Impact of Device Implant Depth After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Device-related thrombus (DRT) remains one of the main concerns after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Several risk factors have been proposed, but most cannot be modulated. A modifiable factor such as device implantation depth is a potential target to adjust the risk for DRT. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of LAAO device implantation depth as a predisposing factor for DRT. METHODS: The study included patients who underwent successful LAAO at 9 centers in Europe and Canada. Patients were classified into 2 groups: proximal device implantation (covered pulmonary ridge [PR] in the lobe and disc cohort or <5 mm from the PR in the single-lobe cohort) and distal device implantation (uncovered PR in the disc and lobe cohort and ≥5 mm in the single-lobe cohort). RESULTS: A total of 1,317 patients were included. Among these, proximal and distal device implantation was achieved in 732 (55%) and 585 (45%) patients, respectively. No differences in procedural outcomes were observed between the groups. At follow-up, patients with proximal implantation had a lower incidence of DRT (2.3%) than those with distal implantation (12.2%) (P < 0.001). Deeper device implantation and a larger uncovered left atrial appendage area were associated with a higher incidence of DRT (P < 0.001), regardless of device type. In multivariable analysis, distal implant (HR: 5.92; 95% CI: 3.39-10.36) and no or single antiplatelet therapy (HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 0.99-2.62) emerged as independent predictors of DRT. CONCLUSIONS: LAAO device implantation depth is an independent risk factor for DRT. Deeper device implantation and larger uncovered left atrial appendage areas were associated with a higher incidence of DRT.

The Canadian WATCHMAN Registry for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Background: Access to left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in Canada is limited, due to funding restrictions. This work aimed to assess Canadian clinical practice on patient selection, postprocedural antithrombotic therapy, and safety and/or efficacy with WATCHMAN device implantation. Methods: Seven Canadian centres implanting the WATCHMAN device participated in this prospective multicentre, observational registry. All procedures were done under general anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiography guidance. Patients were prospectively followed for 2years. The long-term stroke rate was compared with the expected rate based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Results: A total of 272 patients who underwent LAAC with the WATCHMAN device between December 2013 and August 2019 (mean age: 75.4 years [standard deviation {SD}: 8.75]; male, 63.2%; CHA2DS2-VASc score: 4.35 [SD: 1.64]; HAS-BLED score: 3.55 [SD: 0.94]) were included. Most patients (90.4%) had prior history of bleeding (major, 80.5%; minor, 21.7%). The WATCHMAN device was successfully implanted in 269 patients (98.9%), with a few procedure-related complications, including 5 pericardial effusions requiring drainage (1.8%), and 1 death (0.4%; 22 days post-LAAC from respiratory failure). Post-LAAC antithrombotic therapy included dual antiplatelet therapy in 70.6%, single antiplatelet therapy in 18.4%, and oral anticoagulation in 13.6%. During the follow-up period (mean: 709.7 days [SD: 467.2]), an 81.4% reduction of the ischemic stroke rate occurred, based on the expected rate from the CHA2DS2-VASc score (6.0% expected vs 1.1% observed). Device-related thrombus was detected in 1.8%. Conclusions: The majority of Canadian patients who underwent LAAC had oral anticoagulation contraindication due to prior bleeding, and most were safely treated with antiplatelet therapy post-LAAC, with a low device-related thrombus incidence. Long-term follow-up demonstrated that LAAC achieved a significant reduction in ischemic stroke rate.

