Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(3): 263-272, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340754

RESUMO

The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), namely Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, have increased in Latin America over the past few decades. Although incidence is accelerating in some countries in the region, other areas in Latin America are already transitioning into the next epidemiological stage-ie, compounding prevalence-with a similar epidemiological profile to the western world. Consequently, more attention must be given to the diagnosis and management of IBD in Latin America. In this Review, we provide an overview of epidemiology, potential local environmental risk factors, challenges in the management of IBD, and limitations due to the heterogenity of health-care systems, both public and private, in Latin America. Unresolved issues in the region include inadequate access to diagnostic resources, biological therapies, tight disease monitoring (including treat to target therapy, surveillance and prevention of complications, drug monitoring), and specialised IBD surgery. Local guidelines are an important effort to overcome barriers in IBD management. Advancements in long-term health-care policies will be important to promote early diagnosis, access to new treatments, and improvements in research in Latin America. These improvements will not only affect overall health care but will also lead to optimal prioritisation of IBD-related costs and resources and enhance the quality of life of people with IBD in Latin America.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Doença de Crohn , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/epidemiologia , Doença de Crohn/terapia , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colite Ulcerativa/epidemiologia , Colite Ulcerativa/terapia
2.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 47(3): 253-261, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37330213

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The frequency and patterns of use of scores for the assessment of endoscopic activity in inflammatory bowel disease patients are not known. AIM: To describe the prevalence of adequate use of endoscopic scores in IBD patients who underwent colonoscopy in a real-life setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter observational study comprising six community hospitals in Argentina was undertaken. Patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis who underwent colonoscopy for endoscopic activity assessment between 2018 and 2022 were included. Colonoscopy reports of included subjects were manually reviewed to determine the proportion of colonoscopies that included an endoscopic score report. We determined the proportion of colonoscopy reports that included all of the IBD colonoscopy report quality elements proposed by BRIDGe group. Endoscopist's specialty, years of experience as well as expertise in IBD were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1556 patients were included for analysis (31.94% patients with Crohn's disease). Mean age was 45.94±15.46. Endoscopic score reporting was found in 58.41% of colonoscopies. Most frequently used scores were Mayo endoscopic score (90.56%) and SES-CD (56.03%) for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, respectively. In addition, 79.11% of endoscopic reports failed to comply with all recommendations on endoscopic reporting for inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of endoscopic reports of inflammatory bowel disease patients do not include the description of an endoscopic score to assess mucosal inflammatory activity in a real-world setting. This is also associated with a lack of compliance in recommended criteria for proper endoscopic reporting.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Doença de Crohn , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Argentina/epidemiologia , Colonoscopia
3.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37806345

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) incidence and prevalence in Latin America have experienced a significant shift in the last decades. There is paucity of IBD epidemiologic data in Argentina. AIM: To determine the incidence and prevalence of IBD between 2018 and 2022 of a population from the city of Buenos Aires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2022, the total population of two healthcare insurances were studied. 'Possible' IBD cases were identified using the following information sources: IBD-unit patient databases; electronic medical record; central laboratory electronic database; histopathology electronic database; pharmacy electronic database. Age-adjusted incidence and prevalence rates for Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and IBD were estimated based on the number of patients compared with the at-risk population and expressed per 100,000 subjects. Trends in IBD incidence and prevalence were estimated as annual percentage changes; we used Poisson regression modeling to calculate significance in these trends over time. RESULTS: Information source analysis rendered 172 possible cases, of which 82 cases of IBD were finally confirmed: 27.16% were CD and 72.84% were UC. Mean age-standardized incidence across the study period for IBD, CD and UC was 11.93 (11.28-12.55), 2.88 (2.65-3.07) and 9.05 (8.83-9.2) respectively. Point prevalence on December 31st, 2022 for IBD, UC and CD was 134 (95%CI 132.3-135.6), 98 (96.95-99.52) and 36 (35.69-36.4) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found an incidence and prevalence of IBD in a population from Buenos Aires higher than those previously published in epidemiological studies in Argentina.

