Lower refractive prediction accuracy of total keratometry using intraocular lens formulas loaded onto a swept-source optical biometer.

PURPOSE: To compare refractive outcomes calculated using intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas loaded onto the IOLMaster 700 with the employment of anterior keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK). METHODS: A total of 225 eyes of 225 patients underwent uneventful cataract surgery and implantation of a single model of nontoric monofocal IOL by a single surgeon. All eyes underwent preoperative ocular biometric measurements with the IOLMaster 700. Refractive outcomes, including the mean numerical prediction error (MNE); standard deviation (SD); adjusted mean absolute prediction error (MAE); adjusted median absolute prediction error (MedAE); percentages of eyes with adjusted prediction error (PE) within ± 0.25, ± 0.50, ± 0.75, and ± 1.00 diopter; and IOL Formula Performance Index (FPI), were compared between the K-based formula and the TK-based formula of Barrett Universal II (BUII), Haigis, SRK/T, Holladay 2, and Hoffer Q. Axial length (short, medium, and long) subgroup analyses and anterior and posterior keratometry (flat, medium, and steep) subgroup analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The K-based formula performed better than the TK-based formula in the accuracy of refractive prediction of each IOL calculation formula: BUII-K (FPI 0.690), BUII-TK (0.677), Haigis-K (0.617), Haigis-TK (0.584), SRK/T-K (0.608), SRK/T-TK (0.595), Holladay 2-K (0.419), Holladay 2-TK (0.406), Hoffer Q-K (0.364), and Hoffer Q-TK (0.356). The subgroup analyses of refractive prediction outcomes showed that TK influenced the refractive outcomes in eyes with relatively normal ranges of axial length and anterior keratometry. CONCLUSIONS: Using TK instead of K leads to lower refractive prediction accuracy of the IOL power calculation formulas loaded on the IOLMaster 700.

Pulmonary tuberculosis misdiagnosed as extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis due to selection of a nontuberculous mycobacterial colony from a preculture dish used for a drug-susceptibility test.

Drug-susceptibility test (DST) is important for tuberculosis care; however, there are several pitfalls with the procedure. A 70-year-old woman was diagnosed with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis based on the result of a DST using microdilution method. Because she had no history of medication for tuberculosis and the sputum acid-fast bacillus smear test turned negative during standard treatment, identification of the strain used for DST was performed. Consequently, the strain was found to be M. intracellulare. It was assumed that a colony of M. intracellulare that had existed in the preculture solid medium was selected and used for the DST.