Developmental drugs for sarcoidosis.

Sarcoidosis is a multi-organ granulomatous inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. Over 50% of patients will require treatment at some point in their disease and 10%-30% will develop a chronic progressive disease with pulmonary fibrosis leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Recently published guidelines recommend immunosuppressive therapy for sarcoidosis patients at risk of increased disease-related morbidity and mortality, and in whom disease has negatively impacted quality of life. Prednisone the currently recommended first line therapy is associated with significant toxicity however none of the other guideline recommended steroid sparing therapy is approved by regulatory agencies for use in sarcoidosis, and data in support of their use is weak. For patients with severe refractory disease requiring prolonged therapy, treatment options are limited. The need for expanding treatment options in sarcoidosis has been emphasized. Well conducted large, randomized trials evaluating currently available therapeutic options as well as novel pathways for targeting disease are necessary to better guide treatment decisions. These trials will not be without significant challenges. Sarcoidosis is a rare disease with heterogenous presentation and variable progression and clinical outcome. There are no universally agreed upon biomarkers of disease activity and measurement of outcomes is confounded by the need to balance patient centric measures and objective measures of disease activity. Our paper provides an update on developmental drugs in sarcoidosis and outlines several novel pathways that may be targeted for future drug development. Currently available trials are highlighted and ongoing challenges to drug development and clinical trial design are briefly discussed.

Anti-inflammatory Therapy for Sarcoidosis.

Over 50% of patients with sarcoidosis will require anti-inflammatory therapy at some point in their disease course. Indications for therapy are to improve health-related quality of life, prevent or arrest organ dysfunction (or organ failure) or avoid death. Recently published treatment guidelines recommended a stepwise approach to therapy however there are some patients for whom up front combination or more intense therapy maybe reasonable. The last decade has seen an explosion of studies and trials evaluating novel therapeutic agents and treatment strategies. Currently available anti-inflammatory therapies and several novel therapies are discussed here.

High-Resolution CT Scan Fibrotic Patterns in Stage IV Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Impact on Pulmonary Function and Survival.

BACKGROUND: Different patterns of fibrosis on high-resolution CT scans (HRCT) have been associated with reduced survival in some interstitial lung diseases. Nothing is known about HRCT scan patterns and survival in sarcoidosis. RESEARCH QUESTION: Will a detailed description of the extent and pattern of HRCT scan fibrosis in patients with stage IV pulmonary sarcoidosis impact pulmonary function and survival? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred forty patients with stage IV sarcoidosis at two large tertiary institutions were studied. The earliest HRCT scan with fibrosis was reviewed for extent of fibrosis (< 10%, 10%-20%, and > 20%) and presence of bronchiectasis, upper lobe fibrocystic changes, basal subpleural honeycombing, ground-glass opacities (GGOs), large bullae, and mycetomas. Presence of sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension (SAPH) and pulmonary function testing performed within 1 year of HRCT were recorded. Patients were followed up until last clinic visit, death, or lung transplantation. RESULTS: The mean age was 58.4 years. Seventy-four percent were Black, 63% were female, and mean follow-up was 7.4 years. Death or LT occurred in 53 patients (22%). Thirty-one percent had > 20% fibrosis, 25% had 10%-20% fibrosis, and 44% had < 10% fibrosis. The most common HRCT abnormalities were bronchiectasis (76%), upper lobe fibrocystic changes (36%), and GGOs (28%). Twelve percent had basal subpleural honeycombing, and 32% had SAPH. Patients with > 20% fibrosis had more severe pulmonary impairment, were more likely to have SAPH (53%), and had worse survival (44% mortality; P < .001). Upper lobe fibrocystic changes, basal subpleural honeycombing, and large bullae were associated with worse pulmonary function and worse survival. Patients with basal subpleural honeycombing had the worst pulmonary function and survival (55% mortality; P < .001). GGOs were associated with worse pulmonary function but not worse survival, and mycetomas were associated with worse survival but not worse pulmonary function. A Cox proportional hazards model indicated that basal subpleural honeycombing (hazard ratio, 7.95), diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide < 40% (HR, 5.67) and White race (hazard ratio, 2.61) were independent predictors of reduced survival. INTERPRETATION: HRCT scan features of fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis had an impact on pulmonary function and survival. Presence of >20% fibrosis and basal subpleural honeycombing are predictive of worse pulmonary function and worse survival in patients with stage IV pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Quality of life in sarcoidosis.