4.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 2023 Sep 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37738567

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammation in immune-mediated conditions has been associated with an increased risk in atherosclerotic disease. There is paucity of evidence regarding the prevalence of asymptomatic atherosclerosis in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and its association with disease activity. We sought to compare the prevalence of asymptomatic atherosclerotic disease between young patients with UC with and without mucosal healing (MH) and healthy control individuals. METHODS: An observational study was conducted in 2 hospitals in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Patients with UC 18 to 50 years of age with at least 1 previous colonoscopy in the last year were enrolled, along with age- and sex-matched healthy control individuals. Carotid and femoral ultrasound assessments were performed to determine the prevalence of atherosclerotic lesions and abnormal intima-media thickness (IMT). We compared the prevalence of atherosclerotic disease and the prevalence of abnormally increased IMT in at least 1 vascular territory. RESULTS: Sixty patients with UC and 60 healthy control individuals were enrolled. Mean age was 38 years and 53.33% were men. Although the prevalence of atherosclerotic lesions was similar in patients with UC without MH when compared with both patients with UC with MH and control individuals (3.7% vs 0% vs 6.67%; P = .1), we found a significant increase in abnormal IMT in at least 1 vascular territory in UC patients without MH when compared with healthy control individuals (48.15% vs 26.67%; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with UC with active mucosal inflammation showed a significantly increased odds of asymptomatic femoral or carotid vascular disease when compared with control individuals.


Young patients with endoscopically active ulcerative colitis showed a significantly higher prevalence of abnormal intima-media thickness when compared with control individuals. Among patients with ulcerative colitis, age, disease duration, and C-reactive protein were associated with increased odds of asymptomatic vascular lesions.

5.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 41(10): 2044-2047, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37140714

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Crohn's disease (CD) and Behçet's disease (BD) are two autoinflammatory diseases that share clinical and pathogenic features. Furthermore, when BD involves the gastrointestinal tract, it is extremely difficult to distinguish endoscopic lesions from CD lesions. HLA-B*51 allele expression is highly associated with BD diagnosis. In this study we analysed HLA-B*51 status in 70 Argentine patients with confirmed CD diagnosis and compared it to our previous Argentine BD cohort, with the aim of finding similarities or differences between these two diseases regarding HLA-B*51 status. METHODS: This is a multi-centre case-control study, including 70 patients with confirmed CD diagnosis, who underwent HLA-B*51 allele status testing; the results were compared to our previous BD cohort of 34 patients. RESULTS: Among patients with CD, 12.85% were positive for the HLA-B*51 allele, compared with 38.24% patients with BD (OR=0.238; 95% CI=0.089-0.637; p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding suggests that determination of HLA-B*51 allele status may contribute to the differential diagnosis between CD and BD.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Behçet , Doença de Crohn , Humanos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/genética , Alelos , Antígenos HLA-B/genética , Síndrome de Behçet/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Behçet/genética , Antígeno HLA-B51/genética
6.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 57(11): 1231-1248, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37038269

