Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
J Surg Res ; 299: 255-262, 2024 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781735

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) continues to be a major cause of morbidity in trauma. It is unclear whether the type of hemorrhage control procedure (i.e., splenectomy versus angioembolization) is associated with an increased risk of VTE. We hypothesize that hemodynamically stable patients undergoing angioembolization for blunt high-grade splenic injuries have lower rates of VTE compared to those undergoing splenectomy. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program dataset from 2017 to 2019 was queried to identify all patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade 3-5 blunt splenic injuries. Outcomes including VTE rates were compared between those who were managed with splenectomy versus angioembolization. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed adjusting for age, sex, initial vital signs, Injury Severity Score, and splenic injury grade. RESULTS: The analysis included 4698 matched patients (splenectomy [n = 2349] and angioembolization [n = 2349]). The median (interquartile range) age was 41 (27-58) years and 69% were male. Patients were well matched between groups. Angioembolization was associated with significantly lower VTE than splenectomy (2.2% versus 3.4%, P = 0.010) despite less use of VTE chemoprophylaxis (70% versus 80%, P < 0.001), as well as a relative delay in initiation of chemoprophylaxis (44 h versus 33 h, P < 0.001). Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay and mortality were also significantly lower in the angioembolization group. CONCLUSIONS: Angioembolization is associated with a significantly lower incidence of VTE than splenectomy. Thus, angioembolization should be considered for initial management of hemodynamically stable patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries in whom laparotomy is not otherwise indicated.

2.
J Burn Care Res ; 2024 May 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758544

RESUMO

A National Trauma Research Action Plan identified the involvement of burn survivors as critical informants to determine the direction of research. This study employed a web-based survey to identify care gaps in a sample of burn survivors. We surveyed burn survivors from around the United States through social media and email contact with the Phoenix Society for Burn Survivors. We elicited demographic info, burn history, and unmet needs. Statistical analysis was performed to test our hypothesis that lack of access to mental health support/professionals would be identified as an unmet need in long-term burn survivors. Of 178 survey respondents, most were at least ten years removed from the date of their burn injury (n=94, 53%). Compared to those less than 3 years from their burn injury, individuals greater than 10 years were at least 5 times more likely to note lack of access to mental health support [11-20 years OR 8.7, p< 0.001; >20 years OR5.7, p=0.001]. 60% of Spanish speakers reported lack of support group access was among their greatest unmet needs, compared to 37% of English speakers (p=0.184). This study highlights the need for ongoing access to mental health resources in burn survivors. Our findings emphasize that burn injury is not just an acute ailment, but a complex condition that evolves into a chronic disease. Additional studies should focus on the experiences of Spanish-speaking burn survivors, given small sample size leading to a likely clinically significant but not statistically different lack of access to support groups.

3.
J Surg Res ; 298: 379-384, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669784

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Relative to other hospitalized patients, trauma patients are younger with fewer comorbidities, but the incidence and outcomes of in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (IHCA) with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in this population is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to investigate factors associated with survival in trauma patients after IHCA to test the hypothesis that compared to other hospitalized patients, trauma patients with IHCA have improved survival. METHODS: Retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database 2017 to 2019 for patients who had IHCA with CPR. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and ventilator days. Data were compared with univariate and multivariate analyses at P < 0.05. RESULTS: In 22,346,677 admitted trauma patients, 14,056 (0.6%) received CPR. Four thousand three hundred seventy-seven (31.1%) survived to discharge versus 26.4% in a national sample of all hospitalized patients (P < 0.001). In trauma patients, median age was 55 y, the majority were male (72.2%). Mortality was higher for females versus males (70.3% versus 68.3%, P = 0.026). Multivariate regression showed that older age 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.02), Hispanic ethnicity 1.21 (95% CI 1.04-1.40), and penetrating trauma 1.51 (95% CI 1.32-1.72) were risk factors for mortality, while White race was a protective factor 0.36 (95% CI 0.14-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that the incidence of IHCA with CPR is approximately six in 1000 trauma admissions and 31% survive to hospital discharge, which is higher than other hospitalized patients. Age, gender, racial, and ethnic disparities also influence survival.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Parada Cardíaca , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Parada Cardíaca/mortalidade , Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Parada Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Parada Cardíaca/etiologia , Adulto , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Idoso , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Surgery ; 175(5): 1418-1423, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38418296