Contexte: Au Canada, l'accès à la fermeture de l'appendice auriculaire gauche (FAAG) est limité en raison de restrictions quant au financement de cette intervention. Le présent rapport visait à évaluer les pratiques cliniques canadiennes sur la sélection des patients, le traitement antithrombotique après l'intervention et l'innocuité ou l'efficacité par l'implantation d'un dispositif WATCHMAN. Méthodologie: Sept centres canadiens procédant à l'implantation du dispositif WATCHMAN ont participé à ce registre observationnel, prospectif et multicentrique. Toutes les interventions ont été réalisées sous anesthésie générale avec guidage par échocardiographie transœsophagienne. Les patients ont par la suite été suivis de manière prospective pendant deux ans. Le taux d'AVC à long terme a été comparé au taux attendu, selon le score CHA2DS2-VASc. Résultats: Ont été inclus à l'étude 272 patients ayant subi une FAAG avec implantation d'un dispositif WATCHMAN entre décembre 2013 et août 2019 (âge moyen : 75,4 ans [écart-type {É.-T.} : 8,75]; hommes : 63,2 %; score CHA2DS2-VASc : 4,35 [É.-T. : 1,64]; score HAS-BLED : 3,55 [É.-T. : 0,94]). La plupart des patients (90,4 %) avaient des antécédents de saignements (majeurs : 80,5 %; mineurs : 21,7 %). Le dispositif WATCHMAN a bien été implanté chez 269 patients (98,9 %), avec quelques complications associées à l'intervention, dont cinq effusions péricardiques nécessitant un drainage (1,8 %) et un décès (0,4 %; 22 jours après la FAAG, en raison d'une insuffisance respiratoire). Le traitement antithrombotique après la FAAG comprenait une bithérapie antiplaquettaire dans 70,6 % des cas, une monothérapie antiplaquettaire dans 18,4 % des cas et une anticoagulothérapie orale dans 13,6 % des cas. Pendant la période de suivi (durée moyenne : 709,7 jours [É.-T. : 467,2]), on a noté une réduction de 81,4 % du taux d'AVC ischémique observé par rapport au taux attendu selon le score CHA2DS2-VASc (taux attendu : 6,0 %; taux observé : 1,1 %). Un thrombus associé au dispositif a été détecté dans 1,8 % des cas. Conclusions: La majorité des patients canadiens qui ont subi une FAAG présentaient des contre-indications à l'anticoagulothérapie orale en raison de leurs antécédents de saignements, et la plupart ont été traités de manière sécuritaire par des thérapies antiplaquettaires après la chirurgie, avec un faible taux d'incidence de thrombus associé au dispositif. Le suivi à long terme a montré que la FAAG permet d'obtenir une réduction importante du taux d'AVC ischémique.

Symptomatic vs. non-symptomatic device-related thrombus after LAAC: a sub-analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry.

BACKGROUND: Device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is associated with adverse outcomes, i.e. ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE). Data on predictors of stroke/SE in the context of DRT are limited. AIMS: This study aimed to identify predisposing factors for stroke/SE in DRT patients. In addition, the temporal connection of stroke/SE to DRT diagnosis was analyzed. METHODS: The EUROC-DRT registry included 176 patients, in whom DRT after LAAC were diagnosed. Patients with symptomatic DRT, defined as stroke/SE in the context of DRT diagnosis, were compared against patients with non-symptomatic DRT. Baseline characteristics, anti-thrombotic regimens, device position, and timing of stroke/SE were compared. RESULTS: Stroke/SE occurred in 25/176 (14.2%) patients diagnosed with DRT (symptomatic DRT). Stroke/SE occurred after a median of 198 days (IQR 37-558) after LAAC. In 45.8% stroke/SE occurred within one month before/after DRT diagnosis (DRT-related stroke). Patients with symptomatic DRT had lower left ventricular ejection fractions (50.0 ± 9.1% vs. 54.2 ± 11.0%, p = 0.03) and higher rates of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (84.0% vs. 64.9%, p = 0.06). Other baseline parameters and device positions were not different. Most ischemic events occurred among patients with single antiplatelet therapy (50%), however, stroke/SE was also observed under dual antiplatelet therapy (25%) or oral anticoagulation (20%). CONCLUSION: Stroke/SE are documented in 14.2% and occur both in close temporal relation to the DRT finding and chronologically independently therefrom. Identification of risk factors remains cumbersome, putting all DRT patients at substantial risk for stroke/SE. Further studies are necessary to minimize the risk of DRT and ischemic events.

Leucocyte-derived micro-RNAs as candidate biomarkers in Brugada syndrome.

