Enlarged Breast Size (Macromastia) and Associated Neurologic Risks: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Symptomatic macromastia (enlarged breasts) is a syndrome of persistent headache, neck and shoulder pain, thoracic kyphosis, painful shoulder grooving from bra straps, inframammary rash, backache, and upper extremity paresthesias. Up to 89% of the 100,000 US women undergoing breast reduction surgery (reduction mammoplasty) annually report headache preoperatively with many endorsing postoperative headache improvement. Headache is one insurance indication to cover surgical reduction, and peak prevalence of migraine matches the average age of women with macromastia at time of surgery. Little is known about the influence of macromastia on headache. The goal of our narrative review is to understand the evidence for and potential mechanisms underlying macromastia-related headache. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed Medline using concepts "breast hypertrophy," "macromastia," "headache," "migraine," "breast reduction," and "reduction mammoplasty" excluding limits on age, language, publication date, or study type. Supplemental literature searches were performed to provide a comprehensive understanding of potential mechanisms underlying macromastia-related headache. RESULTS: We identified 25 studies describing macromastia-associated headache in the setting of reduction mammoplasty, with 23 original research studies (retrospective, n = 12, prospective, n = 11) totaling 3,799 patients, 1 systematic review, and 1 meta-analysis. Most (24/25) were published in Plastic Surgery, one in Internal Medicine, and none in Neurology. Wide ranges were identified for preoperative headache prevalence (2%-89%) and postoperative headache improvement (34%-100%). Studies described headache as "myofascial" or "tension-type" without detailing headache definitions, chronicity, headache screening method, or neurologic examination. Potential pathophysiologic mechanisms of macromastia-associated headache include structural, mechanical, psychosocial, and hormonal. DISCUSSION: No studies on macromastia-associated headache and reduction mammoplasty are published in Neurology. This important women's health topic remains unexplored in fields outside Plastic Surgery. Many questions remain unanswered that are important for neurologists to understand, including which headache type(s) women with macromastia experience and which headache type(s) respond to surgical intervention.

"Idiopathic" intracranial hypertension: An update from neurointerventional research for clinicians.

BACKGROUND: The recognition of venous sinus stenosis as a contributing factor in the majority of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension coupled with increasing cerebral venography and venous sinus stenting experience have dramatically improved our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms driving this disease. There is now a dense, growing body of research in the neurointerventional literature detailing anatomical and physiological mechanisms of disease which has not been widely disseminated among clinicians. METHODS: A literature search was conducted, covering the most recent neurointerventional literature on idiopathic intracranial hypertension, the pathophysiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and management strategies (including venous sinus stenting), and subsequently summarized to provide a comprehensive review of the most recently published studies on idiopathic intracranial hypertension pathophysiology and management. CONCLUSION: Recent studies in the neurointerventional literature have greatly improved our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms causing idiopathic intracranial hypertension and its associated conditions. The ability to make individualized, patient-specific treatment approaches has been made possible by advances in our understanding of how venous sinus stenosis and cerebral venous hypertension fundamentally contribute to idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for prevention of migraine: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled PREMIUM II trial.

AIM: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine prevention. METHODS: After completing a 4-week diary run-in period, adults who had migraine with or without aura were randomly assigned to receive active non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation or sham therapy during a 12-week double-blind period. RESULTS: Of 336 enrolled participants, 113 (active, n = 56; sham, n = 57) completed ≥70 days of the double-blind period and were ≥66% adherent with treatment, comprising the prespecified modified intention-to-treat population. The COVID-19 pandemic led to early trial termination, and the population was ∼60% smaller than the statistical target for full power. Mean reduction in monthly migraine days (primary endpoint) was 3.12 for the active group and 2.29 days for the sham group (difference, -0.83; p = 0.2329). Responder rate (i.e. the percentage of participants with a ≥50% reduction in migraine days) was greater in the active group (44.87%) than the sham group (26.81%; p = 0.0481). Prespecified subgroup analysis suggested that participants with aura responded preferentially. No serious device-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine prevention, particularly for patients who have migraine with aura, and reinforce the well-established safety and tolerability profile of this therapy.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03716505).

