Ultrasound-based measures in carpal tunnel syndrome: What to measure?

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy and is caused by compression of the median nerve (MN) at the level of transverse carpal ligament of the volar wrist. Radiomics is an advanced semi-automated image analysis method that is utilized to identify characteristics in the MN that can detect CTS with considerable reproducibility.

Outcomes and Complications of Corticosteroid Injection of Rheumatoid Nodules.

Objective: Rheumatoid nodules (RN), a classic cutaneous extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis, can often cause discomfort or cosmetic embarrassment. This research determined the effectiveness and complications of corticosteroid injection of the RN. Methods: Using a repeated measure design, 66 consecutive symptomatic RN were measured, underwent corticosteroid injection with 1 to 2mL of a 50:50 mixture of 1% lidocaine and triamcinolone acetonide (20-40mg), and then reassessed at four months for softening, reduction in size, and complications, including infection. Results: The mean age of our patient group was 53.3±10.6 years; 45 percent were Hispanic, 55 percent were non-Hispanic White, 100 percent were seropositive (rheumatoid factor and/or anti-CCP antibody), and 87.5 percent were female. Baseline mean RN diameter was 0.50±0.51cm and four months after injection was reduced to 0.29±0.33cm (decreased 42% or 0.21±0.57cm reduction, 95% CI: 0.46 <0.21< 0.37, p=0.013), 100 percent (66/66) were less painful, and 77 percent (51/66) were palpably softened. However, 70 percent (46/66) demonstrated cutaneous atrophy and/or hypopigmentation at four months, 53 percent (35/66) nodules recurred within 12 months, and 47 percent (31/66) nodules were eventually surgically removed. Limitations: Two (3%) of the larger RN (2.5cm on the olecranon and 2cm on the 2nd toe) became infected and failed antibiotic therapy, necessitating surgical excision for complete resolution. Conclusion: For short-term symptomatic relief, smaller RN can be safely injected with triamcinolone. Large symptomatic RN (≥2cm) are at greater risk of infection; thus, in these cases, lower corticosteroid doses or surgical excision may be preferred. In the long-term, effective systemic antirheumatic therapy with treat-to-target is the best approach.

Systemic sclerosis in Native Americans of the American Southwest.

OBJECTIVE: Many indigenous non-Caucasian populations, including Native Americans, have been reported to have higher rates, distinct clinical phenotypes, increased complications, and greater severity of systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, little is known of SSc specifically in Native Americans of the American Southwest. This study compared the clinical and serologic manifestations and outcomes of SSc in Native Americans and non-Native Americans (non-Natives) of this region. METHODS: This cross-sectional retrospective study included 137 SSc patients (109 [80%] were non-Native and 28 [20%] were Native Americans) followed over a mean of 11.5 ± 7.6 years. Participants were repetitively evaluated with medical history, physical examination, echocardiography, chest imaging, and serologic testing. Disease characteristics and outcomes were statistically compared between Native Americans and non-Native patients. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of SSc in Native Americans was 40.0 cases/100 000 vs 17.1 cases/100 000 for non-Natives (odds ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-3.55, P < .001). The cohorts were similar in terms age, age of onset, limited vs diffuse cutaneous SSc, telangiectasias, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Raynaud phenomenon, serologies, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension, scleroderma renal crisis, cancer prevalence, and overall mortality (all P > .05). However, for Native Americans, mortality specifically from fatal infections was 3.94-fold that of non-Natives (hazard ratio 6.88, 95% CI 1.37-34.64; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In Native Americans of the American Southwest, SSc is increased in prevalence but is phenotypically similar to SSc in non-Natives. However, mortality due specifically to infection is increased in Native Americans with SSc.

Systemic sclerosis manifestations and clinical outcomes in Hispanics/Latinos of the American Southwest.

Objective: Certain Hispanic/Latino (Hispanic) populations have been reported to have higher rates and severity of systemic sclerosis; however, little is known of systemic sclerosis in the American Southwest. This study compared manifestations of systemic sclerosis in Hispanics with non-Hispanics of New Mexico. Methods: This cross-sectional longitudinal study included 109 systemic sclerosis patients followed over a mean of 12.6 ± 8.9 years. Subjects were repetitively evaluated including physical examination, echocardiography, chest imaging, and serologic testing and observed for complications. Disease characteristics and long-term outcomes were statistically compared between self-identified Hispanic and non-Hispanic subjects. Results: A total of 73 (67%) systemic sclerosis subjects were Hispanic and 36 (33%) were non-Hispanic. The cohorts were similar in mean age, age of systemic sclerosis onset, limited versus diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, telangiectases, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Raynaud's phenomenon, autoantibody profile, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, scleroderma renal crisis, mortality, and comorbid malignancy (all p > 0.05). However, the standardized mortality ratio was increased in both cohorts relative to age-adjusted mortality: Hispanic: 2.08, confidence interval (1.94-2.24); non-Hispanic: 1.56, confidence interval (1.46-1.68). Furthermore, the standardized incidence ratio for malignancy was increased in both cohorts: Hispanic: 1.45, confidence interval (1.35-1.56); non-Hispanic: 1.24, confidence interval (1.16-1.34). The mean age of cancer diagnosis occurred at a significantly younger age in Hispanics (Hispanics: 53.1 ± 9.7 years; non-Hispanics 63.7 ± 7.9 years; 95% confidence interval: -19 ⩽ 10.6 ⩽ 2.2; p = 0.016). Conclusion: Systemic sclerosis phenotype, autoantibodies, complications, outcomes, malignancy rates, and mortality are generally similar between Hispanics and non-Hispanics with systemic sclerosis in the American Southwest. However, age-adjusted comorbid malignancy and mortality rates are significantly increased in both groups.

Statin-associated immune-mediated necrotizing myositis in Native Americans.

OBJECTIVES: Statin-associated immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) and idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) are myopathies with overlapping features. This study compared the manifestations of IMNM to IIM in Native Americans. METHOD: Twenty-one Native American patients with inflammatory myopathy (IM) were characterized as to diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, statin exposure, myopathy diagnosis, muscle histology, autoimmune and myositis-specific autoantibodies, therapy and outcome. RESULTS: IM consisted of 52.4% IMNM, 42.9% IIM and 4.8% metabolic myopathy. IMNM vs IIM patients were older [61.6 years (s.d. 9.8) vs 39.8 (14.3)], diabetes mellitus (100% vs 55.6%), hyperlipidaemia (100% vs 33.3%), statin-exposure (100% vs 22.2%), creatine kinase [CK; 11 780 IU (s.d. 7064) vs 1707 (1658)], anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies (85.7% vs 11.1%) and necrotizing IM (81.8% vs 11.1%), but shorter disease duration [26.2 months (s.d. 395) vs 78.4 (47.9)], RP (9.1% vs 55.6%), cutaneous manifestations (0% vs 55.6%), ANA (18.2% vs 66.7%) or any autoantibody (18.2% vs 88.9%) (all P < 0.05). MRI abnormalities, histologic IM, myositis-specific autoantibodies, pulmonary hypertension, oesophageal dysfunction, interstitial lung disease, disability and persistently elevated CK were similar. IMNM vs IIM was treated more with IVIG (72.7% vs 11.1%; P = 0.009) and less with antimetabolites (45.5% vs 88.9%; P = 0.05) and rituximab (18.2% vs 55.6%; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: IMNM may occur in Native Americans and is associated with diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, statin use and older age and is characterized by marked CK elevation, necrotizing myopathy and anti-HMGCR antibodies with few cutaneous or vascular manifestations.

Intraarticular injection of the interphalangeal joint for therapy of digital mucoid cysts.

Mucoid cysts are associated with osteoarthritis (OA) of the digital joints and frequently recur after needle drainage, injection, or surgical ablation. This study determined whether intraarticular injection of the adjacent interphalangeal joint rather than the cyst itself might be effective in resolving digital mucoid cysts. Using paired case series design and sterile technique, 25 consecutive OA digital joints with an adjacent mucoid cyst underwent dorsal non-transtendinous intraarticular injection with a 25-gauge needle and 20-mg triamcinolone acetonide, followed by puncture and manual expression of cyst fluid. Patient pain was measured with the 10-cm Visual Analogue Pain Scale prior to the procedure and at 6 months. Cyst resolution was determined at 6 months and 3 years. The subjects were 61.0 ± 7.7 years old and 60% (15/25) female. Mucoid cysts were adjacent to 19 distal interphalangeal, 3 metacarpophalangeal, and 3 interphalangeal joints. Pre-procedural pain was 4.7 ± 1.0; procedural pain was 6.2 ± 0.6 cm, and post-procedural pain at 6 months was 1.2 ± 0.8 cm (74.5% reduction, 95% CI of difference: 3.0 < 3.5 < 4.0 (p < 0.0001)). 84% (21/25) of the cysts resolved at 6 months; however, 60% (15/25) of the mucoid cysts recurred within 3 years and required retreatment (14 adjacent joints re-injected and 1 ablative cyst surgery). No complications were noted. Intraarticular corticosteroid injection using a dorsal non-transtendinous approach of the joint adjacent to a mucoid cyst is effective resolving cysts and reducing pain at 6 months; however, 60% of mucoid cysts reoccur within 3 years and may require reinjection or surgery.Trial registration: This was not a clinical trial.

A randomized, controlled trial of the reciprocating procedure device for local anesthesia.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the new reciprocating procedure device (RPD) is superior to the conventional syringe for the administration of local anesthesia. There were 209 local lidocaine anesthesia procedures randomized between the RDP and the conventional syringe. Outcome measures included administration time, anesthesia pain, procedure pain, and operator satisfaction. The RPD significantly reduced anesthesia administration time by 49% (RPD: 0.68 +/- 0.59 min, Syringe: 1.32 +/- 1.01 min, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] for % reduction: 36%-60%), reduced anesthesia pain by 27% (RPD visual analog pain scale score: 4.05 +/- 2.64; Syringe: 5.55 +/- 3.00; p < 0.001, 95% CI 14%-38%), reduced significant procedure pain by 74% (p < 0.001, 95% CI 60%-87%), and improved physician satisfaction by 63% (p < 0.001, 95% CI 53%-74%). The RPD markedly reduces the pain associated with lidocaine anesthesia administration, reduces administration time, and maintains the effectiveness of local anesthesia. The RPD is superior to and significantly more effective than the conventional syringe for the administration of local lidocaine anesthesia.