AIMS: Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in patients with Brugada syndrome remains a major challenge. Contemporary risk prediction models have only modest predictive value. The aim of this study was to assess the role of micro-RNAs from peripheral blood as candidate biomarkers in Brugada syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective study, Brugada patients and unaffected control individuals were enrolled for analysis of leucocyte-derived microRNAs (miRNAs) levels. Expression levels of 798 different circulating miRNAs were analysed on the NanoString® nCounter platform. All results were cross-validated by using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Micro-RNA expression levels of Brugada patients were compared with clinical data. A total of 21 definite Brugada patients (38% with a history of ventricular arrhythmia or cardiac arrest) and 30 unaffected control individuals were included in the study. Micro-RNA analysis showed a distinct expression profile in Brugada patients with 42 differentially expressed markers (38 up-regulated, 4 down-regulated miRNAs). The symptom status of Brugada patients was associated with a distinct miRNA signature. Micro-RNAs 145-5p and 585-3p were significantly up-regulated in symptomatic Brugada patients (P = 0.04). Incorporating miRNAs 145-5p and 585-3p into a multivariable model demonstrated significantly increased symptom prediction (area under the curve = 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.00). CONCLUSION: Brugada patients display a distinct miRNA expression profile compared with unaffected control individuals. There is also evidence that certain miRNAs (miR-145-5p and miR-585-3p) are associated with the symptom status of Brugada patients. The results suggest the principal utility of leucocyte-derived miRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for Brugada syndrome.

Antithrombotic Management After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Left atrial appendage closure is an alternative to chronic oral anticoagulation to prevent embolic events related to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. After device implantation, antithrombotic treatment is prescribed to prevent device-related thrombosis, a dreadful complication associated with an increased risk of ischemic events. However, the optimal antithrombotic treatment after left atrial appendage closure, effective on both device-related thrombus prevention and bleeding risk mitigation, remains to be determined. In more than 10 years experience with left atrial appendage closure, a wide range of antithrombotic treatments have been used, mostly in observational studies. In this review, we analyzed the body of evidence for each antithrombotic regimen after left atrial appendage closure to provide tools to guide the physician choice and describe future perspectives in the field.

Incidence and Predictors of Early Death in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) aims to prevent ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. As a preventive procedure, early death after LAAC could render the procedure futile. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate the incidence and factors associated with early death in LAAC recipients. METHODS: This was a multicenter study including consecutive patients undergoing LAAC in a 10-year period (2009-2019). Death was considered early when occurring in the first year after LAAC. RESULTS: A total of 807 patients (mean age 76 ± 8 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.5 ± 1.5) were included. Early death occurred in 125 patients (15.5%). In the multivariable analysis, factors associated with early death after LAAC were older age HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06 per year; P = 0.01), lower body mass index (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88-0.97 per 1 kg/m2 increase; P < 0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.19-2.47; P = 0.002), prior heart failure (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.20-2.53; P = 0.001), and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.05-1.13 per 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrease; P < 0.001). There was a stepwise increase in risk of early death within the first year of LAAC with the combination of different risk factors (up to 48.9% in the presence of >3 risk factors). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter international registry, close to 1 in 6 patients died within the first year of LAAC. Older age, low body mass index, impaired estimated glomerular filtration rate, prior diabetes, and prior heart failure are independently associated with an increased risk. The risk of early death appeared to be prohibitive (∼50%) in the presence of >3 of these risk factors.

Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in a Patient With Hypoplasia of the Left Brachiocephalic Vein.

Venous anomalies are typically asymptomatic and may be discovered unexpectedly at the time of implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device. We report a case of leadless pacemaker implantation in a patient with hypoplasia of the left brachiocephalic vein who had previously undergone multiple interventions for relapsing right-sided breast cancer. The prevalence and etiology of this anatomic variant remain unknown. However, awareness of its existence may prevent complications during left-sided interventions. such as placement of a central venous line or a cardiac implantable electronic device. Alternative diagnostics and implantation strategies are discussed.

Les anomalies veineuses sont généralement asymptomatiques et peuvent être découvertes de façon inattendue au moment de l'implantation d'un dispositif cardiaque électronique. Nous présentons un cas d'implantation d'un stimulateur cardiaque sans sonde chez une patiente atteinte d'hypoplasie de la veine brachiocéphalique gauche qui avait déjà subi de nombreuses interventions en raison de la rechute d'un cancer du sein du côté droit. On ignore la prévalence et l'étiologie de cette variante anatomique. Toutefois, la sensibilisation à son existence peut permettre de prévenir les complications durant les interventions du côté gauche telles que la pose d'un cathéter veineux central ou l'implantation d'un dispositif cardiaque électronique. Les autres diagnostics et stratégies d'implantation font l'objet de discussions.

Safety of Cefazolin Test Dose in Patients With Penicillin Allergy Just Prior to Cardiac Device Implantation: A Single-Centre Experience.