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Thromboprophylaxis after blunt splenic trauma is complicated by the risk of bleeding, but the risk after angioembolization is unknown. We hypothesized that earlier thromboprophylaxis initiation was associated with increased bleeding complications without mitigating venous thromboembolism events. METHODS: All blunt trauma patients who underwent splenic angioembolization within 24 hours of arrival were identified from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program datasets from 2017 to 2019. Cases with <24-hour length of stay, other serious injuries, and surgery before angioembolization were excluded. Venous thromboembolism was defined as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Bleeding complications were defined as splenic surgery, additional embolization, or blood transfusion after thromboprophylaxis initiation. Data were compared with χ2 analysis and multivariate logistic regression at P < .05. RESULTS: In 1,102 patients, 84% had American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade III to V splenic injuries, and 73% received thromboprophylaxis. Splenic surgery after angioembolization was more common in those with thromboprophylaxis initiation within the first 24 hours (5.7% vs 1.7%, P = .007), whereas those with the initiation of thromboprophylaxis after 72 hours were more likely to have a pulmonary embolism (2.3% vs 0.2%, P = .001). Overall, venous thromboembolism increased considerably when thromboprophylaxis was initiated after day 3. In multivariate analysis, time to thromboprophylaxis initiation was associated with bleeding (odds ratio 0.74 [95% confidence interval 0.58-0.94]) and venous thromboembolism complications (odds ratio 1.5 [95% confidence interval 1.20-1.81]). CONCLUSION: This national study evaluates bleeding and thromboembolic risk to elucidate the specific timing of thromboprophylaxis after splenic angioembolization. Initiation of thromboprophylaxis between 24 and 72 hours achieves the safest balance in minimizing bleeding and venous thromboembolism risk, with 48 hours particularly serving as the ideal time for protocolized administration.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Baço/cirurgia , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia
5.
J Pediatr Surg ; 59(5): 889-892, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38383176

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Motor vehicle collisions (MVC) are the second leading cause of death in children and adolescents, but appropriate restraint use remains inadequate. Our previous work shows that about half of pediatric MVC victims presenting to our trauma center were unrestrained. This study evaluates restraint use among children and adolescents who did not survive after MVC. We hypothesize that restraint use is even lower in this population than in pediatric MVC patients who reached our trauma center. METHODS: We reviewed the local Medical Examiner's public records for fatal MVCs involving decedents <19 years old from 2010 to 2021. When restraint use was not documented, local Fire Rescue public records were cross-referenced. Patients were excluded if restraint use was still unknown. Age, demographics, and restraint use were compared using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Of 199 reviewed cases, 92 met selection criteria. Improper restraint use was documented in 72 patients (78%). Most decedents were White (72% versus 28% Black) and male (74%), with a median age of 17 years [15-18]. Improper restraint use was more common among Black (92% vs 73% White, p = 0.040) and male occupants (85% vs 58% female, p = 0.006). Improper restraint use was lower in the Hispanic population (73%) compared to non-Hispanic individuals (89%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.090). CONCLUSION: Most pediatric patients who die from MVCs in our county are improperly restrained. While male and Black patients are especially high-risk, the overall dismal rates of restraint use in our pediatric population present an opportunity to improve injury prevention measures. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Proteção para Crianças , Ferimentos e Lesões , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Acidentes de Trânsito , Veículos Automotores , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia
6.
J Pediatr Surg ; 59(3): 488-493, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37993397

