Access to social security benefits among multiple sclerosis patients in Italy: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge concerning the predictors of social security benefits and the proportion of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients receiving these benefits is very limited. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the likelihood of receiving social security benefits for Italian MS patients. METHODS: From September 2014 to November 2015, we interviewed MS outpatients from two Italian MS clinics to collect information regarding their personal data, clinical and working history, and access to social security benefits. We performed both univariate and multivariable analyses to evaluate the predictors for receiving social security benefits. RESULTS: We interviewed 297 patients, with a mean age of 49.5 (±â€¯10.7) years; 71.4% were females. About 73% of patients had a relapsing-remitting (RR) course and the median EDSS score was 2.5 (IQR 1.5-6). About 75% of MS patients received a full exemption from co-payments, while the proportions of people who enjoyed each of the other social security benefits were lower, ranging from 8.8% (car adaptation) to 32% (disable badge). At multivariable analysis, the probability of obtaining each of the benefits was significantly associated with the EDSS score: walking aids (OR 3.9), care allowance (OR 3.6), disabled badge (OR 2.4), exemption from co-payment (OR 1.6) and allowed off work permit (OR 1.7). Only the probability of obtaining an allowed off work permit was also influenced by comorbidities (OR 2.9) and a higher education (OR 2.2). CONCLUSION: Except for full exemption from co-payments, the proportions of MS patients who enjoyed social security benefits seem to be limited in our study sample. The EDSS score is the strongest predictor of the probability of receiving all the benefits. Only a small proportion of patients received care allowance and working permits, probably because such benefits are only granted to people with a high level of disability. On the other hand, the low proportion of patients who enjoyed fiscal benefits for home and car adaptations could have been influenced by the way such benefits are granted in our country.

Quality of life and patient preferences: identification of subgroups of multiple sclerosis patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to estimate preferences related to quality of life attributes in people with multiple sclerosis, by keeping heterogeneity of patient preference in mind, using the latent class approach. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment survey was developed using the following attributes: activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, pain/fatigue, anxiety/depression and attention/concentration. Choice sets were presented as pairs of hypothetical health status, based upon a fractional factorial design. RESULTS: The latent class logit model estimated on 152 patients identified three subpopulations, which, respectively, attached more importance to: (1) the physical dimension; (2) pain/fatigue and anxiety/depression; and (3) instrumental activities of daily living impairments, anxiety/depression and attention/concentration. A posterior analysis suggests that the latent class membership may be related to an individual's age to some extent, or to diagnosis and treatment, while apart from energy dimension, no significant difference exists between latent groups, with regard to Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 scales. CONCLUSIONS: A quality of life preference-based utility measure for people with multiple sclerosis was developed. These utility values allow identification of a hierarchic priority among different aspects of quality of life and may allow physicians to develop a care programme tailored to patient needs.

Glatiramer acetate is a treatment option in neutralising antibodies to interferon-beta-positive patients.

Neutralising antibodies develop in 15% of interferon-beta (IFNbeta)-treated patients, causing the reduction of the clinical effects of the treatment. This is the first study that shows that switching patients from IFNbeta to glatiramer acetate (GA) in case of neutralising antibodies (NAb) positivity is effective in reducing relapse rate and in delaying the time to first relapse. In conclusion, our data suggest the use of GA in NAb-positive patients.