Prescribing Oxygen for Cluster Headache: A Guide for the Provider.

BACKGROUND: Oxygen is the standard of care for acute treatment of cluster headache. CMS, the US Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, has made the indefensible decision to not cover oxygen for cluster headache for patients with Medicaid and Medicare insurance, despite the evidence and professional guidelines. Commercial insurance generally covers oxygen for cluster headache. OBJECTIVE: This is a "how-to" guide for successfully prescribing oxygen in the US. SUMMARY: Prescription information is provided that can be incorporated as dot phrases, smart sets, or other standard templates for prescribing oxygen for cluster patients. In many states, oxygen is affordable and can be prescribed for Medicaid and Medicare patients who wish to pay cash. Welding or nonmedical grade industrial oxygen is almost the same cost as medical oxygen. However, it is less pure, lacks the same inspection of tanks, and is delivered without regulators to provide appropriate flow rates. Patients who pay cash should be strongly encouraged to buy medical oxygen.

Clinic and Emergency Room Evaluation and Testing of Headache.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the headache patient in the outpatient clinic and emergency department (ED) has different focuses and goals. The focus of this paper is to review the evaluation of patients in both settings with mention of evaluation in the pediatric and pregnant patient population. The patient's history should drive the practitioner's decision and evaluation choices. We review recommendations made by the American Board of Internal Medicine and American Headache Society through the Choosing Wisely Campaign, which has an emphasis on choosing the right imaging modality for the clinical situation and elimination/prevention of medication overuse headache, as well as the US Headache Consortium guidelines for migraine headache. We will also review focusing on ED evaluation of the pediatric patient and pregnant patient presenting with headache. CONCLUSION: At the end of the review we hope to have provided you with a framework to think about the headache patient and what is the appropriate test in the given clinical setting in order to ensure that the patient gets the right diagnosis and is set on a path to the appropriate management plan.

Migraine and epilepsy: review of the literature.

Migraine and epilepsy are disorders that are common, paroxysmal, and chronic. In many ways they are clearly different diseases, yet there are some pathophysiological overlaps, and overlaps in clinical symptomatology, particularly with regard to visual and other sensory disturbances, pain, and alterations of consciousness. Epidemiological studies have revealed that the two diseases are comorbid in a number of individuals. Both are now recognized as originating from electrical disturbances in the brain, although their wider manifestations involve the recruitment of multiple pathogenic mechanisms. An initial excess of neuronal activity in migraine leads to cortical spreading depression and aura, with the subsequent recruitment of the trigeminal nucleus leading to central sensitization and pain. In epilepsy, neuronal overactivity leads to the recruitment of larger populations of neurons firing in a rhythmic manner that constitutes an epileptic seizure. Migraine aura and headaches may act as a trigger for epileptic seizures. Epilepsy is not infrequently accompanied by preictal, ictal, and postictal headaches that often have migrainous features. Genetic links are also apparent between the two disorders, and are particularly evident in the familial hemiplegic migraine syndromes where different mutations can produce either migraine, epilepsy, or both. Also, various medications are found to be effective for both migraine and epilepsy, again pointing to a commonality and overlap between the two disorders.

The effect of a predialysis calcitriol administration protocol on postdialysis parathyroid hormone levels.

Patients with chronic kidney disease often develop secondary hyperparathyroidism because of decreases in 1,25(OH)(2)-vitamin D (calcitriol) levels. These changes may be ameliorated with appropriate administration of oral calcitriol during the predialysis period. A calcitriol administration protocol was used with patients beginning on June 1, 2001. Mean serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcium, and phosphorous levels from the three months preceding and three months following initiation of dialysis were measured. A significant difference in iPTH levels between patients treated under the calcitriol protocol and patients in the control group was observed. In addition, patients treated under the protocol were more likely to receive calcitriol than those who were not. No significant difference in serum calcium or phosphorous levels was observed. Administration of calcitriol via a protocol in predialysis patients reduced iPTH levels among patients after the initiation of dialysis.