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown improved survival for severely injured adult patients treated at American College of Surgeons verified level I/II trauma centers compared to level III and undesignated centers. However, this relationship has not been well established in pediatric trauma centers (PTCs). We hypothesize that severely injured children will have lower mortality at verified level I/II PTCs compared to centers without PTC verification. METHODS: All patients 1-15 years of age with ISS >15 in the 2017-2019 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs (ACS TQP) dataset were reviewed. Patients with pre-hospital cardiac arrest, burns, and those transferred out for ongoing inpatient care were excluded. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of pediatric trauma center verification on mortality. RESULTS: 16,301 patients were identified (64 % male, median ISS 21 [17-27]), and 60 % were admitted to verified PTCs. Overall mortality was 6.0 %. Mortality at centers with PTC verification was 5.1 % versus 7.3 % at centers without PTC verification (p < 0.001). After controlling for injury mechanism, sex, age, pediatric-adjusted shock index (SIPA), ISS, arrival via interhospital transfer, and adult trauma center verification, pediatric level I/II trauma center designation was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.61-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment at ACS-verified pediatric trauma centers is associated with improved survival in critically injured children. These findings highlight the importance of PTC verification in optimizing outcomes for severely injured pediatric patients and should influence trauma center apportionment and prehospital triage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV - Retrospective review of national database.


Assuntos
Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos e Lesões , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Hospitalização , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Modelos Logísticos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia
7.
J Pediatr Surg ; 59(1): 134-137, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37858390

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cryptorchidism is commonly treated with orchiopexy at 6-12 months of age, often allowing time for undescended testicle(s) (UT) to descend spontaneously. However, when an inguinal hernia (IH) is also present, some surgeons perform orchiopexy and inguinal hernia repair (IHR) immediately rather than delaying surgery. We hypothesize that early surgical intervention provides no benefit for newborns with both IH and UT. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify newborns with diagnoses of both IH and UT from 2010 to 2014. Patients were stratified by management: IHR performed on initial admission (Repair) or not (Deferral). Demographics, outcomes, and complications were compared. Results were weighted for national estimates. RESULTS: We analyzed 1306 newborns (64% premature) diagnosed with both IH and UT. IHR was performed at index admission in 30%. Repair was more common in premature babies (43% vs. 8% full-term, p < 0.001) and patients with congenital anomalies (33% vs. 27% without congenital anomaly, p = 0.012). There was no difference in readmission rates. Repair patients had higher rates of orchiectomy than did Deferral. No Deferral patients were readmitted for bowel resection, and <1% were readmitted for orchiectomy or hernia incarceration. CONCLUSION: In newborns with UT and IH, immediate repair is not associated with improved outcomes. Even with incarceration on initial presentation, rates of readmission with incarceration or bowel compromise for patients who undergo Deferral of surgery are minimal. Moreover, Repair newborns have higher rates of orchiectomy. We found no benefit to early operative intervention; thus, we recommend waiting until 6-12 months of age to reassess for surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study.


Assuntos
Criptorquidismo , Hérnia Inguinal , Lactente , Masculino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Hérnia Inguinal/complicações , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Hérnia Inguinal/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Criptorquidismo/complicações , Criptorquidismo/cirurgia , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Orquidopexia/métodos , Herniorrafia/métodos
8.
J Surg Res ; 295: 641-646, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38103321

