An Autopsy Case of An Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Triggered by the Inhalation of a Waterproofing Spray.

An 82-year-old Japanese man with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experienced dyspnea after using a waterproofing spray in a closed room. He presented with hypoxemia and his chest computed tomography showed additive bilateral diffuse ground-glass attenuation on fibrosis, which was diagnostic of an acute exacerbation of IPF (AE-IPF). Combined treatment with high-dose corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were ineffective, and he later died of respiratory failure. Autopsy findings showed diffuse alveolar damage with honeycombing. His medical history and autopsy histopathology suggested AE-IPF caused by the inhalation of a waterproofing spray.

[Evaluation of the Influence of the Experience and Training of EBUS-TBNA on Diagnostic Rate and Safety].

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been widely used in Japan. The guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians has recommended that EBUS-TBNA should be performed by well-trained operators who can perform highly accurate procedures, but the indicators of the degree of experience and training are unclear. In our department, physicians who do not have enough experience perform EBUS-TBNA under the supervision of bronchoscopic instructors who have EBUS-TBNA techniques (Board Certified Member of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy) after guidance and training in EBUS-TBNA using a simulator as an operator and helper. In order to evaluate the influence of the experience and training of EBUS-TBNA on diagnostic accuracy and safety, we retrospectively compared the diagnostic accuracy and safety of EBUS-TBNA performed by physicians within one year of experience of EBUS-TBNA and those performed by physicians with more than one year of experience. A total of 111 cases (148 lesions) who were eventually diagnosed as having primary lung cancer and underwent EBUS-TBNA in our department between April 2014 and January 2016 were divided into two groups. Group A (43 cases, 57 lesions) was examined by third-year doctors within one year of experience of EBUS-TBNA, and group B (68 cases, 91 lesions) was examined by doctors with four or more years of experience and with more than one year of experience of EBUS-TBNA. Diagnostic rate, examination time, and complications were evaluated. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the diagnostic rate (A, 89.5% vs. B, 90.1%, P = 1.0) or examination time (A, 27 min vs. B, 23 min, P = 0.149), and no complications were observed in either group. This study suggests that even less-experienced physicians may safely perform EBUS-TBNA as well as moderately-experienced physicians with more than 1 year experience of EBUS-TBNA with similar diagnostic rates when proper training and supervision are supplied.

[A Case of Left Upper Lobe Lung Cancer Successfully Diagnosed by Transesophageal Endoscopic Ultrasound with Bronchoscope-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Alone].

A 58-year-old Japanese woman with fever and cough visited A hospital. Her chest X-ray and CT showed a tumor attached to the mediastinum in the left upper lobe with mediastinal lymphadenopathy (#4R). After an introduction from A hospital to our hospital, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for the mediastinal lymphadenopathy and a simultaneous approach to the mass lesion in the left upper lobe were performed. In spite of twice aspiration by EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy, we failed to obtain enough specimens, and, as the mass lesion in the left upper lobe was invisible in the endobronchial ultrasound, we could not approach it. Then using the same ultrasound bronchoscope, we subsequently performed a transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) to the mass lesion in the left upper lobe twice, with the result that sufficient tissues were obtained. Then we changed from the ultrasound bronchoscope to a normal bronchoscope and we performed brushing and transbronchial lung biopsy for the left upper lobe mass lesion. Pathological results revealed that only the specimens obtained by EUS-B-FNA were diagnostic for adenocarcinoma; the other specimens obtained using EBUS-TBNA and normal bronchoscope failed to be diagnostic. EUS-B-FNA in combination with EBUS-TBNA has been recommended for the diagnosis of mediastinal and near-mediastinal lesions in the guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians in 2013, but EUS-B-FNA has not been widely used in Japan. As shown in our present patient who was successfully diagnosed as having lung cancer by EUS-B-FNA alone, respiratory physicians should be aware of being skillful at performing EUS-B-FNA to accurately and effectively approach target lesions.