencing a primary, noncontact ACL injury for all analyses. The lateral tibial slope measure was not found to moderate the association between the LFCI and ACL injury. A conditional logistic regression analysis using the LFCI data of the injured knees, instead of the uninjured knees, of the participants with ACL injury revealed that the LFCI was significantly associated with ACL injury. CONCLUSION: In this population of athletically active female and male participants, the LFCI was not found to be a risk factor for noncontact ACL injury, regardless of the geometric features of the lateral tibial slope.

Clinical-Grade MRI-Based Methods to Identify Combined Anatomic Factors That Predict ACL Injury Risk in Male and Female Athletes.

BACKGROUND: Recently developed multivariate sex-specific statistical models can predict anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk using various knee anatomic factors. However, screening tools able to identify individuals at an increased injury risk are unlikely to be developed based on these models, given that sophisticated and time-consuming methods were used to measure those factors on research-grade resolution magnetic resonance images (MRIs). PURPOSE: To determine whether simpler methods, amenable to using clinical-grade resolution MRIs, can identify the same knee anatomic factors previously found to contribute to ACL injury risk using sophisticated methods and research-grade resolution images. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: High-resolution 3-dimensional MRIs previously acquired from 87 patients with primary, noncontact, grade III ACL injury and 87 uninjured matched control participants for a series of published studies were downgraded to clinical-grade resolution images. The 4 knee anatomic factors found to contribute to ACL injury risk in women and in men in these published studies-femoral intercondylar notch width at the anterior outlet of the ACL (NW_O), posterior-inferior directed slope of the middle region articular cartilage surface of the tibial plateau's lateral compartment (LatTibMCS), ACL volume, and tibial plateau's lateral compartment posterior meniscus to subchondral bone wedge angle (LatTibMBA)-were measured using clinical-grade resolution MRI-based methods. Stepwise multivariate conditional logistic regressions were used to identify the combinations of factors most highly associated with an ACL injury risk in women and men separately. RESULTS: The multivariate model that best predicted ACL injury risk in the female participants included the LatTibMCS and the NW_O. For the male participants, this model included the ACL volume and the LatTibMBA. These results corroborate the previously published results that reported models with the same knee anatomic factors to best predict injury risk in this group of young women and men. CONCLUSION: Simpler methods using MRIs downgraded to a clinical-grade resolution can identify the same knee anatomic factors previously found to significantly contribute to ACL injury risk using sophisticated methods and research-grade resolution MRIs.