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In pediatric patients, incarcerated inguinal hernias are often repaired on presentation. We hypothesize that in appropriate patients, repair may be safely deferred. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify pediatric patients (aged < 18 y) with incarcerated inguinal hernia from 2010 to 2014. Patients were stratified by management approach (Early Repair versus Deferral). Overall frequencies of these operative strategies were calculated. Propensity score matching was then performed to control for patient age, comorbidities, perinatal conditions, and congenital anomalies. Outcomes including complications, surgical procedures, and readmissions were compared. Outpatient surgeries were not assessed. RESULTS: Among 6148 total patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia, the most common strategy was to perform Early Repair (88% versus 12% Deferral). Following propensity score matching, the cohort included 1288 patients (86% male, average age 1.7 ± 4.1 years). Deferral was associated with equivalent rates of readmission within one year (13% versus 15%, P = 0.143), but higher readmissions within the first 30 days (7% versus 3%, P = 0.002) than Early Repair. Deferral patients had lower rates of orchiectomy (2% versus 5%, P = 0.001), wound infections (< 2% versus 2%, P = 0.020), and other infections (7% versus 15%, P < 0.001). The frequency of other complications including bowel resection, oophorectomy, testicular atrophy, sepsis, and pneumonia were equivalent between groups. Three percent of Deferrals had a diagnosis of incarceration on readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Deferral of incarcerated inguinal hernia repair at index admission is associated with higher rates of hospital readmissions within the first 30 days but equivalent readmission within the entire calendar year. These patients are at risk of repeat incarceration but have significantly lower rates of orchiectomy than their counterparts who undergo inguinal hernia repair at the index admission. We propose that prospective studies be performed to identify good candidates for Elective Deferral following manual reduction and overnight observation. Such studies must capture outpatient surgical outcomes.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Hospitalização , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
J Surg Res ; 291: 603-610, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37542774

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Synthetic mesh is widely utilized for clean ventral hernia repair; however, it is unclear if synthetic mesh provides the same benefits with high-risk patients or during contaminated cases. Many surgeons use biologic mesh in these settings, but there is little evidence to support this practice. Our objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of utilizing biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh during ventral hernia repair. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a review of the literature was conducted using Cochrane library, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and PubMed for randomized controlled trials published that compared biologic versus synthetic mesh during ventral hernia repair. The primary outcome was major complications defined as deep or organ space surgical site infection, reoperations, and hernia recurrences. RESULTS: Of 1889 manuscripts screened, four publications were included. The four studies included a total of 758 patients, with 381 receiving biologic mesh and 377 receiving synthetic mesh. Compared to biologic mesh, synthetic mesh had lower rates of major complications (38.6% versus 23.4, risk ratio = 0.55, 95% confidence interval = 0.35 to 0.86, P = 0.009) and hernia recurrence (24.5 % versus 10.3%, risk ratio = 0.44, 95% confidence interval = 0.28 to 0.69, P = 0.004). In addition, there was a lower percentage of surgical site infection and reoperation in the synthetic mesh group. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to current surgical teaching, placement of permanent synthetic mesh into a contaminated field yielded rates of complications that were comparable or reduced compared to biologic mesh.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Hérnia Ventral , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/etiologia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 24(5): 425-432, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37222708

RESUMO

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are rapidly spreading, life-threatening infections that require emergent surgical intervention with immediate antibiotic initiation. However, there is no consensus regarding duration of antibiotic therapy after source control. We hypothesized that a short course of antibiotic therapy is as effective as a long course of antibiotic therapy after final debridement for NSTI. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to November 2022. Observational studies comparing short (≤7 days) versus long (>7 days) antibiotic duration for NSTI were included. Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes included limb amputation and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cumulative analysis was performed with Fisher exact test. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2. Results: A total of 622 titles were screened and four observational studies evaluating 532 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 52 years, 67% were male, 61% had Fournier gangrene. There was no difference in mortality when comparing short to long duration antibiotic agents on both cumulative analysis (5.6% vs. 4.0%; p = 0.51) and meta-analysis (relative risk, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.0; I2 0; p = 0.19). There was no significant difference in rates of limb amputation (11% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.50) or CDI (20.8% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.14). Conclusions: Short duration antibiotic therapy may be as effective as longer duration antibiotic therapy for NSTI after source control. Further high-quality data such as randomized clinical trials are required to create evidence-based guidelines.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/cirurgia
11.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 95(1): 111-115, 2023 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37038260