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the context of an ageing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population, cardiovascular comorbidities become particularly relevant. Novel small molecule drugs (SMDs) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe IBD have been recently approved, including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1P) modulators. Data from rheumatoid arthritis population have raised concerns about the risk of cardiovascular events with the use of tofacitinib, which was extrapolated to other immune-mediated diseases and other JAK inhibitors. S1P receptor modulation has been associated with potential cardiovascular events, especially bradycardia and cardiac conduction abnormalities. AIM: To review the incidence of cardiovascular events with the use of SMDs in patients with IBD and to provide practical recommendations on mitigation strategies. METHODS: Published literature was reviewed; recommendations were synthesised by experts in both cardiovascular diseases and IBD. RESULTS: Evidence from the IBD population does not indicate a higher risk of cardiovascular events with tofacitinib and other JAK inhibitors. The risk is higher in patients with intermediate to high cardiovascular risk. S1P modulators may be associated with a dose-dependent, first-dose effect, transient risk of conduction abnormalities (bradycardia and AV block). Screening and monitoring of cardiovascular risk factors should be done in all patients with IBD. Risk stratification for cardiovascular disease should be performed before starting treatment with SMDs. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence of both JAK inhibitors and S1P modulators indicates a reassuring safety profile of SMDs from the cardiovascular perspective in the overall IBD population. Efforts should be made to identify patients with IBD at a higher risk of cardiovascular events.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Inibidores de Janus Quinases , Humanos , Inibidores de Janus Quinases/uso terapêutico , Bradicardia/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Pirróis/efeitos adversos
7.
J Crohns Colitis ; 17(2): 199-210, 2023 Mar 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36087107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] could potentially lead to a state of immunosuppression with an increased risk of opportunistic infections [OIs]. We aimed to provide an update on the incidence of OIs among adult IBD patients in randomized controlled trials [RCTs] of approved biologics and small-molecule drugs [SMDs]. Also, we aimed to describe OI definitions utilized in RCTs, to ultimately propose a standardized definition. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from January 1, 1990, until April 16, 2022. Our primary outcome was incidence rate of overall OIs among IBD patients exposed and unexposed to biologics or SMDs. We also describe specific OIs reported in included trials, as well as definitions of OIs within studies when provided. RESULTS: Ninety studies were included. The incidence rates of reported OIs were 0.42 and 0.21 per 100 person-years in patients exposed to advanced therapies and placebo, respectively. This was highest for anti-tumour necrosis factors [0.83 per 100 person-years] and Janus kinase inhibitors [0.55 per 100 person-years] and lowest for anti-integrins and ozanimod. On meta-analysis, no increased risk of OIs was observed. None of the studies provided a detailed definition of OIs, or a comprehensive list of infections considered as OIs. CONCLUSION: Different mechanisms of action may have specific OI profiles. In the absence of a uniform definition of OIs, these estimates are less reliable. We propose a definition to be used in future studies to help provide standardized reporting. When using this definition, we saw significant differences in incidence rates of OIs across mechanisms of action.


Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Infecções Oportunistas , Adulto , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Infecções Oportunistas/epidemiologia , Infecções Oportunistas/etiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Incidência
8.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 33(6): 520-524, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35786621

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy is a gold standard diagnostic method for small bowel lesions. There is scarce evidence regarding vari- ables that may increase the odds of identifying small bowel lesions with this endoscopic method. The aim of this work is to describe variables associated with a higher probability of finding small bowel lesions on capsule endoscopy. METHODS: Cross-sectional study was performed using our Department's adult patients' capsule endoscopy database. The presence of any small bowel mucosal lesion was registered. Other variables were examined: age, gender, reason for referral, quality of bowel cleans- ing, and intestinal transit time. These variables were compared between those patients showing at least 1 lesion versus those without lesions. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine variables significantly associated with the presence of bowel lesions. RESULTS: In total, 140 studies were analyzed; 90% were performed due to occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Median age was 69 years (60-75); 54.29% were males. Bowel cleansing was adequate in 94.29%; 68.57% showed at least 1 lesion. Non-significant difference was observed in terms of age between groups of comparison (70 [61-76] vs 63 [59-74], P = .07). No difference was found comparing bowel cleansing, gender, or reason for referral. Intestinal transit time was significantly longer among those patients with a bowel lesion (359 minutes [257-427] vs 279 minutes [200-333], P = .05). On multivariate analysis, age and intestinal time were significantly associ- ated with the presence of at least one small bowel lesion (odds ratio 1.02 [1-1.06] and 1.09 [1.03-1.12], respectively). CONCLUSION: Age and intestinal transit time were significantly associated with the presence of abnormal findings on capsule endoscopy.


Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Adulto , Idoso , Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/patologia , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/patologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 7(2): 161-170, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34856198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a growing armamentarium for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. We aimed to compare the relative efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecule drugs for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials without language restrictions for articles published between Jan 1, 1990, and July 1, 2021. Major congresses' databases from Jan 1, 2018, to July 3, 2021, were reviewed manually. Phase 3, placebo-controlled or head-to-head randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of biologics or small molecule drugs as induction or maintenance therapies for patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis were included. Phase 2 RCTs were excluded because of their small sample sizes and inclusion of doses not further explored in phase 3 RCTs. Summary data from intention-to-treat analyses were extracted from included reports by JSL and PAO. The primary outcome was the induction of clinical remission. A network meta-analysis was done under the frequentist framework, obtaining pairwise odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) was used to rank the included agents for each outcome. Higher SUCRA scores correlate with better efficacy, whereas lower SUCRA scores correlate with better safety. Maintenance data on efficacy for treat-straight-through and randomised responder trials are also presented. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021225329. FINDINGS: Our search yielded 5904 results, from which 29 studies (four being head-to-head RCTs) fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included. Of these, 23 studies assessed induction therapy with either a biologic or small molecule drug, comprising 10 061 patients with ulcerative colitis. A risk of bias assessment showed a low risk of bias for most of the included studies. Upadacitinib was significantly superior to all other interventions for the induction of clinical remission (infliximab [OR 2·70, 95% CI 1·18-6·20], adalimumab [4·64, 2·47-8·71], golimumab [3·00, 1·32-6·82], vedolizumab [3·56, 1·84-6·91], ustekinumab [2·92, 1·31-6·51], etrolizumab [4·91, 2·59-9·31], tofacitinib [2·84, 1·28-6·31], filgotinib 100 mg [6·15, 2·98-12·72], filgotinib 200 mg [4·49, 2·18-9·24], and ozanimod (2·70, 1·18-6·20), and ranked highest for the induction of clinical remission (SUCRA 0·996). No differences between active interventions were observed when assessing adverse events and serious adverse events. Vedolizumab ranked lowest for both adverse events (SUCRA 0·184) and serious adverse events (0·139), whereas upadacitinib ranked highest for adverse events (0·843) and ozanimod ranked highest for serious adverse events (0·831). INTERPRETATION: Upadacitinib was the best performing agent for the induction of clinical remission (the primary outcome) but the worst performing agent in terms of adverse events in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Vedolizumab was the best performing agent for safety outcomes. With the paucity of direct comparisons in the published literature, our results might help clinicians to position drugs in treatment algorithms. FUNDING: None.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/patologia , Humanos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
11.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(12): 857-873, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34453143

RESUMO

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of thrombotic events. Therapies for IBD have the potential to modulate this risk. The aims of this Evidence-Based Guideline were to summarize available evidence and to provide practical recommendations regarding epidemiological aspects, prevention and drug-related risks of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with IBD. A virtual meeting took place in May 2020 involving 14 international IBD experts and 3 thrombosis experts from 12 countries. Proposed statements were voted upon in an anonymous manner. Agreement was defined as at least 75% of participants voting as 'fully agree' or 'mostly agree' with each statement. For each statement, the level of evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system. Consensus was reached for 19 statements. Patients with IBD harbour an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombotic events. Thromboprophylaxis is indicated during hospitalization of any cause in patients with IBD. Disease activity is a modifiable risk factor in patients with IBD, and physicians should aim to achieve deep remission to reduce the risk. Exposure to steroids should be limited. Antitumour necrosis factor agents might be associated with a reduced risk of thrombotic events.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/fisiopatologia , Cooperação Internacional , Gravidade do Paciente , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Trombose/diagnóstico , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/fisiopatologia
12.
Drug Saf ; 44(6): 645-660, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33666900

