RESUMO
Exponemos el caso clínico de una mujer de 71 años de edad con antecedente de múltiples carcinomas basocelulares (CBC) que presenta una lesión nodular en la totalidad de la extensión del borde libre de párpado inferior. Se realiza un abordaje de la lesión mediante exéresis del margen palpebral con resección limitada vertical de tarso y colgajo de Tripier con un resultado estético y funcional correcto, márgenes histológicos libres y ausencia de recidiva en un seguimiento de 12 meses (AU)
We present the clinical case of a 71-year-old woman with a history of multiple basal cell carcinomas (BCC) who presented a nodular lesion in practically the entire extension of the free edge of the lower eyelid. The lesion was approached by excision of the palpebral margin with limited vertical resection of the tarsus and Tripier flap with a correct aesthetic and functional result, free histological margins and no recurrence in a 12-month follow-up (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Basocelular/cirurgia , Neoplasias Palpebrais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Palpebrais/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , SeguimentosRESUMO
We have compared three methods for the detection and quantification of coliforms and E. coli in fish: the conventional three-tube MNP method (APHA), the Simplate Method and the Petrifilm Method. Thirty samples of the tilapia's external surface (skin, gills and fin) produced in an artificial pond were collected. Samples were processed individually in buffered peptone water 1%, then they were diluted and inoculated in Simplate, Petrifilm and LST tubes. Coliforms were isolated from 100% of the samples. The Simplate and 3M Petrifilm results were obtained after 24 h of incubation. The conventional three-tube MNP method showed results only after 96 hours of incubation. Simplate showed better recovery of coliforms and E. coli than 3 M Petrifilm and APHA method (P < 0.05). 3M Petrifilm and APHA were not significantly different for E. coli recovery.
Assuntos
Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/veterinária , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/veterinária , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Doenças dos Peixes/microbiologia , Tilápia/microbiologia , Animais , Aquicultura , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/métodos , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Extremidades/microbiologia , Água Doce , Brânquias/microbiologia , Pele/microbiologiaRESUMO
We have compared three methods for the detection and quantification of coliforms and E. coli in fish: the conventional three-tube MNP method (APHA), the Simplate Method and the Petrifilm Method. Thirty samples of the tilapia's external surface (skin, gills and fin) produced in an artificial pond were collected. Samples were processed individually in buffered peptone water 1, then they were diluted and inoculated in Simplate, Petrifilm and LST tubes. Coliforms were isolated from 100 of the samples. The Simplate and 3M Petrifilm results were obtained after 24 h of incubation. The conventional three-tube MNP method showed results only after 96 hours of incubation. Simplate showed better recovery of coliforms and E. coli than 3 M Petrifilm and APHA method (P < 0.05). 3M Petrifilm and APHA were not significantly different for E. coli recovery.
Assuntos
Animais , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/veterinária , Doenças dos Peixes/microbiologia , Enterobacteriaceae , Escherichia coli , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/veterinária , Tilápia , Aquicultura , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/métodos , Extremidades , Água Doce , Brânquias , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , PeleRESUMO
We have compared three methods for the detection and quantification of coliforms and E. coli in fish: the conventional three-tube MNP method (APHA), the Simplate Method and the Petrifilm Method. Thirty samples of the tilapias external surface (skin, gills and fin) produced in an artificial pond were collected. Samples were processed individually in buffered peptone water 1, then they were diluted and inoculated in Simplate, Petrifilm and LST tubes. Coliforms were isolated from 100 of the samples. The Simplate and 3M Petrifilm results were obtained after 24 h of incubation. The conventional three-tube MNP method showed results only after 96 hours of incubation. Simplate showed better recovery of coliforms and E. coli than 3 M Petrifilm and APHA method (P < 0.05). 3M Petrifilm and APHA were not significantly different for E. coli recovery.(AU)
Assuntos
Estudo Comparativo , Animais , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/veterinária , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/veterinária , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Doenças dos Peixes/microbiologia , Tilápia/microbiologia , Aquicultura , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/métodos , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Extremidades/microbiologia , Água Doce , Brânquias/microbiologia , Pele/microbiologiaRESUMO
We have compared three methods for the detection and quantification of coliforms and E. coli in fish: the conventional three-tube MNP method (APHA), the Simplate Method and the Petrifilm Method. Thirty samples of the tilapias external surface (skin, gills and fin) produced in an artificial pond were collected. Samples were processed individually in buffered peptone water 1
, then they were diluted and inoculated in Simplate, Petrifilm and LST tubes. Coliforms were isolated from 100
of the samples. The Simplate and 3M Petrifilm results were obtained after 24 h of incubation. The conventional three-tube MNP method showed results only after 96 hours of incubation. Simplate showed better recovery of coliforms and E. coli than 3 M Petrifilm and APHA method (P < 0.05). 3M Petrifilm and APHA were not significantly different for E. coli recovery.