Inequities in Patient Access to Care Among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Adults in Medicaid.

BACKGROUND: Despite decades of advocacy for disaggregated data collection and reporting for Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AA and NHPI) people, significant gaps remain in our ability to understand AA and NHPI individuals' access to care. We assess inequities in access to care measures between non-Hispanic White and AA and NHPI adult Medicaid enrollees. METHODS: We used the 2014-15 Nationwide Adult Medicaid Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, the first-and-only nationally representative sample of Medicaid enrollees. Our main outcomes were access to needed care, access to a personal doctor, timely access to a checkup, and timely access to specialty care. Using multivariable linear probability models, we assessed the relationship between racial/ethnic group and our outcomes, both in the aggregate and disaggregated into ten racial/ethnic groups, and adjusted for enrollee-level sociodemographic characteristics, health status, and state-level Medicaid expansion status. RESULTS: In aggregate, AA and NHPI enrollees reported worse access to care than White enrollees on all four metrics (p < 0.001). The magnitude of disparities varied across the ten AA and NHPI ethnic groups. Disparities relative to White enrollees were particularly large in magnitude, roughly 1.5 to 2 times greater, for Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese enrollees than for the aggregated AA and NHPI group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite comparable insurance coverage, there were inequities in multiple access to care metrics between non-Hispanic White and AA and NHPI Medicaid enrollees. Collection of disaggregated health data on AA and NHPI patients reveals important variation in access to care by ethnic group.

Narrow Dialysis Networks In Medicare Advantage: Exposure By Race, Ethnicity, And Dual Eligibility.

The 21st Century Cures Act permitted people with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) to enroll in Medicare Advantage (MA) effective January 2021. It is imperative to understand the breadth of dialysis facility networks across MA contracts because most patients with ESRD need thrice-weekly dialysis to survive. In 2020 MA contracts' networks included a mean of 51 percent of dialysis facilities in their service areas. MA contracts with plans in a single state, with not-for-profit status, and with higher proportions of dually eligible enrollees with ESRD were significantly more likely to include less than or equal to 25 percent of dialysis facilities in their service area in network ("narrow networks") than contracts with plans in multiple states, with for-profit status, and with lower proportions of dually eligible enrollees with ESRD (by 12.9, 13.0, and 11.7 percentage points, respectively). Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native people with ESRD were enrolled in contracts with narrow networks of dialysis facilities at markedly higher rates than non-Hispanic White people with ESRD. In contrast, Black people with ESRD were less likely to be enrolled in a narrow-network contract. Policy makers should monitor and address the adequacy of dialysis facility networks in MA contracts, as well as disparities in enrollment in narrow-network plans.