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators are approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and are under development for other immune-mediated conditions; however, safety concerns have arisen. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the safety profile of S1P modulators in patients with multiple sclerosis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, psoriasis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January, 1990 through 1 April, 2020. We also performed a manual review of conference databases from 2017 through 2020. The primary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events. We also estimated the occurrence of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, malignancy, bradycardia, atrio-ventricular block, and macular edema. We performed a meta-analysis of controlled studies to assess the risks of such events. RESULTS: We identified 3843 citations; of these, 26 studies were finally included, comprising 9604 patients who were exposed to a sphingosine-1-phosphate modulator. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed an increased risk in herpes zoster infection [risk ratio, 1.75 (95% confidence interval 1.09-2.80)], bradycardia [2.64 (1.77-3.96)], and atrio-ventricular block [1.73 (1.03-2.91)] among subjects exposed to sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators as compared with a placebo or an active comparator. CONCLUSIONS: We found an increased risk of herpes zoster infection, and transient cardiovascular events among patients treated with sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020172575.


Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Herpes Zoster , Esclerose Múltipla , Psoríase , Bradicardia , Herpes Zoster/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico
13.
Gastroenterol Res Pract ; 2020: 4060648, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32411197

RESUMO

METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study involving seven referral centers from three cities of Argentina was undertaken. Patients with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD), or indeterminate colitis (IBDU/IC) were invited to answer an anonymous survey, which included a 5-point Likert scale to evaluate adherence to therapies. Independent variables associated with inadequate adherence were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 447 UC/IBDU and 135 CD patients were enrolled. Median age was 37 years (range 21-72); 39.8% were male; median time from diagnosis was 6 years (0.5-35). 91.4% were under treatment with at least one oral medication; 50.3% of patients reported inadequate adherence to oral medications. Patients with UC/IBDU had a lower risk of inadequate adherence when compared to patients with CD (OR 0.57 (0.37-0.87)). 21.8% reported inadequate adherence to biologics; subcutaneous administration was significantly associated with inadequate adherence to biologics (OR 4.8 (1.57-14.66)). CONCLUSION: Inadequate treatment adherence is common among patients with IBD, and potentially modifiable factors were identified.

14.
Arq Gastroenterol ; 57(1): 87-90, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32294741

RESUMO

Inflammatory bowel disease comprises two distinct conditions - Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis - which can be treated with immunomodulators. A non-neglectable proportion of these patients will need biologic therapy, and many patients under biologic treatment will experience either primary or secondary failure. As a consequence, clinical trials evaluating new therapeutic alternatives are being developed. These trials share common features, such as being controlled with placebo. Placebo use in clinical trials is a matter of intense debate. Those who support placebo use highlight the methodologic advantages placebo-controlled trials have. Those against placebo use argue that it would be against ethical principles in clinical research to expose a patient to placebo when a valid therapeutic alternative exists. In this review, we summarize the existing arguments for and against the use of placebo in the context of inflammatory bowel disease research. We finally suggest that it is very likely that in the near future inflammatory bowel disease trials will no longer be controlled with a placebo arm, but instead they will be non-inferiority trials with an active comparator.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Placebos
15.
Arq. gastroenterol ; Arq. gastroenterol;57(1): 87-90, Jan.-Feb. 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1098055

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Inflammatory bowel disease comprises two distinct conditions - Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis - which can be treated with immunomodulators. A non-neglectable proportion of these patients will need biologic therapy, and many patients under biologic treatment will experience either primary or secondary failure. As a consequence, clinical trials evaluating new therapeutic alternatives are being developed. These trials share common features, such as being controlled with placebo. Placebo use in clinical trials is a matter of intense debate. Those who support placebo use highlight the methodologic advantages placebo-controlled trials have. Those against placebo use argue that it would be against ethical principles in clinical research to expose a patient to placebo when a valid therapeutic alternative exists. In this review, we summarize the existing arguments for and against the use of placebo in the context of inflammatory bowel disease research. We finally suggest that it is very likely that in the near future inflammatory bowel disease trials will no longer be controlled with a placebo arm, but instead they will be non-inferiority trials with an active comparator.


