Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS Med ; 16(6): e1002839, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31233507

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) provides antifilarial medications to hundreds of millions of people annually to treat filarial infections and prevent elephantiasis. Recent trials have shown that a single-dose, triple-drug treatment (ivermectin with diethylcarbamazine and albendazole [IDA]) is superior to a two-drug combination (diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole [DA]) that is widely used in LF elimination programs. This study was performed to assess the safety of IDA and DA in a variety of endemic settings. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Large community studies were conducted in five countries between October 2016 and November 2017. Two studies were performed in areas with no prior mass drug administration (MDA) for filariasis (Papua New Guinea and Indonesia), and three studies were performed in areas with persistent LF despite extensive prior MDA (India, Haiti, and Fiji). Participants were treated with a single oral dose of IDA (ivermectin, 200 µg/kg; diethylcarbamazine, 6 mg/kg; plus albendazole, a fixed dose of 400 mg) or with DA alone. Treatment assignment in each study site was randomized by locality of residence. Treatment was offered to residents who were ≥5 years of age and not pregnant. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed by medical teams with active follow-up for 2 days and passive follow-up for an additional 5 days. A total of 26,836 persons were enrolled (13,535 females and 13,300 males). A total of 12,280 participants were treated with DA, and 14,556 were treated with IDA. On day 1 or 2 after treatment, 97.4% of participants were assessed for AEs. The frequency of all AEs was similar after IDA and DA treatment (12% versus 12.1%, adjusted odds ratio for IDA versus DA 1.15, 95% CI 0.87-1.52, P = 0.316); 10.9% of participants experienced mild (grade 1) AEs, 1% experienced moderate (grade 2) AEs, and 0.1% experienced severe (grade 3) AEs. Rates of serious AEs after DA and IDA treatment were 0.04% (95% CI 0.01%-0.1%) and 0.01% (95% CI 0.00%-0.04%), respectively. Severity of AEs was not significantly different after IDA or DA. Five of six serious AEs reported occurred after DA treatment. The most common AEs reported were headache, dizziness, abdominal pain, fever, nausea, and fatigue. AE frequencies varied by country and were higher in adults and in females. AEs were more common in study participants with microfilaremia (33.4% versus 11.1%, P < 0.001) and more common in microfilaremic participants after IDA than after DA (39.4% versus 25.6%, P < 0.001). However, there was no excess of severe or serious AEs after IDA in this subgroup. The main limitation of the study was that it was open-label. Also, aggregation of AE data from multiple study sites tends to obscure variability among study sites. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that IDA was well tolerated in LF-endemic populations. Posttreatment AE rates and severity did not differ significantly after IDA or DA treatment. Thus, results of this study suggest that IDA should be as safe as DA for use as a MDA regimen for LF elimination in areas that currently receive DA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT02899936.


Assuntos
Antiparasitários/administração & dosagem , Antiparasitários/efeitos adversos , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Adulto , Análise por Conglomerados , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Filariose Linfática/diagnóstico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Fadiga/induzido quimicamente , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 109(5)2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28040690

RESUMO

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is one of the most common hematologic malignancies in the United States and is consistently preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). This study investigates the role of obesity in the progression of MGUS to MM. Methods: A retrospective identified cohort of patients in the US Veterans Health Administration database diagnosed with MGUS between October 1, 1999, and December 31, 2009, was followed through August 6, 2013. Patient-level clinical data were reviewed to verify MM diagnosis, if any. Survival analyses utilizing interval-censored data were used to investigate the risk of progression of MGUS to MM. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The analytic cohort consisted of 7878 MGUS patients with a median follow-up of 68 months. Within the cohort, 39.8% were overweight and 33.8% were obese; 64.1% were of white race. During follow-up, 329 MGUS patients (4.2%) progressed to MM: 72 (3.5%) normal-weight patients (median follow-up = 61.9 months), 144 (4.6%) overweight patients (median follow-up = 69.1 months), and 113 (4.3%) obese patients (median follow-up = 70.6 months). In the multivariable analysis, overweight (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16 to 2.06) and obesity (HR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.47 to 2.68) were associated with an increased risk of transformation of MGUS to MM. Moreover, black race was associated with a higher risk of MM (HR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.55 to 2.54). Conclusions: Obesity and black race are risk factors for transformation of MGUS to MM. Future clinical trials should examine whether weight loss is a way to prevent the progression to MM in MGUS patients.


Assuntos
Gamopatia Monoclonal de Significância Indeterminada/epidemiologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Comorbidade , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Peso Corporal Ideal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/etnologia , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Lancet Haematol ; 2(1): e30-6, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26034780

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is one of the most common haematological malignancies in the USA and is consistently preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). We aimed to assess the association between metformin use and progression of MGUS to multiple myeloma. METHODS: We did a retrospective cohort study of patients registered in the US Veterans Health Administration database and diagnosed with MGUS between Oct 1, 1999, and Dec 31, 2009. We included patients (aged >18 years) with at least one International Classification of Diseases (9th revision) code for diabetes mellitus and one treatment for their diabetes before MGUS diagnosis. We reviewed patient-level clinical data to verify diagnoses and extract any available data for size of baseline M-protein and type of MGUS. We defined metformin users as patients with diabetes who were given metformin consistently for 4 years after their diabetes diagnosis and before multiple myeloma development, death, or censorship. Our primary outcome was time from MGUS diagnosis to multiple myeloma diagnosis. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models to analyse the association between metformin use and MGUS progression. FINDINGS: We obtained data for 3287 patients, of whom 2003 (61%) were included in the final analytical cohort. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR 49­96). 463 (23%) participants were metformin users and 1540 (77%) participants were non-users. 13 (3%) metformin users progressed to multiple myeloma compared with 74 (5%) non-users. After adjustment, metformin use was associated with a reduced risk of progression to multiple myeloma (hazard ratio 0·47, 95% CI 0·25­0·87). INTERPRETATION: For patients with diabetes diagnosed with MGUS, metformin use for 4 years or longer was associated with a reduced risk of progression of MGUS to multiple myeloma. Prospective studies are needed to establish whether this association is causal and whether these results can be extrapolated to non-diabetic individuals. FUNDING: Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, American Cancer Society.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Gamopatia Monoclonal de Significância Indeterminada/epidemiologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Veteranos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...