RESUMO
Colon cancer is one of the most common cancers in the United States of America. In addition to conventional treatment approaches such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation for colorectal cancer, immunotherapy has gained recognition over the past few years. However, its effectiveness in colorectal cancer treatment is controversial. Our study investigates the survival and progression-free rates of immunotherapy for different types of colorectal cancer over the last 10 years. We conducted literature reviews from various clinical trials and research studies to evaluate immunotherapy's role in colorectal cancer treatment. We also investigated how it affects clinical outcomes. We discovered a range of effective immunotherapy approaches targeting various growth factors and signaling pathways. These modalities include monoclonal antibodies aimed at growth factors such as epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and downstream signaling pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS), B-raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF), and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). Additionally, we identified immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, as well as target therapy and adoptive cell therapy as promising immunotherapeutic options. Nevertheless, the application of immunotherapy remains highly limited due to various factors influencing survival and progression-free rates, including tumor microenvironment, microsatellite instability, immune checkpoint expression, and gut microbiome. Additionally, its effectiveness is restricted to a small subgroup of patients, accompanied by side effects and the development of drug resistance mechanisms. To unlock its full potential, further clinical trials and research on molecular pathways in colorectal cancer are imperative. This will ultimately enhance drug discovery success and lead to more effective clinical management approaches.
RESUMO
Background Chronic steroid use is debilitating to health, but, in some cases, it is necessary. We examined the effect of chronic steroid use on the discharge disposition of people undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods We queried the National Inpatient Sample Database (NIS) from 2016 to 2019. We identified patients with current chronic steroid use with the International Classification of Diseases for the Tenth (ICD-10) code Z7952. Furthermore, we used the ICD-10 procedure codes for TAVR 02RF3. Outcomes were the length of hospitalization (LOS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), disposition, in-hospital mortality, and total hospital charges (THC). Results Between 2016 and 2019, we identified 44,200 TAVR hospitalizations, and 382,497 were on current long-term steroid therapy. Of these, 934 had current chronic steroid use and underwent TAVR (STEROID) with a mean age of 78 (SD=8.4). About 50% were female, 89% were Whites, 3.7% were Blacks, 4.2% were Hispanics, and 1.3% were Asians. Disposition was 'home,' 'home with home health' (HWHH), 'skilled nursing home' (SNF), 'short-term inpatient therapy' (SIT), 'discharged against medical advice' (AMA), and 'died.' A total of 602 (65.5%) were discharged home, 206 ( 22%) were discharged to HWHH, 109 (11.7%) to SNF, and 12 (1.28%) died. In the SIT and AMA groups, there were only three and two patients, respectively, p=0.23. The group that underwent TAVR and was not on chronic steroid therapy (NOSTEROID) had a mean age of 79 (SD=8.5), with 28731 (66.4%) being discharged home, 8399 (19.4%) to HWHH, 5319 (12.3%) to SNF, and 617 (1.43%) died p=0.17. Comparing the STEROID vs. NONSTEROID group, according to the CCI, the STEROID group scored higher than the NOSTEROID group; 3.5 (SD=2) vs. 3 (SD=2) p=0.0001, while for LOS, it was 3.7 days (SD=4.3) vs. 4.1 days (SD=5.3), p=0.28, and the THC was $203,213 (SD=$110,476) vs. $215,858 (SD=$138,540), p=0.15. Conclusion The comorbidity burden of individuals on long-term steroids undergoing TAVR was slightly higher than those not on steroids undergoing TAVR. Despite this, there was no statistically significant difference in their hospital outcomes following TAVR with respect to dispositions.