RESUMO A doença inflamatória intestinal compreende duas condições distintas: a doença de Crohn e a retocolite ulcerativa, que podem ser tratadas com imunomoduladores. Uma proporção não negligenciável desses pacientes necessitará de terapia biológica e, muitos destes em tratamento biológico, experimentarão falha primária ou secundária. Como consequência, ensaios clínicos avaliando novas alternativas terapêuticas estão sendo desenvolvidos. Estes ensaios partilham características comuns, tais como ser controlado com placebo. O uso de placebo em ensaios clínicos é uma questão de intenso debate. Aqueles que apoiam o uso do placebo destacam as vantagens metodológicas que os ensaios controlados com placebo têm. Aqueles contra o uso de placebo argumentam que seria contra os princípios éticos na investigação clínica expor um paciente ao placebo quando uma alternativa terapêutica válida existe. Nesta revisão, resumimos os argumentos existentes a favor e contra o uso de placebo no contexto da pesquisa de doença inflamatória intestinal. Finalmente, sugerimos que é muito provável que em um futuro próximo os ensaios de doença inflamatória intestinal não serão mais controlados com um braço placebo; em vez disso, serão feitos ensaios de não-inferioridade com um comparador ativo.


Assuntos
Humanos , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Placebos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto
16.
Gastroenterology ; 158(6): 1554-1573.e12, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31926171

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Inhibitors of Janus kinases (JAKs) are being developed for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases and other immune-mediated diseases. Tofacitinib is effective in treatment of ulcerative colitis, but there are safety concerns. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the safety profile of tofacitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, psoriasis, or ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1990, through July 1, 2019. We performed a manual review of conference databases from 2012 through 2018. The primary outcome was incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. We also estimated incidence rates of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, non-melanoma skin cancer, other malignancies, major cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, and mortality. We performed a meta-analysis, which included controlled studies, to assess the relative risk of these events. RESULTS: We identified 973 studies; of these, 82 were included in the final analysis, comprising 66,159 patients with immune-mediated diseases who were exposed to a JAK inhibitor. Two-thirds of the included studies were randomized controlled trials. The incidence rate of AEs was 42.65 per 100 person-years and of serious AEs was 9.88 per 100 person-years. Incidence rates of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, malignancy, and major cardiovascular events were 2.81 per 100 person-years, 2.67 per 100 person-years, 0.89 per 100 person-years, and 0.48 per 100 person-years, respectively. Mortality was not increased in patients treated with JAK inhibitors compared with patients given placebo or active comparator (relative risk 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.28). The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in risk of herpes zoster infection among patients who received JAK inhibitors (relative risk 1.57; 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.37). CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found an increased risk of herpes zoster infection among patients with immune-mediated diseases treated with JAK inhibitors. All other AEs were not increased among patients treated with JAK inhibitors.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Janus Quinases/efeitos adversos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/imunologia , Artrite Reumatoide/mortalidade , Azetidinas/efeitos adversos , Herpes Zoster/induzido quimicamente , Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/imunologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/mortalidade , Inibidores de Janus Quinases/administração & dosagem , Janus Quinases/antagonistas & inibidores , Janus Quinases/imunologia , Janus Quinases/metabolismo , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Placebos/efeitos adversos , Psoríase/imunologia , Psoríase/mortalidade , Purinas , Pirazóis , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Espondilite Anquilosante/imunologia , Espondilite Anquilosante/mortalidade , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Triazóis/efeitos adversos
17.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 16(5): 312-321, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30659247

RESUMO

Big data methodologies, made possible with the increasing generation and availability of digital data and enhanced analytical capabilities, have produced new insights to improve outcomes in many disciplines. Application of big data in the health-care sector is in its early stages, although the potential for leveraging underutilized data to gain a better understanding of disease and improve quality of care is enormous. Owing to the intrinsic characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the management dilemmas that it imposes, the implementation of big data research strategies not only can complement current research efforts but also could represent the only way to disentangle the complexity of the disease. In this Review, we explore important potential applications of big data in IBD research, including predictive models of disease course and response to therapy, characterization of disease heterogeneity, drug safety and development, precision medicine and cost-effectiveness of care. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of potential data sources that big data analytics could draw from in the field of IBD, including electronic health records, clinical trial data, e-health applications and genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic and microbiomic data.


