Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by previous treatment: post hoc analysis of phase II/III trials.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with distinct treatment histories. METHODS: Pooled phase II/III trial data from patients who received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or placebo, as monotherapy or with conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), were analyzed post hoc. Separate evaluations were conducted for populations with a prior inadequate response (IR) to: 1) non-methotrexate (MTX) csDMARDs only (non-MTX csDMARD-IR; n = 537); 2) MTX (MTX-IR; n = 3113); and 3) biologic (b)DMARDs (bDMARD-IR; n = 782). Efficacy outcomes included rates of response (American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70% response criteria) and remission (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints derived from 4 measures, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-4(ESR)] < 2.6) at month 3, and changes from baseline in DAS28-4(ESR) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores. Safety was assessed up to month 24. RESULTS: At month 3, efficacy was generally improved with tofacitinib (both doses) vs placebo in each population. Generally, efficacy outcomes with tofacitinib were numerically more favorable in non-MTX csDMARD-IR vs MTX-IR or bDMARD-IR patients. Over 24 months, crude incidence rates for adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs were generally numerically lower in non-MTX csDMARD-IR and MTX-IR vs bDMARD-IR populations; rates for AEs of special interest were generally similar across populations. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib provided clinical benefit across patients with rheumatoid arthritis with a range of prior treatment experience but may have greater efficacy and an improved benefit/risk profile in those with fewer prior treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00147498/NCT00413660/NCT00550446/NCT00603512/NCT00687193/NCT00976599/NCT01359150/NCT00847613/NCT00814307/NCT00853385/NCT00960440/NCT01039688/NCT00856544.

Persistence and adherence of biologics in US patients with psoriatic arthritis: analyses from a claims database.

Aim: To evaluate the persistence and adherence of subcutaneous biologics in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Patients & methods: Psoriatic arthritis patients who initiated adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab or secukinumab between 15 January 2016 and 31 July 2017 were identified in the Truven Databases. Outcomes included discontinuation rate, persistence and adherence over 12 months. Results: Of 1558 patients included, the 12-month discontinuation rate was lowest with secukinumab (36.5%), followed by adalimumab, golimumab, etanercept and certolizumab pegol (42.6-51.6%). Mean persistence ranged from 240.7 (certolizumab pegol) to 282.8 days (secukinumab). The mean proportion of days covered was highest with secukinumab (0.67) and lowest with certolizumab pegol (0.49). Conclusion: Patients who initiated secukinumab had the lowest discontinuation rate and highest persistence and adherence over 12 months.

Immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of abatacept administered subcutaneously with or without background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a phase III, international, multicenter, parallel-arm, open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) on subcutaneous (SC) abatacept immunogenicity, and to assess safety and efficacy. METHODS: This phase III, open-label study had a 4-month short-term (ST) period and an ongoing long-term extension (LTE) period. Rheumatoid arthritis patients were stratified to receive SC abatacept (125 mg/week) with (combination) or without MTX (monotherapy), with no intravenous loading dose; patients receiving monotherapy could add MTX in the LTE period. Immunogenicity (percentage of anti-abatacept antibody-positive patients) was assessed. ST and LTE period data are reported, including efficacy through LTE month 14 and safety through LTE month 20. RESULTS: Ninety-six of 100 enrolled patients completed the ST period; 3.9% (combination) and 4.1% of patients (monotherapy) developed transient immunogenicity, and no patients were antibody positive at month 4. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 3.9% (combination) and 6.1% of patients (monotherapy); 5.9% (combination) and 8.2% of patients (monotherapy) experienced SC injection reactions, and all were mild in intensity. Mean 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) changes were -1.67 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] -2.06, -1.28; combination) and -1.94 (95% CI -2.46, -1.42; monotherapy) at month 4. Ninety patients entered and were treated in the LTE period; 83.3% (75 of 90) remained ongoing at month 24. One LTE-treated patient (1.1%) developed immunogenicity, 14.4% of patients experienced SAEs, and no SC injection reactions were reported. For patients entering the LTE period, mean DAS28 changes from baseline were -1.84 (95% CI -2.23, -1.34; combination) and -2.86 (95% CI -3.46, -2.27; monotherapy) at month 18. CONCLUSION: SC abatacept did not elicit immunogenicity associated with loss of safety or efficacy, either with or without MTX.

Overexpression of CD70 and overstimulation of IgG synthesis by lupus T cells and T cells treated with DNA methylation inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: Generalized DNA hypomethylation contributes to altered T cell function and gene expression in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Some of the overexpressed genes participate in the disease process, but the full repertoire of genes affected is unknown. Methylation-sensitive T cell genes were identified by treating T cells with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine and comparing gene expression with oligonucleotide arrays. CD70, a costimulatory ligand for B cell CD27, was one gene that reproducibly increased. We then determined whether CD70 is overexpressed on T cells treated with other DNA methylation inhibitors and on SLE T cells, and determined its functional significance. METHODS: Oligonucleotide arrays, real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and flow cytometry were used to compare CD70 expression in T cells treated with 2 DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (5-azacytidine and procainamide) and 3 ERK pathway inhibitors known to decrease DNA methyltransferase expression (U0126, PD98059, and hydralazine). The consequences of CD70 overexpression were tested by coculture of autologous T and B cells with and without anti-CD70 and measuring IgG production by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The results were compared with those of T cells from lupus patients. RESULTS: SLE T cells and T cells treated with DNA methylation inhibitors overexpressed CD70 and overstimulated B cell IgG production. The increase in IgG synthesis was abrogated by anti-CD70. CONCLUSION: SLE T cells and T cells treated with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and ERK pathway inhibitors overexpress CD70. This increased B cell costimulation and subsequent immunoglobulin overproduction may contribute to drug-induced and idiopathic lupus.

Decreased T cell ERK pathway signaling may contribute to the development of lupus through effects on DNA methylation and gene expression.

T cells from patients with active lupus have multiple biochemical abnormalities. One of these is DNA hypomethylation, which in model systems alters gene expression and induces lupus-like autoimmunity. Recent reports indicate that DNA methylation is regulated in part by the ERK pathway, and that ERK pathway signaling is diminished in lupus T cells. This suggests a model in which defective T cell ERK pathway signaling contributes to the development of autoimmunity by decreasing DNA methyltransferase expression, modifying DNA methylation patterns and altering gene expression. This mechanism could contribute to idiopathic and drug-induced lupus.