Background: Cephalosporins are the cornerstone of cardiac device infection prophylaxis. Owing to fears of cross-reactivity, penicillin-allergic patients are exposed to potentially more-toxic drugs, with decreased efficacy. We evaluated the safety of a cefazolin test dose (CTD) in self-reported penicillin-allergic patients. Methods: In this single-centre study, we evaluated consecutive patients with chart documentation of penicillin allergy undergoing cardiac device implantation, over a 2-year period. A CTD was performed if no cephalosporin allergy or severe anaphylactic reaction to penicillin had been documented. Patients were given 2 doses of 100 mg IV cefazolin, and if no allergic reaction occurred after 5 minutes, the full dose (1800 mg) was administered in the electrophysiology laboratory just before the implantation procedure. Results: A total of 2200 patients were included. The frequency of reported penicillin allergy was 9.3% (n = 204). In 80% of cases, the type of allergic reaction was not reported in medical notes or was unknown by the patient. A CTD was performed in 67.6% of patients with a penicillin allergy (n = 138). A total of 5 adverse events occurred (3.6% of patients [95% confidence interval, 1.1%-6.1%]) - 4 skin rashes and 1 tongue edema. These 5 patients became asymptomatic after antihistaminic and corticosteroid IV treatment. Even if the test dose was negative, 79% of patients also were administered vancomycin before the procedure, as it requires a 1-hour infusion prior to the CTD in the implantation procedure room. Conclusion: A CTD in most penicillin-allergic patients appears to be safe and allows its use per recommended guidelines.

Contexte: Les céphalosporines sont la pierre angulaire de la prophylaxie des infections des dispositifs cardiaques. En raison du risque appréhendé de réactivité croisée, les patients allergiques à la pénicilline se trouvent exposés à des médicaments potentiellement plus toxiques, qui s'avèrent aussi moins efficaces. Nous avons évalué l'innocuité d'une dose d'essai de céfazoline chez des patients qui s'étaient dits allergiques à la pénicilline. Méthodologie: Dans cette étude monocentrique, nous avons suivi pendant deux ans des patients consécutifs dont le dossier médical faisait état d'une allergie à la pénicilline et chez qui un dispositif cardiaque devait être implanté. Une dose d'essai de céfazoline a été administrée aux patients sans antécédents documentés d'allergie aux céphalosporines ou de réaction anaphylactique sévère à la pénicilline. Deux doses de 100 mg de céfazoline ont été administrées par voie intraveineuse. En l'absence de réaction allergique après cinq minutes, les patients recevaient la dose complète (1 800 mg) au laboratoire d'électrophysiologie juste avant l'implantation du dispositif cardiaque. Résultats: Au total, 2 200 patients ont été inscrits à l'étude. Le taux de signalement de l'allergie à la pénicilline était de 9,3 % (n = 204). Dans 80 % des cas, le type de réaction allergique n'a pas été précisé dans les notes médicales ou était inconnu du patient. Une dose d'essai de céfazoline a été administrée à 67,6 % des patients allergiques à la pénicilline (n = 138). Au total, cinq événements indésirables se sont produits (3,6 % des patients [intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 1,1-6,1 %]) ­ quatre éruptions cutanées et un œdème de la langue. Les cinq patients touchés par ces événements sont devenus asymptomatiques après avoir reçu un antihistaminique et un corticostéroïde par voie intraveineuse. Même en l'absence de réaction allergique à la dose d'essai, 79 % des patients ont reçu de la vancomycine avant l'intervention, cet agent devant être administré par perfusion durant une heure avant la dose d'essai de céfazoline dans la salle d'intervention. Conclusion: Chez la plupart des patients allergiques à la pénicilline, une dose d'essai de céfazoline semble sans danger et permet d'avoir recours à ce médicament conformément aux lignes directrices.

Clinical and echocardiographic risk factors for device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure: an analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry.

