Reduced quality of life in veterans at risk for drug-related problems.

The relationships between drug therapy and health-related quality of life in 1054 patients who received care from Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs) were assessed. Patients at high risk for drug-related problems were enrolled into a pharmaceutical care study at nine VAMCs. On enrollment, the short form (SF)-36 was completed and medical records were examined for evidence of coexisting illness. Drug therapy in the year before enrollment was analyzed in relation to SF-36 scores. Mean +/- SD SF-36 scores ranged from 37.99+/-41.70 for role physical to 70.78+/-18.97 for mental health domains, with all domain scores significantly below age-adjusted national norms (p<0.05). Patients taking a drug that required therapeutic monitoring had significantly lower SF-36 scores (p=0.0001 to p=0.0033) across all domains except for bodily pain and mental health, compared with patients not taking these agents.

Can clinical pharmacists affect SF-36 scores in veterans at high risk for medication-related problems?

BACKGROUND: An objective of pharmaceutical care is for pharmacists to improve patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL) by optimizing medication therapy. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine whether ambulatory care clinical pharmacists could affect HRQOL in veterans who were likely to experience a drug-related problem. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a 9-site, randomized, controlled trial involving Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs). Patients were eligible if they met > or = 3 criteria for being at high risk for drug-related problems. Enrolled patients were randomized to either usual medical care or usual medical care plus clinical pharmacist interventions. HRQOL was measured with the SF-36 questionnaire administered at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: In total, 1,054 patients were enrolled; 523 were randomized to intervention, and 531 to control. After patient age, site, and chronic disease score were controlled for, the only domain that was significantly different between groups over time was the bodily pain scale, which converged to similar values at the end of the study. Patients' rating of the change in health status in the past 12 months was statistically different between groups, intervention patients declining less (-2.4 units) than control subjects (-6.3 units) (P < 0.004). This difference was not considered clinically meaningful. However, a dose-response relationship was observed for general health perceptions (P = 0.004), vitality (P = 0.006), and change in health over the past year (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that clinical pharmacists had no significant impact on HRQOL as measured by the SF-36 for veterans at high risk for medication-related problems.

Clinical and economic impact of ambulatory care clinical pharmacists in management of dyslipidemia in older adults: the IMPROVE study. Impact of Managed Pharmaceutical Care on Resource Utilization and Outcomes in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

We examined the impact of ambulatory care clinical pharmacist interventions on clinical and economic outcomes of 208 patients with dyslipidemia and 229 controls treated at nine Veterans Affairs medical centers. This was a randomized, controlled trial involving patients at high risk of drug-related problems. Only those with dyslipidemia are reported here. In addition to usual medical care, clinical pharmacists were responsible for providing pharmaceutical care for patients in the intervention group. The control group did not receive pharmaceutical care. Seventy-two percent of the intervention group and 70% of controls required secondary prevention according to the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. Significantly more patients in the intervention group had a fasting lipid profile compared with controls (p=0.021). The absolute change in total cholesterol (17.7 vs 7.4 mg/dl, p=0.028) and low-density lipoprotein (23.4 vs 12.8 mg/dl, p=0.042) was greater in the intervention than in the control group. There were no differences in patients achieving goal lipid values or in overall costs despite increased visits to pharmacists. Ambulatory care clinical pharmacists can significantly improve dyslipidemia in a practice setting designed to manage many medical and drug-related problems.

An economic analysis of a randomized, controlled, multicenter study of clinical pharmacist interventions for high-risk veterans: the IMPROVE study. Impact of Managed Pharmaceutical Care Resource Utilization and Outcomes in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if clinical pharmacists could affect economic resource use and humanistic outcomes in an ambulatory, high-risk population. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Nine Veterans Affairs medical centers. PATIENTS: Patients who were at high risk for medication-related problems. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to usual medical care with input from a clinical pharmacist (intervention group) or just usual medical care (control group). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 1,054 patients enrolled, 523 were randomized to the intervention group and 531 to the control group. The number of clinic visits increased in the intervention group (p=0.003), but there was no difference in clinic costs. Mean increases in total health care costs were $1,020 for the intervention group and $1,313 for the control group (p=0.06). CONCLUSION: Including the cost of pharmacist interventions, overall health care expenditures were similar for patients randomized to see a clinical pharmacist versus usual medical care.

