Real-World Safety and Tolerability of Nintedanib in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Interim Report of a Post-Marketing Surveillance in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Nintedanib is recommended for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); however, treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) is common. A large-scale post-marketing surveillance study is investigating the real-world tolerability/safety of nintedanib in Japanese patients with IPF in routine clinical practice. Here, we report a 12-month interim analysis of this study. METHODS: The study included Japanese patients with IPF who started nintedanib between 31 August 2015 and 25 December 2018. The primary outcome was the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), defined as AEs for which a causal relationship with nintedanib could not be excluded. The secondary outcome was change from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC). Outcomes were analysed in patients who stopped ('discontinued' subgroup) and continued ('continued' subgroup) nintedanib after 12 months. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine potential risk factors for treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: Of 5578 patients in the safety analysis set, 2795 (50.1%) discontinued nintedanib within 12 months of treatment initiation. Overall, 3767 patients (67.5%) had ADRs, with 1356 (24.3%) discontinuing nintedanib because of an ADR. Among patients in the 'discontinued' subgroup (n = 2795), 1442 (51.6%) discontinued because of an ADR. The most common ADRs causing discontinuation within 3 and 12 months were hepatic function abnormal (n = 137/730; 18.8%) and diarrhoea (n = 190/1442; 13.2%), respectively. At 12 months, the decrease in FVC from baseline was smaller in the 'continued' versus the 'discontinued' subgroup (adjusted mean ± standard error change - 104.4 ± 10.9 ml vs. - 311.2 ± 29.2 ml). Stage III/IV IPF and FVC < 70% predicted at baseline were risk factors for early treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: About 50% of Japanese patients with IPF discontinued nintedanib within the first year of treatment, with worse lung function being associated with an increased risk of early treatment discontinuation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02607722; European Union electronic register of Post-Authorisation Studies: EUPAS10891.

Design and rationale of the Japanese Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (JIPS) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies investigated patients with IPF; however, only a few examined patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs). METHODS: The Japanese Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (JIPS) Registry, which was initiated in December 2016, is a multicenter prospective observational study of patients newly diagnosed with IIPs from 86 facilities treating ILDs. The plan is to enroll more than 600 new patients during the 2-year enrolment period and to follow their progress for 3 years after the last case enrolment. If additional consent is obtained, the study will continue for another 2 years. Research questions mainly focus on identifying the frequency by IIP classification, patient background, and diagnostic methods during enrolment, survival, acute exacerbation rate, changes in high-resolution CT imaging, forced vital capacity, and interstitial pneumonia markers over time. Other research questions, including those regarding disease behavior in patients with progressive fibrosing-ILD and new biomarkers associated with genetic predispositions, will be investigated. DISCUSSION: The JIPS Registry will provide a comprehensive description of the disease progression, prognosis, treatment status, new biomarkers, and validity of guidelines and central multidisciplinary decisions for IPF and similar diseases that can be differentiated from IPF among IIPs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board of Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center (KCRC-16-0005), and that of Jichi Medical University approved the biobank part (I18-005). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and will be presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinTrials.gov Registry (NCT03041623, first posted on February 3, 2017).

[Central Pattern Generators for Breathing and Gait and Possible Medical Application of Oriental BodyWork: Access to Extrapyramidal and Body Trunk Movement System Through Breathing Methods].

The neurophysiological background of oriental bodywork based on breathing methods is poorly understood. Recently, experimental techniques using genetically engineered animals have been applied to identify and analyze the functions of motor columns such as medial motor column (MMC), known as evolutionarily old locomotion central pattern generators (CPGs) in lamprey. In oriental bodywork between two individuals, locomotion-related body reactions are often observed. In Nishino Breathing Methods (NBM), the extrapyramidal system is likely to be accessed through the practice of Sokushin-kokyu (whole body awareness with breathing), Karin (body axis rotation and reactivation with breathing), and Taiki (body trunk mutual signaling with breathing; the coordination of two individual body trunks). In addition, kinesiological discussions of ancient oriental traditions, such as the practice of mysterious hand-back contact and the active expiration that relates to music and body trunk reaction, are presented. Based on the hypothesis that oriental bodywork is accessing the extrapyramidal body trunk motor system (basal ganglia to spiral locomotion CPGs), this paper discusses the inter-individual body reactions coexisting through different evolutionary levels in multilayered motor systems, and their possible medical applications.

Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.In a randomized, open-label, phase III NEJ009 study, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib-alone in patients with untreated non-small-cell lung cancer harboring mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor. Herein, we report the updated survival outcome and long-term tolerability. Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib (gefitinib 250 mg orally, once daily) and gefitinib combined with carboplatin plus pemetrexed (GCP in a 3-week cycle for six cycles followed by concurrent gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance) groups. At the data cutoff (May 22, 2020), GCP demonstrated significantly better PFS2 (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; P = .027) than gefitinib. However, the updated median OS was 38.5 months (95% CI, 31.1 to 47.1) and 49.0 months (95% CI, 41.8 to 56.7) in the gefitinib and GCP groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.06; P = .127). The OS in both groups was similar for the overall patient population. No severe adverse events occurred since the first report. This updated analysis revealed that the GCP regimen improved PFS and PFS2 with an acceptable safety profile compared with gefitinib-alone. GCP is more efficient than gefitinib monotherapy as a first-line treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

Long-term safety of Prolastin®-C, an alpha1-proteinase inhibitor, in Japanese patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of alpha1-proteinase inhibitor, modified process (Alpha-1 MP), was evaluated in a clinical trial of Japanese patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). The present study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety of weekly intravenous infusions of 60 mg/kg Alpha-1 MP in Japanese patients with AATD. METHODS: This was a multi-center, open-label extension (OLE) study that enrolled adult patients with AATD, who had completed the preceding safety and PK clinical trial. Patients were administered with Alpha-1 MP (60 mg/kg) weekly, for 52 weeks, and this could be renewed annually. Alpha1-MP trough levels (Cmin) were evaluated, and safety endpoints include: treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAEs potentially related to Alpha-1 MP, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, laboratory parameters, vital signs, and pulmonary function tests (forced expiration volume in 1 s [FEV1] and forced vital capacity [FVC]). RESULTS: Four patients underwent Alpha-1 MP intravenous infusions at a mean (SD) of 210.8 (9.54) for 213 weeks (four years), with a Cmin of 55.73 (4.99) mg/dL. A total of fifty-four TEAEs were reported in four patients, in which most of them were mild (n = 52, 96.3%). Two patients had five SAEs, and all were unrelated to treatment. Three mild TEAEs were potentially related to treatment with Alpha-1 MP. No clinically significant findings in laboratory parameters, COPD exacerbations, or vital signs were observed. There were no identifiable differences in FEV1 and FVC throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term weekly intravenous infusions of 60 mg/kg Alpha-1 MP are generally safe and well-tolerated in Japanese patients with AATD. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT02870348; JAPIC CTI: JapicCTI-163194.

Bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in Japanese patients with advanced, metastatic, EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ026): overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab is a promising candidate for combination treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (eg, erlotinib), which could improve outcomes for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We have previously shown in NEJ026, a phase 3 trial, that the combination of bevacizumab plus erlotinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in these patients. In further analyses, we aimed to examine the effects of bevacizumab-erlotinib on overall survival, time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death, and quality of life. METHODS: This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial (NEJ026) was done in 69 hospitals and medical, community-based centres across Japan. Eligible patients had stage IIIB, stage IV, or postoperative recurrent, EGFR-mutant (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 Leu858Arg point mutation) NSCLC, had not previously received systemic chemotherapy, and were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation sequence and minimisation to receive either 150 mg oral erlotinib once daily plus 15 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab once every 21 days, or 150 mg oral erlotinib once daily, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified according to sex, smoking status, EGFR mutation subtype, and clinical disease stage. All participants, investigators, and study personnel (including those assessing outcomes) were unmasked to treatment allocation. We report the secondary outcomes of overall survival and quality of life (the period from enrolment to confirmation of a minimally important difference on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30), and the exploratory outcome of time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death. Overall survival and the exploratory outcome were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and had response evaluations. Quality of life was analysed in patients in the modified intention-to-treat population who had completed the quality of life questionnaires. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000017069, and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031180056, and is currently closed. FINDINGS: Between June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were enrolled. 112 patients who received bevacizumab-erlotinib and 112 who received erlotinib only were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. At data cutoff (Nov 30, 2019) and a median follow-up of 39·2 months (IQR 23·9-43·5), the median overall survival was 50·7 months (95% CI 37·3-not estimable [NE]) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group and 46·2 months (38·2-NE) in the erlotinib-only group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·007, 95% CI 0·681-1·490; p=0·97). In analysis of the exploratory outcome, after a median follow-up of 23·9 months (IQR 14·2-39·1), the median time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death was 28·6 months (95% CI 22·1-35·9) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group and 24·3 months (20·4-29·1) in the erlotinib-only group (HR 0·773, 95% CI 0·562-1·065). The median time between enrolment and confirmation of a minimally important difference on the EORTC QLQ-C30 was 6·0 months (95% CI 5·2-11·3) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group and 8·3 months (5·7-13·9) in the erlotinib-only group (p=0·47). INTERPRETATION: The addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib did not prolong survival in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC, but both treatment groups had relatively long survival durations. Why the addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib did not affect overall survival is unclear, but it is possible that the beneficial effects of combination therapy were not seen because overall survival was influenced by treatment regimens used after disease progression. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical.

A phase II study of first-line afatinib for patients aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: North East Japan Study Group trial NEJ027.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is most common among older individuals. However, polypharmacy and comorbidities, which are also more common in older individuals, can limit treatment options. Previous studies suggest that afatinib can be used safely and effectively in elderly patients. This study investigated the anti-tumour activity and safety profile of first-line afatinib in previously-untreated elderly Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This was a single-arm, open-label, phase II study, performed in multiple centres in Japan. Previously untreated patients, aged ≥75 years, with EGFR mutation-positive (Del19 or L858R) advanced NSCLC were treated with afatinib 40 mg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were managed with protocol-defined dose adjustments. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by central review. RESULTS: In total, 38 patients received at least one dose of afatinib, and 37 were evaluable for response. Median age was 77.5 years (range 75-91), all patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and 60.5% had Del19-positive disease. Median follow-up was 838 days. ORR was 75.7% (2 complete responses and 26 partial responses). Median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5-19.0). Median overall survival (OS) was 35.2 months (95% CI, 35.2-not reached); the 2-year OS rate was 78.3%. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were diarrhoea (28.9%), paronychia (23.7%), and rash/acne (15.8%). Dose reductions due to TRAEs were reported in 78.9% of patients, and eight (21.1%) patients discontinued afatinib due to TRAEs. No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Although dose adjustments were relatively common in this small group of Japanese patients aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, discontinuation occurred much less frequently, and most patients were able to stay on treatment for well over a year. Further, afatinib was associated with high response rates and prolonged PFS and OS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT) as trial number 031180136 (date of initial registration: 19 February 2019), and the University Hospital Network (UMIN) as trial number 000017877 (date of initial registration: 11 June 2015).

Serum surfactant protein D as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 trial in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, fatal disorder with a variable disease course. The recent advancement of antifibrotic therapy has increased the need for reliable and specific biomarkers. This study aimed to assess alveolar epithelial biomarkers as predictors for the efficacy of the antifibrotic drug pirfenidone. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of pirfenidone in Japan (total, n = 267; pirfenidone, n = 163; placebo, n = 104). Logistic regression analysis was performed to extract parameters that predicted disease progression, defined by a ≥ 10% relative decline in vital capacity (VC) from baseline and/or death, at week 52. For assessment of serum surfactant protein (SP)-D, SP-A and Krebs von den Lungen (KL)-6, all patients were dichotomized by the median concentration of each biomarker at baseline to the high and low biomarker subgroups. Associations of these concentrations were examined with changes in VC at each time point from baseline up to week 52, along with progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, the effect of pirfenidone treatment on serial longitudinal concentrations of these biomarkers were evaluated. RESULTS: In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, body mass index (BMI), %VC and SP-D in the pirfenidone group, and BMI and %VC in the placebo group were indicated as predictors of disease progression. Pirfenidone treatment reduced the decline in VC with statistical significance in the low SP-D and low SP-A subgroups over most of the treatment period, and also prolonged PFS in the low SP-D and low KL-6 subgroups. Furthermore, SP-D levels over time course were reduced in the pirfenidone group from as early as week 8 until the 52-week treatment period compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Serum SP-D was the most consistent biomarker for the efficacy of pirfenidone in the cohort trial of IPF. Serial measurements of SP-D might have a potential for application as a pharmacodynamic biomarker. Trial registration The clinical trial was registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (JAPIC) on September 13, 2005 (registration No. JapicCTI-050121; http://Clinicaltrials.jp ).