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have debated the optimal time to perform excision and grafting of second- and third-degree burns. The current consensus is that excision should be performed before the sixth hospital day. We hypothesize that patients who undergo excision within 48 hours have better outcomes. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs data set was used to identify all patients with at least 10% total body surface area second- and third-degree burns from years 2017 to 2019. Patients with other serious injuries (any Abbreviated Injury Scale, >3), severe inhalational injury, prehospital cardiac arrest, and interhospital transfers were excluded. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision , procedure codes were used to ascertain time of first excision. Patients who underwent first excision within 48 hours of admission (early excision) were compared with those who underwent surgery 48 to 120 hours from admission (standard therapy). Propensity score matching was performed to control for age and total body surface area burned. RESULTS: A total of 2,270 patients (72% male) were included in the analysis. The median age was 37 (23-55) years. Early excision was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit LOS. Complications including deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection were significantly lower with early excision. There was no significant difference in mortality. CONCLUSION: Performance of excision within 48 hours is associated with shorter hospital LOS and fewer complications than standard therapy. We recommend taking patients for operative debridement and temporary or, when feasible, permanent coverage within 48 hours. Prospective trials should be performed to verify the advantages of this treatment strategy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.


Assuntos
Queimaduras , Embolia Pulmonar , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Queimaduras/cirurgia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Escala Resumida de Ferimentos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(9): 1809-1815, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37121883

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pediatric pedestrian injuries (PPI) are a major public health concern. This study utilized geospatial analysis to characterize the risk and injury severity of PPI. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of PPI patients (age < 18) from a level 1 trauma center was performed (2013-2020). A geographic information system geocoded injury location to home and other public landmarks. Incidents were aggregated to zip codes and the Local Indicators of Spatial Association statistic tested for spatial clustering of injury rates per 10,000 children. Predictors for increased injury severity were assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS: PPI encompassed 6% (n = 188) of pediatric traumas. Most patients were black (54%), male (58%), >13 years (56%), and with Medicaid insurance (68%). Nine zip codes comprised a statistically significant cluster of PPI. Nearly half (40%) occurred within a quarter mile of home; 7% occurred at home. Most (65%) PPI occurred within 1 mile of a school, and 45% occurred within a quarter mile of a park. Nearly all (99%) PPI occurred within a quarter mile of a major intersection and/or roadway. Using admission to ICU as a marker for injury severity, farther distance from home (OR 1.060, 95% CI 1.001-1.121, p = 0.045) and age <13 years (3.662, 95% CI 1.854-7.231, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of injury severity. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant sociodemographic disparities in PPI. Most injuries occur near patients' homes and other public landmarks. Multidisciplinary injury prevention collaboration can help inform policymakers, direct local safety programs, and provide a model for PPI prevention at the national level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.


Assuntos
Pedestres , Ferimentos e Lesões , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hospitalização , Sistemas de Informação Geográfica , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia
13.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 24(4): 322-326, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36944154

RESUMO

Background: Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is defined by the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP) using laboratory findings, pathophysiologic signs/symptoms, and imaging criteria. However, many critically ill trauma patients meet the non-specific laboratory and sign/symptom thresholds for VAP, so the TQIP designation of VAP depends heavily upon imaging evidence. We hypothesized that physician opinions widely vary regarding chest radiograph findings significant for VAP. Patients and Methods: The TQIP Spring 2021 Benchmark Report (BR) was used to identify 14 patients with VAP at an academic Level 1 Trauma Center. Critically ill trauma patients (n = 7) who spent at least four days intubated and met TQIP's laboratory and sign/symptom thresholds for VAP but did not appear as VAPs on the BR comprised the control group. For each deidentified patient, four successive chest radiographic images were compiled and arranged chronologically. Cases and controls were randomly arranged in digital format. Blinded physicians (n = 27) were asked to identify patients with VAP based solely on imaging evidence. Results: Radiographic evidence of VAP was highly subjective (Krippendorff α = 0.134). Among physicians of the same job description, inter-rater reliability remained low (α = 0.137 for trauma attending physicians; α = 0.141 for trauma fellows; α = 0.271 for radiologists). When majority judgment was compared to the TQIP BR, there was disagreement between the two tests (Cohen κ = -0.071; sensitivity, 64.3%; specificity, 28.6%). Conclusions: Current definitions of VAP rely on subjective imaging interpretation and ignore the reality that there are numerous explanations for opacities on CXR. The inconsistency of physicians' imaging interpretation and protean physiologic findings for VAP in trauma patients should preclude the current definition of VAP from being used as a quality improvement metric in TQIP.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Humanos , Estado Terminal , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
14.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 94(5): 672-677, 2023 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36749659

