Intra-abdominal hypertension, fluid balance, and adverse outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is frequently encountered in critically ill surgical patients. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of IAH after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) and its impact on organ function, hospital length-of-stay (LOS), and death. METHODS: This prospective, observational, cohort study evaluated consecutive adult patients admitted in the ICU after undergoing OLT. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured every 4-6 h for 3 days. Worsening IAP was defined as a gradual increase in IAP over a period of time. Daily fluid balance was the daily sum of all intakes minus the output. RESULTS: IAH was observed in 48% of the patients within the first 3 days after ICU admission, while ACS was diagnosed in 15%. Patients with IAH had a higher positive fluid balance at day 1 (1764 mL [812-2733 mL] vs. 1301 mL [241-1904 mL], p = 0.025). Worsening IAH was associated with fewer days free of organ dysfunction. IAH within 72 h after ICU admission was independently associated with a composite outcome of death or a longer ICU LOS (odds ratio 2.9; CI 95% 1.02-8.25, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: After OLT, nearly half of the patients presented IAH, that was associated with unfavorable outcomes.

Restrictive strategy of intraoperative fluid maintenance during optimization of oxygen delivery decreases major complications after high-risk surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal fluid management is crucial for patients who undergo major and prolonged surgery. Persistent hypovolemia is associated with complications, but fluid overload is also harmful. We evaluated the effects of a restrictive versus conventional strategy of crystalloid administration during goal-directed therapy in high-risk surgical patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study of high-risk patients undergoing major surgery. For fluid maintenance during surgery, the restrictive group received 4 ml/kg/hour and the conventional group received 12 ml/kg/hour of Ringer's lactate solution. A minimally invasive technique (the LiDCO monitoring system) was used to continuously monitor stroke volume and oxygen delivery index (DO2I) in both groups. Dobutamine was administered as necessary, and fluid challenges were used to test fluid responsiveness to achieve the best possible DO2I during surgery and for 8 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included. The patients' median age was 69 years. The conventional treatment group received a significantly greater amount of lactated Ringer's solution (mean ± standard deviation (SD): 4, 335 ± 1, 546 ml) than the restrictive group (mean ± SD: 2, 301 ± 1, 064 ml) (P < 0.001). Temporal patterns of DO2I were similar between the two groups. The restrictive group had a 52% lower rate of major postoperative complications than the conventional group (20.0% vs 41.9%, relative risk = 0.48, 95% confidence interval = 0.24 to 0.94; P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: A restrictive strategy of fluid maintenance during optimization of oxygen delivery reduces major complications in older patients with coexistent pathologies who undergo major surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN94984995.

Prospective, randomized trial comparing fluids and dobutamine optimization of oxygen delivery in high-risk surgical patients [ISRCTN42445141].

INTRODUCTION: Preventing perioperative tissue oxygen debt contributes to a better postoperative recovery. Whether the beneficial effects of fluids and inotropes during optimization of the oxygen delivery index (DO2I) in high-risk patients submitted to major surgeries are due to fluids, to inotropes, or to the combination of the two is not known. We aimed to investigate the effect of DO2I optimization with fluids or with fluids and dobutamine on the 60-day hospital mortality and incidence of complications. METHODS: A randomized and controlled trial was performed in 50 high-risk patients (elderly with coexistent pathologies) undergoing major elective surgery. Therapy consisted of pulmonary artery catheter-guided hemodynamic optimization during the operation and 24 hours postoperatively using either fluids alone (n = 25) or fluids and dobutamine (n = 25), aiming to achieve supranormal values (DO2I > 600 ml/minute/m2). RESULTS: The cardiovascular depression was an important component in the perioperative period in this group of patients. Cardiovascular complications in the postoperative period occurred significantly more frequently in the volume group (13/25, 52%) than in the dobutamine group (4/25, 16%) (relative risk, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-8.60; P < 0.05). The 60-day mortality rates were 28% in the volume group and 8% in the dobutamine group (relative risk, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-13.46; not significant). CONCLUSION: In patients with high risk of perioperative death, pulmonary artery catheter-guided hemodynamic optimization using dobutamine determines better outcomes, whereas fluids alone increase the incidence of postoperative complications.

Delayed hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheter is a non-essential care in severe sepsis and septico shock

Objective: Prompt adequate antibiotic therapy, eradication of infection, fluids and vasoactive drugs are themain strategies for initial resuscitation of septic shock. Once initial resuscitative efforts are not effective,invasive hemodynamic monitoring (HM) with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been frequently used toguide filling pressures and optimal doses of vasoactive agents. However, the evidence of benefit from PACuse in septic shock is still a matter of debate. We aimed to determine whether early compared to delayplacement of PAC could have influenced outcome.Methods: Retrospective analysis in a 24-bed general ICU tertiary care university hospital. From January 1999to December 2000, patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock and having a PAC inserted werestudied. Early invasive HM was defined whenever a PAC was placed in the first 48 hours, and delayedinvasive HM was placed more than 48 hours after the diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. Organ failurewas defined as a SOFA score of > 3 points.Results. Among 104 patients submitted to invasive monitoring with PAC, 56 patients had sepsis. Fifty-twopatients with severe sepsis (5, 9.6 por cento) and septic shock (47, 90.4 por cento) were enrolled. Thirty-six patients (69 por cento) hadearly HM and 16 (21 por cento) delayed HM. Overall in-hospital mortality was 69 por cento. The groups had similar APACHEII score (18.6 ± 8.0, early HM; 18.5 ± 3.8, delayed HM), SOFA score (9.4 ± 3.2, early HM; 9.9 ± 4.4, delayed HM)and number of organs failure (1.6 ± 0.9, early HM; 1.8 ± 1.4, delayed HM) at the onset of severe sepsis/septicshock. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in delayed HM group (87.5 por cento) compared withearly HM (61.3 por cento) (RR: 0.70, CI 95 por cento 0.50-0.96, p < 0.05). Compared with delayed HM, early HM patientsreceived significantly higher amount of fluids (10.3 ± 3.6 L vs 6.8 ± 3.5 L, p = 0.002) within 48 hours from onsetof severe sepsis/septic shock.Conclusion. Delayed monitoring with PAC patients with severe sepsis/septic shock is associated with a veryhigh risk of death and might be considered a non-essential care.