Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 132(7): 927-36, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22402769

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Epoca-Reconstruction-(Reco)®-Glenoid has been developed to treat patients with cuff-tear-arthropathy. The glenoid component of this system has a hemispheric shape that canopies the humeral head. This design is believed to provide a stable fulcrum and restore normal deltoid function. The purpose of this study was to analyse strengths and disadvantages of the Epoca-Reco®-Glenoid in cuff-tear-arthropathy patients. Changes in functional outcome using Constant-Murley-Scoring(CMS), CMS sub-scoring parameters and radiological outcome were analysed. For this purpose, a classification for radiologic lucency was proposed. Diverging results, influencing factors and alternative treatment options have been discussed to analyse weaknesses and enhance future development of this arthroplastic model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 patients aged 68 ± 8.4 years with irreparable cuff-tear-arthropathy refractory to physiotherapeutic treatment were treated with Reco-Glenoid Total-Shoulder-Arthroplasty (TSA). Pre-operative standardized evaluations included history, physical examination, radiographs, computer tomography and clinical scorings. The post-operative controls included physical examination with CMS, video documentation and radiological evaluation. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 38 ± 18 months, the CMS had been significantly improved (p < 0.001) from (17.4 ± 5.8) to (43.2 ± 19.2) points. Significant improvement in pain, activities of daily life, range of motion (p < 0.001) and power (p = 0.006) was achieved. Significantly, inferior results in functional outcome and higher lucency rates were observed in female patients and in patients treated with small glenoid components. The follow-up rate was 100 %. CONCLUSION: The semi-constraint reconstruction glenoid prosthesis model in cuff-tear-arthropathy patients significantly improves shoulder function, however, it yields controversial results, with satisfactory results in male and poor results in female patients. Revision rate of the female cohort and loosening of the glenoid component in this short-term follow-up is of concern. Further investigations taking BMD, osteopenic conditions and influence of surface area in smaller individuals into consideration are recommended, to determine whether this is the underlying cause of the inferior results in females.


Assuntos
Artrite/cirurgia , Artroplastia de Substituição/instrumentação , Cavidade Glenoide , Prótese Articular , Lesões do Manguito Rotador , Traumatismos dos Tendões/cirurgia , Idoso , Artrite/etiologia , Artroplastia de Substituição/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Manguito Rotador/cirurgia , Fatores Sexuais , Traumatismos dos Tendões/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Arthroscopy ; 27(10): 1323-8, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21868190

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) block in pain reduction after arthroscopic subacromial decompression operations and its influence on patient satisfaction. Furthermore, we wanted to evaluate whether better perioperative pain management could positively influence postoperative shoulder function. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial, 3 groups of patients--each with 15 participants--were treated with SSN block (10 mL of 1% ropivacaine), placebo, or a subacromial infiltration of local anesthesia (20 mL of 1% ropivacaine). Preoperative and postoperative pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale. Functional outcome was measured by the Constant-Murley score, and patient satisfaction was measured anecdotally by interview 2 days, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: The SSN group reported significantly lower levels of postoperative pain, required significantly less analgesia, had better range of motion, and had higher levels of postoperative satisfaction in comparison to the subacromial infiltration group and placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with SSN blocks had less pain overall, which led to a decreased need for analgesics in comparison to the subacromial infiltration and placebo groups. Furthermore, patients in the SSN-blocked group achieved better postoperative ROM and were significantly more satisfied after surgery.


Assuntos
Artroscopia/métodos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Satisfação do Paciente , Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro/cirurgia , Dor de Ombro/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Amidas , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Ropivacaina , Dor de Ombro/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Injury ; 42(4): 324-9, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20394920

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures is a minimally invasive technique which was reported to be an easy procedure with low complication rates, good cosmetic and functional results, restoration of clavicular length and fast return to daily activities. Recent studies, however, also report on higher complication rates and specific problems with the use of this technique. This prospective study compares ESIN with non-operative treatment of displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures. METHODS: Between December 2003 and August 2007, 120 patients volunteered to participate. Of these, 112 patients completed the study (60 in the operative and 52 in the non-operative group). Patients in the non-operative group were treated with a simple shoulder sling. In the operative group, intramedullary stabilisation was performed within 3 days of the trauma. Clavicular shortening was determined after trauma and after osseous consolidation on thorax posteroanterior radiographs as the proportional length difference between the left and right side with the uninjured side serving as a control for clavicular length (100%). Radiographic union was assessed every 4 weeks on 20 degrees cephalad anteroposterior and posteroanterior radiographs of the clavicle. Constant shoulder scores and DASH scores (DASH, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) were assessed at final follow-up after 2 years. RESULTS: ESIN led to faster osseous healing and better restoration of clavicular length in simple fractures. We were not able to restore clavicular length in comminuted fractures using ESIN. Functional outcome at a mean follow-up of 24 months (range: 22-27 months) was better in the operative group. Delayed union and non-union accounted for the majority of complications in the non-operative group. In the operative group, telescoping was the main complication, which occurred in complex fractures with severe post-traumatic shortening only. CONCLUSION: We recommend ESIN for all simple displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures in order to minimise the rate of delayed union, non-union and symptomatic mal-union. We also recommend ESIN in comminuted fractures with moderate (< or = 7%) post-traumatic shortening, as they will heal with moderate shortening. In comminuted fractures with severe shortening, however, we recommend plate osteosynthesis in order to provide for stability, clavicular length and endosteal blood supply.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Clavícula/lesões , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/instrumentação , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 129(6): 807-15, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18989685

RESUMO

Fractures of the clavicle are common and have been typically addressed to nonoperative treatment. Favorable results, which predominantly were achieved in the young and adolescents, were supposed to be usual in midshaft clavicular fractures. However, in the presence of comminution or complete displacement, especially when occurring in females or elderly patients, there is a marked risk of nonunion, malunion, and poor outcome. Thus, many authors prefer primary surgical stabilization, when risk factors add up. Plate fixation and intramedullary stabilization seem to be equally favored. Though, indications for operative management remain controversial. Further prospective randomized comparative clinical trials are necessary for a well-founded risk-benefit analysis.


Assuntos
Clavícula/lesões , Fraturas Fechadas/cirurgia , Fraturas Cominutivas/cirurgia , Fraturas Mal-Unidas/cirurgia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Clavícula/diagnóstico por imagem , Clavícula/cirurgia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Fechadas/classificação , Fraturas Fechadas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Fechadas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cominutivas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Cominutivas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Mal-Unidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Mal-Unidas/epidemiologia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas não Consolidadas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA