Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(28): e26634, 2021 Jul 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34260556

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Emergency departments (EDs) are on the frontline of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. To resolve the abrupt overloading of COVID-19-suspected patients in a community, each ED needs to respond in various ways. In our hospital, we increased the isolation beds through temporary remodeling and by performing in-hospital COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing rather than outsourcing them. The aim of this study was to verify the effects of our response to the newly developed viral outbreak.The medical records of patients who presented to an ED were analyzed retrospectively. We divided the study period into 3: pre-COVID-19, transition period of response (the period before fully implementing the response measures), and post-response (the period after complete response). We compared the parameters of the National Emergency Department Information System and information about isolation and COVID-19.The number of daily ED patients was 86.8 ±â€Š15.4 in the pre-COVID-19, 36.3 ±â€Š13.6 in the transition period, and 67.2 ±â€Š10.0 in the post-response period (P < .001). The lengths of stay in the ED were significantly higher in transition period than in the other periods [pre-COVID-19 period, 219.0 (121.0-378.0) min; transition period, 301 (150.0-766.5) min; post-response period, 281.0 (114.0-575.0) min; P < .001]. The ratios of use of an isolation room and fever (≥37.5°C) were highest in the post-response period [use of isolation room: pre-COVID-19 period, 0.6 (0.7%); transition period, 1.2 (3.3%); post-response period, 16.1 (24.0%); P < .001; fever: pre-COVID-19 period, 14.8(17.3%); transition period, 6.8 (19.1%); post-response period, 14.5 (21.9%), P < .001].During an outbreak of a novel infectious disease, increasing the number of isolation rooms in the ED and applying a rapid confirmation test would enable the accommodation of more suspected patients, which could help reduce the risk posed to the community and thus prevent strain on the local emergency medical system.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isolamento de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , República da Coreia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(6): e24666, 2021 Feb 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33578597

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance depends on individual ability and training. Well-trained or professional rescuers can maintain high-quality CPR for longer than laypeople. This study aimed to examine the effects of reducing resting intervals on CPR performance, physiological parameters, and hemodynamic parameters during prolonged CPR in well-trained providers. METHODS: The study enrolled 90 volunteers from the paramedic students of our institution. They were randomly divided into 3 groups: 2 minutes, 1 minute 45 seconds, and 1 minute 30 seconds rest groups. Each participant performed 5 cycles of chest compression only CPR (2 min/cycle) with different resting intervals according to grouping. CPR quality, physiological variations, and hemodynamic variations were measured for each cycle and compared across the groups. RESULTS: Of the 90 volunteers, 79 well-trained providers were finally included. The variation of the average chest compression depth across the 5 cycles showed significant differences between the 3 groups: from cycle 1 to 2: 1.2 (3.1) mm, -0.8 (2.0) mm, and -2.0 (3.0) mm in the 2 minutes, 1 minute 45 seconds, and 1 minute 30 seconds groups, respectively (P < .001); from cycle 1 to 3: 0.0 (3.0) mm, -0.7 (3.2) mm, and -2.6 (3.9) mm, respectively (P = .030). However, all 3 groups maintained the recommended rate and chest compression depth for all 5 cycles. Physiological and hemodynamic parameters showed no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Well-trained providers were able to maintain high-quality CPR despite reducing rest intervals. Adjusting the rest interval may help maintain overall CPR quality in special situations or where layperson rescuers are involved.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/educação , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Descanso/fisiologia , Pessoal Técnico de Saúde/educação , Pessoal Técnico de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/estatística & dados numéricos , Oscilação da Parede Torácica/estatística & dados numéricos , Oscilação da Parede Torácica/tendências , Auxiliares de Emergência/educação , Auxiliares de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fadiga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fenômenos Fisiológicos/fisiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Estudantes , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...