Prognostic factors for patients with metastatic or recurrent thymic carcinoma receiving palliative-intent chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Thymic malignancies are a model of rare cancer. However, little clinical data is available based on the large database. We aimed to clarify the prognostic factors, particularly the metastatic sites, for thymic malignancies using one of the largest, representative, multi-institutional databases, the NEJ023 database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Stage IVA/IVB or recurrent thymic carcinoma were enrolled between 1995 and 2014. Clinicopathologic information was evaluated, and the patients were subdivided according to the metastatic organs of involvement (serosal dissemination, liver, lymph node, pulmonary, and bone metastasis). A Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression were used to evaluate survival. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-nine patients with metastases and a predominantly squamous histology (66.7%) were included. Most patients (53.0%) had serosal dissemination, whereas 26.5%, 21.9%, 19.7%, and 15.8% had pulmonary, lymph node, bone and liver metastases, respectively. Over a median follow-up time of 21.5 months, the median overall survival (mOS) was 30.7 months. When the subjects were grouped according to involved metastatic sites, patients with more than 3 involved metastatic organs had the worst survival outcome. Among patients with isolated involvement, those with bone metastasis had the poorest survival, followed by patients with liver metastasis. Subjects with hypoalbuminemia also had poor survival outcomes. When patients treated with platinum and anthracycline-containing pharmacotherapy were compared with those treated with platinum and non-anthracycline-containing pharmacotherapy, no significant difference was observed. Bone metastasis (P = 0.0005), liver metastasis (P =  0.047), and hypoalbuminemia (P =  0.0021) were identified as prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The site of metastatic involvement affects the survival outcomes of patients with thymic carcinoma, and this result may reflect the sensitivity of metastatic sites to pharmacotherapy. As a next step, controlling liver metastasis with pharmacotherapy could help to improve the prognosis of patients with thymic carcinoma.

Clinical Outcomes of Second-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Thymic Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 191 Patients from the NEJ023 Study.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the rarity of this tumor, there is limited information about second-line chemotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional, retrospective study named NEJ023 for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. Patients without indications for curative treatment were treated with chemotherapy from 1995 to 2014 at 40 institutions in the North East Japan Study Group. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, data on treatment methods, and outcomes of second-line chemotherapy were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: In total, 191 patients were enrolled in this study. Second-line chemotherapy included platinum-based doublets in 57.6% of patients, other multidrug chemotherapy (e.g., cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide) in 13.6%, and monotherapy in 28.8%. The median follow-up time was 50.5 months, and the median overall survival (OS) from the start of second-line chemotherapy was 22.4 (95% confidence interval, 17.5-26.7) months. The average response rate (RR) was 20.0% overall; it was 21.6% for patients treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, 13.6% for those treated with other multidrug chemotherapy, and 19.6% for those treated with single agent chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in OS between platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, other multidrug chemotherapy, and monotherapy (the median OS was 22.4, 25.7, and 21.4 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: The median OS was 22.4 months in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma treated with second-line chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in RR and OS between monotherapy and multidrug chemotherapy in this study. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Owing to the rarity of this tumor, there is limited information about second-line chemotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma. This is the largest data for those patients treated with second-line chemotherapy. This study suggests there is no significant difference in efficacy between monotherapy and multidrug chemotherapy for previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma. This result can support the adequacy to select monotherapy as treatment of those patients.

