In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of acidic fluoride dentifrices.

This study evaluated the effectiveness of acidic low-fluoride dentifrices compared to conventional neutral dentifrices. Enamel blocks were submitted to pH cycling and treatment with slurries of dentifrices containing 0, 275, 412, 550 and 1,100 microg F/g (pH 4.5 or 7.0), and also a commercial dentifrice (1,100 microg F/g) and a commercial children's dentifrice (500 mug F/g). Variations in surface microhardness and in the mineral content in enamel after pH cycling were calculated. Enamel blocks treated with acidic dentifrices exhibited less mineral loss compared to neutral dentifrices (ANOVA; p < 0.05). The acidic dentifrices with 412 and 550 microg F/g had the same effectiveness as the neutral 1,100-microg F/g dentifrice and commercial 1,100-microg F/g dentifrice.

In vitro evaluation of acidified toothpastes with low fluoride content.

Fluoride toothpastes are a risk factor for the development of dental fluorosis. Products with low fluoride content offer a higher security, but their effectiveness must be proven. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare two acidified toothpastes with low fluoride concentration (412 and 550 microg F/g) with neutral toothpastes. Bovine enamel blocks were selected by surface microhardness (SMH) and randomized to twelve groups of 13, according to the fluoride concentration in toothpaste (placebo, 275, 412, 550 or 1,100 microg F/g) and pH (7.0 or 5.5). Two commercially available toothpastes were also studied: a 1,100-microg F/g, pH 7.0 paste (positive control) and a children's paste (500 microg F/g, pH 7.0). The blocks were subjected to pH cycling for 7 days. The toothpaste treatment was done twice daily. Surface and cross-sectional microhardnesses were assessed to calculate the percentage change of SMH (%SMH) and the mineral loss (DeltaZ). The amount of fluoride, calcium and phosphorus in the solutions after the pH cycling was also analyzed. Compared to neutral toothpastes, the acidified toothpastes reduced the %SMH in all F concentrations. Higher F and lower Ca and P concentrations were found in solutions for the acidified toothpastes. Regarding DeltaZ, only the positive control, 1,100-microg F/g (acidified and neutral) groups were not statistically different. The acidified toothpastes showed a dose-response relationship with all variables. For the low-fluoride toothpastes evaluated, only the 550-microg F/g acidified paste had the same anticariogenic action as the 1,100-microg F/g neutral paste.