Having sarcoidosis often has a major impact on quality of life of patients and their families. Improving quality of life is prioritized as most important treatment aim by many patients with sarcoidosis, but current evidence and treatment options are limited. In this narrative review, we describe the impact of sarcoidosis on various aspects of daily life, evaluate determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and provide an overview of the different patient-reported outcome measures to assess HRQoL in sarcoidosis. Moreover, we review the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life for people with sarcoidosis.

Sarcoidosis and frailty: recognizing factors that foster holistic resilience.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan system disease exerting significant impact on biophysical, social, psychological and emotional well-being. Mortality and disability correlate to accessible, timely, expert care for sarcoidosis and its related complications. Across health conditions, positive healthcare interactions and interventions can rehabilitate unfavourable factors tied to concepts of ' frailty' . Here, we set out to introduce concepts related to frailty and their impact in the context of sarcoidosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies examining frailty across other multiorgan and single organ-based diseases that mirror organ involvement in sarcoidosis demonstrate findings that bear relevance in sarcoidosis. Namely, factors predisposing a person to frailty are a multifactorial phenomenon which are also reflected in the lived experience of sarcoidosis; and that early diagnosis, intervention and prevention may alter a course towards more favourable health outcomes. SUMMARY: Factors predisposing to frailty in other health conditions may also signal a risk in sarcoidosis. In turn, proactive health preservation - regardless of age - may lead to improved biopsychosocial reserve and health-related quality of life. Fortifying holistic resilience in sarcoidosis is anticipated to reduce risk of the occurrence and prolongation of health-related complications, and facilitate swifter recovery from biophysical complications as well as from psychosocial and emotional stressors.

Diversity and disparity in the treatment and care of sarcoidosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Clinical presentation and outcomes in patients with sarcoidosis vary by race, gender, ethnicity, and geolocation. African Americans and female individuals have the highest incidence of disease. They are also more likely to present with more severe and more advanced forms of disease and to die from sarcoidosis. African American females have the highest disease-associated mortality, yet the mortality rate varies by geolocation. The diverse presentation and outcomes in sarcoidosis have often been attributed to genetics and biology, yet this may not be entirely so. RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies have shown that African Americans and female individuals are more likely to earn less and be more socioeconomically disadvantaged in society. Patients with sarcoidosis earning in the lowest income strata present with the most severe disease and report more barriers to care. It is plausible that the racial, gender, and geospatial differences in sarcoidosis are more reflective of healthcare disparities than genetics or biology alone. SUMMARY: Preventable differences in the burden of disease and in the opportunities to achieve optimal health outcomes that are differentially experienced by groups of people disadvantaged by race, gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic background should be identified and addressed.

The prognostic value of gastroesophageal reflux disorder in interstitial lung disease related hospitalizations.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common comorbidity in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). We built and validated a model using the national inpatient sample (NIS) database to assess the contributory role of GERD in ILD-related hospitalizations mortality. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we extracted ILD-related hospitalizations data between 2007 and 2019 from the NIS database. Univariable logistic regression was used for predictor selection. Data were split into the training and validation cohorts (0.6 and 0.4, respectively). We used decision tree analysis (classification and regression tree, CART) to create a predictive model to explore the role of GERD in ILD-related hospitalizations mortality. Different metrics were used to evaluate our model. A bootstrap-based technique was implemented to balance our training data outcome to improve our model metrics in the validation cohort. We conducted a variance-based sensitivity analysis to evaluate GERD's importance in our model. FINDINGS: The model had a sensitivity of 73.43%, specificity of 66.15%, precision of 0.27, negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.62%, accuracy of 67.2%, Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.3, F1 score of 0.4, and area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.76. GERD did not predict survival in our cohort. GERD contribution to the model was ranked the eleventh among twenty-nine variables included in this analysis (importance of 0.003, normalized importance of 5%). GERD was the best predictor in ILD-related hospitalizations who didn't receive mechanical ventilation. INTERPRETATIONS: GERD is associated with mild ILD-related hospitalization. Our model-performance measures suggest overall an acceptable discrimination. Our model showed that GERD does not have a prognostic value in ILD-related hospitalization, indicating that GERD per se might not have any impact on mortality in hospitalized ILD patients.