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown improved survival for patients treated at American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified level I trauma centers compared with level II, level III, and undesignated centers. This mortality difference is more pronounced in severely injured patients. However, a survival benefit for severely injured trauma patients has not been established at teaching institutions compared with nonteaching centers. Because massive transfusion (MT) is associated with high mortality, we hypothesize that patients receiving MT have lower mortality at teaching hospitals than at nonteaching hospitals. METHODS: All adult ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program-eligible patients who underwent MT, defined as >10 U of packed red blood cells in the first 4 hours after arrival, in the 2019 ACS Trauma Quality Programs participant use file were eligible. Patients with severe head injury (head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, ≥3), prehospital cardiac arrest, and interhospital transfers were excluded. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of trauma center hospital teaching status on the adjusted odds of 3-hour, 6-hour, and 24-hour mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,849 patients received MT (81% male; median Injury Severity Score, 26 [18-35]), 72% were admitted to level I trauma centers, and 28% were admitted to level II centers. Overall hospital mortality was 41%; 17% of patients died in 3 hours, 25% in 6 hours, and 33% in 24 hours. Teaching hospitals were associated with decreased 3-hour (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.75), 6-hour (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24-0.56), 24-hour (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34-0.75), and overall mortality (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.98), compared with nonteaching hospitals, controlling for sex, age, heart rate, injury severity, injury mechanism, and trauma center verification level. CONCLUSION: Severely injured patients requiring MT experience significantly lower mortality at teaching hospitals compared with nonteaching hospitals, independently of trauma center verification level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue , Ferimentos e Lesões , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Centros de Traumatologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais de Ensino , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
15.
J Am Coll Surg ; 236(4): 937-942, 2023 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728386

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of whole-body CT scan (WBCT) is widespread in the evaluation of traumatically injured patients and may be associated with improved survival. WBCT protocols include the use of IV contrast unless there is a contraindication. This study tests the hypothesis that using plain WBCT scan during the global contrast shortage would result in greater need for repeat contrast-enhanced CT, but would not impact mortality, missed injuries, or rates of acute kidney injury (AKI). STUDY DESIGN: All trauma encounters at an academic level-I trauma center between March 1, 2022 and June 24, 2022, excluding burns and prehospital cardiac arrests, were reviewed. Imaging practices and outcomes before and during contrast shortage (beginning May 3, 2022) were compared. RESULTS: The study population included 1,109 consecutive patients (72% male), with 890 (80%) blunt and 219 (20%) penetrating traumas. Overall, 53% of patients underwent WBCT and contrast was administered to 73%. The overall rate of AKI was 6% and the rate of renal replacement therapy (RRT) was 1%. Contrast usage in WBCT was 99% before and 40% during the shortage (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of repeat CT scans, missed injuries, AKI, RRT, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma imaging practices at our center changed during the global contrast shortage; the use of contrast decreased despite the frequency of trauma WBCT scans remaining the same. The rates of AKI and RRT did not change, suggesting that WBCT with contrast is insufficient to cause AKI. The missed injury rate was equivalent. Our data suggest similar outcomes can be achieved with selective IV contrast use during WBCT.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Centros de Traumatologia , Imagem Corporal Total/métodos , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia
16.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(4): 633-638, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36670004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Untreated pediatric choledochal cyst (CC) is associated with complications including cholangitis, pancreatitis, and risk of malignancy. Therefore, CC is typically treated by surgical excision with biliary reconstruction. Both open and laparoscopic (lap) surgical approaches are regularly used, but outcomes have not been compared on a national level. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify pediatric patients (age 0-21 years, excluding newborns) with choledochal cyst from 2016 to 2018 based on ICD-10 codes. Patients were stratified by operative approach (open vs. lap). Demographics, operative management, and complications were compared using standard statistical tests. Results were weighted for national estimates. RESULTS: Choledochal cyst excision was performed in 577 children (75% female) via lap (28%) and open (72%) surgical approaches. Patients undergoing an open resection experienced longer index hospital length of stay (LOS), higher total cost, and more complications. Anastomotic technique differed by approach, with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) more often utilized with open cases (86% vs. 29%) and hepaticoduodenostomy (HD) more common with laparoscopic procedures (71% vs. 15%), both p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in post-operative cholangitis or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although utilized less frequently than an open approach, laparoscopic choledochal cyst resection is safe in pediatric patients and is associated with shorter LOS, lower costs, and fewer complications. HD anastomosis is more commonly performed during laparoscopic procedures, whereas RYHJ more commonly used with the open approach. While HD is associated with more short-term gastrointestinal dysfunction than RYHJ, the latter is more commonly associated with sepsis, wound infection, and respiratory dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Retrospective Comparative Study.