Assuntos
Big Data , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/economia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/etiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Medicina de Precisão/economia , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Prognóstico , Estados Unidos
18.
Dig Liver Dis ; 51(3): 327-334, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30555013

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Biologics against tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) have dramatically changed the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). In pivotal clinical trials, golimumab showed efficacy as induction and maintenance therapy in anti-TNF naïve UC patients. However, confirmatory data on effectiveness in the real world setting are needed. AIM: to summarize recent evidence on the effectiveness of golimumab in observational real-world studies. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, and congresses databases for English language articles or abstracts on the effectiveness of golimumab published between January 1, 2014 and May 15, 2018. Pooled short-term (6-14 weeks) and mid- and long-term (24-54 weeks) clinical response and remission rates were calculated. RESULTS: 24 abstracts were included; of those 8 were published full-text articles and 16 were abstracts from medical conferences. Overall, pooled short-term clinical response and remission rates were 59.3% (range 35-85.5%; 13 studies; 1429 patients) and 35.9% (range 14-51.7%; 9 studies; 666 patients), respectively. Pooled mid- and long-term clinical response and remission rates were 60.3% (range 37.1-89.5%; 4 studies; 356 patients) and 39.2% (range 12-84%; 8 studies; 822 patients), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results: of observational studies confirm that golimumab is an effective therapy for UC in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Colite Ulcerativa/patologia , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Indução de Remissão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
19.
Arq Gastroenterol ; 54(2): 167-172, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28327826

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that shows that calcineurin inhibitors may be useful for the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of tacrolimus for remission induction in this setting is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To develop a systematic review on the existing evidence regarding the clinical efficacy of tacrolimus for the induction of remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken from 1966 to August 2016 using MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and the Cochrane Library. The following MeSH terms were used: "Inflammatory Bowel Diseases" or "Ulcerative Colitis" and "Calcineurin Inhibitors" or "Tacrolimus" or "FK506". Studies performed in adult ulcerative colitis patients that evaluated the clinical efficacy of tacrolimus for the induction of remission were considered for revision. A meta-analysis was performed with those included studies that were also placebo-controlled and randomized. Clinical response as well as clinical remission and mucosal healing were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 755 references were identified, from which 22 studies were finally included. Only two of them were randomized, placebo-controlled trials. A total of 172 patients were evaluated. A significantly lower risk of failure in clinical response was found for tacrolimus versus placebo [RR 0.58 (0.45-0.73)]; moreover, a lower risk of failure in the induction of remission was also found versus placebo [RR 0.91 (0.82-1)]. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus seems to be a valid therapeutic alternative for the induction of remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Indução de Remissão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
20.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 13(7): 693-703, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28164724

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Current available treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have some limitations and new options are needed. Several new molecules are being tested for the treatment of IBD and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Among them, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors seem to have the lead, since tofacitinib has received regulatory approval in 2012 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and also it has shown a favorable risk-benefit ratio in phase 3 studies for ulcerative colitis, both in anti-TNF naïve and anti-TNF experienced patients. Other compounds with JAK inhibitory activity are also being tested with promising results. Areas covered: This review discusses the molecular aspects of the JAK-STAT pathway, which gives rationale for the use of JAK inhibitors in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, especially in IBD. Different compounds with JAK inhibitory activity are presented, and relevant efficacy and safety data in IBD and other conditions are discussed. Expert commentary: It would not be surprising that in a foreseeable future many new orally administrated drugs will be available. This enhanced armamentarium will probably pose new dilemmas, in terms of drug positioning, escalation and de-escalation strategies, and combination therapy.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Janus Quinases/antagonistas & inibidores , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Animais , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Transcrição STAT/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA