COVID-19 Myocarditis: An Emerging Clinical Conundrum.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a significant cause of global mortality and morbidity since it was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. COVID19 like previous coronaviruses primarily affects the lungs causing pneumonia, interstitial pneumonitis, and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, there is increasing evidence linking COVID-19 to cardiovascular complications such as arrhythmias, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, fulminant myocarditis, and cardiac death. Given the novelty of this virus, there is paucity of data on some cardiovascular complications of COVID-19, specifically myocarditis. Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart muscle with a heterogenous clinical presentation and progression. It is mostly caused by viral infections and is the result of interaction of the virus and the host's immune system. There have been several case reports linking COVID-19 with myocarditis, however the true mechanism of cardiac injury remains under investigation. In this paper we review the clinical presentation, proposed pathophysiology, differential diagnoses and management of myocarditis in COVID-19 patients.

Suspected COVID-19-Induced Myopericarditis.

Background: The incidence of myocarditis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown; however, increasing evidence links COVID-19 to cardiovascular complications such as arrhythmias, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, fulminant myocarditis, and cardiac death. We present a case of suspected COVID-19-induced myopericarditis and discuss the diagnostic implications, pathophysiology, and management. Case Report: A 72-year-old female was admitted to the hospital with acute on chronic respiratory failure in the setting of COVID-19. The next day, she developed pressure-like retrosternal chest pain. Laboratory findings revealed elevated cardiac enzymes and inflammatory markers consistent with myocardial injury. Electrocardiogram revealed diffuse ST segment elevations without reciprocal changes, concerning for myopericarditis. Transthoracic echocardiography showed new findings of severely reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function, with an estimated ejection fraction (EF) of 20%. Her hospital course was further complicated by cardiogenic shock that required treatment in the intensive care unit with vasopressors and inotropes. During the next few days, she had almost full recovery of her LV function, with EF improving to 50%. However, her clinical status deteriorated, likely the result of a bowel obstruction. She was transitioned to comfort care at the request of her family, and she died shortly after. Conclusion: This case highlights diagnostic and therapeutic challenges that physicians may encounter when managing acute cardiac injury in the setting of COVID-19. The multiple mechanisms of COVID-19-related myocardial injury may influence the approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Rheumatic Aortic Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review.

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) mainly affects people in developing, low-income countries. However, due to globalization and migration, developed countries are now seeing more cases of RHD. In RHD patients who develop severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, surgical aortic valve replacement remains the treatment of choice. In the past decade, there has been an extension of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to intermediate-risk and lower-risk patients with aortic stenosis. This review suggests the possible utility of TAVR for the treatment of rheumatic aortic stenosis. Rheumatic aortic stenosis has been excluded from major TAVR studies due to the predominantly noncalcific pathology of the rheumatic aortic valve. However, there have been case reports and case series showing successful implantation of the valve even in patients with and without significant leaflet calcification. In this review article, we summarize the latest evidence of severe rheumatic aortic stenosis treated with TAVR and discuss the procedure's impact on patient care, safety, and efficacy.

Low risk TAVR: Long- term considerations and appropriate patient selection.

Recent trials have shown impressive results in low-risk patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) with low procedural complication rates, short hospital length of stay, zero mortality, and zero disabling stroke at 30 days and have led to a Food and Drug Administration indication for TAVR in these patients. The long-term data on subclinical leaflet thrombosis, valve durability, effects of pacemaker implantation, right ventricular pacing, and progressive paravalvular leak is unclear. We describe clinical and procedural considerations for patient selection and introduce future potential procedural challenges. Finally, we discuss the importance of considering life expectancy and durability prior to TAVR in this low risk relatively young cohort and emphasize the importance of a heart team approach.