A retroperitoneal sympathetic paraganglioma invading the duodenum and mimicking a submucosal tumor.

We report a case of an autopsy of unusual retroperitoneal sympathetic paraganglioma (SPG) that directly invaded the duodenum and showed expansive growth mimicking a submucosal tumor. The tumor was clinically suspected to be a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the duodenum because of its location and extension to the retroperitoneum without catecholamine-associated symptoms. However, a small biopsy specimen of the tumor showed diffuse proliferation of large basophilic cells that were negative for C-kit and CD34, ruling out GIST and indicating an epithelial malignancy. An autopsy revealed that the tumor was mainly in the retroperitoneum, measuring 7.5 x 9.5 cm, weighing 600 g and extending into the duodenum, adjacent to the pancreas but free of the adrenal glands. On cut section, the tumor involved the entire wall of the duodenum. There were no metastases in any organs. For differential diagnosis, endocrine tumors of the duodenum or pancreas and extra-adrenal SPG were considered. The tumor cells were immunohistochemically strongly positive for chromogranin A and were surrounded by cells positive for S100 protein. The Ki67-labeling index was under 1%. The four catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes were detected in the tumor cells. We report this case of SPG with emphasis on differential diagnosis and the significance of its local invasion.

Phase III study to evaluate the use of high-dose chemotherapy as consolidation of treatment for high-risk postoperative breast cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study, JCOG 9208.

A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) as consolidation of the treatment of high-risk postoperative breast cancer. Patients under 56 years of age with stage I to IIIB breast cancer involving 10 or more axillary lymph nodes were eligible. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). Between May 1993 and March 1999, 97 patients were enrolled, and two patients became ineligible. The median age of the 97 patients was 46 years (range 27-55 years), and 72 (74%) were premenopausal. The median number of involved axillary nodes was 16 (range 10-49). All patients had undergone a radical mastectomy. Major characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms. Forty-eight patients in the standard-dose (STD) arm received six courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by tamoxifen. Forty-nine patients were assigned to undergo HDC with cyclophosphamide and thiotepa after six courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by tamoxifen; however, 15 of these patients (31%) did not undergo HDC. HDC was well tolerated without any treatment-related mortality. At a median follow-up of 63 months, the 5-year RFS of 47 eligible patients in the STD arm and 48 eligible patients in the HDC arm was 37% and 52% on an intent-to-treat basis, respectively (P = 0.17). Five-year overall survival of all randomized patients was 62% for the STD arm and 63% for the HDC arm (P = 0.78). Although the prespecified values of the two arms were not so accurate as to allow detection of the observed difference, no advantage of HDC was observed in terms of RFS or overall survival.

Efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy in a phase I-II study for advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine (VNB) with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) combination chemotherapy, a phase I-II study was carried out in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer. METHODS: The phase I part of this study was carried out to determine the treatment schedule and acceptable dose of VNB for the phase II study. In phase I, VNB was initially given as a short infusion on days 1, 8 and 15, every 4 weeks. The initial dose of vinorelbine was 15 mg/m2. In the AC regimen, 20 mg/m2 of doxorubicin (ADM) was given intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, and 100 mg/body of cyclophosphamide (CPA) was administered orally from days 1 to 14. Subsequently, a phase II study was carried out at the maximum acceptable dose (MAD). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were entered into this study. In patients receiving VNB at a dose of 15 mg/m2, neutropenia (> or = grade 3) frequently occurred on day 15. The treatment schedule of this study was therefore changed to VNB given i.v. on days 1 and 8 with AC combination chemotherapy. In this treatment schedule, grade 4 neutropenia lasting for more than 4 days occurred in patients given VNB at a dose of 20 mg/m2 with AC more frequently than in those given 15 mg/m2 of VNB. Therefore, the MAD of VNB was determined to be 20 mg/m2 in this regimen. At this recommended dose, there were 1 complete (CR) and 8 partial responses (PRs) in 15 patients, with an overall response rate of 60.0%. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that VNB plus AC combination chemotherapy was effective and well tolerated for breast cancer patients. A randomized trial of VNB plus AC vs. AC combination chemotherapy may be required to ascertain the benefit of this regimen for advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients.

1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil + cyclophosphamide + tamoxifen versus CMF + tamoxifen in women with lymph node-positive breast cancer after primary surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

We studied the usefulness of the oral 5-FU anti-cancer drug 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU) + cyclophosphamide (CPM) + tamoxifen (TAM) (HCT group) in comparison with CMF + TAM (CMFT group) in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer by a non-inferiority study based on a multi-institutional joint study. Clinical stage I, II primary breast cancers with histologically positive axillary lymph node metastasis were randomly assigned to the HCT group or the CMFT group after primary surgery. We registered 136 cases (HCT group 68 cases, CMFT group 68 cases). No significant difference in the 5-year overall survival rate (OS) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate (DFS) was found between the two groups. In the stratified analysis, DFS in cases in which the number of metastatic lymph nodes was 1-3 was significantly better in the HCT group (HCT group 84.3%, CMFT group 69.4%, log-rank test p=0.0496). No significant difference in the total incidence of adverse effects was found between the two groups, but there were significantly less adverse effects of grade 2 or over in the HCT group (p=0.034). The QOL survey at 3 months after surgery showed a significant decline of the QOL regarding lassitude, degree of difficulty in daily life, satisfaction with treatment and present mood in the CMFT group. Study results suggest that 2-year HCT therapy including the oral 5-FU anti-cancer drug HCFU is a useful adjuvant therapy which can replace CMFT therapy in early breast cancer cases with 3 or lower metastatic lymph nodes.

Examination of breast conserving therapy in lobular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Experience with conserving surgery for lobular carcinoma has grown as more breast conserving surgeries have been performed. We examined the results of breast conserving therapy in lobular carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined the postoperative positive margin rate, presence or absence of additional surgery, presence or absence of local or systemic recurrence and role of breast helical CT in 25 cases of breast conserving surgery performed at this department from 1991 through June 2003. RESULTS: Among the 303 cases of all breast conserving surgeries, there were 63 case with positive margins (20.8%), but there were 15 of 25 positive margin cases (60.0%) among the lobular carcinoma cases. In 8 of the 15 positive margin cases the technique was changed to mastectomy. One case of recurrence in the breast has been observed thus far. Although the positive margin rate and positive margin rate in infiltrating carcinoma cases tended to decline after the introduction of breast helical CT, the rates remained high. CONCLUSIONS: Since the positive margin rate was significantly high at the time of breast conserving surgery for lobular carcinoma, careful selection of technique based on imaging studies such as breast helical CT and MRI along with careful follow-up is considered necessary.

Metastatic breast cancer of HER2 scored 2+ by IHC and HER2 gene amplification assayed by FISH has a good response to single agent therapy with trastuzumab: a case report.

We report that single agent therapy with trastuzumab had a significant effect on metastatic breast cancer, which was confirmed to be HER2 positive by Herceptest showing 2+staining, and gene amplification positively detected by FISH analysis. A 48-year-old woman underwent extended radical mastectomy (T2N0M0 stage II). Three years after the operation supraclavicular lymph node metastasis was noted. Bone scintigraphy showed metastases to the left ribs 5 years after operation. She was treated with chemo-endocrine therapy, but nonetheless could not bear the back pain caused by the bone metastases. Another chemotherapy course could not be permitted because of leukopenia. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis with Herceptest showed 2+staining for HER2 and FISH analysis showed gene amplification of HER2. We started single agent therapy with trastuzumab and she subsequently had remarkably improved back pain. Physical examination and ultrasonography showed disappearance of the previous palpable supraclaviclar lymph nodes. Serum tumor markers were also reduced after the first administration of trastuzumab. The patient is currently alive, with no further progression of the lymph node or bone metastases.

Long-term results of breast-conserving treatment for early-stage breast cancer in Japanese women from multicenter investigation.