Reduced pain of intraarticular hyaluronate injection with the reciprocating procedure device.

BACKGROUND: Greater than 50% of patients report significant pain with intraarticular injection of hyaluronate. The reciprocating procedure device (RPD), also known the reciprocating syringe, has 2 plungers that reciprocate with each other, permitting one-handed operation. The RPD increases physician control of the needle and is proposed to reduce patient pain during syringe procedures. OBJECTIVES: To determine in a randomized controlled trial whether the RPD induces less pain than the traditional syringe during intraarticular hyaluronate therapy for the knee. METHODS: Eighty intraarticular injection procedures of the knee were randomized to either the conventional syringe or the RPD using hyaluronate sodium derivative (Hylan G-F-20). Outcome measures included physician's estimate of pain, patient pain (Visual Analogue Pain Scale [VAPS]), procedure duration, operator satisfaction, complications, and response to the injected medication. RESULTS: Patients reported 85% more pain than physicians estimated. Fifty-one percent (19/37) of subjects experienced moderate to severe pain with the conventional syringe, while only 14% (6/43) experienced pain with the RPD. The RPD reduced pain scores (RPD VAPS score: 2.12 +/- 2.15; conventional syringe VAPS score: 4.22 +/- 3.25; P < 0.001), reduced procedure time (RPD: 1.34 +/- 1.09, conventional syringe: 1.90 +/- 1.35 minutes, P < 0.001), and improved physician satisfaction (RPD VASS Score: 9.02 +/- 0.80, conventional syringe 5.69 +/- 1.33, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients have considerably more pain with intraarticular needle introduction and injectable hyaluronate therapy than physicians estimate. The RPD reduces patient pain, reduces procedure time, and improves needle introduction compared with the conventional syringe for hyaluronate injection therapy for the knee.

A randomized controlled trial of the reciprocating procedure device for intraarticular injection of corticosteroid.

OBJECTIVE: Injection of intraarticular corticosteroid remains an important therapy for inflammatory arthritis. In a randomized controlled trial we compared the new reciprocating procedure device (RPD) to the traditional syringe for injection of intraarticular corticosteroid. METHODS: One hundred fifty-four intraarticular corticosteroid injection procedures were randomized to the conventional syringe or the RPD. Using the syringe or RPD, the needle was introduced into the joint, any effusion that was present was aspirated, and the corticosteroid (methylprednisolone acetate) was injected. Outcome measures included patient pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS pain), procedure duration, operator satisfaction, complications, and immediate and delayed response to the injected medication. RESULTS: The RPD reduced pain scores by 49% (RPD VAS pain score: 2.40 +/- 2.17; conventional syringe VAS pain score: 4.73 +/- 3.39; p < 0.001), reduced procedure time by 31% (RPD: 1.28 +/- 1.08 min, conventional syringe: 1.86 +/- 1.26; p < 0.01), and improved physician satisfaction with the joint procedure device by 63% (RPD visual analog satisfaction scale score: 9.12 +/- 0.80, conventional syringe 5.59 +/- 1.28; p < 0.001). Fifty-five percent (43/78) of patients experienced moderate to severe pain (VAS pain > or = 5) with the conventional syringe, while 17% (13/76) experienced moderate to severe pain with the RPD. The same beneficial response was present when intermediate or large joints were analyzed separately. Longterm outcomes were equivalent. CONCLUSION: When a conventional syringe is used for corticosteroid injection, many patients experience significant procedural pain. The RPD significantly reduces patient pain, reduces procedure time, and improves operator satisfaction. The RPD is superior to the traditional syringe for injection of intraarticular corticosteroid.

Control and performance characteristics of eight different suction biopsy devices.

PURPOSE: To determine the control and performance characteristics of eight different suction biopsy devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physician control of the syringe and needle was measured precisely with the validated linear displacement method during the aspiration phase and during five biopsy passes. The visual analog scale was used to measure operator difficulty in the following domains: (i) attachment to the needle, (ii) generation of vacuum, (iii) detection of loss of vacuum, (iv) release of the vacuum, and (v) clearing of the sample from the needle. RESULTS: Performance in various phases of the biopsy procedure varied widely among the biopsy devices tested. Unintended forward penetration (ie, loss of control in the forward direction) was significant with the reverse aspiration syringe (31.5 +/- 1.7 mm), three-ringed control syringe (25.4 +/- 4.1 mm), BioSuc-C7 syringe (28.3 +/- 1.9 mm), conventional syringe with a plunger lock (6.1 +/- 1.5 mm), syringe pistol (9.2 +/- 2.4 mm), and conventional syringe (3.8 +/- 2.9 mm) but was significantly less for the reciprocating procedure device (RPD; 0.7 +/- 0.7 mm; P