Validation of the Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Score in a Multicontinental Study.

Rationale: The Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Score (SDS) has been established to quantitate the clinical features consistent with sarcoidosis in a monocentric study. Objectives: We aimed to confirm the diagnostic value of SDS in a large, multicontinental study and to assess the utility of SDS in differentiating sarcoidosis from alternative diagnoses, including infectious and noninfectious granulomatous diseases. Methods: We included patients with biopsy-confirmed sarcoidosis at nine centers across the world. Patients without sarcoidosis seen at the same sites served as control patients. Using a modified World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders organ assessment instrument, we scored all patients for the presence of granuloma on biopsy, highly probable symptoms, and least probable symptoms for each area. Two sarcoidosis scores were generated: SDS Biopsy (with biopsy) and SDS Clinical (without biopsy). SDS Clinical and Biopsy were calculated for all patients. We calculated and compared the area under the curve (AUC) for SDS Clinical and Biopsy according to different diagnosis scenarios. Results: A total of 1,041 patients with sarcoidosis and 1,035 without sarcoidosis were included. The results for SDS Clinical (AUC, 0.888; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.874-0.902) and SDS Biopsy (AUC, 0.979; 95% CI, 0.973-0.985) according to AUC were good to excellent for differentiating sarcoidosis from alternative diagnosis. SDS Clinical was less discriminatory in males (P = 0.01) and in high tuberculosis prevalence centers (P < 0.001). However, SDS Clinical (AUC, 0.684; 95% CI, 0.602-0.766) and SDS Biopsy (AUC, 0.754; 95% CI, 0.673-0.835) were not sufficiently discriminative for noninfectious granulomatous diseases, but both SDSs could differentiate sarcoidosis from infectious granulomatous diseases. Algorithms were proposed for the SDS Clinical and SDS Biopsy to assist the clinician in the diagnostic process, and cutoff values were proposed for the SDS Clinical and SDS Biopsy, allowing the diagnosis of sarcoidosis to be safely confirmed or rejected in most cases except for noninfectious granulomatous disease. Conclusions: This multicontinental study confirms that both SDS Clinical and SDS Biopsy have good to excellent performance in discriminating sarcoidosis from alternative diagnoses. Differences in the AUC were seen for high tuberculosis prevalence versus low tuberculosis prevalence centers and for males versus females. Both SDSs had good discriminatory function for infectious granulomatous disease but failed in cases of noninfectious granulomatous disease such as berylliosis.

Efzofitimod for the Treatment of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary sarcoidosis is characterized by the accumulation of immune cells that form granulomas affecting the lungs. Efzofitimod (ATYR1923), a novel immunomodulator, selectively binds neuropilin 2, which is upregulated on immune cells in response to lung inflammation. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the tolerability, safety, and effect on outcomes of efzofitimod in pulmonary sarcoidosis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating multiple ascending doses of efzofitimod administered intravenously every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, randomized patients (2:1) underwent a steroid taper to 5 mg/d by week 8 or < 5 mg/d after week 16. The primary end point was the incidence of adverse events (AEs); secondary end points included steroid reduction, change in lung function, and patient-reported outcomes on health-related quality-of-life scales. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received at least one dose of study medication. Efzofitimod was well tolerated at all doses, with no new or unexpected AEs and no dose-dependent AE incidence. Average daily steroid doses through end of study were 6.8 mg, 6.5 mg, and 5.6 mg for the 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 5 mg/kg groups compared with 7.2 mg for placebo, resulting in a baseline-adjusted relative steroid reduction of 5%, 9%, and 22%, respectively. Clinically meaningful improvements were achieved across several patient-reported outcomes, several of which reached statistical significance in the 5 mg/kg dose arm. A dose-dependent but nonsignificant trend toward improved lung function also was observed for 3 and 5 mg/kg. INTERPRETATION: Efzofitimod was safe and well tolerated and was associated with dose-dependent improvements of several clinically relevant end points compared with placebo. The results of this study support further evaluation of efzofitimod in pulmonary sarcoidosis. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03824392; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set Development for Interstitial Lung Disease.