BACKGROUND: Although many clinical data regarding breast-conserving treatment have already been reported from European and North American countries, few clinical data with long-term follow-up have been reported from Japan. METHOD: We collected information on therapeutic and possible or developed prognostic factors and follow-up data for Japanese women who had received breast-conserving treatment consisting of wide excision of the primary tumor, axillary dissection and radiotherapy for unilateral breast cancer considered suitable for breast-conserving treatment from 18 Japanese major breast cancer treating hospitals; 1561 patients were registered. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 77 months. Five-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 89.4 and 95.9%, respectively. The 5-year local recurrence-free rate was 96.3%. The patients with histologically positive margins (P < 0.0001) or estrogen receptor negative tumor (P = 0.0340) or younger than 40 years old (P < 0.0001) developed statistically significantly more local recurrences. Adjuvant endocrine therapy was essential for the estrogen receptor positive patients to have a lower local recurrence rate. Endocrine therapy did not change the local recurrence rate among estrogen receptor negative patients at all. Multivariate analysis showed histological margin status and the combination of estrogen receptor status and endocrine therapy were independent prognostic factors for local recurrence. CONCLUSION: The 5-year local recurrence rate of Japanese breast cancer patients who were treated with breast-conserving treatment using radiotherapy was 3.7%. Independent prognostic factors for local recurrence were histological margin status and the combination of estrogen receptor status and adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Efficacy of UFT plus Tamoxifen for Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Tamoxifen plus UFT for Estrogen-Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer : Adjuvant Therapy after Administration of Mitomycin.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prospective multicentre, collaborative randomised study on postoperative adjuvant therapy in patients with stage II primary breast cancer to evaluate the effect of a combination of tegafur and uracil (UFT) on tamoxifen (TAM) plus mitomycin (MM) in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive [ER(+)] breast cancer and TAM on UFT + MM in patients with estrogen-receptor-negative [ER(-)] breast cancer. METHODS: MM (13 mg/m(2)) was intravenously administered on the day of surgery for all patients, after which patients with ER(+) were randomised to TAM 20 mg/day (treatment A) or TAM 20 mg/day and UFT 400 mg/day (treatment B). Patients who were ER(-) were randomly allocated UFT 400 mg/day (treatment C) or TAM 20 mg/day and UFT 400 mg/day (treatment D). TAM and UFT were administered orally for 2 years, starting on day 14 after surgery. ENDPOINTS: 5-year disease-free survival (5y DFS), 5-year overall survival (5y OS), and safety. RESULTS: The study commenced in November 1988 and the data cut-off was May 1997 after follow-up of the last patient for 5 years. A total of 765 patients with stage II breast cancer were enrolled. 436 patients with ER(+) [group A: 213, group B: 223] and 317 patients with ER(-) [group C: 162, group D: 155] breast cancer were eligible for this study. The rate of 5y DFS was 83.1% for group A and 90.7% for group B (p = 0.020). There was a significant difference in 5y DFS between the two groups among postmenopausal and positive lymph node metastases patients. The incidence of adverse reactions was 4% for group A and 18% for group B (p < 0.05). The rate of 5y DFS was 77.1% for group C and 85.5% for group D (p = 0.063). The rate of 5y OS was 84.7% for group C and 89.8% for group D (p = 0.216). The incidence of adverse reactions was 18% in group C and 11% in group D (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: UFT in combination with TAM + MM showed higher efficacy than TAM + MM as a postoperative combination therapy for breast cancer in patients with ER(+) breast cancer. A trend was observed in favour of the addition of TAM to UFT + MM in postmenopausal and lymph node metastases-negative patients with ER(-) breast cancer.

[Early phase II dose-finding study of exemestane in postmenopausal patients with advanced/recurrent breast cancer].

Exemestane was administered orally to postmenopausal women with advanced/recurrent breast cancer at a dose of 10 mg/day or 25 mg/day once daily for more than 8 weeks in order to evaluate the drug's anti-tumor effects and safety in a dose-finding study. The response rate (CR + PR) in the 10 mg and 25 mg group was 25.0% (8/32) and 31.4% (11/35), respectively, demonstrating no significant differences between the two groups, yet a higher efficacy rate was observed in 25 mg group. The efficacy rate in hormone-treatment-resistant patients within the 10 mg and 25 mg groups was 14.3% (3/21) and 26.1% (6/23), respectively, demonstrating more than a 20% response rate in 25 mg group. Incidences of the adverse events of which relevance to the drug could not be excluded were 30.6% (11/36) in the 10 mg group. 13.9% (5/36) in the 25 mg group and 22.2% (16/72) in the total group. The major adverse events were, hot flashes, numbness of the limbs, nausea, headache etc. Abnormal findings in clinical laboratory tests were as follows: ALP increase; GOT increase; GPT increase; gamma-GTP increase; total cholesterol increase; urinary sediment present. Abnormal findings in endocrine function were as follows: aldosterone decrease; testosterone.cortisol.DHEA-S decrease. But discontinuation due to abnormal laboratory findings was not found. No abnormal findings in physical tests were observed. A significant decrease in plasma estrogen concentration at week 4 was observed in both the 10 mg and 25 mg groups compared with baseline. These low levels were maintained throughout the study period. On the basis of these results, the efficacy of exemestane 25 mg/day was verified to be slightly higher than 10 mg/day. In addition the safety profile had no major adverse events to notice. In these patients with advanced/recurrent breast cancer, 25 mg/day was recommended as the most appropriate dose to be used clinically.