Do two operators improve outcomes in left main percutaneous coronary intervention? Insights from the ORPKI Registry.

BACKGROUND: Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is prevalent in 7% of patients undergoing angiography. Limited data exists on the impact of double scrubbing in LMCA PCI. We sought to assess periprocedural outcomes in two-operator LMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Using data from the Polish National Registry of PCI (ORPKI), we collected data on 28,745 patients undergoing LMCA PCI from 154 centers. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of operators performing PCI (one vs. two operators). RESULTS: LMCA PCI was performed by a single operator in 86% of the cases and by two operators in 14% of cases. Patients treated by two operators had a greater comorbidity burden including diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, and previous revascularization. In addition, these were more likely to be treated in high-volume centers, by operators with higher volume of LMCA PCIs. The risk of periprocedural death (2.37% vs. 2.44%; P=0.78), as well as cardiac arrest, coronary artery perforation, no-reflow, and puncture site bleeding was comparable between the two groups. On multivariable analysis, we found that a two-operator strategy was an independent predictor of periprocedural death, with this effect being much more profound in an elective setting (OR=5.13 [1.37-19.26]; P=0.015), compared to an urgent (ACS) setting (OR=1.32 [1.00-1.73]; P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that a two-operator approach is not necessarily routinely recommended for LMCA interventions, although it can be considered for more complex cases.

Risk factors for cardiovascular diseases: the focus on primary prevention.

Views on the etiopathogenesis of atherosclerosis are subject to evolution. In addition to the classic well-known risk factors, new ones related to mental state, social life and environment are being discovered. Both acute and chronic stress stimulate inflammatory processes. Due to the change in lifestyle and eating habits, the accumulation of risk factors in childhood is an increasing problem. Knowledge of risk factors allows for effective primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. The effectiveness of prevention increases when the activities cover the largest possible part of the society, and access to a doctor is easy. Therefore, government programs are being implemented offering patients easier access to diagnostics of cardiovascular diseases at the level of primary health care, which enables faster identification of people at the greatest cardiovascular risk. Easier access to primary care and a good doctor-patient relationship improve patient compliance. In this situation, the importance of the family doctor as a key link in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases is increasing.

Role of Fibrinolysis in the Management of Patients with COVID-19 and Thromboembolic Complications: A Review.

An impaired fibrinolytic process has been demonstrated in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, including those in severe or critical condition. Disruption of fibrinolysis leads to fibrin deposition, which exacerbates inflammation and fibrosis and damages the pulmonary surfactant. Numerous authors point out the different course of coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19. It is reported that they may have a state of secondary hyperfibrinolysis, which may explain, at least in part, the increased incidence of venous thromboembolism, even among those patients already receiving appropriate anticoagulant treatment. This raises the question of whether current guidelines for the prevention and treatment of embolic-thrombotic complications, among patients with severe COVID-19, are sufficient. Some studies show evidence of clinical improvement in patients who have received fibrinolytic therapy, beyond the current indications for its implementation. However, when considering the inclusion of systemic fibrinolytic therapy, the benefits of such treatment should always be weighed over the risk of adverse effects. Thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry can be helpful in making such decisions. The purpose of this study was to review the current knowledge regarding fibrinolysis and its role in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19, including those with thromboembolic complications.