BACKGROUND: Data on Device-related Thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate risk factors for DRT from centers reporting to the EUROC-DRT registry. METHODS: We included 537 patients (112 with DRT and 425 without DRT) who had undergone LAAC between 12/2008 and 04/2019. Baseline and implantation characteristics, anti-thrombotic treatment and clinical outcomes were compared between both groups in uni- and multivariate analyses. Additional propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to focus on the role of implantation characteristics. RESULTS: Patients with DRT showed higher rates of previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (49.1% vs. 34.7%, p < 0.01), spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) (44.9% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.01) and lower left atrial appendage (LAA) peak emptying velocity (35.4 ± 18.5 vs. 42.4 ± 18.0 cm/s, p = 0.02). Occluders implanted in DRT patients were larger (25.5 ± 3.8 vs. 24.6 ± 3.5 mm, p = 0.03) and implanted deeper in the LAA (mean depth: 7.6 ± 4.7 vs. 5.7 ± 4.7 mm, p < 0.01). Coverage of the appendage ostium was achieved less often in DRT patients (69.5% vs. 81.5%, p < 0.01), while DRT patients were less frequently on oral anticoagulation (7.1% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified age, prior stroke/TIA and SEC as independent risk factors for DRT. After PSM, implantation depth was found to be predictive. Rates of stroke/TIA were higher in DRT patients (13.5% vs. 3.8%, Hazard Ratio: 4.21 [95%-confidence interval: 1.88-9.49], p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: DRT after LAAC is associated with adverse outcome and appears to be of multifactorial origin, depending on patient characteristics, anticoagulation regimen and device position.

Experience of Combined Procedure during Percutaneous LAA Closure.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulants (OAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and contraindication to long-term OAC. Combined strategy with percutaneous LAAC at the same time of other cardiac structural or electrophysiological procedures has emerged as an alternative to a staged strategy. AIM: To describe our experience with combined LAAC procedures using Watchman™ devices. METHODS: All patients with combined LAAC procedures using Watchman™ (WN) devices performed from 2016 to 2021 were included. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of periprocedural complications and adverse events during the follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint included strokes, systemic embolisms, major bleeding and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: From 2016, among 160 patients who underwent LAAC using WN devices, 19 underwent a combined strategy: 7 transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEMVR) (37%), 6 typical atrial flutter ablation (31%), 2 leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation (10%) and 4 AF ablation (22%). The WN device was successfully implanted in 98% and 100% of cases for single and combined LAAC procedures, respectively (p = 0.63). Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 25/75 3/24). Device-related complications occurred in 6 out of 141 patients (4%) who underwent single LAAC and in no (0/19) patient in the combined LAAC procedure (p = ns). The procedural-related complications did not differ significantly between groups (5% vs. 10%, respectively, in the single and combined group, p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Combined procedure using the Watchman™ devices and one other structural or electrophysiological procedure appears safe and effective. Larger series are needed to confirm these results.

Early Discontinuation of Antithrombotic Treatment Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Although antithrombotic treatment is recommended after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), some patients require discontinuation of antithrombotic treatment after LAAC without evidence on the safety of such a strategy. We sought to evaluate outcomes of patients who had early antithrombotic treatment discontinuation after LAAC. This is a multicenter study including 1,082 patients who underwent successful LAAC. Early discontinuation of antithrombotic treatment was defined as discontinuation of all antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment within 6 months following the procedure. A propensity-matched analysis was used to compare outcomes of patients with and without early antithrombotic treatment discontinuation. A total of 148 patients (13.7%) had early antithrombotic treatment discontinuation. In the entire population, antithrombotic treatment discontinuation patients exhibited a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (p <0.001) and a higher rate of previous gastrointestinal bleeding episodes (p = 0.01) compared with patients without discontinuation. After a median follow-up of 2.1 (1,1-3.1) years after antithrombotic treatment discontinuation, the rates of death, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding were 12.1, 0.6, and 3.3 per 100 patient-years. In 119 matched pairs with similar baseline characteristics, antithrombotic treatment discontinuation patients had a similar risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65 to 1.71, p = 0.82), ischemic stroke (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.79, p = 0.42) and major bleeding (HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.56 to 3.88, p = 0.43) compared with those without discontinuation. In conclusion, antithrombotic treatment was discontinued in 1 of 7 selected patients within 6 months after LAAC, and this was not associated with an increased risk of death or thromboembolic events after a median follow-up of 2 years. These data support the safety of shorter periods of antithrombotic therapy after LAAC in high bleeding risk patients based on clinician judgment. Further trials are warranted.

Evolution of Devices to Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death: Contemporary Clinical Impacts.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death and were first implanted more than 40 years ago. The addition of cardiac resynchronization improved outcomes in the heart failure population and is now an important part of optimized therapy for this population. In this review, we will address patient selection, risk stratification, and outcomes after ICD placement and technological improvements. Gender disparities in referral and outcomes will be discussed. Far from early technologies with limited pacing capabilities and no antitachycardia pacing (ATP), we have now moved to complex devices with the addition of ATP/ATP during charging, cardiac resynchronization therapy, remote monitoring, and improved battery longevity. The requirement for defibrillation testing at time of implantation has changed and in most implants are not required as part of new clinical guidelines. As the components most likely to fail are the leads, and many complications arise from the intravascular components, extravascular ICDs were developed, the subcutaneous ICD is now an option for many patients, and substernal devices are under clinical trials. Because shocks are associated with worse outcomes, optimized ICD programming is now recommended, with the benefit of reducing appropriate and inappropriate shocks with a decrease in mortality and no increase in the syncopal events. All these improvements will have a positive effect on patient outcomes and quality of life, and new technologies will be developed in the future.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with primary hemostasis disorders and atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: We report our single-center experience with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and primary hemostasis disorders (HD). METHODS: Consecutive patients with primary HD who underwent a percutaneous LAAC were included. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected and compared with the overall LAAC cohort without HD. RESULTS: Since 2013, among 229 LAAC, 17 patients (7%) had a primary HD: thrombocytopenia (n = 5), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 6), von Willebrand syndrome (n = 4), type A hemophilia (n = 1), and dysfibrinogenemia (n = 1). The HD population's age ranged from 61 to 87 years, and the median CHA2DS2VASc was 5. Periprocedural plasmatic management was required in 47% of patients. The immediate LAAC implantation success rate was 100%. Patients received a direct oral anticoagulant (DOA) (n = 9), dual antiplatelet (n = 6), aspirin (n = 1), or no therapy (n = 1) during the first six postoperative weeks, followed with single antiplatelet (n = 16) or no therapy (n = 1) during lifelong. After 20 months, the technical success rate and procedural success rate were 100% and 94%. Zero device-/procedure-related complication and only one life-threatening bleeding occurred. Compared to patients without HD (n = 212), a baseline history of bleeding was less frequent (53% vs 91%, p < 0.001), and more patients received a perioperative blood transfusion (47% vs 4%, p < 0.001) in the HD group. The efficacy and safety outcomes did not differ between HD and non-HD cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous LAAC in primary HD carriers appeared as safe and as effective as in overall LAAC population for stroke and bleeding prevention at midterm follow-up. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation and primary hemostasis disorders. The percutaneous LAAC in primary hemostasis disorders and AF carriers requires a multidisciplinary approach. Cardiologist, anesthesiologist, and hematologist discussion is a cornerstone to assess anticoagulant contraindication, LAAC feasibility, periprocedural management, and follow-up (high). This multidisciplinary care is illustrated by the case of a 61-year-old male with hemophilia type A and recurrent hemarthrosis. Pre-LAAC assessment confirmed procedural indication and cactus LAA anatomy (left). After plasmatic management with factor VIII infusion, a WATCHMAN™ no. 21 was successfully implanted (middle). During follow-up, without antithrombotic regime, no ischemic or hemorrhagic complication occurred (right). LAA, left atrial appendage; LAAC, left atrial appendage closure; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography. Percutaneous LAAC in primary HD carriers appeared as safe and as effective as in overall LAAC population for stroke and bleeding prevention at midterm follow-up.

DREAM-ICD-II Study.

