Use of pediatric trauma simulations to facilitate exposure to pediatric trauma resuscitations during training.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric traumas are often high-acuity but are low-frequency compared to adult trauma activations. This is reflected in the relatively limited experience with these events during training. Although some principles of trauma resuscitation are similar between adults and children, there are also important differences in physiology, injury patterns, and presentation. Therefore, simulation can be used to supplement trainee exposure and enhance their ability to respond to these high-stakes events. METHODS: We developed a multidisciplinary pediatric trauma resuscitation simulation curriculum to increase exposure to pediatric traumas at our institution. The intervention includes monthly sessions in the pediatric resuscitation bays, during which multidisciplinary teams complete 2 full pediatric trauma resuscitation simulations. This is supplemented with formal debriefing, simulation-specific teaching, and standardized trauma cognitive aids. The comprehensiveness of trauma evaluations and resuscitation efforts are evaluated using our institutional structured trauma resuscitation observation tool, and post-simulation surveys are used to assess the impact of the teaching interventions. RESULTS: Nine simulation sessions were conducted with more than 100 participants, including surgical residents, emergency medicine residents, nursing staff, respiratory therapists, and medical students. Completeness of resuscitation efforts improved from 55% to 82% (P < .01) between initial and repeat simulations. Surveyed participants reported improvement in overall team performance on the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Implementing a multidisciplinary pediatric trauma simulation curriculum with structured teaching interventions and standardized trauma scripts promotes teamwork and strengthens trainees' ability to conduct comprehensive evaluations required for high-acuity pediatric traumas.

Bladder Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Time Saver in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients undergoing transabdominal pelvic ultrasound require a full bladder as an acoustic window. Patients are typically relied upon to subjectively identify bladder fullness, but inaccurate reporting often leads to delays in test results, diagnosis, and treatment. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to objectively evaluate bladder fullness by comparing the height of the bladder to the height of the uterus on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Our hypothesis was that this method would result in faster time to imaging and decrease emergency department length of stay (ED LOS). METHODS: Bladder fullness was assessed using POCUS every 30 min until the bladder was full. If the height of the bladder was equal to or greater than the height of the uterus in the sagittal view, the bladder was considered full. The POCUS group was compared with a control group that relied solely on patients' self-identified bladder fullness. RESULTS: Females aged 8-18 years old with pelvic pain in the pediatric ED were included in the study. Forty POCUS patients were compared with a control group of 105 patients. The POCUS group demonstrated a decrease in time to pelvic imaging by 38.7 min (95% confidence interval -59.2 to -18.2; p < 0.0001) and a decrease in LOS by 49.2 min (95% CI -89.7 to -8.61; p = 0.004). There was poor overall agreement on bladder fullness between patient's subjective sensation and POCUS (k = 0.04). CONCLUSION: POCUS to evaluate bladder fullness by comparing the height of the bladder with the height of the uterus reduces time to pelvic imaging and ED LOS.