Assuntos
Colangite , Cisto do Colédoco , Laparoscopia , Recém-Nascido , Criança , Humanos , Feminino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Masculino , Cisto do Colédoco/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anastomose em-Y de Roux , Resultado do Tratamento , Colangite/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos
17.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(8): 1560-1565, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36464499

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malrotation with midgut volvulus is a surgical emergency commonly encountered in pediatric surgical practice. Outcomes are excellent with timely diagnosis and treatment, but the development of bowel ischemia is associated with many negative consequences. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify patients 0-18 years (excluding newborns) with malrotation and midgut volvulus from 2010 to 2014. Demographics, procedures, and outcomes were compared by income group (highest quartile vs. lowest quartile) using standard statistical tests. Results were weighted for national estimates. RESULTS: Emergency surgery for midgut volvulus was performed in 572 patients. The majority (86%) underwent Ladd's procedure, while 14% required bowel resection and/or ostomy. Patients in the lowest income quartile were more likely to require bowel resection (18% vs. 8%, p = 0.03) or ostomy (9% vs. 2%, p = 0.015) compared to those in the highest income quartile. Low-income patients were more likely to experience prolonged hospital stay (8 [5-13] days vs. 6 [4-8] days, p<0.001) and experience complications including infections (19% vs. 5%, p = 0.002), endotracheal intubation (18% vs. 4%, p<0.001), and blood transfusions (13% vs. 3%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Income disparity represents a major factor in surgical outcomes in children with midgut volvulus. A broad spectrum of clinical outcomes following surgery for midgut volvulus exists. Patients from lower-income communities are at significantly higher risk for numerous complications, negative outcomes, and higher resource utilization. These findings support additional investigations of practices to mitigate risk for low-income patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Retrospective comparative study.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Volvo Intestinal , Laparoscopia , Criança , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Volvo Intestinal/epidemiologia , Volvo Intestinal/cirurgia , Volvo Intestinal/complicações , Laparoscopia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
J Surg Res ; 279: 733-738, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35940049