BACKGROUND: Regulatory authorities of most industrialized countries recommend 6 months of private driving restriction after implantation of a secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). These driving restrictions result in significant inconvenience and social implications. This study aimed to assess the incidence rate of appropriate device therapies in contemporary recipients of a secondary prevention ICD. METHODS: This retrospective study at 3 Canadian tertiary care centers enrolled consecutive patients with new secondary prevention ICD implants between 2016 and 2020. RESULTS: For a median of 760 days (324, 1190 days), 721 patients were followed up. The risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia was highest during the first 3 months after device insertion (34.4%) and decreased over time (10.6% between 3 and 6 months, 11.7% between 6 and 12 months). The corresponding incidence rate per 100 patient-days was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.35-0.64) at 90 days, 0.28 (95% CI, 0.17-0.45) at 180 days, and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.13-0.33) between 181 and 365 days after ICD insertion (P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of arrhythmic syncope resulting in sudden cardiac incapacitation was 1.8% within the first 90 days and subsequently dropped to 0.4% between 91 and 180 days (P<0.001) after ICD insertion. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of appropriate therapies resulting in sudden cardiac incapacitation in contemporary recipients of a secondary prevention ICD is much lower than previously reported and declines significantly after the first 3 months. Lowering driving restrictions to 3 months after the index cardiac event seems safe, and revision of existing guidelines should be considered in countries still adhering to a 6-month period. Existing restrictions for private driving after implantation of a secondary prevention ICD should be reconsidered.

Incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of bleeding recurrence in patients with prior gastrointestinal bleeding undergoing LAAC.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is associated with a high recurrence rate and a prior GIB episode is common in real-world left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) recipients. The present study sought to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with prior GIB undergoing LAAC, and to determine the factors associated with and clinical impact of GIB recurrence. METHODS: Multicenter study including 277 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous LAAC and had prior GIB. All-cause death, all bleeding, GIB recurrence, and clinical ischemic stroke were recorded. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 17 (interquartile range: 6-37) months post-LAAC, the rates of death, bleeding, GIB recurrence, and ischemic stroke were 14.0 per 100 person-year (PY), 29.3 per 100 PY, 17.7 per 100 PY, and 1.1 per 100 PY, respectively. GIB recurrence occurred within 3 months post-LAAC in 55.8% of patients. A previous lower GIB (vs. upper or unclassified) (HR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.09-2.82; p = .020) and eGFR < 45 mL/min (HR: 1.70; 95% CI:1.04-2.67; p = .033) determined an increased risk of GIB recurrence. By multivariable analysis, eGFR < 45 mL/min (HR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.70-4.34; p < .001), GIB recurrence following LAAC (HR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.33-3.46; p = .002), diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.10-2.84; p = .018), and age (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.10; p < .001) were associated with an increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior GIB undergoing LAAC exhibited a relatively low rate of GIB recurrence, and prior lower GIB and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease determined an increased risk. GIB recurrence was associated with an increased mortality.

Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Data on Thrombus Characteristics, Treatment Strategies, and Clinical Outcomes From the EUROC-DRT-Registry.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure is an established therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. Although device-related thrombosis (DRT) is relatively rare, it is potentially linked to adverse events. As data on DRT characteristics, outcome, and treatment regimen are scarce, we aimed to assess these questions in a multicenter approach. METHODS: One hundred fifty-six patients with the diagnosis of DRT after left atrial appendage closure were included in the multinational EUROC-DRT registry. Baseline characteristics included clinical and echocardiographic data. After inclusion, all patients underwent further clinical and echocardiographic follow-up to assess DRT dynamics, treatment success, and outcome. RESULTS: DRT was detected after a median of 93 days (interquartile range, 54­161 days) with 17.9% being detected >6 months after left atrial appendage closure. Patients with DRT were at high ischemic and bleeding risk (CHA2DS2-VASc 4.5±1.7, HAS-BLED 3.3±1.2) and had nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (67.3%), previous stroke (53.8%), and spontaneous echo contrast (50.6%). The initial treatment regimens showed comparable resolution rates (antiplatelet monotherapy: 57.1%, dual antiplatelet therapy: 85.7%, vitamin K antagonists: 80.0%, novel oral anticoagulants: 75.0%, and heparin: 68.6%). After intensification or switch of treatment, complete DRT resolution was achieved in 79.5% of patients. Two-year follow-up revealed a high risk of mortality (20.0%) and ischemic stroke (13.8%) in patients with DRT. Patients with incomplete DRT resolution showed numerically higher stroke rates and increased mortality rates (stroke: 17.6% versus 12.3%, P=0.29; mortality: 31.3% versus 13.1%, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of DRT is detected >6 months after left atrial appendage closure, highlighting the need for imaging follow-up. Patients with DRT appear to be at a high risk for stroke and mortality. While DRT resolution was achieved in most patients, incomplete DRT resolution appeared to identify patients at even higher risk. Optimal DRT diagnostic criteria and treatment regimens are warranted.