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) as a scientific method of disability data collection comprised of >1,200 categories describing the spectrum of impairment types (functional, symptoms-based and anatomical) under the bio-psycho-social model with consideration of environmental and personal factors (pf). ICF Core Sets and ICF Checklists are streamlined disease-specific resources for clinical use, service provision, and for use in health economics and health policy. ICF can disclose strengths and weaknesses across multiple patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and help consolidate best-fitting question-items from multiple PROMs. Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), are generally progressive, with restrictive physiology sometimes occurring in the context of multi-organ autoimmunity/inflammatory conditions such as connective tissue diseases (CTDs). In spite of significant associated morbidity and potential disability, ILD has yet to be linked to the ICF. Methods: Each instrument and their question-items within the consensus-recommended core sets for clinical trials in ILD were deconstructed to single concept units, and then linked per updated ICF linkage rules. Inter-linker agreement was established. Three additional subsequently validated measures were also included. Results: One-hundred-eleven ICF categories were identified for ten PROMs and three traditional objective measures that were amenable to ICF linkage. The proportion of agreement ranged from 0.79 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.91) to 0.93 (0.76, 0.99) with the overall proportion of inter-linker agreement being very high 0.86 (0.82, 0.89) for the initial instruments, with 94-100% for the three additional PROMs. Thirty-four new 'Personal Factors' emerged to capture disease-specific qualities not elsewhere described in ICF, e.g. 'pf_embarrassed by cough' or 'pf_panic/afraid when can't get a breath'. Conclusion: This first known effort in ICF linkage of ILD has provided important revelations on the current utility of the ICF in lung disease. Results have indicated areas for meaningful assessment of ICF descriptors for lung impairment. The mapping across PROMs provides insight into possibilities of developing more streamline and precise instrumentation. Finally, familiarity with the ICF in ILD may enable clinicians to experience a smoother transition with the imminent harmonization of ICD and ICF, ICD-11.

Sarcoidosis: Updates on therapeutic drug trials and novel treatment approaches.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. It affects the lungs in over 90% of patients yet extra-pulmonary and multi-organ involvement is common. Spontaneous remission of disease occurs commonly, nonetheless, over 50% of patients will require treatment and up to 30% of patients will develop a chronic progressive non-remitting disease with marked pulmonary fibrosis leading to significant morbidity and death. Guidelines outlining an immunosuppressive treatment approach to sarcoidosis were recently published, however, the strength of evidence behind many of the guideline recommended drugs is weak. None of the drugs currently used for the treatment of sarcoidosis have been rigorously studied and prescription of these drugs is often based on off-label" indications informed by experience with other diseases. Indeed, only two medications [prednisone and repository corticotropin (RCI) injection] currently used in the treatment of sarcoidosis are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. This situation results in significant reimbursement challenges especially for the more advanced (and often more effective) drugs that are favored for severe and refractory forms of disease causing an over-reliance on corticosteroids known to be associated with significant dose and duration dependent toxicities. This past decade has seen a renewed interest in developing new drugs and exploring novel therapeutic pathways for the treatment of sarcoidosis. Several of these trials are active randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed to recruit relatively large numbers of patients with a goal to determine the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of these new molecules and therapeutic approaches. While it is an exciting time, it is also necessary to exercise caution. Resources including research dollars and most importantly, patient populations available for trials are limited and thus necessitate that several of the challenges facing drug trials and drug development in sarcoidosis are addressed. This will ensure that currently available resources are judiciously utilized. Our paper reviews the ongoing and anticipated drug trials in sarcoidosis and addresses the challenges facing these and future trials. We also review several recently completed trials and draw lessons that should be applied in future.