Gefitinib Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: NEJ009 Study.

PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy is highly effective for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations; however, little is known about the efficacy and safety of this combination compared with that of standard therapy with EGFR- tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone. METHODS: We randomly assigned 345 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC with EGFR mutations to gefitinib combined with carboplatin plus pemetrexed or gefitinib alone. Progression-free survival (PFS), PFS2, and overall survival (OS) were sequentially analyzed as primary end points according to a hierarchical sequential testing method. Secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: The combination group demonstrated a better ORR and PFS than the gefitinib group (ORR, 84% v 67% [P < .001]; PFS, 20.9 v 11.9 months; hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.490 [P < .001]), although PFS2 was not significantly different (20.9 v 18.0 months; P = .092). Median OS in the combination group was also significantly longer than in the gefitinib group (50.9 v 38.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.722; P = .021). The rate of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events, such as hematologic toxicities, in the combination group was higher than in the gefitinib group (65.3% v 31.0%); there were no differences in quality of life. One treatment-related death was observed in the combination group. CONCLUSION: Compared with gefitinib alone, gefitinib combined with carboplatin plus pemetrexed improved PFS in patients with untreated advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations with an acceptable toxicity profile, although its OS benefit requires further validation.

Correction to: Real-world treatment of over 1600 Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer with daily afatinib.

The original article can be found online.

Erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ026): interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to first-generation or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy develops in almost half of patients with EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after 1 year of treatment. The JO25567 phase 2 trial comparing erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination therapy with erlotinib monotherapy established the activity and manageable toxicity of erlotinib plus bevacizumab in patients with NSCLC. We did a phase 3 trial to validate the results of the JO25567 study and report here the results from the preplanned interim analysis. METHODS: In this prespecified interim analysis of the randomised, open-label, phase 3 NEJ026 trial, we recruited patients with stage IIIB-IV disease or recurrent, cytologically or histologically confirmed non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR genomic aberrations from 69 centres across Japan. Eligible patients were at least 20 years old, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease, and one or more measurable lesions based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (1.1). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral erlotinib 150 mg per day plus intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 21 days, or erlotinib 150 mg per day monotherapy. Randomisation was done by minimisation, stratified by sex, smoking status, clinical stage, and EGFR mutation subtype. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. This study is ongoing; the data cutoff for this prespecified interim analysis was Sept 21, 2017. Efficacy was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of treatment and had at least one response evaluation. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000017069. FINDINGS: Between June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab (n=114) or erlotinib alone (n=114). 112 patients in each group were evaluable for efficacy, and safety was evaluated in 112 patients in the combination therapy group and 114 in the monotherapy group. Median follow-up was 12·4 months (IQR 7·0-15·7). At the time of interim analysis, median progression-free survival for patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group was 16·9 months (95% CI 14·2-21·0) compared with 13·3 months (11·1-15·3) for patients in the erlotinib group (hazard ratio 0·605, 95% CI 0·417-0·877; p=0·016). 98 (88%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 53 (46%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was rash (23 [21%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group vs 24 [21%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). Nine (8%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and five (4%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had serious adverse events. The most common serious adverse events were grade 4 neutropenia (two [2%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group) and grade 4 hepatic dysfunction (one [1%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and one [1%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: The results of this interim analysis showed that bevacizumab plus erlotinib combination therapy improves progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC. Future studies with longer follow-up, and overall survival and quality-of-life data will be required to further assess the efficacy of this combination in this setting. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Real-world treatment of over 1600 Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer with daily afatinib.