Treatment of urge incontinence in Veterans Affairs medical centers.

Urinary incontinence has far-reaching medical, psychological, social, and economic effects. The objectives of this descriptive study were to examine utilization patterns and discontinuation rates of various pharmacologic agents used to treat symptoms of overactive bladder, primarily urge incontinence (UI), and to estimate the prevalence of urinary incontinence in the study population. Patient-level data regarding specific drugs used to treat UI and the use of diapers or pads over a 9-month period from October 1995 to May 1996 were retrospectively extracted from the medication databases of 9 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. A total of 2233 male patients were included in the analyses. Most patients were receiving oxybutynin chloride (39.8%), dicyclomine hydrochloride (16.0%), or imipramine hydrochloride (13.9%), and the remaining 30.3% were using flavoxate hydrochloride, propantheline bromide, hyoscyamine sulfate, and adult diapers or pads. Overall, 72.1% of patients had been prescribed daily dosages within the recommended dosing ranges for these medications. The majority (91.3%) of patients had not switched to another UI medication during the study period. Based on a chronic disease index, 47.6% of patients had 2 or fewer chronic diseases. Using pooled prevalence estimates, the estimated percentage of patients who had ever experienced UI in this population ranged from 7.4% to 20.8%; however, a considerably smaller percentage were taking medications for the treatment of UI. The results of this study suggest that oxybutynin, dicyclomine, and imipramine are the agents most commonly used to treat urinary incontinence within Veterans Affairs medical centers. The majority of patients who received a prescription for one of these drugs did not routinely refill the medication over the course of the study. There are many reasons for patients not to refill a prescription (eg, ineffectiveness, side effects, complications, obtaining the drug from another source), but the present study did not address the causes.

A comparison of antihypertensive medication utilization before and after guideline changes using the Department of Defense Prescription Database.

OBJECTIVE: To determine changes in the proportion of antihypertensive medication utilization, distributed by medication classes, associated with the Fifth Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC V) guideline changes and the Department of Defense Pharmacoeconomic Center's recommendations to follow JNC V guidelines in presumed newly treated hypertensive patients. DESIGN: A 43-month, longitudinal, retrospective analysis using data from the Department of Defense Uniformed Services Prescription Database. SETTING: Seven outpatient US military sites. PATIENTS: Eligible patients (n = 7277) included those from seven military sites, aged 20-49 years, who were: (1) active-duty members of the US Armed Forces, (2) active-duty members' family members, (3) retired members of the US Armed Forces, and (4) US Armed Forces retired members' family members. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of antihypertensive medication utilization, distributed by medication class over the 43-month study period. METHODOLOGY: Segmented time series analysis was used for each of the following four medication classes: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and diuretics. RESULTS: Segmented time series analyses revealed no significant differences in utilization of the four medication classes that corresponded to published guidelines outlining initial antihypertensive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: It appeared that JNC V guidelines and recommendations of the Pharmacoeconomic Center to follow JNC V had little effect on the utilization of prescription medication classes studied.

Patterns of antihypertensive use among patients in the US Department of Defense database initially prescribed an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker.

The US Department of Defense recently assembled electronic records of outpatient prescriptions dispensed through the Uniformed Services Prescription Database Project (USPDP) going back to 1990. The objectives of this portion of a larger study were: (1) to examine longitudinally the patterns of antihypertensive drug use during the first year of therapy in patients whose initial therapy was with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or a calcium channel blocker (CCB); (2) to determine continuous and noncontinuous users of antihypertensive drugs; and (3) to estimate the direct medication costs for each pattern of medication use. Filtering criteria for patient and prescription identification were developed, because the USPDP contains no records of confirmatory diagnoses of hypertension. Once data filters were implemented, information for 771 patients was analyzed. An ACE inhibitor was the initial therapy for 328 patients, accounting for 1935 antihypertensive medication prescription fills, and a CCB was the initial therapy for 443 patients, accounting for 2459 fills (including refills). Slightly more than half of the patients (n = 401, 52.0%) were classified as continuous users (> or = 80% medication-possession ratio [supply of medication in days divided by the number of days in the 12-month study period]). In the first year, 177 of these continuous users (44.1%) had no change in therapy in the first year, 49 (12.2%) had an increase in dose, 8 (2.0%) had a decrease in dose, 15 (3.7%) had a change to a different therapeutic class of antihypertensive medication, 14 (3.5%) were changed to a different medication in the same therapeutic class, 20 (5.0%) had a new medication added to the regimen, and 118 (29.4%) had complex regimens involving more than one change. For continuous users, the mean medication supply in days was 354.6, and the average time before a medication change was 152.1 days for those continuous users who had one change in therapy. The overall average wholesale price (AWP) and average manufacturer price (AMP) for continuous users during 1 year of therapy were $471.31 and $378.51, respectively. For those patients whose therapy was changed to an ACE inhibitor/CCB combination and who were continuous users, the average AWP was $598.47 per year ($492.05 AMP). Once the change from monotherapy to an ACE inhibitor/CCB combination occurred in continuous users, AWP costs per member per month increased by approximately $22.00 ($18.00 AMP). Over half of the patients whose initial therapy was an ACE inhibitor or CCB had at least one change in their first year of therapy. Research into the reasons for these changes and their outcomes is needed.

Evaluation of physician intervention letters.

OBJECTIVES: The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 requires that Medicaid Agencies perform drug utilization review (DUR). The Texas Medicaid Agency, in cooperation with the Texas DUR Board, have chosen to mail intervention letters to physicians with patient profiles that indicate possible inappropriate use of medications. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of intervention letters indicating duplicative anti-ulcer medications. METHODS: Analysis of Medicaid prescription claims produced 335 patient profiles involving concurrent therapy. Physicians for 174 patients were selected randomly to receive an intervention letter, a response form, and a stamped envelope. The remaining patients served as a control group. RESULTS: A 71.2% response rate was obtained. Of these responses, 48.9% agreed with the letter and 19.1% disagreed with the letter. Profiles generated 6 months after the letters were sent indicated that 47.7% of the patients in the experimental group were still on concurrent therapy compared with 64.4% of patients in the control group (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The high response rate to the letter, the moderately high agreement with the letters, and the statistically significant reduction of duplicative therapy in the experimental group indicate that intervention letters can be an effective way to change prescribing. Future research is needed to assess the effects of educational intervention letters for other drug categories, for other populations, and for longer periods of time; and the effect these changes may have on true patient outcomes.

Effects of Medicaid drug utilization review intervention letters.

The state of Texas Drug Utilization Review (DUR) Board, composed of six physicians and six pharmacists, meets quarterly to determine criteria for implementing retrospective DUR. The board agreed to send intervention letters to physicians concurrently prescribing: (1) two histamine2 (H2)-antagonists (H2As) or (2) either any H2A or omeprazole with sucralfate. To measure the effect of these intervention letters, approximately half of these physicians were randomly chosen to receive a letter while the others served as a control group and did not receive letters. This project focused on the H2A or omeprazole with sucralfate intervention letters in a two-step process. Data on concurrent therapy involving two H2As were analyzed separately and these results are not included in this report. Objective one was to examine feedback from the physicians who received the letters, and objective two was to review and compare patient profiles 6 months after the letters were sent. Analysis of Medicaid prescription claims indicated that 190 physicians had concurrently prescribed either an H2A or omeprazole with sucralfate for 222 patients. Ninety-seven physicians (from 117 identified patient profiles) were selected to receive an intervention letter with their patient's profile or profiles, a response form, and a stamped envelope addressed to the Texas Department of Human Services. A 67.5% response rate was obtained. Of these responses, 49.4% agreed with the letter and 29.1% disagreed with the letter. The remaining indicated responses such as "not my patient," they were no longer seeing the patient, or that they did not prescribe the medication in question. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)