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Firearm injuries (GSW) in the pediatric population is a public health crisis. Little is known about the outcomes of damage control laparotomy (DCL) following abdominal GSW. This study aims to evaluate outcomes from abdominal GSWs in the pediatric population. METHODS: The trauma registry from an urban Level 1 trauma was queried for pediatric (0-18 y) GSW was queried from September 2013 to June 2020. Demographics, clinical variables, outcomes, readmissions, and recidivism were analyzed. RESULTS: Abdominal GSW were identified in 83 patients (17% of all GSW). The median age was 16 [15-17], 84% were male and 86% Black. Violent intent accounted for 90% of GSW. The injury severity score was 16 [9-26] and 80% went directly from the resuscitation bay to the operating room. Laparotomy was required in 87% of patients, and surgery was not required in any patient initially managed nonoperatively. The most common complications were intraabdominal infection (20%), other infections (13%), and small bowel obstruction (8%). DCL with temporary abdominal closure was performed in 16% of laparotomies and was associated with a longer length of stay, more infections, but similar rates of readmission and mortality. Overall mortality was 13%, with all but one patient expiring in the resuscitation bay or the operating room. All patients who underwent DCL survived to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal firearm injuries have high morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. Damage control operations for abdominal GSWs are a valuable surgical option with similar outcomes to primary abdominal closure after initial injury survival.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Armas de Fogo , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/complicações , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia
19.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(6): 1040-1044, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35279286

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Down syndrome (DS) is the most common abnormality associated with Hirschsprung disease (HD). It has been suggested patients with HD and DS have worse outcomes, however the literature is controversial. METHODS: The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) from 2003 to 2012 was used to identify newborns with HD. Demographics, hospital characteristics, and outcomes were compared among patients with and without DS using standard statistical tests. RESULTS: There were 481 patients identified with HD, of which 45 (9%) had DS. Patients with DS were older at the time of first rectal biopsy (6 [3-11] days vs. 4 [3-6] days, p = 0.012). There were no differences in operative versus non-operative management in patients with and without DS (p = 0.706). Hospital length of stay was longer in the DS cohort (22 [13-33] days vs. 15 [10-24] days, p = 0.019), and patients with DS were more likely to have a concomitant diagnosis of wound infection (<12% vs. 3%, p = 0.002) and necrotizing enterocolitis (<14% vs. 5%, p = 0.018). The mortality rate for patients with DS was four times higher than those without DS (< 5% vs. < 0.8%, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort of patients with Hirschsprung disease, those with Down syndrome experienced delays in diagnosis and worse outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study, retrospective comparative study.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Síndrome de Down , Doença de Hirschsprung , Síndrome de Down/complicações , Doença de Hirschsprung/complicações , Doença de Hirschsprung/cirurgia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Intestinos/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(6): 1110-1114, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35232601

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Pediatric patients with Crohn's disease often require colectomies. The laparoscopic approach is considered safe, but there is little national data on outcomes and readmissions in this population. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried from 2010 to 2014 for patients ≤ 18 years who underwent colectomy for Crohn's disease during index admission. Patients were stratified by operative approach: laparoscopic versus open. Outcomes were compared with standard statistical methods. RESULTS: There were 2833 patients (47% female) who underwent a colectomy via laparoscopic (58%) vs. open (42%) approach. Index admissions were elective 55% of the time. Most operations were right hemicolectomy (86%), followed by total colectomy (8%). Of the study population, 489 (17%) were diverted with an ostomy. Readmission rates at 30 days and 1 year were 9% and 18%, respectively. The most common diagnoses at readmission were intra-abdominal infection (16%), small bowel obstruction (16%), and surgical site infection (9%). Laparoscopy was more commonly performed during elective admissions (63% vs. 44%), for patient with private insurance (72% vs. 39%), and for patients in the highest income quartile (66% vs. 48% in the lowest income quartile), all p<0.001. Length of stay was longer on index admission for open colectomy (8[5-12] days vs. 6[4-11] days, p<0.001), while cost was similar ($17,754[$12,375-$30,625] vs. $17,017[$11,219-$27,336], p = 0.104). There were no differences in readmission rate, intraabdominal infection or small bowel obstruction. CONCLUSION: In pediatric patients, laparoscopic colectomy for Crohn's disease is safe and is associated with shorter hospitalization and equivalent hospital costs compared to the open procedure. Socioeconomic disparities in laparoscopic utilization exist and warrant future investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Obstrução Intestinal , Laparoscopia , Criança , Colectomia/métodos , Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...