BACKGROUND: This prospective, post-marketing observational study in Japanese patients aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of daily afatinib use in general practice. METHODS: This non-interventional study (NCT02131259) enrolled treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients with inoperable/recurrent EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, eligible for afatinib treatment as per the afatinib label in Japan. Patients received afatinib at the approved dose (20, 30, 40, or 50 mg/day; physician decision), and were observed following treatment initiation for 52 weeks or until premature discontinuation. Primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Secondary endpoints included ADRs of special interest, and objective response rate (ORR). Post hoc Cox multivariate analyses were used to assess prognostic factors associated with the incidence of ADRs. RESULTS: 1602 patients, at 374 sites (April 2014-March 2015), were included in the analysis; 307 (19%) were aged ≥ 75 years. The most frequently reported ADRs (all/grade 3-4) were diarrhea (78%/15%), rash/acne (59%/6%), stomatitis (31%/4%), and nail effects (38%/4%). Serious ADRs resulting in death occurred in 18 patients (1%). 762 patients (48%) had ≥ 1 afatinib dose reduction and 366 (23%) discontinued due to ADRs; the most common reason for both was diarrhea (8.2% and 6.7%, respectively). ORR was 40.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world treatment of 1602 Japanese patients with afatinib was associated with a predictable ADR profile. Afatinib showed effectiveness in inoperable/recurrent EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, especially as first-line treatment. As with other EGFR TKIs, prompt management of adverse events is needed in the Japanese population, to reduce serious events and outcomes, including interstitial lung disease.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of Alpha-1 MP (Prolastin®-C) in Japanese patients with alpha1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Alpha1-Proteinase Inhibitor, Modified Process (Alpha-1 MP) is used for augmentation therapy in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD), an extremely rare disease in Japan. Weekly doses of 60 mg/kg Alpha-1 MP have been shown to be safe and well tolerated in non-Japanese subjects, but the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) have not been evaluated in Japanese subjects. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety and PK of 60 mg/kg Alpha-1 MP administered by weekly IV infusions over 8 weeks in Japanese subjects with AATD. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label trial in Japanese adults aged ≥20 years with AATD. Samples for evaluation of serum alpha1-PI concentration and PK parameters were collected at 10 time points until the seventh day after the last dose at Week 8: immediately before dosing, immediately after dosing (time 0), and 0.25, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 120, and 168 hours after dosing. RESULTS: Four subjects were analyzed. The median tmax was 0.534 h. Mean ± SD values for t½, Cmax, and AUC0-7days were 150.4 ± 36.18 h, 174.2 ± 30.51 mg/dL, and 14,913.2 ± 1633.45 mg*h/dL, respectively. Mean trough concentration at week 8 was 55.4 ± 7.23 mg/dL. Alpha-1 MP therapy was safe, with no serious adverse events or deaths reported. Two treatment-emergent adverse events of fatigue in one subject were considered to be possibly related. CONCLUSIONS: The PK and safety of Alpha-1 MP in Japanese subjects with AATD were consistent with the Alpha-1 MP profile in non-Japanese subjects (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02870309; JAPIC CTI: JapicCTI-163160).

Phase I Study Evaluating the Combination of Afatinib with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed After First-line EGFR-TKIs.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Promising reports have described the combination of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) with carboplatin plus pemetrexed or bevacizumab. However, no analysis of afatinib with platinum-doublet chemotherapies has been performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the safety and antitumor efficacy of afatinib combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who progressed during first-generation EGFR-TKIs. RESULTS: Ten patients received 20 or 30 mg/day afatinib with carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2). Dose-limiting toxicities included delay of afatinib ≥14 days, grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 hypokalemia, grade 3 serum amylase increase and grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The recommended dose of afatinib was 20 mg/day in this combination therapy. Overall response rate was 30% and median progression-free survival was 13.7 months. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate the combination of afatinib, carboplatin and pemetrexed. At the recommended dose, this combination was well tolerated and had a good clinical efficacy.

Updated survival outcomes of NEJ005/TCOG0902: a randomised phase II study of concurrent versus sequential alternating gefitinib and chemotherapy in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer with sensitive EGFR mutations.

