RESUMO
The increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has sparked global concern due to the dwindling availability of effective antibiotics. To increase our treatment options, researchers have investigated naturally occurring antimicrobial compounds and have identified MC21-A (C58), which has potent antimicrobial activity against MRSA. Recently, we have devised total synthesis schemes for C58 and its chloro-analog, C59. Here, we report that both compounds eradicate 90% of the 39 MRSA isolates tested [MIC90 and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC90)] at lower or comparable concentrations compared to several standard-of-care (SoC) antimicrobials including daptomycin, vancomycin, and linezolid. Furthermore, a stable, water-soluble sodium salt of C59, C59Na, demonstrates antimicrobial activity comparable to C59. C59, unlike vancomycin, kills stationary-phase MRSA in a dose-dependent manner and completely eradicates MRSA biofilms. In contrast to vancomycin, exposing MRSA to sub-MIC concentrations of C59 does not result in the emergence of spontaneous resistance. Similarly, in a multi-step study, C59 demonstrates a low propensity of resistance acquisition when compared to SoC antimicrobials, such as linezolid and clindamycin. Our findings suggest C58, C59, and C59Na are non-toxic to mammalian cells at concentrations that exert antimicrobial activity; the lethal dose at median cell viability (LD50) is at least fivefold higher than the MBC90 in the two mammalian cell lines tested. A morphological examination of the effects of C59 on a MRSA isolate suggests the inhibition of the cell division process as a mechanism of action. Our results demonstrate the potential of this naturally occurring compound and its analogs as non-toxic next-generation antimicrobials to combat MRSA infections. IMPORTANCE: The rapid emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates has precipitated a critical need for novel antibiotics. We have developed a one-pot synthesis method for naturally occurring compounds such as MC21-A (C58) and its chloro-analog, C59. Our findings demonstrate that these compounds kill MRSA isolates at lower or comparable concentrations to standard-of-care (SoC) antimicrobials. C59 eradicates MRSA cells in biofilms, which are notoriously difficult to treat with SoC antibiotics. Additionally, the lack of resistance development observed with C59 treatment is a significant advantage when compared to currently available antibiotics. Furthermore, these compounds are non-toxic to mammalian cell lines at effective concentrations. Our findings indicate the potential of these compounds to treat MRSA infections and underscore the importance of exploring natural products for novel antibiotics. Further investigation will be essential to fully realize the therapeutic potential of these next-generation antimicrobials to address the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance.
Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Bifenil Polibromatos , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Vancomicina/farmacologia , Linezolida/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The development of multi-dose, subunit vaccine formulations can be challenging since antimicrobial preservatives (APs) often destabilize protein antigens. In this work, we evaluated Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Virus-Like Particles (VLPs) to determine if combining different APs used in approved parenteral products, each at lower concentrations than used alone, would maintain both antimicrobial effectiveness and antigen stability. To identify promising AP combinations, two different screening strategies were utilized: (1) empirical one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) and (2) statistical design-of-experiments (DOE). Seven different APs were employed to screen for two- and three-AP combinations using high-throughput methods for antimicrobial effectiveness (i.e., microbial growth inhibition assay and a modified European Pharmacopeia method) and antigen stability (i.e., serotype-specific mAb binding to conformational epitopes of HPV6, 11, 16 VLPs by ELISA). The OFAT and DOE approaches were complementary, such that initial OFAT results (and associated lessons learned) were subsequently employed to optimize the combinations using DOE. Additional validation experiments confirmed the final selection of top AP-combinations predicted by DOE modeling. Overall, 20 candidate multi-dose formulations containing two- or three-AP combinations were down-selected. As described in Part 2 (companion paper), long-term storage stability profiles of aluminum-adjuvanted, quadrivalent HPV VLP formulations containing these lead candidate AP combinations are compared to single APs.
Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Vacinas de Partículas Semelhantes a Vírus , Humanos , Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas de Partículas Semelhantes a Vírus/química , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Conservantes Farmacêuticos , Anticorpos AntiviraisRESUMO
This work describes Part 2 of multi-dose formulation development of a Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Virus-Like Particle (VLP) based vaccine (see Part 1 in companion paper). Storage stability studies with candidate multi-dose formulations containing individual or combinations of seven different antimicrobial preservatives (APs) were performed with quadrivalent HPV VLP (6, 11, 16, 18) antigens adsorbed to aluminum-salt adjuvant (Alhydrogel®). Real-time (up to two years, 2-8°C) and accelerated (months at 25 and 40°C) stability studies identified eight lead candidates as measured by antigen stability (competitive ELISA employing conformational serotype-specific mAbs), antimicrobial effectiveness (modified European Pharmacopeia assay), total protein content (SDS-PAGE), and AP concentration (RP-UHPLC). The AH-adsorbed HPV18 VLP component was most sensitive to AP-induced destabilization. Optimal quadrivalent antigen storage stability while maintaining antimicrobial effectiveness was observed with 2-phenoxyethanol, benzyl alcohol, chlorobutanol, and 2-phenoxyethanol + benzyl alcohol combination. Interestingly, for single-AP containing multi-dose formulations, this rank-ordering of storage stability did not correlate with previously reported biophysical measurements of AP-induced antigen destabilization. Moreover, other APs (e.g., m-cresol, phenol, parabens) described by others for inclusion in multi-dose HPV VLP formulations showed suboptimal stability. These results suggest that each HPV VLP vaccine candidate (e.g., different serotypes, expression systems, processes, adjuvants) will require customized multi-dose formulation development.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Humanos , Papillomavirus Humano , Anticorpos Antivirais , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Conservantes Farmacêuticos , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Álcoois BenzílicosRESUMO
Introducing multi-dose formulations of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines will reduce costs and enable improved global vaccine coverage, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This work describes the development of key analytical methods later utilized for HPV vaccine multi-dose formulation development. First, down-selection of physicochemical methods suitable for multi-dose formulation development of four HPV (6, 11, 16, and 18) Virus-Like Particles (VLPs) adsorbed to an aluminum adjuvant (Alhydrogel®, AH) was performed. The four monovalent AH-adsorbed HPV VLPs were then characterized using these down-selected methods. Second, stability-indicating competitive ELISA assays were developed using HPV serotype-specific neutralizing mAbs, to monitor relative antibody binding profiles of the four AH-adsorbed VLPs during storage. Third, concentration-dependent preservative-induced destabilization of HPV16 VLPs was demonstrated by addition of eight preservatives found in parenterally administered pharmaceuticals and vaccines, as measured by ELISA, dynamic light scattering, and differential scanning calorimetry. Finally, preservative stability and effectiveness in the presence of vaccine components were evaluated using a combination of RP-UHPLC, a microbial growth inhibition assay, and a modified version of the European Pharmacopoeia assay (Ph. Eur. 5.1.3). Results are discussed in terms of analytical challenges encountered to identify and develop high-throughput methods that facilitate multi-dose formulation development of aluminum-adjuvanted protein-based vaccine candidates.
Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Alumínio , Hidróxido de Alumínio , Anticorpos Antivirais , Humanos , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/química , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Vacinas CombinadasRESUMO
To accelerate the formulation development of live-virus vaccine (LVV) candidates, more rapid approaches to rank-order formulations and estimate their real-time storage stability losses are needed. In this case-study, we utilize new and previously described stability data of a live, rotavirus vaccine candidate (RV3-BB) in three different liquid formulations to model and compare predicted vs. experimental RV3-BB stability profiles. Linear-regression extrapolations of limited real-time (2-8 °C) stability data and Arrhenius modeling of accelerated (15, 25, 37 °C) stability data provided predictions of RV3-BB real-time stability profiles (2-8 °C, 24 months). Good correlations of modeled versus experimental stability data to rank-order the RV3-BB formulations were achieved by employing (1) a high-throughput RT-qPCR assay to measure viral titers, (2) additional assay replicates and stability time-points, and (3) a -80 °C control for each formulation to benchmark results at each stability time-point and temperature. Instead of accumulating two-year, 2-8 °C storage stability data, the same rank-ordering of the three RV3-BB formulations could have been achieved by modeling 37°, 25°, 15° (and 2-8 °C) stability data over 1, 3 and 12 months, respectively. The results of this case-study are discussed in the context of accelerating LVV formulation development by expeditiously identifying stable formulations, estimating their shelf-lives, and determining vaccine vial monitoring (VVM) designations.
Assuntos
Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Anticorpos Antivirais , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Humanos , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas AtenuadasRESUMO
Formulation development was performed with the live, attenuated, human neonatal rotavirus vaccine candidate (RV3-BB) with three main objectives to facilitate use in low- and middle- income countries including (1) a liquid, 2-8°C stable vaccine, (2) no necessity for pre-neutralization of gastric acid prior to oral administration of a small-volume dose, and (3) a low-cost vaccine dosage form. Implementation of a high-throughput RT-qPCR viral infectivity assay for RV3-BB, which correlated well with traditional FFA assays in terms of monitoring RV3-BB stability profiles, enabled more rapid and comprehensive formulation development studies. A wide variety of different classes and types of pharmaceutical excipients were screened for their ability to stabilize RV3-BB during exposure to elevated temperatures, freeze-thaw and agitation stresses. Sucrose (50-60% w/v), PEG-3350, and a solution pH of 7.8 were selected as promising stabilizers. Using a combination of an in vitro gastric digestion model (to mimic oral delivery conditions) and accelerated storage stability studies, several buffering agents (e.g., succinate, adipate and acetate at ~200 to 400 mM) were shown to protect RV3-BB under acidic conditions, and at the same time, minimize virus destabilization during storage. Several optimized RV3-BB candidate formulations were identified based on negligible viral infectivity losses during storage at 2-8°C and -20°C for up to 12 months, as well as by relative stability comparisons at 15°C and 25°C (up to 12 and 3 months, respectively). These RV3-BB stability results are discussed in the context of stability profiles of other rotavirus serotypes as well as future RV3-BB formulation development activities.