Cisapride for the treatment of constipation in children: A double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cisapride is effective in the treatment of children with constipation. STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which children with chronic constipation were randomly assigned to treatment with cisapride or placebo for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Forty children were enrolled, and 36 completed the therapy. Treatment successes occurred in 13 of 17 (76%) subjects in the cisapride group and 8 of 19 (37%) subjects in the placebo group (P <.03). The odds ratio for response after cisapride administration was 8.2 times higher (95% CI 1.3 to 49.4). During cisapride therapy, there was a significant improvement in number of spontaneous bowel movements per week (from 0.9 +/- 0.1 to 4.1 +/- 1.1), and there was a significant decrease in number of fecal soiling episodes per day (1.8 +/- 0.5 to 0.08 +/- 0.4), percent with encopresis (82% vs 23%), number of laxative doses per week (from 10.3 +/- 2.6 to 0.8 +/- 0.6), percent using laxatives (77% to 24%), and total gastrointestinal transit time (from 115.0 +/- 3.7 hours to 77.0 +/- 11.1 hours). With placebo, there were no significant changes in the number of spontaneous bowel movements (from 1.0 +/- 0.8 to 2.2 +/- 0.6), percent with encopresis (74% vs 47%), or total gastrointestinal transit time (from 112.5 +/- 4.9 hours to 95.4 +/- 9.8 hours); but there was a significant decrease in number of fecal soiling episodes per day (from 1.3 +/- 0.4 to 0.4 +/- 0.2) and number of laxative doses used per week (from 11.5 +/- 2.9 to 2.05 +/- 0.7). The final number of spontaneous bowel movements, fecal soiling episodes, laxatives used, or percent patients with encopresis was not different when patients receiving cisapride were compared with those receiving placebo. CONCLUSION: Cisapride was effective in the treatment of children with constipation.

Successful use of a chicken-based diet for the treatment of severely malnourished children with persistent diarrhea: a prospective, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a chicken-based diet for the treatment of persistent diarrhea in severely malnourished children. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study that compared a chicken-based diet with elemental (Vivonex) and soy (Nursoy) diets. Hospitalized children with third-degree malnutrition and persistent diarrhea, aged 3 to 36 months, were included. Diets were isocaloric and given nasogastrically at 150 ml/kg per day in progressively increasing concentrations. RESULTS: Fifty-six children were included (18 received Vivonex, 19 Nursoy, 19 chicken). They had a mean age of 6.4 +/- 4.4 months, a mean weight of 3604 +/- 1232 gm, and a mean weight-for-age percentage of 51.4% +/- 7.2%. Sixty-four percent had associated conditions on admission to the hospital. Forty-one children (73.2%) were successfully treated (13 Vivonex, 13 Nursoy, 15 chicken). There were no differences in diarrheal outcomes, and all groups had significant weight gain. Failure was independent of the diet and was associated with the presence of infection on admission. There was a significantly higher nitrogen balance in the children from the chicken group (358.2 +/- 13 mg/kg per day) than in those receiving Vivonex (226.6 +/- 61) or Nursoy (291-4 +/- 111.6; p < 0.05) groups. CONCLUSIONS: The chicken-based diet was as effective as Vivonex or Nursoy. It is well tolerated, inexpensive, and widely available and thus represents an effective and inexpensive alternative to the treatment of severely malnourished children with persistent diarrhea.