BACKGROUND: The North-East Japan Study Group (NEJ) 005/Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group (TCOG) 0902 study has reported that first-line concurrent and sequential alternating combination therapies of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (gefitinib) plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (carboplatin/pemetrexed) offer promising efficacy with predictable toxicities for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. However, overall survival (OS) data were insufficient in the primary report because of the lack of death events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were re-evaluated at the final data cut-off point (March 2017) for the entire population (n=80). RESULTS: At the median follow-up time of 35.6 months, 88.8% of patients had progressive disease and 77.5% of patients had died. Median PFS was 17.5 months for the concurrent regimen and 15.3 months for the sequential alternating regimen (P=0.13). Median OS was 41.9 and 30.7 months, respectively (P=0.036). Updated response rates were similar in both groups (90.2% and 82.1%, respectively; P=0.34). Patients with Del19 tumours displayed relatively better OS (median: 45.3 vs 33.3 months, respectively) than those with L858R (31.4 vs 28.9 months, respectively). No severe adverse events, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in the period since the primary report. CONCLUSIONS: This updated analysis confirms that PFS is improved with first-line combination therapy compared with gefitinib monotherapy and that the concurrent regimen, in particular, offers an OS benefit of 42 months in the EGFR-mutated setting. Our ongoing NEJ009 study will clarify whether this combination strategy can be incorporated into routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN C000002789, Post-results.

Prognostic Factors and Efficacy of First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Thymic Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 286 Patients from NEJ023 Study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic factors and the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy remain unclear in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study named NEJ023 for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. All patients without any indication of curative treatment were treated with chemotherapy from 1995 to 2014 at 40 institutions of the North East Japan Study Group. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients with advanced thymic carcinoma were analyzed. First-line chemotherapy included platinum-based doublets in 62.2% of the patients, monotherapy in 3.5%, and other multidrug chemotherapy (e.g., cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide [ADOC]) in 34.3%. The median follow-up period was 55.5 months, and the median overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line chemotherapy was 30.7 months (95% confidence interval, 25.9-35.9 months). There was no significant difference in OS among different first-line chemotherapy regimens (e.g., between carboplatin/paclitaxel and ADOC, median OS: 27.8 vs. 29.9 months). Masaoka-Koga stage IVa and volume reduction surgery were favorable prognostic factors for OS in the multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of each first-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced thymic carcinoma did not vary significantly. Our results might support the adequacy of the use of carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for these patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Because of its rarity, there is limited information about prognostic factors and efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. This is the largest data set for those patients treated with chemotherapy. This study suggests there is no significant difference in efficacy between carboplatin/paclitaxel and cisplatin/doxorubicin/vincristine/cyclophosphamide for advanced thymic carcinoma. This result can support the adequacy of the selection of platinum doublets as treatment for those patients, rather than anthracycline-based multidrug regimen.

Identification of Secretory Leukoprotease Inhibitor As an Endogenous Negative Regulator in Allergic Effector Cells.

Mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils are central effectors in allergic inflammatory disorders. These cells secrete abundant serine proteases as well as chemical mediators and cytokines; however, the expression profiles and functions of their endogenous inhibitors remain elusive. We found that murine secretory leukoprotease inhibitor (SLPI) is expressed in basophils and eosinophils but in not in mast cells. SLPI-deficient (Slpi-/-) basophils produce more cytokines than wild-type mice after IgE stimulation. Although the deletion of SLPI in basophils did not affect the release of chemical mediators upon IgE stimulation, the enzymatic activity of the serine protease tryptase was increased in Slpi-/- basophils. Mice transferred with Slpi-/- basophils were highly sensitive to IgE-mediated chronic allergic inflammation. Eosinophils lacking SLPI showed greater interleukin-6 secretion and invasive activity upon lipopolysaccharide stimulation, and the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 by these eosinophils was increased without stimulation. The absence of SLPI increases JNK1 phosphorylation at the steady state, and augments the serine phosphorylation of JNK1-downstream ETS transcriptional factor Elk-1 in eosinophils upon stimulation. Of note, SLPI interacts with a scaffold protein, JNK-interacting protein 3 (JIP3), that constitutively binds to the cytoplasmic domain of toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, suggesting that SLPI controls Elk-1 activation via binding to JIP3 in eosinophils. Mice transferred with Slpi-/- eosinophils showed the exacerbation of chitin-induced allergic inflammation. These findings showed that SLPI is a negative regulator in allergic effector cells and suggested a novel inhibitory role of SLPI in the TLR4 signaling pathways.