Controversies in the Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

There are many challenging aspects of the management of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive therapy (IST). First, it is not always clear who will benefit from therapy or when to initiate treatment. Secondly, there are no randomized controlled trials or large prospective studies to guide what medications to use, at what doses, and for how long. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of sarcoidosis makes a strong recommendation for the use of immuno-suppressive therapy in CS patients with functional cardiac abnormalities, including heart blocks, dysrhythmias, or cardiomyopathy where patients are considered at-risk of adverse outcomes. Corticosteroids are the first line immunosuppressive therapy in CS however, early initiation of second-line steroid sparing medications has been advocated and there is data to suggest that concomitant initiation of therapy may be more beneficial. The use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents (including infliximab and adalimumab) considered beneficial third-line anti-sarcoidosis treatment agents in other severe refractory manifestations of disease remains controversial.

Ageing with Interstitial lung disease: preserving health and well being.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ageing, the accrual of molecular and cellular damage over a lifetime confers progressive physiologic dysfunction of bodily systems, leaving the body in a heightened state of vulnerability to biophysical and psychosocial stressors. The inflection point is frailty which easily leads to disability and death. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) creates biophysical and psychosocial stresses difficult for even optimally fit patients to cope with. With evolving ILD treatment pathways, people with ILD are living longer. RECENT FINDINGS: ILD and ageing are bi-directionally influential: ILD, its treatments, complications, and collateral systemic extra-pulmonary damage (hypoxic and oxidative stress) wear on the ageing person and ageing impacts a person's tolerance of ILD. ILD extent may proportionally accelerate age-related vulnerabilities. ILD related to inflammatory systemic diseases, e.g. connective tissue diseases or sarcoidosis, exert an even more complex biophysical impact on the body. SUMMARY: The present review stresses goals of preventing frailty in ILD and preserving general health and well being of people living with ILD of any age, from time of diagnosis and as they age. The development of a prediction score is proposed to classify those at risk of frailty and guide interventions that preserve successful ageing for all levels of ILD severity. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COPM/A32.

National Temporal Trends in Hospitalization and Inpatient Mortality in Patients With Pulmonary Sarcoidosis in the United States Between 2007 and 2018.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis-related hospitalizations have been increasing in the past decade. There is a paucity of data on mortality trends over time in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis and respiratory failure who are hospitalized. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the national temporal trends over time in hospitalization and inpatient mortality rates in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis and respiratory failure hospitalized in the United States between 2007 and 2018? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Hospitalization data between 2007 and 2018 were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample for subjects with pulmonary sarcoidosis. Inpatient mortality was stratified by age, respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation (MV), hospital location, and setting (rural vs urban, academic vs nonacademic). A Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to assess the linear trend in mortality, respiratory failure, and need for MV. RESULTS: Hospitalizations in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis increased from 258.5 per 1,000,000 hospitalizations in 2007 to 705.7 per 1,000,000 in 2018. Hospitalizations for respiratory failure increased ninefold from 25.9 to 239.4 per 1,000,000 hospitalizations, and the need for MV increased threefold from 9.4 per 1,000,000 in 2007 to 29.4 per 1,000,000 in 2018. All-cause inpatient mortality was 2.6%; however, mortality was 13 times higher in patients with respiratory failure (10.6% vs 0.8%) and 26 times higher in patients who required MV (31.2% vs 1.2%). Inpatient mortality associated with respiratory failure declined 50% from 17.2% in 2007 to 6.6% in 2018. Independent inpatient mortality predictors were older age (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.025), respiratory failure (aHR, 3.12), need for MV (aHR, 6.01), pulmonary hypertension (pHTN; aHR, 1.44), pulmonary embolism (aHR, 1.61), and frailty (aHR, 3.10). INTERPRETATION: Hospitalizations for respiratory failure in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis are increasing; however, inpatient mortality from respiratory failure has declined. Older age, respiratory failure, pHTN, and frailty are important predictors of inpatient mortality in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis who are hospitalized.

Assessment of dyspnea in sarcoidosis using the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI).

INTRODUCTION: The Borg and Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scales have been used to evaluate dyspnea in sarcoidosis. The Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) are useful for the assessment of dyspnea in COPD. It is not known if the BDI-TDI accurately assesses dyspnea in sarcoidosis patients. METHODS: Data was analyzed from the Registry for Advanced Sarcoidosis (ReAS), a multi-national database enrolling patients with advanced sarcoidosis and a comparison group of sarcoidosis patients with non-advanced disease. At baseline, patients completed a BDI questionnaire along with spirometry, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), mMRC, Borg score, fatigue assessment score (FAS) and HRQoL assessments using Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) and St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). At 12-months, patients with advanced disease completed a TDI questionnaire along with the other measures. Correlations between BDI and baseline variables, and between TDI and changes in baseline variables were evaluated. RESULTS: There was significant correlation (p < 0.001 for all) between BDI and baseline 6MWD (rho = 0.336), FVC% (rho = 0.387), FEV1% (rho = 0.285), DLCO% (rho = 0.355), mMRC (rho = -0.721), Borg score (rho = -0.389), FAS (rho = -0.669), SGRQ (rho = -0.785), and KSQ (rho = 0.318 to 0.724). At follow-up, TDI correlated with BDI, but not with changes in pulmonary function or other dyspnea measures. CONCLUSION: BDI scores correlated with pulmonary function, 6MWD, and other dyspnea measures. TDI scores did not correlate with changes in pulmonary function or other dyspnea measures. BDI may be a useful independent measure of dyspnea in sarcoidosis patients. The role of TDI needs further evaluation in longitudinal studies associated with changes in clinical parameters.

Acute motor neuropathy with quadriparesis following treatment with triple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, nintedanib.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare progressive interstitial lung disease characterized by declining lung function, worsening dyspnea and poor prognosis with median survival of 3-5 years. IPF predominantly affects people over 60 years, it however has worse prognosis in younger patients with genetic predisposition like short telomere syndrome. Nintedanib, one of two anti-fibrotic therapies approved for IPF treatment has occasional neurological side effects like fatigue, dizziness and headaches. Significant polyneuropathy or motor dysfunction is rarely seen. This case report illustrates a patient who developed quadriparesis following initiation of Nintedanib.

The impact of demographic disparities in the presentation of sarcoidosis: A multicenter prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To study how demographic differences impact disease manifestation of sarcoidosis using the WASOG tool in a large multicentric study. METHODS: Clinical data regarding 1445 patients with sarcoidosis from 14 clinical sites in 10 countries were prospectively reviewed from Feb 1, 2020 to Sep 30, 2020. Organ involvement was evaluated for the whole group and for subgroups differentiated by sex, race, and age. RESULTS: The median age of the patients at diagnosis was 46 years old; 60.8% of the patients were female. The most commonly involved organ was lung (96%), followed by skin (24%) and eye (22%). Black patients had more multiple organ involvement than White patients (OR = 3.227, 95% CI: 2.243-4.643) and females had more multiple organ involvement than males (OR = 1.238, 95% CI: 1.083-1.415). Black patients had more frequent involvement of neurologic, skin, eye, extra thoracic lymph node, liver and spleen than White and Asian patients. Women were more likely to have eye (OR = 1.522, 95%CI: 1.259-1.838) or skin involvement (OR = 1.369, 95%CI: 1.152-1.628). Men were more likely to have cardiac involvement (OR = 1.326, 95%CI: 1.096-1.605). A total of 262 (18.1%) patients did not receive systemic treatment for sarcoidosis. Therapy was more common in Black patients than in other races. CONCLUSION: The initial presentation and treatment of sarcoidosis was related to sex, race, and age. Black and female individuals are found to have multiple organ involvement more frequently. Age at diagnosis<45, Black patients and multiple organ involvement were independent predictors of treatment.