The effect of MK-0524, a prostaglandin D(2) receptor antagonist, on prostaglandin D (2)-induced nasal airway obstruction in healthy volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: Nasal congestion in allergic rhinitis results from tissue edema and vasodilatation in the nasal mucosa. Of the mediators released by mast cells in response to allergens, prostaglandin (PG) D(2) is regarded as the most potent inducer of nasal congestion. Intranasal administration of PGD(2) reproduces the nasal blockade experienced by patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) via its action on the PGD(2) (DP) receptor to induce nasal vasodilatation. Intranasal challenge with PGD(2) can be a useful tool for evaluating DP-receptor antagonists. OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to examine the ability of MK-0524, a DP receptor antagonist in development for the treatment of SAR, to block PGD(2) induced nasal congestion in healthy volunteers. METHODS: To this end, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 3-period study was performed in 15 healthy subjects. During each period, subjects received MK-0524 25 mg, MK-0524 100 mg or placebo qd for 3 days. Twenty-four hours following the last dose, nasal provocations with PGD(2) were performed to determine the PD(75), which is the intranasal dose of PGD(2) that provokes a 75% increase in baseline total nasal airway resistance as performed by active anterior rhinomanometry. RESULTS: Following treatment with MK-0524, the PD(75) (mean+/-SD) was significantly shifted from 15.8 +/- 18.3 mug/nostril during the placebo period to more than 512 mug/nostril both following the 25- and 100-mg (maximum challenge dose tested) dose regimen. CONCLUSION: Whether this >45 fold increase in PD(75) will induce a clinically meaningful effect of MK-0524 will require clinical study in participants with SAR.

Effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Aprepitant is a neurokinin-1 (NK1)-receptor antagonist developed as an antiemetic for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period, parallel-group study. During period 1, warfarin was individually titrated to a stable prothrombin time (expressed as international normalized ratio, INR) from 1.3 to 1.8. Subsequently, the daily warfarin dose remained fixed for 10-12 days. During period 2, the warfarin dose was continued for 8 days, and on days 1-3 administered concomitantly with aprepitant (125 mg on day 1, and 80 mg on days 2 and 3) or placebo. At baseline (day -1 of period 2) and on day 3, warfarin pharmacokinetics was investigated. INR was monitored daily. During period 2, warfarin trough concentrations were determined daily. RESULTS: The study was completed by 22 healthy volunteers (20 men, 2 women). On day 3, steady-state pharmacokinetics of warfarin enantiomers after aprepitant did not change, as assessed by warfarin AUC(0-24 h) and C(max). However, compared with placebo, trough S(-) warfarin concentrations decreased on days 5-8 (maximum decrease 34% on day 8, P<0.01). The INR decreased after aprepitant with a mean maximum decrease on day 8 of 11% versus placebo (P=0.011). CONCLUSION: These data are consistent with a significant induction of CYP2C9 metabolism of S(-) warfarin by aprepitant. Subsequently, in patients on chronic warfarin therapy, the clotting status should be monitored closely during the 2-week period, particularly at 7-10 days, following initiation of the 3-day regimen of aprepitant with each chemotherapy cycle.