RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery with breast re-irradiation is an emerging technique in the treatment of selected cases of locally recurrent breast cancer. Further information is needed to characterize factors that may select for an appropriate patient population for this treatment approach. METHODS: We report herein a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence treated with a second breast-conserving therapy with intraoperative radiotherapy. Patient records were reviewed to analyze toxicity, further recurrence, and characteristics of recurrent patients following this treatment approach. RESULTS: We included 57 patients in the analysis. At median follow-up of 24.5 months, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence occurred in six patients (11%), four of which localized to the quadrant of the initial recurrent disease and two of which recurred elsewhere in the treated breast. Locoregional control was 89%, and disease-free survival was 81%. Only one patient was found to have grade 3 or greater toxicity. CONCLUSION: A second breast-conserving surgery with intraoperative radiotherapy is tolerable with acceptable toxicity for patients with locally recurrent disease refusing mastectomy. Prospective clinical trials are needed to define the subset of patients who may be appropriate for this treatment approach as an alternative to mastectomy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia Segmentar , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Terapia Combinada , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Reirradiação , Reoperação , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have emerged as a prognostic indicator in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). There is debate surrounding the prognostic value of hot spots for CD8+ TIL enumeration. METHODS: We compared hot spot versus whole-tumor CD8+ TIL enumeration in prognosticating TNBC using immunohistochemistry on whole tissue sections and quantification by digital image analysis (Halo imaging analysis software; Indica Labs, Corrales, NM). A wide range of clinically relevant hot spot sizes was evaluated. RESULTS: CD8+ TIL enumeration was independently statistically significant for all hot spot sizes and whole-tumor annotations for disease-free survival by multivariate analysis. A 10× objective (2.2 mm diameter) hot spot was found to correlate significantly with overall survival (P = .04), while the remaining hot spots and whole-tumor CD8+ TIL enumeration did not (P > .05). Statistical significance was not demonstrated when comparing between hot spots and whole-tumor annotations, as the groups had overlapping confidence intervals. CONCLUSION: CD8+ TIL hot spot enumeration is equivalent to whole-tumor enumeration for prognostication in TNBC and may serve as a good alternative methodology in future studies and clinical practice.