RESUMO
Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), encompassing thymoma and thymic carcinoma, represent a rare and heterogeneous group of thoracic malignancies with varying prognoses and treatment strategies. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of therapy for localized stages, but the management of locally advanced or unresectable TETs often involves induction therapy, including chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, as a neoadjuvant approach aimed at downstaging the tumor to facilitate subsequent resection. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the re-evaluation process and operative indications following induction therapy for TETs, highlighting the pivotal role of accurate assessment in guiding surgical decisions and optimizing patient outcomes. Induction therapy's efficacy is contingent upon precise re-evaluation methods to accurately gauge treatment response and assess resectability post-therapy. This review discusses the various modalities employed in re-evaluation, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), and the significance of tumor markers, underlining their strengths and limitations. The adoption of modified RECIST criteria for TETs by the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) underscores the necessity for standardized assessment guidelines to ensure consistency and reliability across studies and clinical practices. Furthermore, we explore the implications of induction therapy on surgical decision-making, emphasizing the criteria for determining the suitability of patients for surgical intervention post-therapy. The review addresses the challenges and future perspectives associated with the re-evaluation process, including the potential for advanced imaging techniques and the integration of molecular and genetic markers to enhance the precision of treatment response assessment. In conclusion, the re-evaluation of TETs post-induction therapy is a complex but critical component of the multidisciplinary management approach for these patients. Standardizing re-evaluation methodologies and incorporating novel diagnostic tools could significantly improve the prognostication and treatment stratification, ultimately enhancing the therapeutic outcomes for patients with advanced TETs.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Preoperative malnutrition is a risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with lung cancer. Assessing the preoperative nutritional status should be considered essential for patients scheduled to undergo lung surgery. This prospective study aimed to investigate whether preoperative nutritional intervention improves the nutritional conditions and short-term postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The primary endpoints included safety, feasibility and short-term therapeutic efficacy of preoperative nutritional intervention. Patients with clinical stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (histologically proven or suspected) were screened. Patient enrollment was conducted between January 2021 and December 2022. A total of 15 patients were included in the analysis. Patients with a preoperative prognostic nutritional index of < 45 were considered eligible. All participants received preoperative nutritional intervention. The trajectories of prognostic nutritional index and the incidence of postoperative complication rates in the intervention group were investigated. RESULTS: No adverse events were observed during the nutritional intervention. The pre-intervention and post-intervention prognostic nutritional indices were 42.2 (39.8-44.5), and 43.1 (41.4-45.9), respectively (p = 0.04). The postoperative complication rate was 26.7% (n = 15). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study to report the preoperative trajectories of prognostic nutritional index in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Our results suggest the safety and feasibility of preoperative nutritional intervention. Further research, such as randomized clinical trials, is warranted to investigate clinical efficacy and optimal nutritional interventions for lung surgery for malignant tumors.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Desnutrição , Estado Nutricional , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Pneumonectomia/efeitos adversos , Avaliação Nutricional , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Tempo , Estudos de Viabilidade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Objective nutritional scoring systems using preoperative blood samples have shown the potential to predict the postoperative outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it remains unclear whether the prognostic impact depends on age and comorbid burdens. We conducted this study to validate the impact of preoperative nutritional status, stratified with age and comorbidity. METHODS: We reviewed the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and postoperative outcomes of 713 consecutive patients with completely resected NSCLC. RESULTS: We identified the optimal cutoff values of the PNI as 46. Significantly higher postoperative complication rates and worse survival rates were observed in the low PNI (≤ 46) group, regardless of age/comorbidity burdens. Multivariate analysis showed that a low PNI (≤ 46) was an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.5). A matched-pair analysis gave consistent results, showing that a low PNI (≤ 46) was an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival (OS; hazard ratio: 1.8) and recurrence-free survival (RFS; hazard ratio: 1.6). CONCLUSION: Nutritional status, indexed by the PNI, is a strong prognostic factor for the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing curative resection for NSCL, regardless of age/comorbidity burdens.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Relevância Clínica , Comorbidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Avaliação Nutricional , Estado Nutricional , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Mounting evidence suggests that preoperative nutritional status can predict postoperative outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. However, a consensus on the optimal evaluation tool among the various nutritional assessment methods has not been reached. This study aimed at validating the predictive value of 3 nutritional scoring systems for clinical outcomes in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative data of 475 consecutive patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer to assess the following 3 albumin-based nutritional methods: prognostic nutritional index, controlling nutritional status score, and geriatric nutritional risk index. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curves of the prognostic nutritional index, controlling nutritional status score, and geriatric nutritional risk index identified the optimal cutoff values for predicting the postoperative complications as 47, 2, and 101, respectively. Stratification of patients using these cutoff values indicated a higher postoperative complication rate in the malnutrition group than in the group with proper nutrition (P < .05 for all nutritional assessment methods). Additionally, patients with malnutrition exhibited significantly lower 5-year overall and recurrence-free survivals, regardless of the assessment method (P < .05 for all 3 nutritional assessment methods). Multivariate analyses showed that all 3 nutritional parameters were independent prognostic factors for overall survival after lung resection. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 nutritional assessment methods we used were found to have high predictive values for postoperative complications and survival. Preoperative nutritional conditioning may improve the postoperative outcomes in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.